The Price of Practice: An Analytical Report on the Drivers of Physician Compensation in the United States

Section 1: The Decade of Investment: Quantifying the Personal and Financial Cost of Becoming a Physician

The high compensation awarded to physicians in the United States cannot be understood without first examining the immense personal and financial investment required to enter the profession.

This path, far more arduous and costly than in most other developed nations, demands over a decade of post-secondary education and training, imposes a staggering debt burden, and exacts a significant physical and emotional toll.

High future earnings are, in part, a necessary return on this high-risk, high-cost, and prolonged investment.

1.1. The Financial Gauntlet: Medical School Tuition and Debt Accumulation

The financial barrier to becoming a physician in the U.S. is exceptionally high.

Unlike many European systems where medicine is an undergraduate course of study, the North American model requires a four-year bachelor’s degree before embarking on a four-year medical degree, extending the educational timeline to at least eight years before post-graduate training even begins.¹

The direct costs of this education are substantial.

According to the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), the average annual cost of medical school in 2024 is $58,968, which translates to a total of over $235,000 for a four-year program.²

These figures, which include tuition, fees, and health insurance, vary significantly based on the institution.

For the class of 2025, the median four-year cost of attendance (COA) was $286,454 for public schools and a formidable $390,848 for private schools.³

At some elite institutions, the cost is even higher; Harvard Medical School, for instance, estimates a first-year COA of over $104,200.⁴

This level of expense forces the vast majority of students to take on significant debt.

For the medical school graduating class of 2024, the median education debt was $205,000.³

This figure often excludes premedical debt from undergraduate studies, which 28% of graduates carry at a median of $28,000.⁵

Consequently, the average total debt for an indebted medical school graduate in 2024 was $212,341.⁵

An analysis of AAMC data reveals the scale of this burden: 56% of all graduates leave school with $200,000 or more in debt, and nearly a quarter (23%) owe more than $300,000.⁵

This financial pressure is not distributed equally; data indicates that Black, non-Hispanic medical students graduate with a median debt of $230,000, significantly higher than the overall median.⁷

This debt does not remain static.

With interest rates for federal Direct PLUS loans at 8.05% for 2023-2024, the total cost of repayment balloons over time.⁸

A physician with an initial $200,000 loan can expect to pay over $370,000 and potentially as much as $455,000 in total, depending on the repayment plan and income level.⁵

On a standard 10-year repayment plan following residency, monthly payments can easily surpass $3,100.⁵

This immense financial undertaking establishes a high baseline expectation for future earnings simply to service the debt and justify the initial investment.

Metric	Public School	Private School	Overall/Average
Median 4-Year Cost of Attendance (Class of 2025)	$286,454	$390,848	N/A
Median Graduating Education Debt (Class of 2024)	$200,000	$230,000	$205,000
% of Graduates with >$200k Debt (2024)	54%	61%	56%
% of Graduates with >$300k Debt (2024)	17%	31%	23%
Data sourced from AAMC Graduation Questionnaire analysis.3

The structure of this financial investment has profound, if unintended, consequences.

By creating such a high-stakes financial gamble, the system may inadvertently filter for applicants from higher socioeconomic backgrounds who are better positioned to assume such risk or have access to family support.

This can create a barrier for highly qualified candidates from lower-income families, potentially impacting the diversity of the physician workforce and, by extension, its ability to serve an increasingly diverse patient population.⁷

1.2. The Crucible of Residency: Years of Low Pay, Long Hours, and High Stress

Upon graduating with a doctorate and substantial debt, a new physician is not yet licensed to practice independently.

They must first complete a mandatory post-graduate training program known as residency.

This period is a crucible of intense work, long hours, and high stress, all for relatively low pay.

The duration of residency ranges from three to seven years, depending on the chosen specialty.⁹

Primary care fields like family medicine and internal medicine typically require three years, while surgical specialties are longer; general surgery requires five years, and neurosurgery can take seven years or more.⁹

Work during residency is notoriously grueling.

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the body that oversees these programs, limits resident duty hours to a maximum of 80 per week, averaged over a four-week period.¹³

While this rule was implemented to improve patient safety and resident well-being, working at or near this limit is common.

These hours include all clinical and educational activities, from direct patient care to administrative tasks.¹⁴

Despite holding a doctoral degree and working these extensive hours, residents are compensated with a modest stipend.

The median stipend for a first-year resident in 2024 was approximately $65,100.⁵

When contextualized by the hours worked, the pay is remarkably low.

