From Assembly Line to Ecosystem: Why School Subjects Are Broken and How We Can Fix Them

Introduction: The Day the Lesson Died

My name is Sarah, and for fifteen years, I was a public school teacher.

I wasn’t just any teacher; I was the one who arrived early, stayed late, and poured every ounce of my creative energy into my classroom.

I loved my students, I loved my subject—History—and I believed, with every fiber of my being, in the power of education to change lives.¹

I was, by all accounts, a “good” teacher operating within the system.

I remember the breaking point with crystalline clarity.

It was a unit on the American Revolution, a topic brimming with passion, conflict, and world-changing ideas.

I had spent weeks, no, months, designing what I believed was the perfect lesson plan.

I had color-coded binders, scaffolded worksheets, primary source documents meticulously curated for different reading levels, and a series of “engaging” activities that were perfectly aligned with state standards.

I had built, in my mind, a flawless instructional machine.

And then I delivered it.

Day after day, I executed my plan with precision, only to be met with a sea of glazed-over eyes.

My students were compliant, yes.

They filled out the worksheets.

They highlighted the key terms.

But there was no spark.

No curiosity.

No debate.

They were passively receiving information, checking boxes on an academic to-do list.³

The fire of revolution was reduced to a list of dates and battles to be memorized for a test and promptly forgotten.

A 2022 meta-analysis would later confirm what I felt in my gut: in a traditional model, students retain only 50% of the material taught after just 24 hours.⁵

One afternoon, as I watched a student mindlessly copy a definition of the Stamp Act, a devastating question hit me with the force of a physical blow: What if the problem isn’t my lesson? What if the problem is the very structure of “school” itself?

That question unraveled everything I thought I knew.

It sent me on a journey that would take me out of the classroom I loved, into the world of homeschooling my own children, and deep into research far outside the field of education.

It forced me to confront the uncomfortable truth that our education system, filled with dedicated, brilliant teachers like my colleagues, is based on a fundamentally flawed design.

Why does a system with so much talent and good intention so often produce disengaged students and lackluster results? And if the model itself is the problem, what on earth is the alternative? This is the story of how I found the answer—not by trying to fix a broken machine, but by learning to cultivate a living ecosystem.

Part I: The Anatomy of a Broken System: Why Our Schools Feel Stuck in the 19th Century

To understand why my American Revolution unit failed, I had to look past my own classroom and examine the architecture of the entire system.

What I discovered was that the problems we face today—the disengagement, the burnout, the emphasis on testing over learning—are not bugs in the system.

They are features.

Our schools are not broken; they are simply obsolete, running perfectly on a 19th-century operating system that is no longer compatible with the modern world.

1.1 The Factory Floor: An Architecture of Compliance

The modern school system was not born from a desire to cultivate individual genius or foster critical thought.

Its DNA can be traced directly back to the Industrial Revolution and a Prussian model of education that valued obedience and conformity above all else.⁵

When Horace Mann championed public education in the United States, he was inspired by a system designed to produce loyal, compliant citizens and soldiers.

As the Industrial Age surged forward, industrialists like Andrew Carnegie and John d+. Rockefeller saw the immense value in this model.

They needed a workforce that was punctual, obedient, and, most importantly, didn’t ask questions about the way things were done.⁵

School became a factory for workers.

Students were the raw materials, teachers were the line managers, and the curriculum was the assembly line.

Every student was treated as a product to be standardized: same curriculum, same pace, same progression.⁶

This “one-size-fits-all” approach, by its very design, is destined to fail the individual.

It bores the bright students into disengagement while leaving struggling students to fall further and further behind.⁵

As Rockefeller’s advisor, Frederick T.

Gates, chillingly envisioned, the goal was not to create “philosophers or men of learning or men of science,” but a populace that would “yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands”.⁵

This historical context is crucial.

It reveals that the system isn’t broken—it’s working exactly as it was designed.

The tragedy is that we are still using this factory model, a tool designed to forge compliant workers for the 19th century, to prepare students for the complexities of the 21st.

We are trying to build spaceships with a hammer and anvil, and then wondering why they won’t fly.

1.2 The Silo Effect: How We Teach a Fragmented World

The primary mechanism of the factory model is the division of knowledge into discrete, isolated subjects.

