The Maximum Illusion: A Definitive Report on the Realities of Student Loan Discharge

Introduction: The Flawed Quest for a Single Number

The task of identifying the single “maximum” amount of student loan debt that has been discharged in the United States is a deceptively complex undertaking.

An initial inquiry into the matter yields a chaotic and seemingly contradictory array of figures.

On one hand, programs like Teacher Loan Forgiveness (TLF) present a clear, fixed ceiling of $17,500.¹

On the other, flagship programs such as Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) and Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) promise to forgive 100% of a borrower’s remaining balance, an amount that is theoretically uncapped.¹

Compounding this complexity are the massive, multi-billion-dollar group discharges granted to hundreds of thousands of borrowers who were victims of institutional fraud.⁴

To present any one of these figures as the definitive “maximum” would be to fundamentally misrepresent the intricate and fragmented nature of the American student loan discharge system.

This inherent complexity necessitates a more sophisticated framework for analysis.

The system is not a single destination with one entrance fee but rather a complex transportation network with multiple routes, each with its own unique vehicle.

To understand the “maximum,” one must first understand the specific “Discharge Vehicle” a borrower is using.

Some of these vehicles are Marathon Runners, like PSLF and IDR, built for endurance and requiring years of sustained commitment.

Some are Emergency Exits, such as Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) or Bankruptcy discharge, designed for individuals facing life-altering crises.

Finally, some are part of a Justice Fleet, like Borrower Defense to Repayment, mobilized to deliver restitution to those harmed by institutional malpractice.

The carrying capacity of each vehicle—its maximum payload—is fundamentally different, and only by examining each one in detail can a true and accurate picture of student loan discharge emerge.

In a Nutshell: The Real Answers to the Maximum Question

Breaking down the question of “maximum discharge” through the lens of this new framework provides clear and distinct answers.

• Maximum Possible Forgiveness: For the most comprehensive federal programs—Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF), Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) Forgiveness, Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) Discharge, Borrower Defense to Repayment, and Closed School Discharge—the theoretical maximum is 100% of a borrower’s eligible federal loan balance. This amount is uncapped and can reach hundreds of thousands of dollars, depending on the individual’s debt load.¹ In contrast, more targeted programs have fixed dollar limits, most notably the
  $17,500 maximum for Teacher Loan Forgiveness (TLF).²
• Highest Recorded Individual Forgiveness: The largest publicly reported individual student loan discharge is $413,000, forgiven for a Washington Legal Director through the PSLF program.⁹ This case serves as a powerful example of the uncapped potential of service-based forgiveness, particularly for professionals who accumulate significant debt through graduate-level education.
• Largest Group Forgiveness Action: The single largest group discharge action to date was the cancellation of $6.1 billion in federal student loans for approximately 317,000 borrowers who attended The Art Institutes. This action was a direct consequence of a Department of Education finding that the institution engaged in widespread and substantial misrepresentations.⁴
• Total Forgiveness by Program (latest available data): The cumulative relief provided through the major discharge pathways is substantial and reflects significant recent policy shifts.

• Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF): $78.5 billion for over 1 million borrowers.⁹
• Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) Plans: $57.1 billion for 1.45 million borrowers.¹¹
• Borrower Defense & Related Settlements: $34.5 billion for nearly 2 million borrowers.¹¹
• Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) Discharge: $18.7 billion for over 630,000 borrowers.¹¹

The following table provides a high-level overview of the primary discharge pathways, serving as a foundational reference for the detailed analysis that follows.

Program Name	Maximum Forgiveness Potential	Core Eligibility Requirement	Typical Timeframe
Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF)	100% of remaining Direct Loan balance	120 qualifying payments while in qualifying public service employment	10+ years
Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) Forgiveness	100% of remaining balance	20-25 years of qualifying payments	20-25 years
Total & Permanent Disability (TPD) Discharge	100% of federal loan balance	Proof of a total and permanent disability	Varies; can be immediate with data matching
Borrower Defense to Repayment	100% of federal loan balance	Proof of school misconduct/fraud	Varies; can be years
Closed School Discharge	100% of federal loan balance	School closed while enrolled or shortly after withdrawal	Varies
Teacher Loan Forgiveness (TLF)	Up to $17,500	5 consecutive years teaching in a low-income school	5 years
Perkins Loan Cancellation	Up to 100% of Perkins Loan balance	Eligible employment or service (e.g., teaching, military)	Varies; typically over 5 years
Bankruptcy Discharge	Up to 100% of loan balance	Proof of “undue hardship” in an adversary proceeding	Varies with bankruptcy case

---

Part I: The Marathon Runners — Forgiveness Through Sustained Service & Repayment

This category of discharge vehicles is defined by long-term commitment.

Borrowers must complete a “marathon” of sustained payments or service, often lasting a decade or more, to reach the finish line of forgiveness.

These pathways are not designed for immediate relief but as a reward for sustained contributions to public service or consistent participation in the repayment system.

A. Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF): The 10-Year Ultra-Marathon

The Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program stands as one of the most powerful discharge mechanisms available, promising to forgive the entire remaining balance on a borrower’s Federal Direct Loans.

