The Common Application: An In-Depth Analysis of its Role and Impact on U.S. Higher Education Admissions

The Common Application: An Institutional Profile

The Common Application is far more than a website or a digital form; it is a central, organizing force in the landscape of American higher education admissions.

To understand its function is to understand the structure of The Common Application, Inc., a non-profit, member-based organization driven by a specific mission, a distinct governance model, and a nearly 50-year history that has seen it evolve from a niche convenience into a dominant industry platform.

This institutional identity is fundamental to its operations, its strategic decisions, and its profound influence on the students and universities it serves.

Mission, Governance, and History

The foundational purpose of the Common Application is articulated in its mission to promote access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process.

This mission statement positions the organization not as a neutral technology vendor but as an active participant with a normative vision for higher education.

The organization’s history began in 1975, when a consortium of 15 private colleges sought to simplify their application procedures.

Inspired by the efficiency of the photocopier, they created a standardized paper form that students could complete once and send to multiple institutions.

This simple act of streamlining a repetitive process laid the groundwork for a revolutionary shift in admissions.

The platform moved online in the late 1990s and was formally incorporated as a non-profit public charity in 2000, cementing its mission-driven identity.

This non-profit structure is reinforced by a unique governance model.

Headquartered in Arlington, Virginia, The Common Application, Inc. is managed by a professional staff under a President & CEO, a position held by Jenny Rickard since 2016.

Crucially, oversight is provided by an 18-member volunteer Board of Directors.

This board is deliberately composed of professionals from both sides of the admissions process: college admission deans from member institutions and college counselors from secondary schools, alongside at-large experts from outside the immediate field.

This structure creates a direct feedback loop between the platform’s operators and its primary user communities.

It ensures that the organization’s strategic direction is grounded in the practical realities and ethical considerations of college admissions, rather than being driven solely by technological or commercial imperatives.

This governance likely acts as a stabilizing force, leading to an evolutionary, rather than revolutionary, approach to changes in the application, which are often based on extensive feedback from the educational community.

Under its current leadership, the organization has pursued its mission with increasing vigor, undertaking strategic initiatives that expand its role beyond application processing.

A landmark move was the acquisition of Reach Higher, the college access and success campaign initiated by former First Lady Michelle Obama.

This action signaled a clear intent to become a more proactive force in encouraging and supporting students on their path to college, particularly those from underrepresented backgrounds.

As the organization marks its 50th anniversary, its history reflects a consistent trajectory from a simple tool of convenience to a complex ecosystem aimed at shaping the future of educational opportunity.

The Common App Ecosystem: Scope and Scale

The influence of the Common App is most clearly understood through the sheer scale of its operations.

The platform serves as the primary application portal for a vast and diverse network of over 1,000 member colleges and universities.

Each year, more than one million students use the platform to submit their applications.

The geographic reach of this network is extensive, encompassing institutions in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, as well as a growing number of universities in Canada, China, Japan, and various European nations.

The institutional diversity of the membership is a testament to the platform’s widespread adoption across the spectrum of higher education.

The network includes over 250 public universities, 12 historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs), and a varied list of private, large, small, engineering, and liberal arts schools.

This includes nearly all of the nation’s most selective institutions, such as all eight Ivy League universities, Stanford, Duke, and the University of Chicago.

The platform is also a critical tool for promoting affordability; over 400 of its member institutions do not charge an application fee, a fact that is easily searchable within the platform’s tools.

Membership in the Common App comes with specific requirements that standardize the admissions landscape.

As a condition of joining, any member institution that also maintains its own separate, proprietary application is required to give equal and impartial consideration to applications submitted via the Common App. This policy prevents institutions from disadvantaging students who choose the streamlined platform.

Further cementing its central role, approximately one-third of all member institutions are “exclusive users,” meaning the Common App is the only application they accept, making it an indispensable tool for any student considering those schools.

This broad adoption and deep integration into institutional processes create a powerful network effect; as more schools join, the platform becomes more essential for students, which in turn incentivizes even more schools to join.

This dynamic places the organization in a unique position, operating with the public-service mission of a non-profit while wielding the market influence of a near-monopoly.

This tension between its mission of access and its dominant market position shapes many of the platform’s benefits and challenges.

The Applicant’s Journey: A Practical Guide

For a prospective college student, the Common Application is the primary interface for one of the most significant processes of their academic lives.

Navigating the platform effectively requires both a practical understanding of its components and a strategic approach to building a compelling personal narrative.

The application, which typically goes live for the new cycle on August 1st each year, is structured to gather information in a logical sequence, moving from objective data to subjective, personal expression.

Account Creation and Core Components

The journey begins at the Common App’s official website, commonapp.org, where a student creates a free account.

During this initial step, the applicant must specify their type, such as a “first-year student” or “transfer student,” which tailors the application to their needs.

A valuable feature is the ability for account information to be rolled over from one year to the next, allowing students to familiarize themselves with the platform and even begin filling out core sections well before their senior year.

Once inside the platform, the applicant’s work is centered around two main tabs: the “Common App” tab and the “My Colleges” tab.

The “Common App” tab contains the standardized information that will be sent to every college the student applies to.

It is divided into seven primary sections :

• Profile: This section collects fundamental personal data. It includes subsections for Personal Information (name, birthdate), Address, Contact Details, Demographics (gender, race, ethnicity), Language, and Geography and Nationality. It also contains the Common App Fee Waiver section, a critical component for students facing financial barriers.
• Family: Here, applicants provide information about their household structure and details about their parents’ or guardians’ educational backgrounds and occupations. This information is not used to make admissions decisions directly but provides crucial context for admissions officers to understand an applicant’s home environment and potential access to resources.
• Education: This is a comprehensive record of the applicant’s academic history. It requires information on all high schools attended, graduation date, GPA and class rank (if available), a list of current year courses, and details of any college-level courses taken during high school.
• Testing: In this section, students self-report scores from standardized tests such as the SAT and ACT. They can also indicate future test dates. While many colleges have become test-optional, this section remains the designated place to share scores for those who choose to do so.

