Beyond the Resume: What Employers Really Want (And How I Learned to See It)

I Spent 20 Years Hiring the “Perfect” Candidates. A Lesson from an Ancient Forest Taught Me I Was Doing It All Wrong.

---

Introduction: The Day I Realized I Was Hiring All Wrong

For the first two decades of my career as a Human Capital Strategist, I was a collector.

I collected resumes like they were rare artifacts, hunting for the shiniest credentials, the most prestigious degrees, the most dazzling lists of technical skills.

My philosophy was simple, and it was the same one that powers countless hiring departments: a team’s strength is the sum of its individual parts.

If you want to build a winning team, you just need to recruit the best players.

I prided myself on my ability to spot these “star players,” the ones who looked perfect on paper, a belief reinforced by conventional wisdom that prioritizes educational background and relevant experience above all else.¹

Then came Alex.

Alex was, by every metric I valued, the perfect candidate.

He was a developer with a resume that glowed in the dark—a top-tier computer science degree, a portfolio of breathtakingly elegant code, and he aced every technical assessment we threw at him.

He was, in the language of my old paradigm, the tallest, strongest tree in the forest.

I hired him to lead a critical project, confident that his individual brilliance would guarantee success.

I was catastrophically wrong.

Once on the team, Alex’s brilliance became a toxic, isolating force.

He was a poor communicator, often dismissive of ideas from his colleagues.

He didn’t collaborate; he dictated.

His presence created a culture of fear and resentment, where other talented team members were afraid to speak up or contribute.

He was the quintessential “brilliant jerk,” a high-performer who torpedoes team morale.³

Within six months, the project was in shambles, team productivity had plummeted, and two of my most valuable, collaborative mid-level employees—the very people who made other projects sing—had quit.

The failure was total, and it was mine.

It forced me to confront a devastating question: If a team of A-players, led by a certified genius, could fail this spectacularly, what was I missing? What was the invisible force that truly determined a team’s success?

---

Part I: The Epiphany – From a Collection of Stars to a Thriving Forest

My search for an answer led me to the most unexpected of places: a biology article about forest ecology.

I was reading about mycorrhizal networks, the vast, intricate underground webs of fungal threads (mycelium) that connect the root systems of individual trees.⁴

The article described how these networks function as a kind of subterranean internet, allowing trees to share resources like water, carbon, and nitrogen.

They can even transmit warning signals about pests or drought, allowing the entire forest to mount a collective defense.⁶

It was a lightning bolt.

The strongest forests aren’t just collections of the biggest trees competing for sunlight.

They are complex, interconnected, and deeply collaborative systems.

The health and resilience of the entire ecosystem depend on this invisible, symbiotic network.

In that moment, I realized that a high-performing team works the exact same Way. This was the birth of my new framework: the Team as an Ecosystem.

The star players are the visible trees, but their success—and the success of the entire team—depends on the “mycelial network” of unseen connections: communication, collaboration, and trust.

This is the essence of systems thinking—a holistic approach that focuses on how the different parts of a system interact and influence one another, rather than just analyzing the parts in isolation.⁷

It’s a concept echoed in the principles of biomimicry, a discipline that studies nature’s time-tested models to solve complex human problems.⁹

This new paradigm immediately exposed the fundamental flaw in my old approach.

Traditional hiring is a linear, atomized process.

It evaluates candidates in isolation against a checklist of skills, like judging a tree by its height alone.

The ecosystem model reveals this is tragically incomplete because it ignores the most critical factor: how that tree will interact with and influence the entire system.

The value isn’t just in the node; it’s in the network it helps create.

I had been so focused on acquiring individual assets that I had completely failed to cultivate the ecosystem itself.

---

Part II: The Mycelial Network – Why “Soft Skills” Are the Most Powerful Force in Business

This new lens reframed my entire understanding of “soft skills.” They weren’t fluffy, nice-to-have personality traits anymore.

They were the critical, functional infrastructure of a successful team—the mycelial network itself.