In the business world, this is known as the “silo mentality,” a mindset where departments refuse to share information, leading to misaligned priorities, reduced morale, and the death of productivity.⁸

In education, we have perfected this dysfunctional structure.

We march students from a 50-minute math class to a 50-minute history class to a 50-minute English class, with bells dictating the arbitrary start and end of learning.

As education reformer Ted Sizer once asked after visiting a high school, “Why is U.S. History taught in the morning and American Literature in the afternoon?” The only answer was, “Well, that’s the way scheduling sets up the courses”.⁹

There is no deeper pedagogical reason.

This structure actively prevents the natural collaboration between subjects, making it impossible for students to see the rich connections between, for instance, the mathematical principles in a physics experiment or the artistic influences in a historical movement.⁹

The student experience of this fragmented curriculum was perfectly captured in research by Robin Fogarty, who quoted a high schooler’s lament: “Math isn’t science, science isn’t English, English isn’t history.

A subject is something you take once and need never take again.

It’s like getting a vaccination; I’ve had my shot of algebra.

I’m done with that”.¹¹

This fragmentation is more than just an organizational inefficiency; it is a cognitive handicap we impose on our students.

The world’s most pressing problems—climate change, economic inequality, global pandemics—are not siloed.

They are complex, interconnected systems of science, economics, politics, ethics, and culture.

By teaching students to see the world in disconnected pieces, we are actively training them not to see the patterns, relationships, and systems that govern their lives.

We are crippling their ability to tackle the very problems their generation must solve.

1.3 The Human Cost: Disengagement, Burnout, and Lost Potential

The predictable and devastating outcomes of this factory-silo model are twofold: widespread student disengagement and an epidemic of teacher burnout.

For students, the experience is one of passive learning.

They become recipients of information, not active participants in its creation.³

They are drilled to memorize facts for standardized tests, a process that emphasizes grades over a genuine understanding of the material.⁶

This creates a culture of immense stress and anxiety, where students feel their worth is determined by a letter grade rather than their curiosity or creativity.¹⁴

They can’t see the relevance of what they’re learning because the siloed curriculum is utterly disconnected from the reality of their lives.³

As one student powerfully stated, it’s hard to live in a world that “isn’t built for us”.¹⁷

For teachers, the system is a recipe for burnout.

My own story of leaving the classroom is echoed in the voices of thousands of my colleagues.

We are professionals with multiple degrees and years of experience, yet we are treated as if we are not competent to do our jobs.¹

We are pressured to “teach to the test,” a soul-crushing mandate that forces us to abandon creative and meaningful instruction in favor of test-prep drills for an exam we aren’t even allowed to see.¹

The mental load is all-encompassing; we are expected to be social workers, counselors, and parents, all while being stripped of our professional autonomy.¹

We are stuck in a no-win situation, blamed for societal crises but denied the tools and trust to address them.¹

The poor academic outcomes we see in national statistics are merely a symptom of this deeper, emotional inefficiency.

No organization can succeed when it simultaneously demotivates its “clients” (the students) and exhausts its “workforce” (the teachers).

The factory is running, but it’s producing apathy and burnout, and hemorrhaging its most valuable people.

Part II: The Epiphany: Learning to See the Ecosystem for the Silos

My departure from the traditional classroom was not a rejection of teaching, but a desperate search for a better way to facilitate learning.

I decided to homeschool my own children, a choice born of the fear that the system I had dedicated my life to would extinguish the natural curiosity I saw in them.²

This journey into the “wilderness” outside the school walls was terrifying, but it was also liberating.

It gave me the freedom to observe how children

actually learn when they aren’t constrained by bells, subject blocks, and standardized tests.

2.1 A Journey into the Wilderness: Questioning Everything

The first few months were a process of “deschooling”—for me as much as for my kids.

I had to unlearn the instinct to schedule our days in 50-minute increments and to separate “math time” from “science time.” I watched as my son’s question about a weird bug in the garden organically blossomed into a week-long investigation.

It was a “science” lesson about insect life cycles, a “math” lesson as we graphed the frequency of different bugs we found, an “art” lesson as he drew them in his nature journal, and a “language arts” lesson as we researched them online and wrote a short report.

It was messy.