A resident working 60 to 70 hours per week for $64,000 a year earns an effective hourly wage of about $21, a rate that can fall below the legal minimum wage in some municipalities.¹⁵

These conditions—long hours, immense responsibility, and low pay, all while managing massive student debt—create a perfect storm for professional burnout.

Studies on resident physicians reveal alarmingly high rates of burnout, a syndrome characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a low sense of professional accomplishment.

The prevalence of burnout among residents ranges from 27% to as high as 75%, depending on the specialty and the study.¹⁶

A 2023 study found an overall burnout prevalence of 58.2% among residents, with working more than 80 hours per week identified as a significant contributing factor.¹⁷

This is not merely a personal issue for the physician; burnout is linked to lower patient satisfaction and an increased risk of medical errors, posing a threat to the quality of care.¹⁶

The residency system, therefore, relies on a vast workforce of highly skilled, underpaid, and overworked laborers to function.

The promise of a high salary upon completion of this training is the implicit contract that makes enduring these conditions psychologically and financially tenable.

Without this “light at the end of the tunnel,” the entire model of graduate medical education would be unsustainable, as few would be willing to undertake such an arduous journey for a modest financial reward.

1.3. The Opportunity Cost: A Decade of Lost Earnings

Beyond the direct financial costs and the personal toll of training, a complete accounting of the investment required to become a physician must include opportunity cost—the substantial income and wealth-building potential foregone during the long training period.

A physician typically does not begin earning an attending-level salary until their early to mid-30s.

In contrast, their peers with bachelor’s or master’s degrees in fields like engineering, business, or law have been in the workforce for nearly a decade, earning progressively higher salaries, contributing to retirement accounts, and building equity.¹⁵

Standard financial analyses that compare lifetime earnings across professions reveal that medicine is not always the most lucrative path when viewed as a pure investment.

A landmark study calculated the hours-adjusted internal rate of return (IRR)—a measure of the profitability of an educational investment—for several professions.

It found that the IRR for primary care physicians was 15.9%, substantially lower than that for business school graduates (29.0%) and attorneys (25.4%).

Even specialist physicians (20.9%) had a lower rate of return than their counterparts in business and law.¹⁹

A more recent 2024 study confirmed these findings in the modern healthcare landscape.

It calculated the IRR for various healthcare careers and found that the return on investment for hospital CEOs (48.8%) and Doctors of Nurse Anesthesia Practice (26.0%) exceeded that of both specialist physicians (20.3%) and primary care physicians (19.2%).²⁰

While a physician’s absolute career earnings are high, the decade-long delay in starting, combined with the enormous upfront cost of education, significantly diminishes the financial return compared to other high-earning professions that require less training time and expense.¹⁵

This large opportunity cost further solidifies the expectation that physician compensation must be high to make the career financially rational over a lifetime.

Section 2: The Anatomy of a Paycheck: Deconstructing Physician Earnings in a Heterogeneous Market

While the investment to become a doctor is uniformly high, physician income is anything but.

The term “doctor’s salary” is a misleading monolith that obscures a vast and complex landscape of compensation.

Earnings are highly variable, determined by a confluence of factors including specialty choice, geographic location, practice environment, and, most critically, the source of payment.

Understanding these variables is essential to deconstructing why some doctors make so much money, while others earn comparatively less.

2.1. A Tale of Two Tiers: The Great Divide Between Specialists and Primary Care

The single greatest determinant of a physician’s income is their chosen specialty.

A deep and persistent chasm separates procedural specialists from physicians in primary and cognitive-based care.

Multiple compensation surveys from 2024 and 2025 consistently illustrate this divide.

The Medscape Physician Compensation Report for 2025 shows that primary care physicians (PCPs) earn an average of $281,000 annually, while specialists earn an average of $398,000.²²

Data from the healthcare networking site Doximity paints an even starker picture, with the average neurosurgeon earning $763,908, while the average pediatric endocrinologist earns just $217,875.²²

Another survey from Sermo reports similar figures, with PCPs averaging $260,000 and specialists averaging $368,000.²³

The highest-earning specialties are consistently those that are procedure-based.