This explains why a staggering 92% of employers report that soft skills are as important, or even more important, than hard skills.¹¹

They form the very medium through which work gets done.

Subsection 2.1: Communication as Nutrient Transfer

In a forest, the mycelial network is the transport layer, moving essential nutrients like nitrogen and carbon from trees with a surplus to those in need.⁵

In a business, effective communication serves the exact same function, transporting the vital nutrients of the knowledge economy: information, context, feedback, and support.

A team with poor communication is a forest where every tree is starving, regardless of its individual size or strength.

This isn’t just about being a good speaker.

It’s a suite of abilities: active listening to truly understand others’ perspectives ¹³; writing with clarity and precision in emails and reports ¹⁵; translating complex technical information into terms that non-specialists can understand ¹; and building consensus through persuasion and dialogue.¹³

This is the functional mechanism that enables all other forms of collaboration and problem-solving.

Subsection 2.2: Emotional Intelligence (EQ) as Chemical Signaling

Scientists have discovered that mycorrhizal networks can transmit complex chemical signals between plants, acting as an early warning system for the entire forest.⁶

This is a perfect analogy for Emotional Intelligence (EQ).

Individuals with high EQ are exquisitely attuned to the “chemical signals” of their team.

They can sense rising stress, detect simmering conflict, and notice when morale is flagging.

They are the ecosystem’s immune system and its first responders.

EQ is a composite of self-awareness, empathy, and strong interpersonal skills.¹¹

It’s the ability to “play nice with others” ¹¹, to manage conflict constructively ¹³, and to build the psychological safety and trust that are foundational to high performance.¹³

It’s no surprise that Forbes listed emotional intelligence as the number one soft skill for 2025.¹⁸

My failure with Alex wasn’t a technical miscalculation; it was a failure to screen for this vital trait.

He wasn’t just a poor fit; he was a toxin introduced into the ecosystem, poisoning the soil around him.

Subsection 2.3: Collaboration as Symbiosis

The relationship between the fungus and the trees in a mycorrhizal network is mutualistic—a form of symbiosis where both parties benefit from the interaction.⁴

This is the essence of true collaboration.

It’s not just “working on a task together.” It’s a dynamic state where the interaction itself creates emergent properties—the whole becomes greater than the sum of its parts.

This is the direct opposite of the parasitic “brilliant jerk,” who drains resources from the team for their own gain.

Collaboration is consistently ranked as a top desired skill by employers.¹⁵

It requires a deep respect for different perspectives, a commitment to shared goals, and the active cultivation of a supportive environment.¹⁴

This principle is vividly demonstrated in sports, where studies have shown that “team chemistry”—built on past shared successes and strong interpersonal relationships—is a far better predictor of future wins than simply adding up the individual statistics of the players.²¹

This leads to a crucial realization: hard and soft skills are not separate, co-equal categories.

Soft skills are the foundational layer upon which the value of hard skills is built.

Without the network (soft skills), the tree (hard skills) cannot access resources, defend itself, or contribute to the forest’s health.

A developer with world-class coding skills but no ability to communicate or collaborate will have a net-negative impact on the system.

Their brilliance is locked away, unable to integrate with the whole.

Conversely, a good developer with excellent soft skills can elevate the performance of everyone around them.

They are not just an additive force; they are a multiplicative one.

---

Part III: The Visible and Invisible Structure – The Symbiosis of Hard and Soft Skills

An ecosystem needs both its visible structures and its invisible networks to thrive.

The same is true for a team.

Hard and soft skills are not in opposition; they are two essential, interdependent parts of a single, functional whole.

Subsection 3.1: Hard Skills as The Trees (The Visible Structure)

Let me be clear: this new paradigm does not diminish the importance of hard skills.

They remain absolutely critical.

Hard skills are the tangible, teachable, and domain-specific abilities required to perform the core functions of a job.²³

They are the trees in our ecosystem—the visible, powerful structures that do the work and produce the “fruit” of the business.

