A Comparative Analysis of U.S. Higher Education: A Strategic Guide for Stakeholders

Executive Summary

The selection of a university is one of the most significant financial and personal decisions an individual or family will make.

The landscape of American higher education, dominated by the choice between state-funded public universities and independent private institutions, is often navigated using outdated stereotypes and simplistic assumptions.

This report provides a comprehensive, data-driven comparison of these university models to equip stakeholders—including prospective students, families, counselors, and policymakers—with a nuanced framework for strategic decision-making.

The central finding of this analysis is that the choice between a state and a private university is not a simple matter of cost or prestige, but a complex determination of “fit” across financial, academic, and cultural dimensions.

The widely cited “sticker price” of tuition is a misleading metric; the true cost is the “net price” paid after financial aid.

While state universities appear more affordable on the surface, this report reveals that substantial institutional aid from private universities can make them surprisingly competitive on final cost, particularly for out-of-state students and those with significant financial need or high academic merit.

Furthermore, the report deconstructs monolithic concepts like “diversity” and “quality.” State universities often excel in creating socioeconomically and demographically diverse communities that reflect their home state’s population.

In contrast, private universities frequently achieve greater geographic diversity, drawing students from across the nation and the world.

Similarly, the academic experience differs significantly, with public institutions offering immense breadth and choice, while private institutions often provide greater depth and personalized mentorship.

Ultimately, this report moves beyond binary judgments to illuminate the underlying structures that shape each university type.

By understanding the distinct funding models, governance, missions, and financial pressures that define public and private institutions, stakeholders can better align a student’s individual learning style, career aspirations, and financial circumstances with the university model best suited to ensure their success.

Section 1: Foundational Models: Governance, Mission, and Structure

The most fundamental distinction between American university types lies not in their campus architecture or athletic prowess, but in their financial and governance structures.

The source of an institution’s funding is the primary determinant of its mission, its scale, its obligations, and its overall character.

This foundational DNA explains nearly every subsequent difference in cost, culture, and curriculum.

1.1 The Public University Mandate: An Engine of Access and State Development

Public, or state, universities are institutions of higher education that are primarily funded by state governments, with additional financial support from federal and local sources.¹

This government funding acts as a direct subsidy to the institution, a system designed to lower the cost of attendance for residents of that state, whose families contribute to the university’s upkeep through taxes.³

This funding model directly shapes their governance and mission.

Public universities are governed by public officials or their appointees and are accountable to the state legislature and, by extension, the taxpayers.⁵

Their core mission is intrinsically tied to serving the needs of the state’s population.⁶

This public mandate translates into several key operational priorities: ensuring broad access to higher education for state residents, maintaining affordability (especially for in-state students), and often developing academic programs that align with and support key state industries.¹

To fulfill this mission of serving a large and diverse populace, state universities have evolved into structurally large institutions, often characterized by sprawling campuses, massive student bodies, and a comprehensive array of academic programs designed to meet a wide spectrum of educational and professional needs.³

1.2 The Private University Ecosystem: Autonomy and Specialized Missions

In contrast, private universities operate as independent entities, most commonly as non-profit organizations.⁸

They do not receive primary funding from state governments.

Instead, their financial model is built upon a combination of student tuition payments, philanthropic donations from alumni and other benefactors, and, most significantly for established institutions, income generated from endowments—large investment funds built over generations.¹

Governed by independent boards of trustees, private universities possess a high degree of operational autonomy.¹⁰

Free from the direct oversight of state legislatures, they have the liberty to define their own curricula, set their own institutional priorities, and cultivate unique missions.¹⁰

This independence fosters a highly diverse ecosystem of institutions.

Some may focus on a traditional liberal arts education, others may have a specific religious affiliation, and many offer highly specialized or unique interdisciplinary programs that set them apart.¹

This specialized approach, combined with a funding model not predicated on mass enrollment, typically results in smaller student populations, more intimate campus communities, and a more curated, though often narrower, selection of academic offerings compared to their public counterparts.³

Table 1: Comparative Overview of University Models

Institution Type	Primary Funding Source	Governance Structure	Typical Size (Student Body)	Core Mission
Public University	State/Federal Appropriations, Tuition	Public Board / State Legislature	Large (15,000+)	Broad access for state residents, workforce development, research 5
Private Non-Profit University	Tuition, Endowments, Donations	Independent Board of Trustees	Small to Large (<5,000 to 15,000+)	Specialized education, research, specific values (e.g., liberal arts, religious) 1

The causal relationship is clear: the source of funding dictates accountability.