Neurosurgery, thoracic surgery, orthopedic surgery, plastic surgery, and interventional cardiology frequently command average salaries well over $500,000, with some topping $650,000 or more.²²

At the other end of the spectrum are primary care fields such as pediatrics and family medicine, as well as specialties like geriatrics and preventive medicine, where average compensation typically falls between $200,000 and $300,000 annually.²³

Medical Specialty	Average Annual Salary (Doximity 2024)	Average Annual Salary (Medscape 2025)	Average Annual Salary (Sermo 2024-25)
Neurosurgery	$763,908	N/A	$750,000
Orthopedic Surgery	$654,000	$543,000	$450,000 – $650,000
Cardiology (Invasive)	N/A	N/A	$460,000
Plastic Surgery	N/A	N/A	$479,000
Gastroenterology	N/A	N/A	N/A
Radiology	N/A	N/A	>$500,000
Anesthesiology	N/A	N/A	$450,000
Emergency Medicine	N/A	N/A	$300,000 – $400,000
Psychiatry	$348,000	$289,000	$300,000 – $400,000
Internal Medicine	N/A	N/A	$200,000 – $300,000
Family Medicine	N/A	N/A	$255,000
Pediatrics	N/A	N/A	$238,000
Data compiled from multiple 2024 and 2025 physician compensation reports.22 Note: N/A indicates data not specified in the same format across all cited reports.

This vast pay differential creates powerful financial incentives that shape the composition of the U.S. physician workforce.

When a medical student graduates with over $200,000 in debt, the choice between a career in pediatrics at around $250,000 per year and one in orthopedic surgery at over $600,000 is not just a professional one, but a stark financial one.³

As one analysis notes, people, including medical students, respond to incentives.²⁵

This rational financial decision, when made by thousands of individuals each year, contributes directly to a systemic outcome: a relative oversupply of highly paid specialists and a persistent shortage of primary care physicians, which has profound consequences for public health and healthcare costs.

2.2. Location, Location, Reimbursement: Geographic and Practice Setting Variances

Beyond specialty, a physician’s income is also heavily influenced by where and how they practice.

Geographic compensation patterns for physicians often defy the trends seen in other professions.

To attract scarce talent, salaries are frequently higher in rural areas and less populous states rather than in major coastal hubs.²⁵

For example, in 2024, some of the highest-paying metropolitan areas for physicians were Charlotte, North Carolina ($462,760) and St. Louis, Missouri ($452,219).²⁴

Of course, cost of living is a critical variable; a salary of $350,000 in a high-cost city like San Francisco may afford a standard of living similar to a $250,000 salary in a lower-cost rural area.²³

The practice setting is another key determinant of earnings.

According to 2024 Doximity data, physicians in private practice, such as single-specialty ($461,000) and multi-specialty ($447,000) groups, are among the highest earners.

In contrast, those employed by the government ($292,000) or working in urgent care centers ($288,000) earn significantly less.

Academic physicians, who work in university-affiliated hospitals, earn an average of $365,000, substantially less than their private practice counterparts, reflecting a trade-off for benefits like research opportunities, teaching roles, and often a more predictable work schedule.²²

This dynamic is evolving as more physicians move from practice ownership to employment.

This shift alters compensation structures but also has a broader impact on healthcare costs.

When physicians become employees of large hospital systems, they gain salary stability but cede their negotiating power over reimbursement rates to the hospital.

These large systems have significant market power and can command much higher payment rates from private insurers than a solo practice could.²⁶

The hospital then bills for the physician’s services at these inflated rates and pays the physician a salary, which is a fraction of the revenue generated.

Thus, the trend toward physician employment, while driven by individual desires for stability, can inadvertently contribute to the overall inflation of healthcare prices.

The physician’s high salary, in this context, becomes a partial pass-through of these systemically higher revenues.

2.3. The Payer is the Price-Setter: Fee-for-Service vs. Value-Based Care and the Payer Mix

The underlying mechanics of how physicians are paid are fundamental to their earnings.

The historically dominant model in the U.S. is Fee-for-Service (FFS), in which providers are reimbursed for each test, procedure, and visit they perform.²⁷

This model inherently incentivizes a higher volume of services.

While there is a gradual system-wide shift toward Value-Based Care (VBC)—where payment is linked to quality metrics and patient outcomes—FFS remains a powerful force.²⁷

Data from the American Medical Association (AMA) shows that even as more physicians are compensated via salary-plus-bonus structures, personal productivity (a proxy for service volume) still factors into the pay of over 55% of physicians.²⁹

However, the most critical element in the payment equation is the payer mix—that is, the proportion of a physician’s patients covered by private insurance versus government programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

Private insurance pays substantially higher rates than public payers for the same services.