This includes everything from data analysis and AI fluency to software development, financial modeling, and graphic design.²³

In specialized fields, it means possessing specific competencies like clinical skills in healthcare or mastery of certain coding languages in Tech.²⁸

These are the “what you can do” qualifications.

They are the price of admission.

Subsection 3.2: The Interdependence Principle

A tree cannot draw nutrients from the soil with its trunk, nor can it photosynthesize with its roots.

The visible and invisible systems are completely interdependent.

In the modern workplace, this interdependence has become more critical than ever.

The relentless advance of technology, particularly Artificial Intelligence, is automating many routine hard skills.³⁰

This paradoxically increases the value of the uniquely human skills that AI cannot replicate: creativity, nuanced critical thinking, empathetic communication, and collaborative problem-solving.¹⁷

The value proposition for an employee is shifting.

It’s no longer just about executing a known technical task flawlessly.

It’s about collaborating with other people—and with AI systems—to solve complex, novel problems.

A data scientist who can not only build a predictive model (hard skill) but can also communicate its implications to the marketing team (soft skill) and use their emotional intelligence to navigate the debate about the results (soft skill) is exponentially more valuable than one who can only do the first part.

Their function is integrated into the ecosystem, not isolated from it.

---

Part IV: Cultivating the Ecosystem – A New Framework for Hiring

If a team is an ecosystem, then hiring is not acquisition; it is cultivation.

It’s the process of thoughtfully selecting new elements that will enhance the health, diversity, and resilience of the whole.

This requires a fundamental shift in how we approach one of the most contentious topics in recruiting: culture.

Subsection 4.1: Beyond Monoculture – The Strategic Imperative of “Culture Add”

For years, the gold standard was “hiring for culture fit.” In ecological terms, this is akin to planting a monoculture forest—a vast tract of genetically identical trees.

It looks uniform and can seem efficient in the short term, but it is dangerously fragile.

A single pest or disease can wipe out the entire system because there is no diversity to halt its spread.³¹

In business, hiring for fit often devolves into affinity bias, where managers hire people who look, think, and act just like them, leading to a homogenous team prone to groupthink and stagnation.³³

Hiring for “culture add,” by contrast, is like cultivating a biodiverse ecosystem.

It is the conscious effort to find individuals who, while aligning with the core values of the organization (the “soil conditions”), bring new perspectives, different backgrounds, and unique skills to the team.³⁵

This diversity is what makes the ecosystem resilient, innovative, and adaptable to change.

This isn’t a random process.

It requires a company to first clearly define its mission and values, and then strategically seek out candidates who can enrich and expand upon that foundation, filling gaps in the existing ecosystem.³⁵

Subsection 4.2: The Ecosystem Hiring Blueprint

This new paradigm reframes the three essential questions every hiring manager is trying to answer ³⁸:

1. Old Question: Can you do the job?
   Ecosystem Question: Can you perform your function within our ecosystem? (This assesses both hard skills and the soft skills needed to integrate them.)
2. Old Question: Do you want the job?
   Ecosystem Question: Are you passionate about this ecosystem’s purpose? (This seeks deep alignment with the company’s mission, a key driver of long-term commitment.39)
3. Old Question: Will you fit in?
   Ecosystem Question: Will you add to our ecosystem’s health and resilience? (This is the direct shift from seeking conformity to seeking contribution.)

To make this practical, I developed a new scorecard for evaluating candidates, moving from a traditional mindset to an ecosystem-based one.

Evaluation Criterion	Traditional (Monoculture) Mindset	Ecosystem (Biodiverse) Mindset
Experience	“Does this person have 10 years of experience doing this exact job?”	“What novel experiences does this person bring that can solve our problems in a new way?”
Skills	“Does this person check every box on our list of hard skills?”	“How does this person’s unique blend of hard and soft skills create a multiplicative effect for our team?”
Teamwork	“Will this person get along with everyone and not rock the boat?”	“Will this person challenge our assumptions respectfully and introduce new ways of collaborating?”
Problem-Solving	“Does this person know the ‘right’ answer based on past precedent?”	“Can this person reframe problems and connect disparate ideas to find innovative solutions?”
Culture	“Is this person like us? Would I want to have a beer with them?” (Focus on Fit)	“Does this person align with our core values while bringing a new perspective that makes us stronger?” (Focus on Add)
Potential	“Can this person climb our pre-defined career ladder?”	“Can this person adapt, learn, and help the entire ecosystem evolve in response to change?”