Showcasing Experience: Activities and Grades

Beyond demographics and academics, the application provides structured spaces for students to showcase their experiences and commitments.

• The Activities Section: This is one of the most strategically important parts of the application, offering a snapshot of a student’s life outside of the classroom. Applicants can list and describe up to 10 extracurricular activities. These can range from traditional pursuits like sports, clubs, and volunteer work to part-time jobs and significant family responsibilities. For each entry, the platform imposes strict character limits that demand conciseness and careful word choice:

• Position/Leadership description: 50 characters
• Organization name: 100 characters
• Activity details, honors, and accomplishments: 150 characters
  The platform also requires students to report their time commitment in hours per week and weeks per year. Students are generally advised to list their activities in order of personal importance, not chronologically. The constraints of this section force applicants to think critically about how to best summarize their contributions, turning a simple list into a powerful narrative tool.
• The Courses & Grades Section: This section is not required by all member colleges; a list of participating institutions is available on the Common App website. For those that do require it, students must manually enter every course from their official high school transcript, along with the grade received for each. While laborious, this process allows admissions offices to begin their academic review more quickly, as they do not have to wait for official transcripts to be processed.

The Narrative Component: Essays

The writing portions of the Common App are where applicants can move beyond data points and share their voice, personality, and perspective.

• The Personal Essay: This is the centerpiece of the application’s narrative component. Most member colleges require this essay, which has a word limit of 650 words. Applicants must choose one of seven prompts, which are designed to be broad and inclusive, encouraging reflection on a wide range of topics. The final prompt is consistently a “topic of your choice,” which gives students complete freedom to write an essay they have already crafted or to design their own question.

Prompt Number	2024-2025 Common App Personal Essay Prompt
1	Some students have a background, identity, interest, or talent that is so meaningful they believe their application would be incomplete without it. If this sounds like you, then please share your story.
2	The lessons we take from obstacles we encounter can be fundamental to later success. Recount a time when you faced a challenge, setback, or failure. How did it affect you, and what did you learn from the experience?
3	Reflect on a time when you questioned or challenged a belief or idea. What prompted your thinking? What was the outcome?
4	Reflect on something that someone has done for you that has made you happy or thankful in a surprising way. How has this gratitude affected or motivated you?
5	Discuss an accomplishment, event, or realization that sparked a period of personal growth and a new understanding of yourself or others.
6	Describe a topic, idea, or concept you find so engaging that it makes you lose all track of time. Why does it captivate you? What or who do you turn to when you want to learn more?
7	Share an essay on any topic of your choice. It can be one you’ve already written, one that responds to a different prompt, or one of your own design.

• College-Specific Supplemental Essays: While the “Common App” tab provides efficiency, the “My Colleges” tab is where the application process becomes truly individualized. After adding a college to their list, an applicant will see a subsection for that school appear under this tab. Here, institutions ask their own specific questions and often require additional writing supplements. These can range from short 50-word responses to additional 650-word essays. These supplements are a college’s primary tool for gauging an applicant’s specific interest and fit for their unique community. The workload required to complete these supplements thoughtfully is often what distinguishes a serious, well-researched applicant from one who is simply adding another school to their list.

Finalizing the Application: Recommendations, Fees, and Submission

The final stage of the process involves coordinating materials from others and managing the logistics of submission.

• Managing Recommendations: The Common App provides a streamlined portal for recommenders. Applicants invite their school counselor and teachers by entering their names and email addresses into the platform. These recommenders then receive an automated email with a link to create their own secure account, from which they can complete required forms (like the School Report) and upload their letters of recommendation. This “one-and-done” process means a teacher only has to upload their letter once, and it can then be sent to all the colleges the student designates. The student’s dashboard provides a way to track whether these materials have been submitted, offering peace of mind during a stressful period.
• Fee Waivers: Acknowledging that application fees (which typically range from $30 to $75) can be a significant barrier, the Common App has a fully integrated fee waiver system. In the “Profile” section, a student can request a fee waiver if they meet at least one of eight indicators of economic need. These criteria include eligibility for the Federal Free or Reduced Price Lunch program, having received an SAT or ACT fee waiver, or residing in federally subsidized housing. The request must be verified by the student’s school counselor. Colleges do not view a fee waiver request negatively; it is seen as a necessary tool to ensure equitable access.
• Submission and Tracking: The application dashboard serves as the applicant’s command center. It provides a comprehensive overview of all colleges on their list, their respective deadlines, and the completion status of each required component, often visualized with green checkmarks. After thoroughly previewing the application, the student can pay any required fees and submit. A critical point is that once an application is submitted to a particular college, that version is final and cannot be altered. If a student later discovers an error, they must contact that college’s admissions office directly to provide a correction.

Market Analysis and Competitive Landscape

While the Common Application is the most prominent platform in undergraduate admissions, its dominance is not absolute.

The market for college applications is a dynamic ecosystem populated by several key competitors, each with a distinct philosophy, geographic focus, or set of features.

The choice of which platform a college uses—or that a student must use—is often a strategic decision that reflects institutional values and priorities.

Understanding this competitive landscape is essential to grasping the Common App’s role and the complex reality faced by many applicants.

The Common App vs. The Coalition for College

The most significant national competitor to the Common App is the Coalition for College Application (often called the Coalition App).

Founded in 2015 by a group of over 80 colleges and universities, the Coalition was created with a specific mission that distinguishes it from the Common App’s more universalist approach.