A comprehensive review of literature by the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) found that, on average, private insurers pay 143% of Medicare rates for physician services.³⁰

This payment gap varies dramatically by specialty.

For evaluation and management services typical of primary care, the markup is relatively modest, around 110% of Medicare rates.

For hospital-based, procedure-heavy specialties, the difference is far greater.

Commercial insurers pay around 250% of Medicare rates for emergency medicine, and as much as 330% for anesthesiology services.³¹

A physician’s ultimate income, therefore, is heavily dependent on the insurance profile of their patient population.

A practice that serves a large percentage of privately insured patients will generate significantly more revenue—and support a higher physician salary—than a practice with a high volume of Medicare or Medicaid patients.

Section 3: The Architecture of Scarcity: How Market Structure and Regulation Inflate Physician Pay

A central economic reason for high physician compensation in the United States is that the supply of physicians is systematically and artificially constrained.

Unlike a free market where supply would rise to meet demand, the pathway to becoming a practicing physician is governed by a series of strict “barriers to entry.” The most significant of these is a bottleneck in post-graduate training, a structure maintained by professional organizations that effectively allows the profession to limit its own numbers, thereby increasing the market value of its labor.

3.1. Supply, Demand, and the Residency Bottleneck

The U.S. does not have a shortage of qualified individuals who want to become doctors.

In 2019, for example, more than 53,000 people applied for only about 22,000 medical school positions.¹

The true constraint occurs

after medical school, at the stage of Graduate Medical Education (GME), more commonly known as residency.

To obtain a license to practice medicine in the U.S., a physician must complete a residency program accredited by the ACGME.³²

The number of available residency positions acts as the primary gatekeeper to the profession.

Each year, this creates a high-stakes musical chairs competition known as the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), or “the Match.” In the 2024 Match, there were 50,413 registered applicants competing for 41,503 available PGY-1 (first-year) and PGY-2 positions.³³

While the majority of U.S. medical graduates successfully match, thousands of other qualified applicants—including U.S. citizens who attended international medical schools and non-U.S. international medical graduates—are left without a position each year.¹⁵

This bottleneck was deliberately solidified by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997.

At the urging of physician organizations, including the AMA, who were concerned about a potential physician surplus, Congress capped the number of residency positions that Medicare would fund.³²

This cap has remained largely frozen for more than two decades, failing to keep pace with U.S. population growth, the rising demand for healthcare from an aging populace, and a significant increase in the number of medical schools and graduates.³²

3.2. The Gatekeepers: The Role of the AMA and ACGME

The supply of physicians is unique in that it is tightly controlled by organizations dominated by physicians themselves.³²

The ACGME sets the standards for and accredits all residency programs, effectively controlling the number of training slots.³²

Historically, the AMA lobbied to limit the number of residents to bolster physician incomes by restricting supply.²⁵

While the AMA’s public stance has since shifted to advocating for an

increase in GME slots to address physician shortages, the restrictive legacy of the cap they once supported remains the primary structural cause of the current supply problem.³⁴

This control extends down to the individual specialty level.

The number of training slots for any given specialty, from dermatology to neurosurgery, is determined by residency review committees.

These committees are composed of members of those same specialties, giving them the power to limit the number of new entrants into their field.

This regulatory structure has long been identified as a mechanism for restricting competition and inflating the incomes of practitioners in those fields.¹

3.3. The International Comparison: Fewer Doctors, Higher Pay

The direct result of this artificial scarcity is that the United States has fewer practicing physicians per capita than most other developed nations.¹

In 2017, the U.S. produced 7.6 medical graduates per 100,000 citizens, a figure dwarfed by countries like France (9.5), Germany (12.0), and Australia (15.5).¹

The economic consequence of this disparity is straightforward: a restricted supply in the face of high and rising demand leads to a higher price for labor.

This is a primary reason why U.S. physician salaries are, on average, double those in other wealthy countries.²⁵

Across the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), there is a clear negative correlation between the number of medical specialists a country trains per capita and the remuneration those specialists receive relative to the average wage.¹

The American system, by design, trains fewer doctors and thus pays them more.

Country	Physicians per 1,000 People	Average Physician Salary (USD)
United States	2.6 (fewer than most OECD nations)	~$352,000
Canada	2.7 (fewer than most OECD nations)	~$273,000
Germany	4.5	~$160,000
United Kingdom	3.2	~$138,000
France	3.2	~$98,000
Mexico	2.5	~$19,000
Data on physician supply and salary compiled from multiple sources and reports.1 Physician density data varies by year and source; figures are representative of the general disparity.