This relief is granted after a borrower makes 120 qualifying monthly payments—the equivalent of 10 years—while working full-time for a qualifying public service employer.³

The structure of PSLF is what makes its “maximum” potential theoretically unlimited.

By forgiving the entire outstanding balance without a specific dollar cap, the program’s value is directly proportional to the borrower’s debt.

This design inherently benefits individuals with high loan balances, a common situation for those who pursue graduate or professional degrees in fields like medicine, law, and academia before entering public service careers.⁹

The highest publicly reported individual discharge—

$413,000 for a legal director in Washington—is the ultimate testament to this principle, demonstrating how the program can erase a life-altering amount of debt for a dedicated public servant.⁹

Data Deep Dive: A Program Transformed

The history of PSLF is a tale of two vastly different eras.

For its first decade, the program was notoriously dysfunctional, plagued by complex rules and poor administration that led to abysmal approval rates.

As of April 2018, a staggering 99.72% of applications had been denied, with only 0.28% approved.¹⁶

By November 2020, the situation had only marginally improved, with the cumulative approval rate climbing to just 2.3%.¹⁷

Before the Biden-Harris administration initiated major reforms, a mere 7,000 public servants had ever received forgiveness through the program since its inception in 2007.¹⁸

This history of failure makes the program’s recent transformation all the more remarkable.

Through a series of administrative fixes, the program has delivered unprecedented relief.

As of early 2025, the administration has approved $78.5 billion in PSLF forgiveness for over 1 million borrowers.⁹

This dramatic increase has shifted the average discharge amount for an approved applicant to a substantial figure, reported to be between

$73,400 and $96,343.⁹

While these averages are significant, the existence of six-figure forgiveness cases, such as

$175,500 for a California high school teacher and the record $413,000 discharge, underscores the program’s profound impact on high-debt professionals.⁹

The Rules of the Road: Navigating the Obstacle Course

Achieving PSLF requires meticulous adherence to a strict set of rules, which historically served as tripwires for countless applicants.

• 120 Qualifying Payments: A borrower must make 120 separate monthly payments. These payments must be for the full amount due as shown on the bill and made no later than 15 days after the due date. Critically, these payments do not need to be consecutive, allowing for breaks in public service employment.⁹ All payments must be made on or after October 1, 2007, when the program began.⁹
• Qualifying Employment: The borrower must be employed full-time by a qualifying employer at the time each of the 120 payments is made and at the time of applying for forgiveness. Eligible employers include any U.S.-based government organization at the federal, state, local, or tribal level, as well as nonprofit organizations that are tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.²⁰
• Eligible Loans and Repayment Plans: This has been the most significant hurdle for many borrowers. Only Federal Direct Loans are eligible for PSLF. Borrowers with older loan types, such as those from the Federal Family Education Loan (FFEL) Program or Federal Perkins Loans, must first consolidate them into a Direct Consolidation Loan to become eligible for forgiveness. Furthermore, the 120 payments must be made under a qualifying repayment plan, which primarily includes all Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) plans and the 10-year Standard Repayment Plan.⁹

The Power of Administrative Simplification

The dramatic turnaround in PSLF’s performance was not the result of new legislation passed by Congress.

Instead, it was driven by administrative actions from the Department of Education that sought to remedy the program’s well-documented flaws.

The data from the program’s first decade clearly showed it was failing.

The labyrinthine rules regarding eligible loan types and repayment plans created a “PSLF cliff,” where thousands of public servants who believed they were on track for forgiveness were denied on technicalities after a decade of service.²²

The key interventions were the “Limited PSLF Waiver” and the subsequent “IDR Account Adjustment.” These were not new laws but temporary changes to the program’s regulations implemented by the executive branch.

These waivers relaxed the strict rules, allowing for the first time payments made on previously ineligible FFEL and Perkins loans to count toward the 120-payment requirement, provided the borrower consolidated into a Direct Loan.

They also gave credit for payments made under non-IDR plans that previously did not qualify.¹⁷

The results were immediate and profound.

The number of borrowers achieving forgiveness skyrocketed from just 7,000 to over 1 million, and the total dollar amount of relief grew from a few hundred million to over $78 billion.¹¹

This transformation reveals that the primary obstacle to PSLF’s success was not a flaw in its legislative intent but the crushing weight of

administrative friction.

The complex, unforgiving bureaucracy was the barrier.

The story of PSLF’s revival is a powerful case study in how simplifying administrative processes and correcting past errors can be as impactful, if not more so, than enacting entirely new legislation.

It demonstrates the immense power of the executive branch to effectuate policy change by reducing bureaucratic hurdles, thereby fulfilling the original promise of the law.

B. Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) Forgiveness: The 20/25-Year Endurance Race

Income-Driven Repayment (IDR) plans represent another marathon-style pathway to forgiveness.

Plans such as Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE), Pay As You Earn (PAYE), Income-Based Repayment (IBR), and Income-Contingent Repayment (ICR) are designed to provide borrowers with affordable monthly payments, typically capped at 10-20% of their discretionary income.¹⁵

The ultimate promise of these plans is that after a long period of sustained repayment—

20 years (240 months) for undergraduate loans or 25 years (300 months) for graduate loans—the entire remaining balance is forgiven.⁷

Similar to PSLF, this forgiveness is uncapped, meaning the maximum potential relief is determined by the borrower’s final loan balance after two decades or more of payments.