• Philosophical Divide and Membership: The core difference lies in their philosophies. The Common App aims to provide a universal, streamlined platform for a vast and diverse membership. The Coalition for College, by contrast, is an advocacy organization whose application platform is a tool to advance its mission of promoting access, affordability, and success, particularly for students from underrepresented and lower-resourced backgrounds. This ideological commitment is enforced through strict membership criteria. To join the Coalition, an institution must demonstrate a strong commitment to providing substantial financial aid, achieving high graduation rates for all students, and graduating students with low debt. As a result, the Coalition has a much smaller, more curated membership of approximately 150-170 institutions, compared to the Common App’s 1,000+. While there is significant overlap (all eight Ivy League schools, for instance, accept both), the choice to join the Coalition is a public statement by a college about its commitment to these specific access-oriented values.
• Feature Comparison: The two platforms also differ in key features:

• Early Engagement Tools: The Coalition App’s most distinctive feature is the “Locker,” a private digital space where students can begin collecting and curating potential application materials—such as essays, artwork, or research projects—as early as the 9th grade. This encourages a long-term, portfolio-based approach to application preparation, aligning with the Coalition’s goal of fostering early college planning.
• Application Limits: The Common App imposes a limit of 20 applications per student per cycle. The Coalition App has no such limit, offering unrestricted use for students applying to a large number of its member schools.
• Activities List: The platforms take a different approach to presenting extracurriculars. The Common App allows for up to 10 activities with very brief descriptions, while the Coalition App permits only 8 but provides more character space for detailed explanations.

Regional and System-Specific Platforms

Beyond the two national platforms, several powerful regional and system-specific applications serve distinct student populations, creating a fragmented landscape that many applicants must navigate.

• ApplyTexas: This platform is a centralized application system for the state of Texas. It allows students to apply to any public two-year or four-year institution in the state, as well as many private Texas colleges, using a single application. Launched in 2003, it is an essential tool for any student focused on Texas institutions. It features its own set of essay prompts and a user interface tailored to the requirements of Texas public universities. While many Texas schools now also accept the Common App or Coalition App to attract out-of-state applicants, some, including major flagships, may require or prefer ApplyTexas, making it indispensable for in-state students.
• University of California (UC) Application: The University of California system, one of the largest and most prestigious public university systems in the world, operates its own entirely separate, proprietary application. No UC campus—including UCLA, UC Berkeley, and UC San Diego—accepts the Common App or Coalition App. The UC Application is unique in its writing requirements, eschewing a single personal statement for four mandatory “Personal Insight Questions” (PIQs). Applicants must choose four prompts from a list of eight and respond to each in a maximum of 350 words. The philosophy behind the PIQs is distinct; they are designed to be more direct and less creative or narrative-driven than a traditional essay, functioning more like short-answer interview questions that allow an applicant to showcase different facets of their life and experiences across multiple responses.

The Unaffiliated: Proprietary Applications

Finally, a small but influential group of institutions deliberately forgoes membership in any common platform, requiring all applicants to use their own unique, proprietary application.

Prominent examples include the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Georgetown University.

The rationale for this strategic independence is rooted in institutional identity.

By maintaining their own application, these universities retain complete control over the questions asked, the information collected, and the overall narrative framing of the application process.

This allows them to create an experience that is deeply tailored to their specific culture, values, and educational mission.

This approach also functions as an inherent filter for applicant interest; a student who is willing to invest the significant extra time and effort required to complete a separate, non-standard application is demonstrating a higher level of commitment and seriousness about that particular institution.

The existence of these diverse platforms reveals that the promise of a single, unified application process remains elusive for many students.

An ambitious applicant with a geographically or institutionally diverse college list may find themselves needing to master the intricacies of three or four separate systems.

This reality reintroduces a significant “administrative burden,” a term from public policy describing the learning, compliance, and psychological costs individuals face when interacting with complex systems.

For students without access to experienced college counselors, this multi-platform landscape can be daunting, ironically undermining the goal of simplification for the very students who stand to benefit most.

Feature	Common Application	Coalition for College Application	University of California (UC) Application	ApplyTexas
Core Philosophy	Universal access and process simplification for a broad member base.	Focused on access, affordability, and success for underrepresented students.	Standardized application for a single, selective public university system.	Centralized application for public and private institutions within Texas.
Approx. Member Count	1,000+	~150-170	9 undergraduate campuses	50+ public and private universities; all public community colleges
Geographic Scope	Global (All 50 U.S. states and 20+ countries)	United States only	California only	Texas only
Application Limit	20 institutions per cycle	No limit	9 campuses (all within one application)	No limit
Key Essay Format	1 essay (max 650 words) from 7 prompts.	1 essay (500-650 words recommended) from 6 prompts.	4 Personal Insight Questions (max 350 words each) from 8 prompts.	1-3 essays (max 800 words) from 3 prompts, requirements vary by school.
Unique Features	Most widely accepted platform; largest member network.	“Locker” for early portfolio building (from 9th grade); strict member criteria for affordability.	System-wide application; PIQ format emphasizes direct responses over narrative.	Specific to Texas institutions; integrated scholarship applications for some members.

Impact Analysis: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective

The widespread adoption of the Common Application has fundamentally reshaped the college admissions landscape, creating a complex web of intended and unintended consequences for all major stakeholders.

While its primary goal of simplifying the application process has been achieved, this very success has triggered a cascade of second-order effects, altering student behavior, institutional strategies, and the very nature of competition in higher education.

For Students: Efficiency vs. Anxiety

For students, the most significant advantage of the Common App is the dramatic gain in efficiency.

The platform eliminates the tedious, repetitive task of filling out the same core information—name, address, parental information, high school courses, and activities—for every single college.

This “enter-once, use-many” model saves countless hours during an already stressful senior year.

The centralized dashboard, which tracks deadlines and the submission status of recommendations and other documents, provides an invaluable organizational tool that helps students stay on top of a complex process.

However, this convenience is a double-edged sword.

The ease with which a student can add another college to their list has fueled a phenomenon known as “shotgunning”—applying to a large number of schools, often without deep consideration of fit, simply to maximize chances of acceptance.

This behavior has led to a massive increase in the total number of applications colleges receive, which in turn drives down admission rates and makes the process appear more selective and arbitrary.

This perception of a hyper-competitive “lottery” is a well-documented source of significant stress and anxiety for applicants, with surveys showing that over half of students rank college applications as their most stressful academic experience.

The standardized format can also feel impersonal.

While efficient, the inability to tailor the main essay or activities list for a specific institution can be frustrating for students who want to present a highly customized application that speaks directly to a particular college’s values.

For Institutions: Exposure vs. Unpredictability

For colleges and universities, joining the Common App offers the immediate and powerful benefit of increased exposure and a larger applicant pool.

