The Act of Being: How a 2,400-Year-Old Idea Redefined My Understanding of Everything

Part I: The Ghost of the Decisive Act

Introduction: My Frustrating Hunt for the “Decisive Act”

For years, my work as a researcher and consultant felt like a hunt for ghosts.

I was obsessed with a single concept: the “act.” I chased it through legal archives, corporate boardrooms, and creative studios, convinced that if I could just isolate the one decisive action, the single moment of transformation, I could unlock the secret to progress itself.

I wanted to pinpoint the legislative vote that turns a proposal into a law, the final brushstroke that makes a canvas a masterpiece, the strategic pivot that saves a company from ruin.

This pursuit, however, was a recipe for burnout.

It was like trying to understand a river by capturing a single cup of water.

I would analyze events in excruciating detail, but the underlying process, the current that gave the event its meaning, always eluded me.

My reports were detailed but shallow, my advice sound but not profound.

I was stuck in a cycle of frustration, haunted by the feeling that I was missing a fundamental piece of the puzzle about how things in this world truly come to be.

I was analyzing outcomes, but I didn’t understand becoming.

A World of Disconnected Meanings: The Many Faces of “Act”

My intellectual toolbox was filled with sharp, but separate, tools.

The word “act” appeared everywhere, but its meaning seemed to change with the context, offering no unified theory.

In Law, an “act” is the finish line of a grueling race.

It is legislation that has been formally enacted into law.¹

A bill, a mere proposal, must pass through the crucible of the legislature—surviving debates, amendments, and votes in both houses—before being signed by an executive or passed over a veto.³

Only then does it achieve the status of an “act” and gain the “force of law,” a permanent measure that shapes society until it is repealed.¹

This legal framework distinguishes between “public laws” affecting everyone and “private laws” for specific entities, or “uniform acts” designed to standardize laws across jurisdictions, but the core idea remains the same: an act is a finalized, binding outcome.³

In Theater, the term splits its meaning.

An “act” is a major structural division of a play, a container for a collection of scenes that advances the plot.⁵

Shakespeare’s plays were traditionally divided into five acts; modern plays and films often favor a three-act structure: setup, confrontation, and resolution.⁵

Simultaneously, “to act” is the performance itself—the verb describing the process of portraying a character, using face, body, and voice to bring a script to life.⁸

Here, an “act” is both a segment of the story and the very process of its telling.

In Psychology, the term takes on a different life as an acronym for Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).¹⁰

Pronounced intentionally as the word “act,” this therapeutic model is not about a single, decisive moment but about a continuous process.

It focuses on helping patients increase “psychological flexibility” by accepting their internal experiences and committing to actions that align with their personal values.¹¹

The goal is not to eliminate difficult feelings but to “move toward valued behavior,” fundamentally changing one’s relationship with their own mind.¹⁴

Even in our daily language, the word carries the weight of finality.

Describing a difficult task as requiring “an act of Congress” reinforces this notion of a monumental, singular event.³

Looking at these definitions, I saw only disconnected fragments.

Yet, a deeper pattern was hiding in plain sight.

Each of these “acts” described a profound transformation.

A bill, a piece of paper with potential, transforms into a law, a rule with actual power.

A script, mere text, transforms into a performance, a lived experience.

A person stuck in patterns of avoidance transforms into someone capable of living a life guided by their deepest values.

The common thread was a change of state, a movement from something unrealized to something realized.

It dawned on me that our language might be smarter than our dictionaries.

The reason we use the same root word—”act”—across these disparate fields is not a coincidence.

Language, in its collective wisdom, seems to have encoded a deep philosophical pattern into this single, versatile term.

It intuits a connection that our siloed, analytical minds often Miss. My professional frustration stemmed from this very cognitive dissonance: language was pointing toward a unified theory of becoming, but all I had were fragmented definitions of outcomes.

I was trying to understand a universal grammar by studying a handful of unrelated words.

Part II: The Epiphany – Unlocking a New Paradigm

The Accidental Discovery: Stumbling into Aristotle’s Metaphysics

The breakthrough didn’t come from a modern business guru or a contemporary legal scholar.

It came, as the most profound insights often do, from an unexpected place: the dense, formidable text of Aristotle’s Metaphysics.¹⁵

One evening, deep in a research rabbit hole, I found myself wrestling with two ancient Greek words that would completely re-architect my worldview:

dunamis and energeia.¹⁷

At first, they seemed archaic and hopelessly abstract.