The Game-Changer: The One-Time IDR Account Adjustment

For most of their existence, IDR plans failed to deliver on their forgiveness promise.

Widespread issues with loan servicer practices and inaccurate payment tracking meant that very few borrowers ever reached the forgiveness finish line.

Acknowledging these deep-seated problems, the Department of Education implemented a landmark administrative fix known as the “one-time IDR account adjustment.” This was a comprehensive review of all borrower accounts to retroactively grant credit toward forgiveness for past periods that previously did not count.

This included:

• Any month a borrower was in a repayment status, regardless of the specific plan or whether a payment was made.
• Periods of forbearance of 12 or more consecutive months or 36 or more cumulative months, addressing the long-standing problem of servicers improperly steering borrowers into forbearance instead of more beneficial IDR plans.¹⁹
• Months spent in economic hardship or military deferments after 2013.

Data Deep Dive: Correcting a Decade of Errors

The impact of this one-time adjustment was monumental.

This single administrative action triggered the forgiveness of $51.7 billion for over 1 million borrowers, with later updates increasing the total to $57.1 billion for 1.45 million borrowers.¹¹

This stands in stark contrast to the program’s history; prior to this intervention, it was reported that only about

50 borrowers had ever received forgiveness through an IDR plan since their creation.¹⁸

This statistic alone highlights the profound, systemic failure of the programs to function as intended before the adjustment.

The automatic forgiveness was granted to any borrower whose newly adjusted payment count met the 240 or 300-month threshold.²⁵

Forgiveness as an Act of Systemic Correction

The IDR account adjustment was more than just a generous new benefit; it was a fundamental correction of past injustices within the student loan system.

For years, advocates and borrowers raised alarms about loan servicers engaging in “forbearance steering”—pushing struggling borrowers into forbearances that paused payments but allowed interest to capitalize, ballooning their debt while making zero progress toward forgiveness.²⁶

This practice was a direct violation of the spirit, and often the letter, of the regulations that required servicers to help borrowers access affordable repayment plans.

The Department of Education’s decision to retroactively credit these forbearance periods was an implicit but powerful acknowledgment of this systemic malpractice.

The action was a direct remedy for years of servicing errors that had financially harmed millions of borrowers and unfairly delayed their progress toward the forgiveness they were legally entitled to pursue.

Therefore, a significant portion of the billions in “forgiveness” granted through this adjustment is more accurately understood as a correction of the record.

It represents the relief that borrowers should have already received or been on track for, had the system functioned correctly.

This reframes the narrative from one of simple debt cancellation to one of administrative justice and accountability for the long-standing failures of the federal student loan servicing apparatus.

The Current Landscape: A Fragile Future

Despite this historic correction, the future of IDR forgiveness is now marked by uncertainty.

The SAVE plan, introduced as the most affordable and beneficial IDR option, has faced significant legal challenges.

In 2024 and 2025, federal court rulings blocked key provisions of the SAVE plan, declaring it an unlawful overreach of executive authority.²⁷

This has thrown the IDR system into a state of flux, pausing new enrollments in SAVE, halting the processing of some forgiveness applications, and forcing the Department of Education to direct borrowers back to older, often less generous plans like IBR and ICR.²⁷

This turmoil underscores the vulnerability of forgiveness pathways that rely on executive actions, which can be undone by judicial review or shifting political priorities.

C. The Sprinters: Teacher Loan Forgiveness (TLF) & Perkins Cancellation

While PSLF and IDR are marathons, some programs are designed as sprints, offering faster relief on a smaller scale.

• Teacher Loan Forgiveness (TLF): This program provides a fixed-dollar forgiveness amount after a much shorter service period. Highly qualified teachers in the fields of mathematics, science, or special education can receive up to $17,500 in forgiveness on their Direct and FFEL Program loans. Other qualified elementary and secondary teachers can receive up to $5,000. The core requirement is to teach full-time for five complete and consecutive academic years in a school or educational service agency that serves low-income families.² Data indicates that TLF has discharged a total of $3.87 billion for nearly 470,000 teachers since its inception, with an average individual discharge of about $8,497.¹⁷
• Perkins Loan Cancellation: The Federal Perkins Loan program was discontinued in 2017, so no new loans are being made. However, for borrowers who still hold these loans, a generous cancellation provision remains. It allows for up to 100% of the loan to be forgiven over a period of five years for service in certain professions, including teaching in a low-income school, special education, or a high-need subject area.¹

The Strategic Trade-off Between Speed and Scale

The existence of these overlapping programs creates a complex strategic dilemma for borrowers, particularly educators.

They are faced with a choice between the fast but limited relief of TLF and the slow but potentially unlimited relief of PSLF.

A teacher with a relatively low debt balance of $30,000 might find receiving $17,500 in forgiveness after just five years to be the most attractive option.

However, a teacher with a graduate degree and $90,000 in debt would be far better served financially by forgoing TLF and committing to the 10-year path for 100% forgiveness under PSLF.

The rules add another layer of complexity: a borrower cannot receive credit for both TLF and PSLF for the same period of teaching service.