Research indicates that institutions see a significant jump in applications—as much as 10% immediately after joining and up to 25% over a decade—as they become visible to the more than one million students using the platform each year.

This allows them to recruit from a much broader geographic area and attract a more diverse set of candidates than they could through their own marketing efforts alone.

For smaller or less-known institutions, being listed alongside prestigious universities on a platform that students are already using is an invaluable recruitment tool.

This surge in applications, however, comes with significant institutional challenges.

The first is a logistical one: a larger pool of applicants requires a greater investment in staff and resources to conduct thorough application reviews, creating a substantial administrative burden.

A more profound challenge is the impact on enrollment management.

Because the Common App makes it easy for students to apply to many schools, a significant portion of the applicant pool may not have a strong, genuine interest in attending.

This makes it exceedingly difficult for admissions offices to predict their “yield rate”—the percentage of admitted students who will ultimately enroll.

Studies and market analyses consistently show that adopting the Common App is associated with a decrease in yield.

This unpredictability complicates everything from class size planning and residence hall assignments to budget forecasting, creating major strategic headaches for university administrators.

For the Admissions Landscape: “Shotgunning” and Demonstrated Interest

The macro-level impact of the Common App has been a fundamental restructuring of the dynamics between applicants and institutions.

The platform is a primary catalyst for the rise of “shotgunning.” Data from the Common App itself shows a steady increase in the average number of applications submitted per student, climbing from 4.63 in the 2013-14 cycle to 6.22 in 2021-22.

The proportion of “high-volume” applicants submitting to more than 10 colleges has more than doubled in that same period.

This has created a self-perpetuating cycle: the ease of applying leads to more applications per student, which causes admission rates to fall, which in turn generates more anxiety among the next cohort of students, who then feel compelled to apply to even more schools to ensure they have options.

A direct consequence of this application inflation is the devaluation of the application itself as a signal of genuine interest.

When submitting an application requires only a few extra clicks, admissions offices can no longer assume that an applicant is truly committed to their institution.

This has led to the widespread adoption of “yield protection” strategies, where highly selective colleges may waitlist or even reject exceptionally qualified candidates whom they suspect are using their institution as a “safety” or “target” school and are ultimately likely to enroll at a more prestigious university.

To counteract this uncertainty, colleges have been forced to find new ways to measure an applicant’s sincerity.

This has given rise to the increasing importance of “demonstrated interest” (DI) in the admissions process.

Institutions that consider DI now employ sophisticated Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software to track every point of engagement a prospective student has with them long before an application is ever submitted.

This tracking can include opening marketing emails, attending virtual information sessions, visiting campus, following the school on social media, and communicating with admissions representatives.

In this new landscape, the college-specific supplemental essays, particularly the “Why do you want to attend our school?” prompt, have become the most critical component for demonstrating genuine, well-researched interest.

The application is no longer a static document submitted at a deadline; it is the culmination of a long-term, digitally monitored courtship.

Stakeholder Group	Advantages	Disadvantages
Students	Time Savings: Eliminates repetitive data entry for multiple applications.	Organization: Centralized dashboard helps manage deadlines and track document submissions.	Access: Integrated fee waiver process reduces financial barriers for eligible students.	Increased Competition: Ease of use leads to application inflation (“shotgunning”) and lower admission rates.	Heightened Stress: Hyper-competitive environment and perceived randomness of admissions are major sources of anxiety.	Impersonal Format: Standardized application can feel limiting and prevent tailoring of core components to specific schools.
Institutions	Increased Applicant Pool: Significantly boosts the number and geographic diversity of applications received.	Enhanced Exposure: Provides visibility to a large audience of students, aiding recruitment, especially for less-known schools.	Data Standardization: Simplifies the initial processing and review of applicant data.	Decreased Yield: Makes it harder to predict which admitted students will enroll, complicating enrollment management.	Administrative Burden: A massive increase in applications requires more staff time and resources for review.	Weaker Interest Signal: The application itself is a less reliable indicator of a student’s genuine interest in attending.

Critical Issues and Controversies

Despite its central role and stated mission of promoting equity, the Common Application is at the heart of several significant debates and controversies in college admissions.

These issues question whether the platform, and the system it enables, truly levels the playing field or inadvertently creates new forms of inequity.

The critiques touch upon fundamental questions of access, authenticity, and the operational integrity of the admissions process.

Equity and Access

The Common App’s relationship with equity is complex and paradoxical.

On one hand, the organization has made concrete strides to broaden access for students from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Its most powerful tool is the integrated fee waiver system, which allows eligible low-income students to apply to member colleges without paying application fees, a benefit that removes a direct financial barrier for hundreds of thousands of applicants each year.

The organization has also actively pursued partnerships to connect students with free virtual mentoring and targeted scholarship opportunities, further supporting its access mission.

Data released by the Common App indicates these efforts are having a measurable effect, with recent application cycles showing disproportionately high growth rates among first-generation, low-income, and underrepresented minority (URM) students.

On the other hand, critics argue that the platform operates within and facilitates a broader admissions system that remains deeply stratified by socioeconomic status.

The very “holistic review” process that the Common App is designed to support can favor applicants with access to resources.

Wealthier students are often better positioned to build the kind of profiles that excel in a holistic review, with opportunities to participate in expensive extracurricular activities, travel, and summer programs, and to hire private counselors and essay coaches to polish their applications.

The complex web of supplemental essays and the “hidden curriculum” of demonstrating interest can present a higher cognitive and logistical burden for students who lack robust support from their schools or families.

Moreover, admissions practices like Early Decision, which are managed through the platform, are widely criticized for advantaging affluent students who do not need to compare financial aid offers before committing to a single institution.

Thus, while the Common App has successfully increased access

to the application process, it does not necessarily ensure equitable access to successful outcomes.

The landscape has been further complicated by the 2023 Supreme Court ruling that ended race-conscious admissions.

In response, the Common App announced that while it would continue to collect optional race and ethnicity data for research, it would also give member colleges the ability to hide, or “suppress,” this information during the application review process.