It was unpredictable.

And it was the deepest, most engaged learning I had ever witnessed.

He wasn’t learning because he was told to; he was learning because he was driven by a question.

I was seeing, firsthand, that learning is not a linear process.

It’s a Web.

2.2 The Discovery: Systems Thinking

This observation gnawed at me.

I knew what I was seeing was powerful, but I lacked the language to describe it.

The epiphany didn’t come from a book on education.

It came from reading about ecology and organizational management.

It was there that I discovered the concept of Systems Thinking.

Systems Thinking is a holistic approach that puts the study of wholes before that of parts.¹⁹

It focuses not on the individual components of a system, but on the web of interconnections and relationships between them, because it’s these interactions that produce the system’s behavior.²⁰

It is, as researchers describe it, the ability to see both “the whole beyond the parts” and “the parts in the context of the whole”.¹⁹

Suddenly, I had a framework.

The factory school model was the opposite of Systems Thinking.

It breaks the whole (the world) into disconnected parts (subjects) and tries to understand them in isolation.

It’s a fundamentally flawed approach because, as any ecologist knows, you can’t understand a forest by studying one tree at a time.

You have to understand the soil, the sunlight, the rainfall, the fungi, the insects, and the complex web of relationships that connect them all.

2.3 The Core Analogy: From Assembly Line to Learning Ecosystem

This led me to the central, paradigm-shifting analogy that has guided my work ever since.

We must stop thinking of our schools as assembly lines and start cultivating them as learning ecosystems.

• The Assembly Line (The Old Paradigm): This model is linear, standardized, and fragmented. It is obsessed with control and predictable, uniform outputs. The teacher is a foreman, tasked with ensuring each student-product moves through the line at the same pace, receiving the same standardized parts (knowledge packets) in the correct sequence. Success is measured by quality control at the end of the line (standardized tests).⁵
• The Learning Ecosystem (The New Paradigm): This model is a complex, adaptive, and interconnected web. It is not about controlling a linear process, but about cultivating the conditions for life and growth to emerge. The teacher is a “gardener” or an “ecosystem architect,” responsible for ensuring the environment is rich with nutrients (resources), sunlight (curiosity), and biodiversity (diverse perspectives). Success is not a uniform product, but a flourishing, resilient, and diverse ecosystem where every organism is thriving in its own unique way.²⁰ As one metaphor puts it, a change in one part of the system—like an acorn dropping in a pond—sends ripples across the entire surface.²²

This is not just a semantic change; it represents a fundamental shift in the goal of education.

The goal of the assembly line is to transmit information.

The goal of the ecosystem is to cultivate the capacity for learning.

This changes everything—the role of the teacher, the role of the student, and the very nature of the curriculum.

2.4 The Three Pillars of a Learning Ecosystem

From the principles of Systems Thinking and the ecosystem analogy, a new model for education emerges, built on three foundational pillars.

These pillars provide a practical framework for moving away from the factory model and beginning the work of cultivating a true learning ecosystem.

1. Interconnectedness: Knowledge is a web, not a series of boxes. The primary strategy to honor this is Interdisciplinary Learning.
2. Inquiry-Driven Exploration: Learning is not passive reception; it is an active process of navigating complexity. The core pedagogy for this is Project-Based Learning (PBL).
3. Authentic Contribution: Learning is deepest and most durable when it serves a real purpose beyond the classroom. The primary goal is connection to the Real World.

Part III: A Practical Guide to Cultivating a Learning Ecosystem

Translating a new paradigm into practice can feel daunting.

But the beauty of the ecosystem model is that it is built on proven, research-backed strategies that passionate educators are already using around the world.

It’s not about inventing something from scratch; it’s about weaving these powerful practices together into a coherent whole.

3.1 Pillar 1: Weaving the Web (Fostering Interconnectedness through Interdisciplinary Learning)

The first and most crucial step in dismantling the factory model is to break down the artificial walls between subjects.

This is the work of Interdisciplinary Learning, a method that combines multiple subjects to address complex problems and themes that cannot be understood through a single lens.²³

Instead of teaching history and literature in separate blocks, we ask: How did the literature of the time shape the history, and how did the history shape the literature?

This approach fundamentally changes the learning experience.