This forces a strategic choice.

Furthermore, as noted in snippet ⁹, a borrower with both Perkins Loans and Direct Loans should pursue the faster, 100% cancellation on their Perkins Loans first, without consolidating them, as they can still pursue PSLF on their separate Direct Loans.

This ability to sequence benefits can significantly impact a borrower’s total forgiveness amount.

This reality underscores a critical point: the “maximum” forgiveness a borrower can achieve is not merely a function of program rules, but also of their own financial literacy and strategic planning.

The system, by its very design, places a significant burden on the individual borrower to navigate its complexities to achieve the optimal outcome.

---

Part II: The Emergency Exits — Discharge Due to Life-Altering Circumstances

Beyond forgiveness earned through service or long-term repayment, the system includes several “emergency exits.” These pathways are designed as critical safety nets, offering a complete discharge of debt for borrowers who experience unavoidable and severe personal crises that render them unable to repay their loans.

A. Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) Discharge: A Compassionate Release

The Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) discharge provision is a crucial component of the federal student loan safety Net. It provides for a 100% discharge of a borrower’s federal student loans (Direct, FFEL, and Perkins) and/or their Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education (TEACH) Grant service obligation.¹⁴

To be eligible, a borrower must be deemed unable to engage in any “substantial gainful activity” due to a medically determinable physical or mental impairment.⁷

The Process Revolution: From Burdensome Paperwork to Automation

For many years, the TPD application process was a significant barrier for the very people it was designed to help.

The administrative burden was immense, requiring borrowers who were already dealing with severe health issues to navigate complex paperwork and provide recurring documentation.

This flawed design had devastating consequences.

A 2016 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report found that an astonishing 98% of cases where a disability discharge was revoked and loans were reinstated occurred simply because borrowers failed to submit the required annual earnings documentation during a three-year monitoring period—not because their income actually exceeded the poverty guideline for a family of two.³²

The process itself, not the borrower’s improved condition, was the primary cause of failure.

Recognizing this systemic flaw, the Department of Education initiated a revolutionary policy shift: automation.

Instead of placing the entire burden on the disabled individual, the Department began proactively using data-matching agreements with the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).³¹

Through these agreements, the government could automatically identify borrowers who were already receiving disability benefits from the SSA or had a 100% service-connected disability rating from the VA and grant them a TPD discharge without requiring an application.

Data Deep Dive: The Impact of Automation

The effect of this shift to automation was immediate and profound.

The first major automatic discharge action, announced in August 2021, instantly erased $5.8 billion in debt for over 323,000 borrowers who had been identified through the SSA data match.³²

This single action provided more relief than had been granted in many previous years combined.

Cumulatively, the TPD program has been a significant source of relief.

An Office of Inspector General (OIG) report covering the period from fiscal years 2014 through 2018 showed that over 715,000 borrowers had received a total of $17.7 billion in principal discharge.³⁵

More recent data from the Biden administration shows a cumulative

$18.7 billion in TPD relief for over 630,000 borrowers.¹¹

The average discharge amount per borrower is approximately

$17,957.¹⁷

The Moral and Economic Case for Reducing Administrative Burden

The transformation of the TPD discharge process provides a powerful lesson in public policy.

The old system, which placed the onus of proof repeatedly on individuals who were, by definition, among the most vulnerable and least equipped to handle complex administrative requirements, was a clear policy failure.

The 98% paperwork-failure rate for reinstated loans is a stark indictment of a system that was inadvertently harming its target population.³²

The move to data-matching represents more than just a technical improvement; it is a fundamental philosophical shift in governance.

It moves the burden of action from the individual citizen to the government, which already possesses the necessary data to verify eligibility.

This change from a passive, application-based model to an active, data-driven one has profound implications.

The success of TPD automation demonstrates that government agencies can, and should, proactively use the information they hold to deliver benefits to which citizens are already legally entitled.

It is a powerful argument that simplifying access and reducing administrative friction is often the most effective, efficient, and compassionate form of policymaking, providing a model that could be replicated across a wide range of public benefit programs.

B. Bankruptcy Discharge: Navigating the “Undue Hardship” Gauntlet

Discharging federal student loans through bankruptcy is widely regarded as the most difficult path to relief.

Unlike most other forms of consumer debt, student loans are not automatically discharged in a standard bankruptcy proceeding.

To even attempt it, a borrower must take the extra step of filing a separate lawsuit within their bankruptcy case, known as an “adversary proceeding.” In this proceeding, they must affirmatively prove to a bankruptcy judge that repaying their student loans would impose an “undue hardship” on them and their dependents.²¹

Defining “Undue Hardship”: The Brunner Test

The term “undue hardship” is not defined in the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, a legislative omission that has led courts to create their own standards.

The vast majority of jurisdictions have adopted the notoriously stringent, three-pronged standard established in the 1987 case Brunner v.

New York State Higher Education Services.