The organization is now placing increased emphasis on other parts of the application that allow students to share their lived experiences and personal context, such as the personal essay and a newly reframed optional section on “Challenges and Circumstances”.

Homogenization vs. Holistic Review

A persistent and powerful critique of the Common Application centers on its potential to homogenize the applicant pool.

The core of this argument is that a single, standardized application—and particularly a single personal essay sent to a dozen or more different schools—incentivizes students to produce generic, “safe,” and formulaic responses.

The fear is that this stifles creativity and authenticity, leading to a deluge of similar-sounding essays about overcoming a sports injury or a transformative service trip.

This makes it more difficult for admissions officers, who are already reading thousands of files under immense time pressure, to discern the unique qualities of an individual applicant.

In this view, the tool designed to facilitate holistic review—a process that is supposed to reveal the “whole person”—may actually encourage a form of strategic self-presentation that obscures authenticity and undermines the very goal of the process.

The Common App and its defenders counter this critique by pointing to the flexibility of the platform.

The essay prompts are intentionally broad, and the seventh “topic of your choice” option provides a complete release valve for any student with an unconventional story to tell.

From this perspective, the true venue for personalization is not the main essay but the college-specific supplemental essays.

These supplements are where colleges can ask targeted questions about their unique programs and values, and where students can demonstrate specific, tailored interest.

This frames the main application as a foundation of common information, upon which a customized, school-specific narrative is built.

Operational Integrity and Data Privacy

As a high-stakes technology platform used by millions of people on strict deadlines, the Common App faces intense scrutiny over its operational reliability.

A recurring and significant issue is the platform’s tendency to slow down, experience glitches, or crash entirely during periods of high traffic, most notably in the final hours before major application deadlines like November 1 and January 1.

While the organization maintains a 24/7 support center and is generally responsive to these issues, the instability is a major source of acute stress and anxiety for students and counselors at the most critical moments of the application process.

A second, less visible concern relates to data privacy.

The Common Application collects an enormous volume of sensitive personal, demographic, and academic data from its users.

According to its privacy policy, this information is shared with member colleges to which a student applies, but it may also be shared with third-party partners for research and other purposes.

As data privacy becomes an increasingly prominent public concern, questions about how this vast repository of student information is used, protected, and potentially commercialized are likely to grow.

The Future of the Digital Application

The college application process is in a state of continuous evolution, shaped by technological advancements, demographic shifts, and transformative events like the COVID-19 pandemic.

As the dominant platform in this space, the Common Application is not only responding to these trends but is actively shaping the future of how students connect with higher education.

Its strategic initiatives suggest a pivot from being a passive application processor to an active engine for access, driven by an unparalleled repository of data.

Post-Pandemic Trends and Technological Evolution

The pandemic served as a massive accelerator for trends that were already underway in college admissions.

The widespread shutdown of in-person activities permanently normalized digital-first engagement.

Virtual campus tours, online information sessions, and digital college fairs are no longer temporary substitutes but permanent fixtures of the recruitment landscape.

This has raised expectations among students for seamless, accessible, and reliable digital experiences throughout the admissions process, placing even greater pressure on platforms like the Common App to be robust and user-friendly.

Simultaneously, the pandemic catalyzed a seismic shift toward test-optional admissions.

In the 2023-2024 application cycle, only 4% of Common App member institutions required SAT or ACT scores, down from 55% just before the pandemic.

While a small number of institutions are reinstating testing requirements, the test-optional landscape appears largely here to stay.

This has fundamentally altered the calculus of admissions, placing significantly more weight on the qualitative, holistic components of the application that the Common App facilitates: the personal essay, the activities list, letters of recommendation, and the applicant’s ability to convey their story and context.

The next technological frontier is artificial intelligence (AI).

AI is poised to impact both sides of the admissions desk.

Students are already using AI tools to brainstorm essay ideas and draft application materials, raising new and complex questions about authenticity and academic integrity.

Concurrently, admissions offices, overwhelmed by rising application volumes, are beginning to explore AI to assist in initial application screening, such as by analyzing transcripts to assess course rigor and grade trends.

The ethical and equitable implementation of these technologies will be a central challenge for the admissions field in the coming years.

The Common App’s Strategic Initiatives

The Common Application is not merely reacting to these trends; it is actively pursuing a strategic vision that redefines its role in the higher education ecosystem.

• Direct Admissions: One of the most transformative initiatives is the expansion of its direct admissions program. In this model, the traditional application process is inverted. Using the data students provide in their Common App accounts, participating colleges proactively offer admission to qualified students—often first-generation and low-income students—before they have even formally applied. In the 2023-24 cycle, 70 member colleges participated, sending over 300,000 proactive admission offers. This initiative represents a radical shift from a “student-pull” system (where students must seek out and apply to colleges) to a “college-push” model designed to demystify the process and build confidence in students who might otherwise not see themselves as college material.
• Expanding the Tent: The organization continues to broaden its membership base, with a strategic focus on increasing the number of public universities and, more recently, community colleges on the platform. This expansion is a direct reflection of its mission to serve as a universal portal to all forms of postsecondary education, not just traditional four-year institutions.
• Data-Driven Insights: The Common App is increasingly leveraging its most valuable asset: its data. With millions of data points from over a million applicants each year, the organization possesses the world’s most comprehensive dataset on college-going behaviors and trends. It has begun to act as a research hub, publishing regular reports and insights on topics such as the impact of test-optional policies, application patterns among URM students, and the effects of the Supreme Court’s affirmative action decision. This positions the Common App not just as a service provider but as a central intelligence and thought leadership organization for the entire higher education sector.

Concluding Analysis and Recommendations for Stakeholders

The Common Application has evolved into an indispensable, yet deeply paradoxical, component of the American higher education system.

It has undeniably succeeded in its original goal of simplifying the logistical mechanics of applying to college, thereby broadening access for millions of students.

However, this very success has spawned a series of complex second-order effects—application inflation, heightened student anxiety, the strategic arms race of demonstrated interest, and new questions about equity—that challenge its core mission.

The future of the platform, and perhaps of college admissions itself, appears to lie in its ongoing transformation from a static, transactional form into a dynamic, supportive ecosystem.