It pushes students beyond rote memorization and asks them to think critically, evaluate conflicting perspectives, recognize their own biases, and synthesize ideas from multiple domains to form a more comprehensive and durable understanding of the world.²³

Research even suggests this model is particularly effective for adolescents, as it mirrors the way their brains are naturally forming new and complex neural connections during a period of rapid cognitive growth.²⁷

To make this concrete, let’s revisit my failed American Revolution unit and reimagine it through the lens of a learning ecosystem.

Table 1: A Tale of Two Curricula: Assembly Line vs. Ecosystem Approach

Feature	Assembly Line (Traditional Unit)	Learning Ecosystem (Interdisciplinary Project)
Organizing Principle	History Subject Silo	Driving Question: What does it take to start a new country?
Disciplines Involved	History: Memorize causes, events, dates, and key figures of the war.	History: Analyze the causes and consequences of revolution. Civics: Deconstruct the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution as arguments and designs for a new government. Economics: Calculate the costs of war and analyze the economic grievances (e.g., taxation without representation). Math/Data Analysis: Analyze statistics of the conflict, casualty rates, and population demographics. Language Arts/Rhetoric: Analyze the persuasive power of primary sources like Common Sense and write their own persuasive pamphlets.
Core Activities	Read textbook chapters, complete worksheets, listen to lectures.	Research historical case studies, debate the principles of governance, interview local government officials, design a budget for a new nation, write and design persuasive media.
Role of Teacher	Lecturer / Dispenser of Information	Facilitator / Co-learner / Resource Curator
Final Product	Five-paragraph essay on the causes of the war.	A “New Country Proposal” (including a constitution, a budget, and a persuasive campaign) presented to a real-world audience.
Assessment	Multiple-choice and short-answer test on memorized facts.	Public presentation to a panel of community members (e.g., local historians, city council members, lawyers); a portfolio of individual work (research notes, essays, calculations); a written reflection on the process.

This table illustrates that an interdisciplinary approach isn’t about abandoning standards or rigor.

It’s about meeting them in a way that is more engaging, more effective, and more reflective of how the world actually works.

3.2 Pillar 2: The Thrill of the Hunt (Fostering Inquiry through Project-Based Learning)

If interdisciplinary learning provides the map of the ecosystem, Project-Based Learning (PBL) is the engine that drives exploration.

In the old model, a “project” was often a “dessert” activity—a fun thing to do after the “real learning” of lectures and worksheets was finished.

In the ecosystem model, the project is the vehicle for learning.²⁸

Gold Standard PBL is defined as a teaching method where students gain knowledge and skills by working for an extended period to investigate and respond to an authentic, engaging, and complex question, problem, or challenge.²⁸

This pedagogy is the engine of the ecosystem because it shifts the classroom from a place of passive reception to one of active inquiry.

It promotes deep learning, critical thinking, and collaboration by challenging students to tackle open-ended problems that have no single right answer, forcing them to learn how to learn.³¹

After leaving the classroom, I put this to the test with my own children and a small homeschool co-op.

We embarked on a project driven by a simple question from my daughter: “Is the creek in our backyard clean?” This question launched a semester-long investigation.

• Biology: We learned how to take water samples and identify macroinvertebrates as indicators of water health.
• Chemistry: We researched common pollutants like nitrates and phosphates and used test kits to measure their levels.
• Social Studies & Civics: We investigated local zoning laws and interviewed a representative from the town’s conservation commission to understand regulations.
• Communications & Technology: The students synthesized their findings, created graphs to display the data, and built a slideshow presentation.

The culmination was not a test, but a presentation to the town’s conservation commission.

The students were nervous, passionate, and incredibly proud.

They hadn’t just “learned about” science; they had been scientists.

My role had completely transformed.

I was no longer a lecturer, but a facilitator, a research partner, and a guide.³¹

I was a co-learner, and it was the most exhilarating teaching I had ever done.

This is the power of PBL: it turns the curriculum from a list of topics to cover into a series of compelling adventures.

3.3 Pillar 3: Making It Matter (Fostering Authentic Contribution through Real-World Connection)

The final, and perhaps most crucial, pillar of a thriving learning ecosystem is authenticity.