The residency bottleneck has secondary effects on the nature of medical education itself.

With residency slots in competitive, high-paying specialties being so scarce, medical students are driven into a “resume arms race.” They must pursue activities like research and publications not necessarily because it makes them better future clinicians, but because these are the metrics used to differentiate top applicants.

This system can divert student time and energy away from core clinical training and toward resume-building activities, creating a “perverse quality signal” where the system selects for the best applicants, who are not always synonymous with the best future community physicians.¹

Furthermore, the rapid expansion in the number of medical schools, particularly osteopathic (DO) schools, without a corresponding increase in federally funded residency slots, is creating a potential crisis.

This trend exacerbates the bottleneck, forcing a larger pool of graduates to compete for a relatively fixed number of positions.³⁵

With evidence suggesting some residency programs still hold a bias against DO graduates, the logical outcome is a future where a growing number of physicians, having accumulated hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt, will fail to secure a residency position.

This leaves them with a medical degree they cannot use to practice, representing a personal financial catastrophe and a gross misallocation of societal and educational resources.³⁹

Section 4: Systemic Context: Situating Physician Pay Within U.S. Healthcare Economics

While the investment required and the supply constraints are crucial drivers, physician compensation must also be viewed within the broader context of the American healthcare system—the most expensive in the world.

Physicians operate within a high-cost environment, facing significant operational expenses like malpractice insurance.

Critically, while their salaries are high in absolute terms, they represent a relatively small portion of America’s total health spending, challenging the narrative that physician pay is the primary cause of exorbitant national healthcare costs.

4.1. The Cost of Risk: Medical Malpractice Insurance

A significant operational expense that directly reduces a physician’s net income is medical liability, or malpractice, insurance.

The cost and risk associated with malpractice are substantially higher in the U.S. than in other countries, adding another layer of financial pressure that supports high gross compensation.²⁵

On average, a U.S. physician spends about $7,500 per year, or roughly 3.2% of their income, on malpractice premiums.⁴¹

However, this average masks extreme variations.

Premiums are determined by specialty risk and geography.

Physicians in high-risk specialties like general surgery or obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) can expect to pay between $30,000 and $50,000 annually.⁴²

Geography plays an equally dramatic role.

An OB/GYN practicing in certain counties in New York may face annual premiums exceeding $170,000 ($14,167 per month), while the same specialist in Miami-Dade County, Florida, could pay over $226,000 per year.⁴³

These figures represent a direct and substantial reduction in a physician’s take-home pay.

Furthermore, the market for this insurance is hardening, with data from 2024 showing that nearly half of all premiums increased from the prior year.⁴¹

The impact of this high-risk environment extends beyond the premium itself.

It incentivizes the practice of “defensive medicine,” wherein physicians order additional tests, consultations, or procedures not primarily for clinical benefit, but to create a robust legal record in case of a lawsuit.²⁶

This behavior, born from a rational desire to mitigate legal risk, directly contributes to the overutilization of healthcare services and inflates overall system costs.

The high cost of malpractice insurance, therefore, has a multiplier effect on national health spending that is far greater than the sum of the premiums paid.

4.2. A Piece of the Pie: Physician Salaries vs. Total National Health Expenditures

A prevalent narrative suggests that high physician salaries are a primary driver of America’s world-leading healthcare costs.

However, an examination of National Health Expenditure (NHE) data reveals this to be a simplistic and misleading conclusion.

Multiple independent analyses consistently find that total physician compensation accounts for a surprisingly small fraction of overall U.S. health spending—approximately 8% to 9%.²¹

As one healthcare executive noted, “if physicians worked for free we would still have a serious cost problem”.⁴⁶

This data indicates that even a drastic cut in physician pay would fail to solve the fundamental cost issues within the U.S. system.

The data points instead to much larger drivers of cost.

The single largest category of health expenditure is Hospital Care, which includes both inpatient and outpatient services.

This category alone accounts for 30-31% of all health spending in the U.S..⁴⁸

The broader category of

Physician and Clinical Services, which encompasses all revenue generated by physician offices and clinics (including salaries, overhead, equipment, and staff pay), makes up about 20% of NHE.⁴⁸

Physician net income is merely a subset of this larger figure.