Public universities are accountable to the state, which mandates a focus on access and affordability for residents.

Private universities are accountable to their boards and donors, which allows for mission-driven autonomy.

This difference is the “source code” for the entire spectrum of characteristics that distinguish these institutions, from admissions policies and curriculum design to campus culture and the final cost to the student.

Section 2: The Economic Engine: A Deep Dive into University Finance

The financial landscape of American higher education is complex and frequently misunderstood.

Simplistic notions of “public is cheap” and “private is expensive” obscure the intricate mechanics of university revenue, the strategic use of financial aid, and the emerging economic pressures that are causing the traditional models to converge.

For any stakeholder, a sophisticated understanding of university finance is essential to accurately assess affordability and value.

2.1 Dueling Revenue Streams: State Appropriations vs. Private Endowments

The economic health and operational stability of universities are directly tied to their primary revenue sources.

For public universities, this is the annual state appropriation.

For private universities, it is the income from their endowment.

Public Funding Models: State appropriations constitute the financial backbone of public higher education, with direct allocations to colleges making up 90% of all state support.¹³

States employ various mechanisms to distribute these funds.

Many use a “base plus” approach, where an institution’s funding in a given year is an adjustment from the previous year’s level, often tied to enrollment figures like full-time enrollment (FTE).⁵

A smaller but growing portion of funding is tied to performance-based metrics, such as graduation rates, though this comprises less than 10% of total state funding.¹³

However, this reliance on public coffers creates vulnerability.

Over the past few decades, per-student state funding has been in long-term decline, making these institutions highly sensitive to state budget cuts and economic downturns.¹³

This financial instability has been a primary driver for public universities to seek alternative revenue, leading them to rely more heavily on tuition and to actively recruit higher-paying out-of-state and international students to bridge funding gaps.¹⁵

The Nature of Endowments: Private university endowments are frequently misconstrued as massive institutional savings accounts.

In reality, an endowment is a portfolio of hundreds or thousands of individual donated funds, invested to generate income in perpetuity.¹⁴

A critical feature is that a large portion of these funds is “restricted” by donors, meaning the principal cannot be touched and the income can only be used for specific purposes, such as funding a scholarship, endowing a professorship, or maintaining a specific building.¹⁷

This limits the university’s flexibility in using endowment income for general operating expenses or to cover sudden budget shortfalls.¹⁸

To ensure the endowment’s longevity, institutions follow prudent spending policies, typically paying out only a small percentage (around 5%) of the fund’s market value each year.¹⁴

Emerging Financial Pressures: Both models are facing significant new financial challenges.

Public universities remain exposed to the volatility of state politics and economies.¹³

Meanwhile, the wealthiest private universities are now subject to a new federal excise tax on their net investment income.

The tiered tax system can charge up to 8% on investment earnings for institutions with the largest endowments per student, such as Harvard, Yale, and Stanford.¹⁹

This policy directly diverts tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars annually that would have otherwise supported financial aid and academic operations, forcing even the wealthiest schools to implement budget reductions and hiring freezes.¹⁷

2.2 The Cost of Attendance (COA): Deconstructing the Sticker Price

The most visible difference between public and private universities is their published price, or “sticker price.” This figure, however, is only the starting point in the affordability calculation.

The gap in published tuition and fees is substantial.

Based on data for the 2024-2025 academic year, the average published tuition and fees at a four-year institution were approximately $11,610 for in-state students at public universities, $30,780 for out-of-state students at public universities, and $43,350 at private non-profit universities.²

However, tuition and fees are only one component of the total Cost of Attendance (COA).

When essential expenses like on-campus housing, meal plans, books, and transportation are included, the total average sticker price escalates dramatically.

For 2024-2025, the estimated total COA reached approximately $29,900 for an in-state public university student, $49,100 for an out-of-state public university student, and $63,000 for a private non-profit university student.²²

The most dramatic disparity is the chasm between in-state and out-of-state tuition at public universities.