Initiatives like direct admissions and partnerships with mentoring organizations point toward a future where the “application” is not a single, high-stakes event, but rather one integrated milestone in a longer, more supportive, and data-informed journey from high school to postsecondary success.

As this evolution continues, all stakeholders must adapt their strategies.

• For Students and Counselors: The primary strategic imperative is to shift focus from quantity to quality. The time saved by the Common App’s efficiency should be reinvested into deep research on a smaller, more thoughtfully curated list of colleges. Success is no longer about “shotgunning” applications but about crafting compelling, tailored supplemental essays that demonstrate genuine interest and institutional fit. Counselors must educate students on the “hidden curriculum” of digital engagement and demonstrated interest, while helping them build authentic narratives that shine through in a holistic review.
• For Institutions: Colleges and universities must develop more sophisticated data analytics capabilities to navigate the noise of inflated applicant pools and to more accurately predict yield. The features of the Common App, particularly the customizable supplemental questions, should be used not merely to gather data but as a primary tool to communicate unique institutional values and to identify mission-aligned students who will thrive in their specific communities.
• For the Common App: The organization’s foremost responsibility is to continue investing heavily in the technological infrastructure required to ensure platform stability and security, especially during peak deadlines. It must take a leadership role in establishing ethical guidelines for the use of AI in admissions, ensuring that technology serves to enhance, rather than undermine, equity and integrity. Finally, it must continue to use its unparalleled data not just to report on trends, but to rigorously research and transparently report on the systemic inequities that persist—and may even be exacerbated by—a system that is, on the surface, common to all.