This table serves as both a guide for hiring managers and a new way for candidates to frame their value.

It shifts the conversation from a static checklist of past accomplishments to a dynamic assessment of future impact.

---

Part V: Ecological Succession – Thriving in the Unknowable Future of Work

The world of work is not a stable, predictable “climax community.” It is in a constant state of change and disruption.

To understand how to build a career that lasts, we can turn to one final ecological concept: succession.

This is the process by which an ecosystem evolves over time, especially after a major disturbance like a fire or a storm.⁴¹

Subsection 5.1: Adaptability as the Pioneer Species

After a forest fire clears the land, the first organisms to return are “pioneer species.” They are hardy, flexible, and built to thrive in uncertain conditions.

In our modern economy, rocked by the “fires” of AI, pandemics, and global economic shifts, adaptability is the ultimate pioneer trait.

It is consistently cited by experts as one of the most critical future-proof skills.²⁰

Employers are desperate for people who can pivot quickly, learn new tools on the fly, and view change not as a threat, but as an opportunity for growth.⁴²

This quality is the key to personal and professional resilience.

Subsection 5.2: The Redefinition of Loyalty

The idea of a 30-year career with a single company—the corporate equivalent of a stable climax community—is now the exception, not the rule.⁴⁴

This is not a moral failure of younger generations; it is a rational, adaptive response to a more volatile economic environment.⁴⁵

Modern loyalty is no longer directed at a single organization (one tree).

Instead, it is invested in one’s own skills, growth, and professional network (the broader ecosystem).

This new loyalty is earned by employers on a daily basis by providing meaningful work, opportunities for growth, and a healthy, supportive culture.⁴⁰

In this new world, stability comes not from tenure, but from

employability—the proven ability to adapt and find a valuable new niche within the ever-changing ecosystem.⁴⁴

This brings us to the future of work.

The dominant narrative around AI is often one of simple job replacement.⁴⁶

The ecosystem model, however, offers a more sophisticated view.

When a new, highly efficient species (like AI) enters an ecosystem, it doesn’t just eliminate other species; it fundamentally changes the flow of resources and creates entirely new niches.

The future of human work lies in mastering the functions that AI cannot perform: empathetic communication, creative problem-solving, complex strategic oversight, and ethical judgment.

It’s not about job replacement, but about functional re-integration.

The employee of 2030 will be valued not for performing a task an AI can do, but for their ability to

partner with that AI, interpret its output, communicate the findings to a human team, and creatively solve the next generation of problems the technology uncovers.³⁰

---

Conclusion: How I Learned to Stop Collecting Resumes and Start Building Worlds

Years after the disastrous “Alex” project, I faced a similar challenge.

We needed to build a team for a high-stakes product launch.

This time, I didn’t look for the tallest tree.

I looked for the best connectors.

One of our key hires was a woman whose resume was unconventional.

She had a background in community organizing before transitioning to project management.

She didn’t have the longest list of software certifications, but during her interview, she spoke with incredible clarity about how to build consensus among diverse stakeholders and motivate a team around a shared purpose.

She was a clear “culture add.” We hired her, and she became the central hub of our team’s mycelial network.

She used her communication skills to bridge the gap between our engineers and our marketing department.

Her emotional intelligence defused tensions before they could escalate.

She didn’t just manage the project; she cultivated the ecosystem.

The launch was a resounding success, not because of any single star player, but because the entire system was healthy, connected, and resilient.

My journey taught me that the most valuable employees are not just skilled individuals; they are powerful connectors, communicators, and collaborators who make the entire system stronger.

They are the mycelial network.

So, my challenge to you—whether you are hiring for your next role or seeking it—is to look beyond the surface.