To pass the Brunner Test, a borrower must prove all three of the following elements ³⁸:

1. Poverty: Based on their current income and reasonable expenses, the borrower cannot maintain a “minimal” standard of living for themselves and their dependents if forced to repay the loans.
2. Persistence: Additional circumstances exist indicating that this state of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion of the loan repayment period. This often requires showing a medical condition, disability, or other long-term barrier to increased income.
3. Good Faith: The borrower has made good-faith efforts to repay the loans before filing for bankruptcy. This can include making some payments, attempting to enroll in affordable repayment plans, or communicating with their loan servicer.

The need to satisfy all three prongs has made this an exceptionally high bar, with some courts interpreting the standard as requiring a “certainty of hopelessness”—a nearly impossible threshold for most borrowers to meet.³⁹

A Glimmer of Hope: The New Department of Justice (DOJ) Guidance

Recognizing the inconsistency and harshness of the existing system, the Department of Justice, in conjunction with the Department of Education, issued new guidance in November 2022 to standardize the process for evaluating undue hardship claims for federal student loans.²⁶

Under this new framework, a borrower who files for an adversary proceeding can submit a detailed attestation form directly to the government.

This form gathers specific information about the borrower’s income, expenses, and circumstances.

The DOJ then uses objective criteria, largely based on IRS national and local standards for allowable living expenses, to assess the borrower’s situation against the prongs of the Brunner test.

If the borrower’s attestation demonstrates that they meet the criteria for undue hardship, the DOJ is authorized to recommend a full or partial discharge to the bankruptcy judge, potentially avoiding a costly and contentious court battle.²⁶

A Shift from Adversarial Gatekeeping to Objective Evaluation

This new guidance represents a significant philosophical shift.

For decades, the government’s default position was to vigorously oppose nearly every attempt to discharge student loans in bankruptcy, treating each borrower as an adversary.

The process was costly for both sides and often resulted in outcomes that felt arbitrary and unjust.

The 2022 guidance is an attempt to fix this broken component of the system from within.

By creating a standardized, data-driven framework based on objective financial metrics, the government has signaled a move away from its historical role as a purely adversarial gatekeeper.

The new process is intended to lead to more consistent, predictable, and fair outcomes, acknowledging that the old approach was inefficient and often failed to provide relief to the truly destitute borrowers for whom the undue hardship exception was created.

While bankruptcy remains a difficult and last-resort option, this guidance represents a crucial step toward a more objective and humane evaluation process.

C. Other Exits: Discharge Due to Death and Forgery

The system includes two other, more straightforward “emergency exits” for specific, definitive circumstances.

• Discharge Due to Death: Federal student loans are fully discharged upon the death of the borrower. In the case of Parent PLUS loans, the loan is discharged upon the death of the parent borrower or the death of the student on whose behalf the loan was taken. The discharge is processed upon receipt of an acceptable proof of death, such as an original or certified copy of the death certificate.¹⁴
• Forgery Discharge: A borrower may be eligible for a discharge of their federal student loans if they can prove that their signature on the loan documents was forged or that they were a victim of identity theft, and a loan was taken out in their name fraudulently.¹

---

Part III: The Justice Fleet — Restitution for Institutional Malpractice

The final category of discharge vehicles, the “Justice Fleet,” operates on a completely different principle from the others.

Relief under these programs is not granted based on the borrower’s service, repayment history, or personal hardship.

Instead, it is a form of restitution delivered to borrowers who were harmed by the illegal, fraudulent, and predatory actions of their educational institutions.

These programs are responsible for the largest and most dramatic loan discharge actions in U.S. history.

A. Borrower Defense to Repayment (BDR): The Anti-Fraud Warship

The Borrower Defense to Repayment (BDR) provision is the federal government’s most powerful tool for holding fraudulent schools accountable and providing relief to their victims.

The program allows for a 100% discharge of a borrower’s federal student loans if their school engaged in certain types of misconduct that caused them harm.

Under the current regulations, this includes actions like “substantial misrepresentation” regarding critical information that influenced a student’s decision to enroll, such as job placement rates, potential graduate salaries, program costs, or the transferability of academic credits.⁸

The Group Discharge Phenomenon

While individual borrowers can apply for BDR, its most potent application is the “group discharge.” When the Department of Education uncovers evidence of widespread and pervasive misconduct at an institution, it has the authority to forgive the loans of an entire cohort of affected students—even those who never submitted an individual application.⁴

This mechanism allows the Department to provide relief on a massive scale, bypassing the need for thousands of individual adjudications.

Data Deep Dive: Forgiveness on an Unprecedented Scale

The use of group discharges against predatory for-profit colleges has resulted in forgiveness on a scale previously unimaginable.

The total relief provided through BDR and related court settlements under the Biden-Harris administration is staggering, with cumulative figures reported between $28.7 billion and $34.5 billion for well over 1.6 million borrowers.¹¹

A GAO report from April 2024 provided a snapshot of this effort, confirming

$17.2 billion in relief for nearly one million borrowers at that point in time.⁴²

These numbers dwarf the relief provided by almost any other discharge program and speak to the massive scale of the fraud perpetrated by the for-profit college industry.

The following table details some of the most significant group discharge actions, providing concrete evidence of the federal response to institutional fraud.