The deepest learning happens when students see that their work has a purpose and an audience beyond the teacher and the classroom walls.

This is the secret ingredient that transforms a school assignment into a meaningful contribution.

Some of the most innovative schools in the world are built around this principle.

• Case Study 1: High Tech High (USA): This network of charter schools in San Diego is renowned for its stunning, real-world student projects. The work is not practice; it is real. Students have created museum-quality exhibits on the physics of motion, published books illustrating economic concepts, analyzed actual case files for the California Innocence Project, and designed and built mobile planters for local kindergartens.³⁴ The key is that their work is made public and serves a genuine purpose in the community, which elevates the stakes and the quality of the learning.
• Case Study 2: Big Picture Learning (USA): The Big Picture model is founded on the principle that learning must be based on the interests and goals of each student. Their motto is “the community is the school”.³⁷ A core component of their design is the “Learning Through Internship” (LTI) program, where students spend two days a week at an internship site, learning from a mentor in a field that interests them.³⁸ The curriculum is co-designed by the student, their teacher-advisor, and their mentor, making it inherently relevant, personalized, and connected to the adult world.
• Case Study 3: Finland’s Phenomenon-Based Learning (PhenoBL): Finland, a global leader in education, has embedded this principle into its national curriculum. Every school is required to facilitate at least one interdisciplinary, “phenomenon-based” learning module per year.³⁹ Students don’t just study subjects; they investigate complex, real-world phenomena like “The European Union” or “Climate Change” or “Food Culture in Germany”.⁴⁰ This approach breaks down subject barriers and requires students to apply knowledge from multiple fields to develop a holistic understanding of a real-world issue.⁴²

These three examples, though different in their specifics, all share a non-negotiable core belief: learning is not a simulation.

When students are creating something for a real audience—a client, a community partner, a museum, a government body—it taps into a fundamental human need to contribute and be valued.

The quality of their work and their level of engagement skyrocket because it is no longer just an assignment; it is their legacy.

Part IV: Challenges and Considerations for the Ecosystem Gardener

To suggest that transitioning from a century-old factory model to a living ecosystem is easy would be naive.

This path is filled with challenges, both practical and philosophical.

But these challenges are not reasons to abandon the journey; they are simply the terrain that every ecosystem gardener must learn to navigate.

Acknowledging them head-on is the first step toward overcoming them.

4.1 Acknowledging the Thorns: Common Challenges and Criticisms

The shift to an interdisciplinary, project-based model presents real hurdles.

With PBL, teachers often face student apathy or resistance, especially from learners conditioned to be passive.

Open-ended projects can feel “messy” and lead to low productivity or inconsistent quality if not structured well.³¹

Teachers, too, can resist, feeling overwhelmed by the increased preparation time and unfamiliar with the role of facilitator.⁴⁴

Interdisciplinary studies face their own set of criticisms.

A primary concern is the potential for a lack of disciplinary depth—the “jack of all trades, master of none” problem.⁴⁵

Some argue that students cannot engage in meaningful interdisciplinary work until they have a mature foundation in the contributing disciplines, and that attempting to do so too early leads to a diluted, superficial experience.⁴⁶

Furthermore, the logistics of team-teaching can be fraught with challenges, including insufficient time for collaboration, territorial conflicts between departments, and a lack of training in group dynamics.⁴⁷

4.2 Practical Solutions for a New Reality

These challenges are significant, but they are solvable.

They do not represent inherent flaws in the ecosystem model, but rather the friction that occurs when a new, dynamic system pushes up against the rigid structures of the old one.

• On Assessment: We must move beyond the multiple-choice test. Authentic assessment is key. This means evaluating students based on the quality of their work and their ability to apply knowledge. Portfolios, public exhibitions, and presentations to panels of outside experts are far more meaningful measures of learning than a standardized test score.³³ To ensure individual accountability within group projects, it’s crucial to grade individual contributions—research notes, written components, reflections—rather than assigning a single grade to the group.⁴⁹ This prevents “social loafing” and gives the teacher accurate data on each student’s understanding.
• On Time and Resources: The idea of redesigning the entire curriculum can be paralyzing. The solution is to start small. A teacher can begin by collaborating with just one colleague from another department to find a single point of curricular overlap.²⁷ They can pilot one small interdisciplinary project instead of trying to overhaul the entire year. This incremental approach allows teachers to build their skills and confidence, demonstrating success on a small scale before advocating for larger changes.
• On Teacher Training: This model requires a profound shift in the teacher’s role from “sage on the stage” to “guide on the side.” This does not happen overnight. It requires sustained, collaborative, and ongoing professional development that is itself project-based. Teachers need to experience this type of learning themselves to understand how to facilitate it.⁴⁴ School leaders must create the time and space within the school day for teachers to meet, plan, and co-design these rich experiences.