Works cited

1. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_App
2. Common App – Wikipedia, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Application
3. Leadership and board – Common App, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/about/board-of-directors
4. www.zippia.com, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.zippia.com/common-application-careers-1480057/history/#:~:text=Common%20Application%20company%20history%20timeline&text=It%20all%20began%20in%201975,streamlining%20the%20college%20application%20process.&text=In%20conjunction%20with%20its%20online,a%20non%2Dprofit%20in%202000.
5. 2023 reflections: shooting for the moon together – Common App, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/blog/2023-reflections-shooting-moon-together
6. Common App CEO Joins Posse Board, Furthers Commitment to Equity in Higher Ed Admissions, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.possefoundation.org/news-and-events/common-app-ceo-joins-posse-board-furthers-commitment-to-equity-in-higher-ed-admissions
7. Join our board – Common App, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/about/join-our-board
8. Changes to the Common App for 2025-2026 | What to Expect – Spark Admissions, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.sparkadmissions.com/blog/changes-to-common-app/
9. Apply to college with Common App | Your future starts here, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/
10. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_App#:~:text=The%20Common%20Application%20(more%20commonly,Japan%2C%20and%20many%20European%20countries.
11. What’s the Common App? Everything to Know for Senior Year – BigFuture, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/plan-for-college/apply-to-college/whats-the-common-app
12. Application guide for first-year students – Common App, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/apply/first-year-students
13. Guide to the Common Application | The Princeton Review, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.princetonreview.com/college-advice/common-application
14. Which Schools Use the Common App? The Rank-Ordered List (2025) – Shemmassian Academic Consulting, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.shemmassianconsulting.com/blog/common-app-schools
15. Complete Guide: Which Schools Use the Common Application? – Blog PrepScholar, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://blog.prepscholar.com/which-schools-use-the-common-application-complete-list
16. 2025 Best Colleges that Accept the Common App in America – Niche, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.niche.com/colleges/search/colleges-that-accept-the-common-app/
17. Filling Out the Common App (2025-2026) | Complete Guide – IvyMax, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://ivymax.com/how-to-fill-out-the-common-app/
18. Everything You Need to Know About the Common App | CollegeData, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.collegedata.com/resources/prepare-and-apply/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-common-app
19. Your 11th grade college planning guide – Common App, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/plan/your-path-to-college/11th-grade
20. The Common App: A How-to Guide – College Essay Guy, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.collegeessayguy.com/blog/common-app
21. The Common App: A Complete Guide (2024-2025 Edition), accessed on August 13, 2025, https://go.collegewise.com/common-app
22. Filling out the college application: Common application walkthrough – Khan Academy, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.khanacademy.org/college-careers-more/college-admissions/applying-to-college/college-application-process/a/filling-out-the-college-application-common-application-walkthrough
23. Pros and Cons: Using the Common App to Apply | College Raptor, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.collegeraptor.com/getting-in/articles/college-applications/pros-and-cons-of-using-the-common-app-to-apply-for-colleges/
24. Approaching the Activities section | Common App, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/static/282333ce43c3c327317762e9e5824a8f/FY-Apply-College-Activities-Section-Common-App.pdf
25. Common App Personal Statement Prompts for 2024-2025 – Galin Education, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://galined.com/blog/common-app-personal-statement-prompts-for-2024-2025/
26. Writing Prompts for First-Year Applicants – Undergraduate Admissions, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.admissions.illinois.edu/apply/freshman/essays
27. Recommender guide – Common App, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/counselors-and-recommenders/recommender-guide
28. Common App Fee Waiver – Liaison International, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://help.liaisonedu.com/The_Common_App_for_transfer_Applicant_Help_Center/Filling_Out_Your_Common_App_for_transfer/Personal_Information/8_Common_App_for_transfer_Fee_Waiver
29. What is a Common App fee waiver? – Student Solutions Center, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://appsupport.commonapp.org/applicantsupport/s/article/What-do-I-need-to-know-about-the-Common-App-fee-waiver
30. College Application Fee Waiver FAQ – BigFuture, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/plan-for-college/apply-to-college/college-application-fee-waiver-faq
31. Navigating the Common, Coalition, UC, and ApplyTexas Applications, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://blog.getintocollege.com/applications-galore-navigating-the-common-coalition-uc-and-applytexas-applications
32. The Common App vs. The Coalition App: What’s the Difference? – Expert Admissions, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://expertadmissions.com/the-common-app-vs-the-coalition-app-whats-the-difference/
33. Difference Between Common App & Coalition App | Rostrum Education., accessed on August 13, 2025, https://rostrumedu.com/common-app-vs-coalition-app/
34. Common App vs Coalition App: Key Differences Explained – Opus College Prep, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://opuscollegeprep.com/whats-the-difference-between-applying-to-college-with-the-common-app-the-coalition-app-and-other-application-platforms/
35. Coalition Application: A College Applicant’s Guide to Admission | BeMo®, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://bemoacademicconsulting.com/blog/coalition-app
36. Common App vs. Coalition App: Which Should You Use? – BestColleges.com, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.bestcolleges.com/blog/common-app-vs-coalition-app/
37. Eligibility Criteria for Members – Coalition for College, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.coalitionforcollegeaccess.org/eligibility-criteria
38. What Is the Coalition Application? – ThoughtCo, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-coalition-application-4583174
39. Common App or Coalition App: Pros, Cons and How to Choose – PrepMaven, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://prepmaven.com/blog/applying/common-app-or-coalition-app/
40. What Is Coalition Application and Who Should Complete It – Signature College Counseling, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.signaturecollegecounseling.com/coalition-application-complete/
41. Common App vs. Coalition App: Which One Should You Use for College Applications?, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://admissionado.com/blog/college/common-app-vs-coalition-app/
42. Should I use the Common App? – Central Michigan University, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.cmich.edu/blog/all-things-higher-ed/should-i-use-the-common-app
43. Common App vs. Coalition App – Bucknell University, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.bucknell.edu/admissions-aid/admissions-blog/common-app-vs-coalition-app
44. How to Choose: Common App vs. Coalition App – Crimson Education US, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.crimsoneducation.org/us/blog/common-app-vs-coalition-app/
45. Universily Blogs, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.universily.com/blog-posts/what-is-applytexas
46. The Essential Guide to Alternative US University Application Systems – BridgeU, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://bridge-u.com/resources/the-essential-guide-to-alternative-us-university-application-systems/
47. Apply Texas Application Guide, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.applytexas.org/application-guide/
48. How to Apply to College in Texas, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.collegeessayguy.com/blog/apply-texas-guide
49. How to Use ApplyTexas for College Applications – Harris County Public Library, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://hcpl.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/130/2025/01/Apply-Texas-Presentation.pdf
50. 5 Tips for Completing the ApplyTexas Application | Bright Horizons College Coach Blog, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://blog.getintocollege.com/5-tips-for-completing-the-applytexas-application
51. More Underrepresented Minority and First-Gen Students Applying to College | BestColleges, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.bestcolleges.com/news/more-urm-and-first-gen-students-applying-to-college/
52. Thank you for taking time to learn about the UC … – UC Admissions, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://admission.universityofcalifornia.edu/how-to-apply/files/presenting-yourself-uc-application-freshman.pdf
53. Personal insight questions – UC Admissions – University of California, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://admission.universityofcalifornia.edu/how-to-apply/applying-as-a-first-year/personal-insight-questions.html
54. The Common, Coalition, and UC Applications – Signet Education, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://signeteducation.com/resources/common-coalition-and-uc-applications/
55. www.ivycentral.com, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.ivycentral.com/common-app-essay-vs-uc-personal-insight-questions/#:~:text=The%20Common%20App%20essay%20is%20a%20canvas%20of%20creativity%2C%20inviting,character%2C%20choices%2C%20and%20achievements.
56. What is the main difference between UC PIQs and CommonApp + Supplementals – Reddit, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/xylq51/what_is_the_main_difference_between_uc_piqs_and/
57. Pros & Cons of the Common App | Ivy Coach, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.ivycoach.com/the-ivy-coach-blog/the-application/pros-cons-using-the-common-application/
58. Disadvantages of Using Common App + How to Overcome Them | AdmissionSight, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://admissionsight.com/disadvantages-of-using-common-app-how-to-overcome-them/