School Name	Total Relief Amount ($)	# of Borrowers	Misconduct Allegations
The Art Institutes	$6.1 Billion	~317,000	Pervasive misrepresentations of job placement rates and graduate salaries 4
Corinthian Colleges	$5.8 Billion	~560,000	Widespread fraud, false advertising of job prospects and career services 5
ITT Technical Institute	$3.9 Billion	~208,000	Widespread misrepresentations about job guarantees and credit transferability 4
Ashford University	$4.5 Billion	~261,000	Misrepresentations about program costs, licensure, and time to degree 4
Westwood College	$1.5 Billion	~79,000	Misrepresentations about graduates’ employment prospects 4
Sweet v. Cardona Settlement	$6+ Billion	~264,000	Claims against ~150 predatory, mostly for-profit schools for various forms of fraud 13
DeVry University	$71.7 Million	~1,800	Substantial misrepresentations about graduates’ job placement rates 13

Forgiveness as a Regulatory Hammer and a Market Correction

The Borrower Defense program is unique among discharge pathways.

Its focus is not on the borrower’s actions or circumstances, but entirely on the illegal conduct of a third party: the school.

In this context, the massive group discharges serve a dual function.

First, they are a regulatory hammer—the government’s ultimate enforcement action against institutions that have engaged in systemic fraud.

When other forms of oversight and accreditation have failed, BDR provides a mechanism to deliver a final, decisive judgment and provide relief to victims.

Second, these discharges represent a massive market correction.

The federal government, through its role as the primary lender in American higher education, effectively underwrote the for-profit college industry by providing billions in taxpayer-funded student loans.

When investigations conclusively proved that the “product” being sold—an education that would lead to gainful employment—was based on fraudulent claims, the government was forced to acknowledge that its investment was worthless.

The BDR discharges are, in economic terms, the government writing off these bad investments.

This process is an acknowledgment of, and an attempt to absorb the financial consequences of, its own failure to adequately regulate a predatory sector of the higher education market.

In-Depth Case Study 1: The Art Institutes ($6.1 Billion Discharge)

The case of The Art Institutes (AI) and its parent company, Education Management Corporation (EDMC), is a textbook example of systemic fraud.

From at least 2004 to 2017, AI engaged in what the Department of Education termed “pervasive and substantial misrepresentations”.¹⁰

The school’s entire recruitment model was built on a foundation of lies.

• The Fraud: AI aggressively advertised job placement rates of over 80%. However, internal records, uncovered through investigations by the attorneys general of Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and Iowa, revealed the true, recalculated rate was no higher than 57%. The school achieved its inflated numbers by counting graduates as “employed in-field” even when their job was unrelated to their degree, or when their job title was unknown. They also systematically falsified graduate salary data. In one of the most egregious examples, a former employee testified that one campus included the annual income of tennis superstar Serena Williams in its salary calculations to “skew the statistics and overinflate potential program salaries”.¹⁰
• The Result: Based on this overwhelming evidence, the Department of Education announced an automatic, 100% discharge of $6.1 billion in federal loans for nearly 317,000 borrowers who attended any AI campus between January 1, 2004, and October 16, 2017.⁴

In-Depth Case Study 2: Corinthian Colleges ($5.8 Billion Discharge)

The collapse of Corinthian Colleges, which operated the Everest, Heald, and WyoTech chains, was a watershed moment that brought the issue of for-profit college fraud into the national spotlight.

• The Fraud: Corinthian was infamous for its high-pressure recruitment tactics and for luring students, many from low-income backgrounds, with false promises of high-paying jobs and robust career services. The reality was that students were left with unpayable debt, worthless degrees, and credits that could not be transferred to legitimate institutions.⁵ Investigations found that the company had systematically misrepresented its job placement rates to both students and accrediting agencies.
• The Result: After years of legal battles and activism, the Department of Education announced in June 2022 an automatic 100% discharge of $5.8 billion for all 560,000 borrowers who had ever attended a Corinthian-owned school from its founding to its collapse.⁵ This case was pivotal not only for its size but also because it was the activism of a small group of former students, known as the “Corinthian 15,” who went on a debt strike and invoked the then-obscure Borrower Defense provision, that forced the issue onto the national stage.⁵

The Sweet v. Cardona Settlement

This landmark class-action lawsuit was another critical development in the fight for borrower defense.

The suit was filed on behalf of borrowers whose BDR applications had languished for years without a decision.

The resulting settlement, approved in 2022, provided at least $6 billion in automatic, full relief—including loan discharge, refunds of payments made, and credit repair—for approximately 264,000 borrowers who had filed claims against a list of roughly 150 predatory, mostly for-profit schools, including many of the largest and most notorious chains.¹³

The settlement was instrumental in forcing the Department to clear its massive backlog of BDR claims and established a powerful precedent for granting group-wide relief.

B. Closed School Discharge: The Lifeboat

The Closed School Discharge program serves as a direct consumer protection measure for students whose education is abruptly cut short.

This pathway provides for a 100% discharge of a borrower’s federal student loans if their school closes while they are enrolled, or if they withdraw within 180 days of the closure, making it impossible for them to complete their program.¹⁴

This pathway is often intertwined with Borrower Defense, as many of the most fraudulent for-profit institutions, such as Corinthian and ITT Technical Institute, ultimately collapsed under the weight of their own misconduct, legal challenges, and loss of access to federal funding.