Ultimately, the biggest barrier to creating learning ecosystems is the immune response of the existing system.

The very structures of our schools—the 50-minute bell schedule, the physically separate departments, the reliance on standardized test scores for accountability, the teacher evaluation systems—are all designed to support and perpetuate the factory model.

They create an environment that is actively hostile to the deep, messy, and time-consuming work of interdisciplinary, project-based learning.

Therefore, true and lasting reform requires more than just changing what happens inside individual classrooms.

It requires a systems-level change to the structures that surround them, a point that echoes in national education reform debates from the UK to the US.⁵¹

Conclusion: There Is No Going Back

My journey began with the quiet despair of a burned-out teacher watching a lesson die in her classroom.

I was a factory foreman, dutifully trying to assemble a product from students who had no interest in being built.

Today, having walked through the wilderness of questioning everything, I see my role entirely differently.

I am an ecosystem gardener.

My work is not to transmit information, but to cultivate the conditions for curiosity, inquiry, and connection to flourish.

It is harder, less predictable, and infinitely more rewarding.

The conclusion is inescapable: the siloed, subject-based factory model of school is an obsolete relic.

It is failing our students, burning out our teachers, and leaving our society unprepared for a complex future.

The path forward is to embrace the logic of living systems and begin the work of transforming our schools into vibrant learning ecosystems—places that are interconnected, inquiry-driven, and authentically tied to the real world.

This is not a call for a top-down, one-size-fits-all revolution.

The very nature of an ecosystem is that it is local and adaptive.

The change begins with small, intentional actions from every stakeholder in the system.

• For Teachers: Find one colleague in another department. Sit down with your curricula and find one point of overlap. Design one small project that allows students to connect the two. Start a conversation in the faculty lounge about what real engagement looks like.
• For Parents: At your next parent-teacher conference, ask different questions. Instead of starting with “What is my child’s grade?” start with “What is my child curious about? What are they excited to learn? How are they contributing to their class community?” Advocate for more project-based opportunities at your school. Join a parent forum and make your voice heard.⁵⁴
• For School Leaders: You are the chief ecosystem architects. Create the most valuable resource of all: time. Restructure the master schedule to allow for longer, integrated learning blocks. Champion authentic, portfolio-based assessment over a fixation on standardized test scores. Trust your teachers as the professionals they are, and give them the autonomy and support to innovate.

This is not a new educational fad.

It is a return to something fundamental.

It is about aligning the way we structure our schools with the way human beings are wired to learn and the way the world actually works.

It is the difficult, necessary, and hopeful work of trading our assembly lines for gardens.

We have been manufacturing compliance for long enough.

It is time to start cultivating potential.