Dunamis was translated as “potentiality” or “potency,” and energeia as “actuality” or “activity.” But as I read on, the fog began to lift.

Aristotle wasn’t just giving new names to old ideas; he was describing a fundamental relationship that governs all change in the universe.

The world, he argued, is not a collection of static objects that are occasionally subjected to “acts.” Instead, everything exists in a dynamic relationship between what it has the potential to be and what it actually Is.

Change was not something that happened to things.

Change was the process of a potential being realized.

The “act” I had been searching for wasn’t a single point in time; it was a state of being.

This was the key that unlocked everything.

The Master Analogy: Source Code vs. The Running Application

To drag this 2,400-year-old concept into the 21st century, I developed a personal analogy that became my Rosetta Stone: the relationship between a computer program’s source code and the running application.¹⁸

• Potentiality (Dunamis) as Source Code: The source code of an application is its potentiality. Stored on a hard drive, it is a universe of defined, structured capacity. It contains every function, every rule, every possible outcome. This is not a vague “maybe”; it is a real, inherent power.²⁰ The source code for a word processor has the potential to format text and check spelling; it does not have the potential to become a flight simulator. This maps perfectly to Aristotle’s idea that a thing’s potential is specific to its nature—a seed has the potential to become a plant, not an airplane.²¹ The code is powerful but inert, waiting to be called into action.
• Actuality (Energeia) as the Running Application: The running application is actuality. It is the source code compiled and executing in the computer’s memory, its instructions alive and “at-work” (energeia).²² It is the living, functioning realization of the code’s potential. This state is the “end” or “completion” (
  entelecheia) for which the code was written.²² The running program is the
  actuality of the code.
• Motion/Change as Compilation and Execution: The bridge between these two states is the process of change, which in our analogy is the act of compiling and running the software. This is where the analogy illuminates one of Aristotle’s most challenging ideas: that motion is “the actuality of a potentiality as such“.²⁴ What does this mean? The “motion” is not the final, static screen of the opened application. It is the
  entire, ongoing process of the CPU fetching and executing the code’s instructions. During this process, the potentiality (the code) is being made actual (it is running), but it is doing so as a potentiality (it is still in the process of executing, not yet finished with its task). It is potential-in-the-act-of-becoming-actual.

This new framework represented a fundamental shift in my thinking, moving me from a world of static events to one of dynamic processes.

Table: A Paradigm Shift in Understanding “The Act”

Concept	The Old View (Act as a Decisive Event)	The New Paradigm (The Act as Actuality)
The “Act”	A single point in time; a finished action.	A state of being; the “being-at-work” of a potential.
Potential	A vague, undefined possibility (“what might be”).	A defined, inherent capacity for a specific actuality (“what can be”).
Change/Motion	A simple transition from Point A to Point B.	The ongoing process of a potential being actualized.
Cause	An external trigger that initiates an event.	An integrated system of material, formal, efficient, and final causes that guide a potential toward its actuality.
Focus	“What did you do?”	“What are you in the act of becoming?”

Part III: The Four Pillars of the New Paradigm

With this new paradigm, the world began to look different.

The concept of “the act” resolved from a blurry snapshot into a high-definition video, supported by four interconnected pillars.

Pillar 1: The Nature of ‘The Act’ as Actuality (Energeia)

The first pillar redefines the “act” itself.

It is not an action that is over and done with, but a state of actuality—a state of being fully and actively what a thing is meant to be.

Aristotle coined two words to capture this: energeia, from ergon (work), and entelecheia, from telos (end) and echein (to have or to be).²²

Together, they describe a state of “being-at-work” or “being-at-an-end”.²⁴

The running application is the

entelechy of its source code; it is fulfilling the end for which it was created.

Crucially, this state of actuality is dynamic, not static.

We tend to think of a finished product as inert, but energeia implies continuous activity.

A living fish, even at rest, is in a constant state of “being-at-work” through its metabolism, actively maintaining its existence as a fish.²⁴

In the same way, the running software application is not a dead screen; it is constantly processing inputs, refreshing its state, and responding to the user.

Actuality is not the end of work; it is the state of perfect, sustained work.

It’s the difference between a photograph of a car engine and the engine itself, running smoothly and powerfully.

Pillar 2: The Unseen Power of Potentiality (Dunamis)

The second pillar rescues “potential” from the realm of vague, dreamy possibility.