When comparing U.S. health spending to that of other developed countries, the difference is not primarily explained by salaries alone.

Instead, nearly 80% of the spending gap is due to higher prices for inpatient and outpatient care—that is, higher prices for hospital stays, procedures, and provider-administered drugs.

High administrative costs are another major factor, accounting for 12% of the spending difference.⁵⁰

Service Category	Share of Total NHE (%) (2023)	Total Spending (Billions USD) (2023)
Hospital Care	31%	$1,519.7
Physician & Clinical Services	20%	$978.0
Retail Prescription Drugs	9%	$449.7
Administration & Net Cost of Insurance	Part of “Other Health” (25%)	N/A
Nursing Care & Retirement Communities	4%	N/A
Other Health	25%	N/A
Data sourced from CMS and KFF analysis of National Health Expenditures.48 “Other Health” includes administration, home health, dental, and other services.

This context reveals a critical misalignment of incentives within the U.S. healthcare system.

While physician salaries make up only about 8-9% of total costs, it is estimated that physician decisions—to admit a patient to the hospital, order an MRI, prescribe a specific drug, or refer to a specialist—direct or influence up to 80% of all healthcare spending.²⁶

In a fee-for-service model, a physician is often compensated more for ordering more services, creating a potential conflict between their financial incentives and the goal of cost-effective care.

The small size of the “salary slice” of the pie is therefore deceptive; the physician’s hand is the one that cuts nearly all the other, much larger slices.

This fundamental disconnect is a key reason why payment model reform is considered central to any serious effort at controlling U.S. healthcare costs.

Section 5: Conclusion: A Synthesis of Drivers and a Forward-Looking Analysis

The high level of physician compensation in the United States is not the result of a single factor but rather the complex outcome of an interconnected system of educational, regulatory, and economic forces.

It is a prominent feature of a healthcare system that is, by nearly every measure, the most expensive in the world.

A nuanced understanding requires moving beyond simple comparisons and appreciating the distinct architecture of the American medical profession.

5.1. Synthesis: The Four Pillars of High Physician Compensation

The analysis presented in this report can be synthesized into four foundational pillars that collectively support high physician pay:

• Pillar 1: The High Buy-In. The path to becoming a physician in the U.S. requires an extraordinary upfront investment. It involves at least eight years of higher education followed by three to seven years of grueling, low-paid residency training, culminating in an average debt burden exceeding $200,000. This immense investment of time, money, and personal well-being creates a rational expectation for a high return to make the career choice financially viable over a lifetime.
• Pillar 2: The Managed Market. Physician labor in the U.S. does not operate in a free market. Supply is artificially and systematically constrained by a long-standing cap on the number of federally funded residency positions—the mandatory gateway to medical practice. This bottleneck, a legacy of policy decisions influenced by physician organizations, limits competition and inflates the economic value of physician labor compared to international peers.
• Pillar 3: The Fragmented and Inflated Payment System. The U.S. healthcare financing system, dominated by a fee-for-service model, rewards a higher volume of procedures. This structure, combined with a payer mix where private insurers pay substantial premiums over government rates (often 143% or more of Medicare), creates opportunities for very high earnings, particularly for procedural specialists who practice in markets with a favorable patient mix.
• Pillar 4: The High-Cost Economy. Physicians practice within a uniquely expensive ecosystem. They are part of a high-wage economy for all skilled professionals and face high operational costs, such as volatile medical malpractice insurance premiums. More broadly, they are key actors in a healthcare system where all prices—for hospital stays, technologies, and drugs—are significantly inflated compared to global norms.

5.2. Future Outlook: Potential Levers of Change

The future landscape of physician compensation is subject to several potential policy shifts that could alter the dynamics described in this report.

Key levers include:

• Expanding GME Funding: A significant increase in the number of federally funded residency slots, as proposed in legislation like the Resident Physician Shortage Reduction Act, is the most direct mechanism to increase physician supply. Over the long term, this would likely exert downward pressure on compensation through increased competition, while simultaneously improving patient access to care.
• Payment Model Reform: An accelerated transition from fee-for-service to value-based care models would continue to realign financial incentives. This could narrow the pay gap between specialists and primary care physicians by rewarding outcomes and population health management over procedure volume, making physicians more accountable for the total cost of care they generate.
• Scope of Practice Expansion: Expanding the scope of practice for non-physician providers, such as nurse practitioners and physician assistants, could increase the supply of primary care services. This is a contentious issue, but it has the potential to alleviate shortages and could impact the wages of primary care physicians.
• Tort Reform: Meaningful, national-level reform of medical liability laws could stabilize or reduce malpractice insurance premiums. This would lower a key operational cost for physicians and could also curb the practice of defensive medicine, thereby reducing a significant driver of systemic cost inflation.