Works cited

1. Teachers are quitting in droves, and it’s not about the low pay …, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.upworthy.com/why-teachers-are-quitting-ex1
2. Former teachers now homeschooling… – The Well Trained Mind Forum, accessed August 13, 2025, https://forums.welltrainedmind.com/topic/90549-former-teachers-now-homeschooling/
3. Pros And Cons Of Traditional Teaching: A Detailed Guide – Blogs, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.billabonghighschool.com/blogs/pros-and-cons-of-traditional-teaching-a-detailed-guide/
4. 7 Disadvantages of Traditional Teaching Methods and a Viable Alternative – SoCal City Kids, accessed August 13, 2025, https://socalcitykids.com/7-disadvantages-of-traditional-teaching-methods-and-a-viable-alternative/
5. Why Traditional School is Broken (And How 2 Hour Learning Is …, accessed August 13, 2025, https://2hourlearning.com/why-traditional-school-is-broken-and-how-were-fixing-it/
6. Why the Traditional Model of Education Isn’t Working for Our Kids – Spielgaben, accessed August 13, 2025, https://spielgaben.com/why-the-traditional-model-of-education-isnt-working-for-our-kids/
7. Why We Need to Move Away from Traditional Learning Methods? | by Tony | Medium, accessed August 13, 2025, https://medium.com/@tonygreat1/why-we-need-to-move-away-from-traditional-learning-methods-1d1411dfe5c6
8. Is A Silo Mentality The Most Overlooked Barrier in Education? | by Eric Patnoudes, M.Ed., accessed August 13, 2025, https://medium.com/@NoApp4Pedagogy/is-a-silo-mentality-the-most-overlooked-barrier-in-education-8534d6a49be8
9. The School Principal- Education Silos and Loss of Integrated Knowledge & Skills, accessed August 13, 2025, https://edvistas.com/the-school-principal-education-silos-and-loss-of-integrated-knowledge-skills/
10. De-Siloing Education | The International Educator (TIE Online), accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.tieonline.com/article/3699/de-siloing-education
11. These 10 models give school faculties a solid foundation for designing curriculums that help their students make valuable connections while learning., accessed August 13, 2025, https://mlc-wels.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/10-Ways-Fogarty.pdf
12. Ten Ways to Integrate Curriculum – ASCD, accessed August 13, 2025, https://files.ascd.org/staticfiles/ascd/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_199110_fogarty.pdf
13. Why traditional education is not the best for everyone – The Observer, accessed August 13, 2025, https://observer.case.edu/why-traditional-education-is-not-the-best-for-everyone/
14. The Student’s Perspective | EDUCAUSE, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/educating-net-generation/students-perspective
15. Authorizing Students’ Perspectives: Toward Trust, Dialogue, and Change in Education, accessed August 13, 2025, https://repository.brynmawr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=edu_pubs
16. Focus on interests or study all subjects in school? | by chel writes | ILLUMINATION’S MIRROR | Medium, accessed August 13, 2025, https://medium.com/illuminations-mirror/focus-on-interests-or-study-all-subjects-in-school-64fe46d6a8b3
17. A Student Perspective on Education Systems Reform Through Research and Data, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/blog/a-student-perspective-on-education-systems-reform-through-research-and-data/
18. Why are teachers quitting and what can we do about it? – Stand Together, accessed August 13, 2025, https://standtogether.org/stories/education/why-are-teachers-quitting-and-what-can-we-do-about-it
19. Systems Thinking for Principals of Learning- Focused Schools – ERIC, accessed August 13, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1228602.pdf
20. 5 ways to better teach systems thinking skills in education | World Economic Forum, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/11/systems-thinking-has-great-potential-in-education-here-are-5-ways-to-deliver-it/
21. Teaching Students About Systems Thinking – Edutopia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.edutopia.org/article/teaching-k-12-students-systems-thinking/
22. Connecting Systems Thinking and Action – The Systems Thinker, accessed August 13, 2025, https://thesystemsthinker.com/connecting-systems-thinking-and-action/
23. Interdisciplinary Education: An Overview – American University, accessed August 13, 2025, https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/interdisciplinary-education/
24. Interdisciplinary Education Literature Review and Landscape Analysis, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.lucasedresearch.org/docs/interdisciplinary-education/
25. Interdisciplinary Teaching Strategies for High School – XQ Institute, accessed August 13, 2025, https://xqsuperschool.org/education-policy/interdisciplinary-teaching-and-learning/
26. Interdisciplinary Teaching: The Why, What, and How, accessed August 13, 2025, https://propello.com/blog/interdisciplinary-teaching
27. An Argument for Interdisciplinary Learning in Middle School – Scholar Commons, accessed August 13, 2025, https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=scamle
28. What is Project Based Learning? | PBLWorks, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.pblworks.org/what-is-pbl