To hiring managers: Stop looking for people who simply fit in.

Start looking for people who will help you grow.

And to candidates: Stop just listing your skills.

Start articulating how you will strengthen the entire ecosystem.

Works cited

1. Qualities and Skills Employers Look For – Columbia State Community College, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.columbiastate.edu/career-development/employer-expectation.html
2. 5 Things Employers Look at When Choosing a Candidate – iMPact Business Group, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://impactbusinessgroup.com/5-things-employers-look-at-when-choosing-a-candidate/
3. 17 Traits to Look for When Hiring for Specialized Tech Jobs | OSI Engineering, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://osiengineering.com/blog/17-traits-to-look-for-when-hiring-for-specialized-tech-jobs/
4. Mycorrhizal network – Wikipedia, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycorrhizal_network
5. www.nationalforests.org, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.nationalforests.org/blog/underground-mycorrhizal-network#:~:text=Mycelium%20are%20incredibly%20tiny%20%E2%80%9Cthreads,nitrogen%2C%20carbon%20and%20other%20minerals.
6. The Common Mycelial Network (CMN) of Forests – College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://clas.ucdenver.edu/ges/common-mycelial-network-cmn-forests
7. What is Systems Thinking? | SNHU, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.snhu.edu/about-us/newsroom/business/what-is-systems-thinking
8. 3 Reasons your team needs system thinking training – MIT Open Learning, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://openlearning.mit.edu/news/3-reasons-your-team-needs-system-thinking-training
9. Biomimetic Organisations: A Management Model that Learns from Nature – MDPI, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/6/2329
10. Biomimicry as a Sustainable Design Methodology—Introducing the ‘Biomimicry for Sustainability’ Framework – PMC, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9036301/
11. A Comprehensive List of Job Skills Employers Value Most | MVNU, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://mvnu.edu/blogs/top-10-job-skills-employers-value/
12. Common Mycorrhizae Network: A Review of the Theories and Mechanisms Behind Underground Interactions – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10512311/
13. 18 Essential Soft Skills You Need to Succeed in Business & Leadership Roles, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://pce.sandiego.edu/18-essential-soft-skills-you-need-to-succeed-in-business-leadership-roles/
14. The Three Essential Soft Skills for Modern Workers – ISS World, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.issworld.com/en-us/insights/insights/blog/us/the-three-essential-soft-skills-for-modern-workers
15. Top 5 Skills Employers Look For | Nth Degree – Newman University, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://newmanu.edu/top-5-skills-employers-look-for
16. Soft skills 101: definition + 50 examples – Handshake, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://joinhandshake.com/blog/students/soft-skills-examples/
17. Future-Proof Your Career: The Top 10 Skills Employers are Looking for in 2025, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.stjohns.edu/news-media/johnnies-blog/top-skills-employers-are-looking-for-2025
18. The top 9 skills employers are looking for in 2025 – AIB – Australian Institute of Business, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.aib.edu.au/blog/career-development/the-top-9-skills-employers-are-looking-for-in-2025/
19. newmanu.edu, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://newmanu.edu/top-5-skills-employers-look-for#:~:text=By%20practicing%20and%20applying%20critical,more%20desirable%20to%20many%20employers.
20. Top 10 Qualities Employers Look for in Candidates – ASC Connections, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.asc-connections.com/blog/top-10-qualities-employers-look-for-in-candidates
21. In Team Sports, Chemistry Matters | News – McCormick School of Engineering, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.mccormick.northwestern.edu/news/articles/2018/12/in-team-sports-chemistry-matters.html
22. “Team chemistry” through chemistry lenses: interdisciplinary science or a metaphorical conundrum? – PMC, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4309159/
23. A Guide To Hard Skills And 7 Important Ones To Hire For – Vervoe, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://vervoe.com/guide-to-hard-skills/