5.3. Final Word: Compensation as a Symptom, Not the Disease

Ultimately, high physician compensation in the United States is best understood as a logical symptom of a much larger and more complex condition.

It is the natural result of a system that demands a massive personal investment from its entrants, deliberately limits their numbers, and pays for their services through a fragmented and price-inflated financing model.

To focus on physician salaries as the core problem of U.S. healthcare is to mistake the symptom for the disease.

Addressing compensation in isolation, without tackling the fundamental drivers of educational cost, workforce scarcity, and systemic pricing, would be a superficial response to a deeply rooted structural challenge.

Works cited

1. One Reason Why Doctors Are Paid So Much: North American Education, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://manhattan.institute/article/one-reason-why-doctors-are-paid-so-much-north-american-education
2. How Much Does Medical School Cost in 2025? | Earnest, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.earnest.com/blog/how-much-does-medical-school-cost/
3. Proposed changes to federal student loans could worsen the doctor …, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.aamc.org/news/proposed-changes-federal-student-loans-could-worsen-doctor-shortage
4. How Much Does Medical School Cost? – Inspira Advantage, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.inspiraadvantage.com/blog/how-much-does-a-medical-school-cost
5. Medical Student Education: Debt, Costs, and Loan Repayment Fact Card for the Class of 2024 – AAMC, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://students-residents.aamc.org/media/12846/download
6. Average Student Loan Debt for Medical School for 2025 – Credible, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.credible.com/statistics/average-student-loan-debt-for-medical-school
7. Average Medical School Debt [2024]: Student Loan Statistics – Education Data Initiative, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://educationdata.org/average-medical-school-debt
8. Medical Student Education: Debt, Costs, and Loan Repayment Fact Card for the Class of 2023, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://medschool.ucsd.edu/_files/financial-aid/aamc-2023-fact-card.pdf
9. medical.rossu.edu, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://medical.rossu.edu/about/blog/how-long-is-a-medical-residency
10. How Long Is Medical Residency? And 5 Other FAQs About This MD Training, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.sgu.edu/school-of-medicine/blog/how-long-is-medical-residency/
11. How Many Years is Residency in USA – AUAMED, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.auamed.org/india-blog/how-many-years-is-residency-in-the-usa/
12. Residency (medicine) – Wikipedia, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residency_(medicine)
13. Well-Being and Work Hour Requirements – ACGME, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.acgme.org/newsroom/2019/1/well-being-and-work-hour-requirements/
14. Duty Hours Overview – ACGME, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pdfs/dutyhoursoverview.pdf
15. Are American Doctors Overpaid? | Med School Insiders, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://medschoolinsiders.com/pre-med/are-american-doctors-overpaid/
16. Burnout During Residency Training: A Literature Review – PMC, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2931238/
17. Burnout among Residents: Prevalence and Predictors of Depersonalization, Emotional Exhaustion and Professional Unfulfillment among Resident Doctors in Canada – MDPI, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3677
18. Do Engineers ever make it to the same income bracket as Doctors and Lawyers? : r/EngineeringStudents – Reddit, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/EngineeringStudents/comments/10e6vu5/do_engineers_ever_make_it_to_the_same_income/
19. A comparison of the educational costs and incomes of physicians and other professionals – PubMed, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8145784/
20. Educational Costs Expended and Career Incomes in Advanced Healthcare Professions, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38289682/
21. What Health Care Policy Lessons Can We Draw From Physician Incomes?, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.niskanencenter.org/what-health-care-policy-lessons-can-we-draw-from-physician-incomes/
22. How Much Do Doctors Make? [Salary by Specialty 2025] | White …, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.whitecoatinvestor.com/how-much-do-doctors-make/
23. Sermo physician compensation report 2024-2025: how much do doctors make?!, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.sermo.com/resources/physician-compensation-report-2024-2025/
24. 2024 Physician Compensation Report – Physicians Thrive, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://physiciansthrive.com/physician-compensation/report/
25. Why Doctors Get Paid More in the US (and Why Some People Hate It), accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.whitecoatinvestor.com/why-us-doctors-get-paid-more/
26. Drivers of Health Care Costs: A Physicians Foundation White Paper – First of a Three-Part Series – PMC, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6179628/