59. Common App vs. Coalition App: Which Application is Best? | Ivy Coach, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.ivycoach.com/the-ivy-coach-blog/the-application/common-app-vs-coalition-app/
60. State-Level Common Application Policies and College Enrollment – MIT Press Direct, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://direct.mit.edu/edfp/article/20/1/164/125404/State-Level-Common-Application-Policies-and
61. On the frontlines of college access: Navigating the administrative burden of applying to public universities Grant Blume, PhD Ev – VTechWorks, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/96049/BLUMEAdministrativeBurdens.pdf
62. The Common App | Fastweb, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.fastweb.com/college-search/articles/the-common-application
63. How the Common App Makes College Applications Easier, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.onpointforcollege.org/blog/getting-into-college/how-the-common-app-makes-college-applications-easi
64. Most College Essays Are Not Very Good : r/ApplyingToCollege – Reddit, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/o5zyfq/most_college_essays_are_not_very_good/
65. Drawbacks to Using the Common App? – CollegeVine, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.collegevine.com/faq/99171/drawbacks-to-using-the-common-app
66. What is “The Shotgun Method” for college admissions? – The Circle, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://blog.aristotlecircle.com/2024/04/09/what-is-the-shotgun-method-for-college-admissions/
67. The common app is breaking college admissions-change my mind – Reddit, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/1jflegk/the_common_app_is_breaking_college/
68. Can College Application Stress Impact Mental Health? – Pathlight Mood & Anxiety Center, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.pathlightbh.com/resources/college-application-stress-mental-health
69. Over half of students rank college applications as their most stressful academic experience, survey finds, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.highereddive.com/news/over-half-of-students-rank-college-applications-as-their-most-stressful-aca/691808/
70. Common Application Has Had Wide-Ranging Effects on College Admissions | NBER, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.nber.org/digest/nov19/common-application-has-had-wide-ranging-effects-college-admissions
71. Diffusion of Common Application Membership and Admissions …, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w13175/w13175.pdf
72. Driving Growth: See how these universities boosted enrollment – Common App, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/blog/driving-growth-see-how-these-universities-boosted-enrollment
73. Uh Oh! Messing With the Common Application Essay – The College Solution, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://thecollegesolution.com/uh-oh-messing-with-the-common-application-essay/
74. Looks or Personality: The Holistic Approach and a Critique of the U.S. College Admissions Process – ACC Chronicle, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://accchronicle.net/4069/op-ed-editorial/looks-or-personality-the-holistic-approach-and-a-critique-of-the-u-s-college-admissions-process/
75. Common Application Influence Continues to Rise – MARKETview, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://marketviewedu.com/blog/common-application-influence-continues-to-rise/
76. High-scoring students applying to selective colleges drive up applications | Higher Ed Dive, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.highereddive.com/news/common-app-high-sat-private-school-application-increase/638459/
77. First-year applications per applicant – Amazon S3, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/ca.research.publish/Research_Briefs_2022/2022_12_09_Apps_Per_Applicant_ResearchBrief.pdf
78. www.commonapp.org, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/about/reports-and-insights#:~:text=First%2Dyear%20applications%20per%20applicant&text=Average%20college%20applications%20via%20Common,international%20or%20fee%20waiver%20recipients.
79. Here’s The Most Important Data Point In Ivy League And Elite College Admissions—And You’re Probably Ignoring It – Forbes, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherrim/2025/03/11/heres-the-most-important-data-point-in-ivy-league-and-elite-college-admissions-and-youre-probably-ignoring-it/
80. Understanding Demonstrated Interest: Key Factors for College Success, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://thescholarshipsystem.com/blog-for-students-families/understanding-demonstrated-interest-key-factors-for-college-success/
81. The Importance of Demonstrated Interest in College Admission – Crimson Education US, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.crimsoneducation.org/us/blog/what-is-demonstrated-interest/
82. List of Colleges that Track Demonstrated Interest, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://thecollegecurators.com/list-of-colleges-that-consider-demonstrated-interest/
83. How to Show Demonstrated Interest & Why It Gets You Into Colleges – Prompt, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.myprompt.com/post/demonstrated-interest-why-showing-colleges-you-like-them-gets-you-in
84. All About Demonstrating Interest – CollegeCalm, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://collegecalm.com/all-about-demonstrating-interest/
85. Latest Common App Trends Show the Future of Selective College Admissions, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.jraeducationalconsulting.com/blog/latest-common-app-trends-show-the-future-of-selective-college-admissions
86. What is Demonstrated Interest in College Admissions? + How to Do it – Appily.com, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.appily.com/guidance/articles/applying-to-college/demonstrated-interest-in-college-admissions
87. Advancing equitable scholarship awarding through outreach – Common App, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/files/Common-App-scholarship-outreach-findings-23-24-season.pdf
88. College Application Surge: Underrepresented Students Lead Growth in 2024-25 Admissions Cycle | Diverse: Issues In Higher Education, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.diverseeducation.com/students/article/15739839/college-application-surge-underrepresented-students-lead-growth-in-202425-admissions-cycle
89. Common App data shows substantial rise in minority student college applications, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.highereddive.com/news/minority-student-college-applications-increase-2023-common-app/725020/
90. Common App data shows 5% jump in first-year college applicants | Higher Ed Dive, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.highereddive.com/news/common-app-data-shows-5-jump-in-first-year-college-applicants/737732/
91. How does a university determine that a applicant is in the top 1% – Reddit, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/1kdtjme/how_does_a_university_determine_that_a_applicant/
92. The college admissions system is biased toward the wealthy – The MoCo Student, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://mocostudent.org/2020/02/4940/
93. Holistic Admissions Criteria Favor the Rich – People’s Policy Project, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.peoplespolicyproject.org/2023/07/25/holistic-admissions-criteria-favor-the-rich/
94. Complex applications create barriers to college—some are trying to change that | Brookings, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/complex-applications-create-barriers-to-college-some-are-trying-to-change-that/
95. Recruiting Underrepresented Minority Students for 2023 – Niche, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.niche.com/about/enrollment-insights/recruiting-underrepresented-students-for-2023/
96. Early decision applications favor the wealthy – The Shield Online, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://macshieldonline.com/57189/opinion/early-decision-applications-favor-the-wealthy/
97. Race and equity in Common App, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/race-in-admissions
98. Problems and Pitfalls in Common App Essays : r/ApplyingToCollege – Reddit, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/1dzy2me/problems_and_pitfalls_in_common_app_essays/
99. Common App Essays: The #1 Problem Faced – MEK Review, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://mekreview.com/common-app-essays-the-1-problem/
100. 10 Tips for Avoiding Common App Technical Glitches – Road2College, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.road2college.com/10-tips-for-dealing-with-common-app-glitches/
101. Common App down : r/ApplyingToCollege – Reddit, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/1ggepd8/common_app_down/
102. Reducing Students’ Anxiety in the College Application Process – Popp & Associates, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://poppandassociates.com/reducing-students-anxiety-in-the-college-application-process/
103. The Post-Pandemic Future of Higher Education: A Virtual Convening of American Academy Affiliates, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.amacad.org/news/post-pandemic-future-higher-education-virtual-convening-american-academy-affiliates
104. Planning for Higher Ed’s Digital-First, Hybrid Future | EAB, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://eab.com/resources/whitepaper/plan-digital-first-hybrid-future-higher-ed/
105. Top 5 Trends Influencing College Admissions – Scholar Launch, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.scholarlaunch.org/blog/top-5-trends-influencing-college-admissions
106. News and updates – Common App, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/blog
107. Reports and insights – Common App, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/about/reports-and-insights
108. First-year application trends through January 1 – Common App, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.commonapp.org/files/DAR/Common-App-Deadline-Updates-2025.01.16.pdf
109. 2025-26 Common App Essay Prompts: Expert Guide and Tips, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.collegeessayadvisors.com/portfolio-items/common-application-essay-prompts-guide/
110. What is The Common Application and what are some advantages and disadvantages of using it to apply to college? – Career Village, accessed on August 13, 2025, https://www.careervillage.org/questions/13547/what-is-the-common-application-and-what-are-some-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-using-it-to-apply-to-college
111. accessed on December 31, 1969, https.www.collegeraptor.com/getting-in/articles/college-applications/pros-and-cons-of-using-the-common-app-to-apply-for-colleges/