Data shows that $1.8 billion has been automatically discharged for 148,300 borrowers through this provision, providing a critical lifeboat for students left stranded by their school’s failure.¹⁷

---

Conclusion: A New Map for a Complex Territory

The initial quest for a single, definitive “maximum” student loan discharge amount is ultimately a flawed one.

The analysis reveals that no such number exists.

Instead, the maximum potential for relief is a dynamic variable, entirely dependent on the specific “Discharge Vehicle” for which a borrower qualifies.

The U.S. student loan discharge system is not a monolith but a fragmented landscape of distinct pathways, each with its own purpose, rules, and capacity.

This report’s central analogy provides a clear map for this complex territory.

The Marathon Runners—PSLF and IDR forgiveness—offer the potential for unlimited, 100% discharge, but only after a decade or more of sustained commitment.

The maximum capacity of a PSLF “cargo plane” can exceed $400,000 for a high-debt professional, while an IDR plan requires a 20 or 25-year journey to the finish line.

In contrast, the Emergency Exits—TPD and Bankruptcy—provide a complete release from debt for those facing catastrophic life circumstances.

A TPD “ambulance” offers a compassionate and increasingly automated exit, while the Bankruptcy pathway remains a difficult gauntlet to navigate.

Finally, the Justice Fleet—led by Borrower Defense—is capable of delivering restitution on an immense scale.

A BDR “armored convoy” can deliver billions of dollars in group relief to hundreds of thousands of victims of institutional fraud, representing the largest discharge actions in history.

Meanwhile, smaller, targeted “sprinter” vehicles like Teacher Loan Forgiveness offer a more modest but much faster form of relief, capped at $17,500.

Ultimately, understanding the maximum potential for student loan discharge requires a systemic view.

It is an outcome shaped by a complex interplay of public policy, administrative execution, individual circumstance, long-term personal commitment, and, increasingly, the accountability demanded of educational institutions.

The true value of this analysis is not a single, simple number, but a new, structured map for navigating this critically important and ever-evolving territory.