27. Value Based Care vs. Fee-for-Service: What’s Best for You? – Vim, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://getvim.com/blog/fee-for-service-vs-value-based-care-the-differences-explained/
28. Value-Based Care Spotlight | CMS, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation-center/value-based-care-spotlight
29. 10-year trend on physician payment methods: What you should know, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.ama-assn.org/about/ama-research/10-year-trend-physician-payment-methods-what-you-should-know
30. How Much More Than Medicare Do Private Insurers Pay? A Review …, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/how-much-more-than-medicare-do-private-insurers-pay-a-review-of-the-literature/
31. Commercial Health Insurance Markups over Medicare Prices for Physician Services Vary Widely by Specialty | Urban Institute, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/104945/commercial-health-insurance-markups-over-medicare-prices-for-physician-services-vary-widely-by-specialty_0.pdf
32. The problem of doctors’ salaries – Politico, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2017/10/25/doctors-salaries-pay-disparities-000557
33. NRMP® Celebrates Match Day for the 2024 Main Residency Match, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.nrmp.org/about/news/2024/03/nrmp-celebrates-match-day-for-the-2024-main-residency-match-releases-results-for-over-44000-applicants-and-almost-6400-residency-programs/
34. The physician shortage will worsen—unless Congress acts now, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.ama-assn.org/about/leadership/physician-shortage-will-worsen-unless-congress-acts-now
35. AMA President highlights growing crisis facing U.S. physicians – HealthExec, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://healthexec.com/topics/healthcare-management/healthcare-policy/ama-president-highlights-growing-crisis-facing-us-physicians
36. Why does US have fewer per capita doctors as compared to Western Europe even though their income is higher in US than Europe? Shouldn’t that attract more people to the profession? : r/AskSocialScience – Reddit, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskSocialScience/comments/9jye90/why_does_us_have_fewer_per_capita_doctors_as/
37. European Doctors Paid Half as Much as US Counterparts – Medscape, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/997263
38. How Do US Physician Salaries Compare With Those Abroad?, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.physiciansweekly.com/how-do-us-physician-salaries-compare-with-those-abroad/
39. Osteopathic Schools seem to be at the Intersection of Medical Education and Business in their aggresive expansions : r/medicalschool – Reddit, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/medicalschool/comments/1litrkl/osteopathic_schools_seem_to_be_at_the/
40. 99 Percent of Osteopathic Medical Students Obtain Residency Positions – AACOM, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.aacom.org/news-reports/news/2025/05/12/99-percent-of-osteopathic-medical-students-obtain-residency-positions
41. What Does Malpractice Insurance Cost?, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://nowinsurance.com/blog/what-does-malpractice-insurance-cost/
42. The Current Cost of Medical Malpractice Insurance | Physicians Thrive, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://physiciansthrive.com/malpractice-insurance/costs/
43. Medical Malpractice Insurance Cost: Fast & Free Quotes | Insureon, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.insureon.com/small-business-insurance/medical-malpractice/cost
44. Surge in medical liability premiums increases reaches fourth year, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/ama-press-releases/surge-medical-liability-premiums-increases-reaches-fourth-year
45. Is medical liability insurance headed toward a hard market in 2025?, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/sustainability/medical-liability-insurance-headed-toward-hard-market-2025
46. Physician Pay Makes Up About 8% of Total Healthcare Costs, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.medicaleconomics.com/view/physician-pay-makes-up-about-8-of-total-healthcare-costs
47. Just how much do physicians earn — and why? | Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), accessed on July 23, 2025, https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/just-how-much-do-physicians-earn-and-why
48. National Spending on Hospital Care – Key Facts About Hospitals – KFF, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.kff.org/key-facts-about-hospitals/?entry=national-hospital-spending-national-spending-on-hospital-care
49. What Factors Contribute to U.S. Health Care Spending? – Health Care Costs and Affordability | KFF, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.kff.org/health-policy-101-health-care-costs-and-affordability/?entry=table-of-contents-what-factors-contribute-to-u-s-health-care-spending
50. What drives health spending in the U.S. compared to other countries …, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/brief/what-drives-health-spending-in-the-u-s-compared-to-other-countries/
51. NHE Fact Sheet – CMS, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.cms.gov/data-research/statistics-trends-and-reports/national-health-expenditure-data/nhe-fact-sheet