24. Top 10 In-Demand Skills in 2025 That You Will Need – CityU of Seattle, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.cityu.edu/blog/skills-in-demand-2025/
25. Not just for Silicon Valley: 8 tech skills that pay off anywhere in the world, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/careers/not-just-for-silicon-valley-8-tech-skills-that-pay-off-anywhere-in-the-world/articleshow/123001390.cms
26. 20 Examples of the Most In-Demand Hard Skills – WalkMe, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.walkme.com/blog/hard-skills-examples/
27. What Makes a Great Creative Designer? – Designity, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.designity.com/blog/what-makes-a-great-creative-designer
28. 7 Qualities of Top Tech Talent: What to Look for in Your Next Hire – Templeton & Partners, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.templeton-recruitment.com/tech-news/7-qualities-of-top-tech-talent-what-to-look-for-in-your-next-hire
29. What Employers Look for in Healthcare Graduates – Hawaii Medical College, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.hmi.edu/what-employers-look-for-in-healthcare-graduates/
30. Your Job in 2030: These 5 AI Changes Will Hit Harder Than You Think, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://beam.ai/agentic-insights/your-job-in-2030-these-5-ai-changes-will-hit-harder-than-you-think
31. The 5 pitfalls of hiring for culture fit – TestGorilla, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.testgorilla.com/blog/pitfalls-of-hiring-for-culture-fit/
32. Why Should You Hire for Culture Add vs. Culture Fit – Indeed, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.indeed.com/hire/c/info/culture-add-vs-fit
33. Does Hiring For Culture Fit Actually Work? – David Burkus, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://davidburkus.com/2025/03/hiring-for-culture-fit/
34. Making the move from culture fit to culture add | LinkedIn Talent Solutions, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://business.linkedin.com/talent-solutions/diversity-inclusion-belonging/why-you-shouldnt-hire-for-culture-fit
35. Culture Add vs. Culture Fit, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.cultureally.com/blog/culture-add-vs-culture-fit
36. Culture Fit vs Culture Add: Pros Cons, and Hiring – BetterUp, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.betterup.com/blog/cultural-fit
37. How to Hire for Company Culture Fit the Right Way – Toggl Track, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://toggl.com/blog/organizational-culture-fit
38. What Hiring Managers Really Want To Hear In A Job … – Simplicant, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://simplicant.com/blog/what-hiring-managers-want-job-interview/
39. 6 Key Qualities Recruiters Look for in Candidates – iSmartRecruit, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.ismartrecruit.com/blog-6-essential-qualities-recruiters-are-looking-for-in-candidates
40. The Importance of Employee Loyalty in the Workplace – InMoment, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://inmoment.com/blog/the-importance-of-employee-loyalty/
41. Inward Theorizing Ecological Resilience and Evolutionary Dynamics in Family Business Succession, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://edbac.org/api/documents/k70ydfdyol6pidopzvogkiygvnaqailbexhhwsjeni8thulpqs
42. Adaptability in the Workplace: Benefits of Being Adaptable – Business.com, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.business.com/articles/how-well-do-you-handle-change-the-benefits-of-being-adaptable/
43. The 25+ Most In-Demand Skills in 2025 & Beyond • Toggl Hire, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://toggl.com/blog/most-in-demand-skills
44. Loyalty, stability, and career: three work concepts that no longer mean the same – Medium, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://medium.com/santi-garcia/loyalty-stability-and-career-three-work-concepts-that-no-longer-mean-the-same-7972e03c93c4
45. Why Is Loyalty in the Workplace Going Down? | EvolveDash, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://evolvedash.com/blog/why-is-loyalty-in-the-workplace-going-down/
46. Charted: The World’s Fastest Shrinking Jobs (2025-2030) – Visual Capitalist, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.visualcapitalist.com/charted-the-worlds-fastest-shrinking-jobs-2025-2030/
47. Future of Jobs Report 2025: 78 Million New Job Opportunities by 2030 but Urgent Upskilling Needed to Prepare Workforces – The World Economic Forum, accessed on August 6, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/press/2025/01/future-of-jobs-report-2025-78-million-new-job-opportunities-by-2030-but-urgent-upskilling-needed-to-prepare-workforces/