For Aristotle, dunamis is not just anything that might happen; it is a real, inherent power or capacity within a thing to become something specific.²⁰

A block of marble has the potential to become a statue, but it does not have the potential to become a tree.

This potential is defined by a thing’s substance—its matter (

hyle) and the form (morphe) that it is capable of taking.²⁵

This leads to a profound and counter-intuitive conclusion: potentiality is also a principle of limitation.

We think of potential as boundless, but Aristotle’s dunamis is what gives change its direction and intelligibility.

The source code’s potential limits what the final application can be.

It cannot spontaneously generate features that were not part of its underlying structure.

In the Thomistic tradition that followed Aristotle, this principle was summarized as “potency is limited by act”—that is, a potential is defined and limited by the specific actuality it is a potential for.²⁷

This is why the universe is an ordered cosmos and not random chaos.

Potentiality is not a principle of infinite freedom, but of directed and constrained possibility.

Pillar 3: Motion as the Act of a Potential

This third pillar addresses the process of change itself, clarifying Aristotle’s notoriously difficult definition of motion as “the actuality of a potentiality, as a potentiality”.²⁴

The software analogy makes this clear: motion is not the destination (the fully loaded app) but the journey (the execution of the code).

While the code is running, it is

actually at work, but it is still potentially unfinished.

It is a potential in the process of actualizing itself.

The falling of a pencil is the actuality of its potential to be on the floor, but it is this actuality as a potentiality, because it is still on its Way.²⁴

This insight shatters the view of change as a series of static states.

It directly resolves Zeno’s famous paradox of the arrow in flight.

Zeno argued that at any given instant, the arrow is in one place, and therefore it is at rest.

He saw motion as an infinite series of static moments.

Aristotle’s framework reveals this as a fallacy of composition—like arguing an animal isn’t alive because its individual cells, when separated, are not the animal.²⁴

The arrow’s flight is not a collection of an infinite number of “rests.” It is a single, continuous, unified process: the

actuality of its potential to reach the target.

This was the fundamental flaw in my original, event-based worldview.

I was looking at the frames of the film, not the motion that connected them.

Pillar 4: The World Re-Examined – Connecting the Dots

The final pillar brings the paradigm home, applying it back to the disconnected definitions that started my journey.

• The Legal Act Revisited: A bill is a document with the potentiality to become law. The complex legislative process—debates, committees, votes, signatures—is the motion that actualizes this potential. The finally enacted law is the actuality. It is no longer just ink on paper; it is a principle “at-work” in society, actively shaping behavior, being interpreted by courts, and having real force.¹ It is a living entity.
• The Theatrical Act Revisited: A script is pure potentiality. The rehearsals, set construction, and the performance itself are the motion. The live show, the shared experience unfolding in real-time between actors and audience, is the actuality of the play. It is the script’s “being-at-work,” the fulfillment of its purpose.⁵ The structural “acts” of the play are simply major phases in this grand process of actualization.
• The Psychological ‘ACT’ Revisited: This is perhaps the most powerful application. A person’s core values—what they care about most deeply—exist as potentialities for a meaningful life. But when a person is entangled in their thoughts or avoids difficult feelings, these values remain inert, like source code that is never run.¹⁴ Acceptance and Commitment Therapy provides the
  motion—a set of skills like mindfulness, defusion, and committed action that allow the person to begin actualizing those values.¹³ The goal, “psychological flexibility,” is the state of
  actuality. It is not a final destination of “happiness” but the dynamic state of being continuously “at-work” living a life aligned with one’s chosen potential. In this light, ACT can be seen as a form of applied Aristotelianism. It is a modern, practical toolkit for facilitating the most important human journey: the one from dunamis to energeia, which Aristotle himself identified as the core of the good life.²⁶

Part IV: Conclusion – The Act of Becoming

My frustrating hunt for the “decisive act” is over, not because I found it, but because I was looking for the wrong thing.

The ghost I was chasing was a phantom of a static worldview.

The world is not a collection of things that are occasionally struck by the lightning of an “act”; it is a continuous, roiling, interconnected process of potentiality flowing into actuality.

The epiphany born from Aristotle’s ancient wisdom and clarified by a modern analogy did more than just solve a professional problem.

It offered a new way to see everything.

It replaced the frustrating, event-focused question that had driven me to burnout—”What decisive act must I do?”—with a far more profound and generative one.

The real question, the one that reframes everything from career planning and personal growth to project management and the pursuit of a meaningful life, is this: “What am I in the act of becoming?”