29. Getting Started with Project-Based Learning – Columbia Center for Teaching and Learning, accessed August 13, 2025, https://ctl.columbia.edu/resources-and-technology/resources/project-based-learning/
30. en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 13, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project-based_learning
31. Project Based Learning: The Possibilities and Pitfalls of a Promising Learning Style – Defined Learning | Blog, accessed August 13, 2025, https://blog.definedlearning.com/blog/project-based-learning-for-new-pbl-teachers-possibilities-and-pitfalls
32. Project-based Learning, Explained | Worcester Polytechnic Institute, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.wpi.edu/news/explainers/project-based-learning
33. Why Is Project-Based Learning Important? – Edutopia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.edutopia.org/project-based-learning-guide-importance
34. Changing the Subject – 20 Years of High Tech High Projects, accessed August 13, 2025, https://changingthesubject.org/
35. Examples of Project-Based Learning at High Tech High, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.hightechhigh.org/student-work/projects/
36. Project School Site: High Tech High, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.hightechhigh.org/hth/project_school_site/high-tech-high/
37. Big Picture Learning: A school design that feels different — and it works! – Truth For Teachers, accessed August 13, 2025, https://truthforteachers.com/truth-for-teachers-podcast/big-picture-learning-and-student-centered-strategies/
38. 2024-2025 Big Picture Handbook – Google Docs, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.lafayetteschools.org/tfiles/folder1145/2024-2025%20Big%20Picture%20Handbook%20-%20Google%20Docs.pdf
39. FINNISH INTERDISCIPLINARY LEARNING MODULES – Peda.net, accessed August 13, 2025, https://peda.net/id/173bfabe4af
40. What is Finland’s Phenomenon-based Learning approach? – Teacher Magazine, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.teachermagazine.com/au_en/articles/what-is-finlands-phenomenon-based-learning-approach
41. 10 Innovative Educational Practices from Finnish Schools – TechClass, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.techclass.com/education-insights/10-innovative-educational-practices-from-finnish-schools
42. Implications of Finnish Phenomenal Teaching for Interdisciplinary Teaching in Basic Education in China – Scientific Research Publishing, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=135012
43. 7 Common Project-Based Learning Challenges and How to Overcome Them, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.experientiallearningdepot.com/experiential-learning-blog/common-project-based-learning-challenges-and-troubleshooting-tips
44. Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of Project-Based Learning in Higher Education, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376198430_Exploring_the_Benefits_and_Challenges_of_Project-Based_Learning_in_Higher_Education
45. Advantages and Drawbacks of Interdisciplinary Education Studies || Neodrafts – Medium, accessed August 13, 2025, https://medium.com/@ar6323133/advantages-and-drawbacks-of-interdisciplinary-education-studies-neodrafts-4e9668f98b33
46. FIVE ARGUMENTS AGAINST INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES – Oakland University, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.oakland.edu/Assets/upload/docs/AIS/Issues-in-Interdisciplinary-Studies/1982-Volume-01/02_Vol_1_pp_38-48_Five_Arguments_Against_Interdisciplinary_Studies_(Thomas_C._Benson).pdf
47. Advantages, Disadvantages, and the Future Benefits of Interdisciplinary Studies – DigitalCommons@COD, accessed August 13, 2025, https://dc.cod.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1121&context=essai
48. The learning problems of design-based interdisciplinary education, accessed August 13, 2025, https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1098&context=iasdr
49. 3 Common PBL Problems—and Solutions | Edutopia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.edutopia.org/article/3-common-pbl-problems-and-solutions/
50. Teacher’s View: Project-Based Learning Can Help Educators and Students Succeed, accessed August 13, 2025, https://blog.definedlearning.com/how-pbl-can-help-educators-and-students-succeed
51. Applying Systems Thinking to Education: The RISE Systems Framework – RISE Programme, accessed August 13, 2025, https://riseprogramme.org/sites/default/files/2021-05/Applying_Systems_Thinking_Education_FINAL.pdf
52. Ten lessons on driving successful school reform – Schools Week, accessed August 13, 2025, https://schoolsweek.co.uk/ten-lessons-on-driving-successful-school-reform/
53. Debate on SEND provision, House of Commons, 5 September 2024 | Local Government Association, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.local.gov.uk/parliament/briefings-and-responses/debate-send-provision-house-commons-5-september-2024
54. Advocacy – Parents Forum, accessed August 13, 2025, https://parentsforum.org/advocacy/
55. Connecting Families: The Vital Role of the Bowley Parent Forum, accessed August 13, 2025, https://bowleyes.dodea.edu/news/articles/connecting-families-vital-role-bowley-parent-forum