Works cited

1. Student Loan Forgiveness – Federal Student Aid, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation
2. Teacher Loan Forgiveness – Federal Student Aid, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/teacher
3. Frequently Asked Questions on Public Service Loan Forgiveness | NEA, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.nea.org/your-rights-workplace/student-debt-support/faqs
4. Borrower Defense Updates – Federal Student Aid, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/announcements-events/borrower-defense-update
5. Justice—and relief—for defrauded Corinthian students | American Federation of Teachers, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.aft.org/news/justice-and-relief-defrauded-corinthian-students
6. Art Institutes Students Secure Big Borrower Defense Win with $6.1 Billion Group Discharge, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.ppsl.org/news/art-institutes-students-secure-big-borrower-defense-win-with-61-billion-group-dischargenbsp
7. Student Loan Forgiveness (and Other Ways the Government Can Help You Repay Your Loans) – Federal Student Aid, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/articles/student-loan-forgiveness/
8. Borrower Defense Loan Discharge | Federal Student Aid, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/borrower-defense
9. Public Service Loan Forgiveness: What It Is, How It Works – NerdWallet, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/loans/student-loans/public-service-loan-forgiveness
10. 1 The Art Institutes Borrower Defense Executive Summary The U.S. …, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/sites/default/files/art-institutes-executive-summary.pdf
11. Biden’s Grand Plans to Cancel Student Debt Fell Apart — but Millions Still Benefited – Money, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://money.com/student-loan-forgiveness-what-biden-accomplished/
12. Biden Administration Announces ‘Final’ Student Loan Debt Relief Approvals – nasfaa, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.nasfaa.org/news-item/35444/Biden_Administration_Announces_Final_Student_Loan_Debt_Relief_Approvals
13. How Borrower Defense to Repayment Works – NerdWallet, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/loans/student-loans/borrower-defense-repayment
14. Loan Forgiveness and Discharge Programs, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.mohela.com/DL/RESOURCECENTER/LOANFORGIVENESSDISCHARGE.ASPX
15. A Snapshot of Federal Student Loan Debt – Congress.gov, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF10158
16. Student Loan Debt Statistics [2025]: Average + Total Debt – Education Data Initiative, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://educationdata.org/student-loan-debt-statistics
17. Student Loan Forgiveness Statistics [2024]: PSLF Data – Education Data Initiative, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://educationdata.org/student-loan-forgiveness-statistics
18. Tracker: Student Loan Debt Relief Under the Biden-Harris …, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.americanprogress.org/article/tracker-student-loan-debt-relief-under-the-biden-harris-administration/
19. Student loan forgiveness – Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.consumerfinance.gov/paying-for-college/student-loan-forgiveness/
20. Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) – Federal Student Aid, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/public-service
21. Available Student Loan Forgiveness Programs – Bankrate, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/loans/student-loans/qualify-for-student-loan-forgiveness-programs/
22. Issue Paper #4: Improving the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Application Process – Department of Education, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.ed.gov/media/document/issue-paper-4-improving-public-service-loan-forgiveness-pslf-application-process-october-4-8-2021-58718.pdf
23. The Complete List of Student Loan Forgiveness Programs [2025] – Credible, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.credible.com/refinance-student-loans/student-loan-forgiveness-programs
24. Who owes all that student debt? And who’d benefit if it were forgiven? – Brookings Institution, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/who-owes-all-that-student-debt-and-whod-benefit-if-it-were-forgiven/
25. Payment Count Adjustments Toward Income-Driven Repayment and Public Service Loan Forgiveness Programs | Federal Student Aid, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/announcements-events/idr-account-adjustment
26. Undue Hardship Discharge of Title IV Loans in Bankruptcy Adversary Proceedings (Updated August 5, 2024) | Knowledge Center – FSA Partner Connect, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://fsapartners.ed.gov/knowledge-center/library/dear-colleague-letters/2023-10-19/undue-hardship-discharge-title-iv-loans-bankruptcy-adversary-proceedings-updated-august-5-2024
27. U.S. Department of Education Continues to Improve Federal Student Loan Repayment Options, Addresses Illegal Biden Administration Actions, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.ed.gov/about/news/press-release/us-department-of-education-continues-improve-federal-student-loan-repayment-options-addresses-illegal-biden-administration-actions
28. Student loan forgiveness in the IBR plan is paused, Education Department says. Here’s what to know. – CBS News, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/student-loan-forgiveness-ibr-debt-payments-education-department-cbs-news-explains/
29. IDR Forgiveness Payment Count Data Available – VIN Foundation, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://vinfoundation.org/idr-forgiveness-payment-count-data-available/
30. FAQs – Loan Discharge and Forgiveness – Nelnet – Federal Student Aid, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://nelnet.studentaid.gov/content/faq/faqdischargeforgivenesscancellation
31. Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) Discharge Application – Federal Student Aid, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/tpd-discharge
32. Automatic Discharges Announced for Student Loans – Empire Justice Center, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://empirejustice.org/resources_post/automatic-discharges-announced-for-student-loans/
33. Total and Permanent Disability Discharge | Federal Student Aid, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/disability-discharge
34. New Automatic Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) Discharge Process, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/announcements-events/automatic-disability-discharge
35. Federal Student Aid’s Total and Permanent Disability Discharge Process – Home | U.S. Department of Education OIG, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://oig.ed.gov/sites/default/files/reports/2024-03/A02Q0006TPDFINAL.pdf
36. Discharge in Bankruptcy | Federal Student Aid, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/manage-loans/forgiveness-cancellation/bankruptcy
37. Bankruptcy – Student Loan Borrowers Assistance, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentloanborrowerassistance.org/for-borrowers/dealing-with-student-loan-debt/loan-cancellation-forgiveness-bankruptcy/bankruptcy/
38. Undue Hardship & Student Loans: A Guide to Bankruptcy Discharge | Lewis Roberts, PA, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://lrlawoffice.com/the-undue-hardship-standard-proving-your-case-for-student-loan-discharge/
39. Time for a Fresh Look at the “Undue Hardship” Bankruptcy Standard for Student Debtors | Iowa Law Review, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/sites/ilr.law.uiowa.edu/files/2022-10/Time%20for%20a%20Fresh%20Look%20at%20the%20%E2%80%9CUndue%20Hardship%E2%80%9D%20Bankruptcy%20Standard%20for%20Student%20Debtors.pdf
40. Clarifying ‘Undue Hardship’: Discharge Remains Possible, but Not Easy – Duane Morris, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.duanemorris.com/articles/clarifying_undue_hardship_discharge_remains_possible_but_not_easy_1222.html
41. Borrower Defense to Repayment, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentloanborrowerassistance.org/for-borrowers/dealing-with-student-loan-debt/loan-cancellation-forgiveness-bankruptcy/cancellation-forgiveness-options/borrower-defense-to-repayment/
42. Department of Education: Student Loan Relief in Cases of College …, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-106530
43. How Borrower Defense to Repayment Works – SoFi, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.sofi.com/learn/content/how-borrower-defense-to-repayment-works/
44. Corinthian Colleges students to get federal student debt erased | fox61.com, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.fox61.com/article/news/nation-world/corinthian-colleges-federal-student-debt-erased/507-2de3d4de-1c84-4cfa-8209-31173ed7e3b4
45. Are The Art Institutes Loans Being Forgiven? – SoFi, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.sofi.com/learn/content/art-institute-loan-forgiveness/
46. Former Art Institute Students Receive $6.1 Billion in Loan Forgiveness, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.collegeaidservices.net/2024/05/02/former-art-institute-students-receive-6-1-billion-in-loan-forgiveness/
47. Education Dept Discharges Student Loans for Victims of Alleged Art Institutes Deceit, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.stateagreport.com/news/education-dept-discharges-student-loans-for-victims-of-alleged-art-institutes-deceit/
48. Frequently Asked Questions About Corinthian Colleges – Federal Student Aid, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://studentaid.gov/announcements-events/corinthian/faq
49. 16000 Washingtonians will receive nearly $158 million in federal student loan discharges, accessed on August 8, 2025, https://www.atg.wa.gov/news/news-releases/16000-washingtonians-will-receive-nearly-158-million-federal-student-loan