This question forces us to see ourselves and our world not as a series of disconnected snapshots, but as a continuous, unfolding process.

It shifts our focus from the finished product to the quality of the work, from the destination to the direction of our motion.

It is in understanding this dynamic, in embracing our role as beings constantly actualizing our potential, that we find the true meaning of the act.

Works cited

1. www.ncsl.org, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/glossary-of-legislative-terms#:~:text=ACT%3A%20Legislation%20enacted%20into%20law,force%20of%20law%20until%20repealed.
2. Glossary of Legislative Terms – National Conference of State Legislatures, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/glossary-of-legislative-terms
3. Act of Congress – Wikipedia, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_Congress
4. What is a Uniform Act?, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.uniformlaws.org/acts/overview/uniformacts
5. Theatre Appreciation Terms – Columbus State University, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.columbusstate.edu/theatre/_docs/theatre-appreciation-terms.pdf
6. Difference Between Scene and Act In a performance or a drama, acts and scenes are vital in sequencing or separating the narratio – Advanced English 1, accessed on August 14, 2025, http://rhinehartadvancedenglish.weebly.com/uploads/2/2/1/0/22108252/difference_between_scene_and_act.pdf
7. eli5: What are “acts” in a movie/film and how are people able to figure out where they start/end? Are there always three acts? More? Less? Please explain. : r/explainlikeimfive – Reddit, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/mktc1g/eli5_what_are_acts_in_a_moviefilm_and_how_are/
8. What is the difference between ‘act’ and ‘perform’? | LanGeek, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://langeek.co/en/grammar/course/1787/act-vs-perform
9. Drama Glossary | KET Education, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://education.ket.org/resources/drama-glossary
10. www.racgp.org.au, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.racgp.org.au/afp/2012/september/acceptance-and-commitment-therapy
11. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy as a Unified Model of Behavior Change – American Psychological Association, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.apa.org/education-career/ce/acceptance-commitment.pdf
12. What is Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) | Los Angeles, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://cogbtherapy.com/acceptance-and-commitment-therapy-act-los-angeles
13. How Does Acceptance And Commitment Therapy (ACT) Work? – Positive Psychology, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://positivepsychology.com/act-acceptance-and-commitment-therapy/
14. Acceptance and commitment therapy – Wikipedia, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceptance_and_commitment_therapy
15. The Principle of Act in Metaphysical Understanding • Philosophy …, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://philosophy.institute/metaphysics/principle-act-metaphysical-understanding/
16. Aristotle’s Metaphysics – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-metaphysics/
17. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potentiality_and_actuality#:~:text=Aristotle%20describes%20potentiality%20and%20actuality,but%2C%20the%20potential%20does%20exist.
18. Aristotle and AI White Paper Draft of June 2024.docx, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.oxford-aiethics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2024-06/Aristotle%20and%20AI%20White%20Paper%20-%20June%202024.pdf
19. The Unexpected Parallels Between Coding and Ancient Philosophy – AlgoCademy, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://algocademy.com/blog/the-unexpected-parallels-between-coding-and-ancient-philosophy/
20. Potentiality and actuality | History of Ancient Philosophy Class Notes – Fiveable, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/history-ancient-philosophy/unit-7/potentiality-actuality/study-guide/IR5nLUwHrtjCxyct
21. What are actuality and potentiality? | GotQuestions.org, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.gotquestions.org/actuality-potentiality.html
22. Potentiality and actuality – Wikipedia, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potentiality_and_actuality
23. Actuality and potentiality in Aristotelian metaphysics | Greek Philosophy Class Notes, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/greek-philosophy/unit-12/actuality-potentiality-aristotelian-metaphysics/study-guide/UMRhV0Uz9A0B9l9Y
24. Aristotle: Motion and its Place in Nature | Internet Encyclopedia of …, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/aristotle-motion/
25. 1.7 Actuality and Potentiality in Aristotle’s Philosophy for UPSC – ias express, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.iasexpress.net/modules/1-7-actuality-and-potentiality-in-aristotles-philosophy/
26. Unlocking Potentiality and Actuality, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/potentiality-actuality-plato-aristotle
27. Potency and Act | Encyclopedia.com, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/potency-and-act
28. Is Aristotle’s act and potency distinction absurd since it leads to actual infinities? – Reddit, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/15vyjiv/is_aristotles_act_and_potency_distinction_absurd/
29. The Power of Potentiality and Actuality – Number Analytics, accessed on August 14, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/power-potentiality-actuality