This price differential is by design; state universities are subsidized by state taxes, and the lower in-state tuition is a benefit for the residents who provide that subsidy.⁴

The premium charged to non-residents has become an indispensable revenue source for these institutions.⁴

In states like California and Michigan, this difference can exceed $25,000 per year, making the cost of attending an out-of-state public university potentially higher than that of attending a private one.¹

Table 2: Cost of Attendance (COA) Analysis, 2024-2025

Institution Type	Average Tuition & Fees	Average Room & Board	Average Total COA (“Sticker Price”)
Public 4-Year (In-State)	$11,610	$13,310	$29,910
Public 4-Year (Out-of-State)	$30,780	$13,310	$49,080
Private Non-Profit 4-Year	$43,350	$15,250	$62,990
Source: Data compiled from CollegeBoard and Bankrate reports for the 2024-2025 academic year.2

2.3 The Great Equalizer: Financial Aid and the Net Price Reality

The sticker price is not the price most students pay.

The “net price”—the actual amount a family pays after all grant and scholarship aid is deducted from the COA—is the true measure of affordability.

It is in the realm of financial aid that the cost difference between public and private universities often narrows dramatically.

The key factor is institutional aid.

While public universities offer aid, their ability to do so is often constrained by limited state resources.²⁵

In contrast, private universities, particularly those with large endowments, leverage their financial strength to offer substantial institutional grants and scholarships.²

This practice, known as “tuition discounting,” is a strategic effort to attract desirable students and make the high sticker price more manageable.

According to the National Association of College and University Business Officers, the average institutional tuition discount rate for first-time, full-time students at private non-profit universities reached a record high of 56% in the 2023-2024 academic year.²⁷

This means many students are effectively paying less than half the published tuition price.

Federal aid dynamics also play a role.

The amount of federal need-based aid a student receives, such as the Pell Grant, is calculated based on both family need and the institution’s COA.

Because private universities have a higher COA, an eligible student may receive a larger Pell Grant and more aid from programs like the Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (FSEOG) than they would at a lower-cost state school, further closing the affordability gap.²⁶

When this powerful combination of institutional and federal aid is applied, the net price reality looks very different from the sticker price.

While the average net price for an in-state public university student remains the lowest at around $20,800, the average for a private university student drops to around $36,200.²³

Crucially, for many individual students—especially those from low-income families or with high academic or artistic merit—a generous financial aid package from a private university can result in a net price that is lower than an out-of-state public university, and in some cases, even lower than their in-state public option.²

Table 3: The Impact of Financial Aid on Affordability (Sticker Price vs. Net Price)

Institution Type	Average Total COA (“Sticker Price”)	Average Net Price (After Grants/Scholarships)
Public 4-Year (In-State)	$29,910	$20,780
Private Non-Profit 4-Year	$62,990	$36,150
Source: Data compiled from BestColleges.com and CollegeBoard reports for the 2024-2025 academic year.21 Net price for out-of-state public universities varies too widely to provide a meaningful average.

The financial models of these institutions are converging.

Pressured by declining state support, public universities are forced to adopt more privatized revenue strategies, such as aggressively recruiting out-of-state students.¹⁶

Simultaneously, facing political scrutiny and the need to justify their high costs, private universities are compelled to act in a quasi-public manner by investing heavily in financial aid to ensure access.²⁹

This creates a dynamic marketplace where stakeholders cannot rely on institutional labels to predict cost.

The only reliable strategy is to investigate the potential net price at each specific university under consideration.

Section 3: The Academic Core: Programs, Faculty, and Research

Beyond the balance sheets, the intellectual heart of a university is its academic environment.

The differences in funding, scale, and mission between public and private institutions create distinct landscapes for learning and discovery.

The choice between them is often a choice between academic breadth and depth, between large-scale research and focused mentorship, and between different modes of student support.

3.1 Breadth vs. Depth: The Spectrum of Academic Offerings

A primary academic distinction lies in the scope of the course catalog.

State universities, with their large size and mission to serve a broad state population, typically offer a comprehensive and expansive range of academic programs, majors, and minors.⁸

A large public university like Purdue offers over 200 majors, covering nearly every conceivable field of study.²⁹

This breadth makes them an ideal environment for students who are undecided about their major or who wish to have the flexibility to explore a wide variety of academic disciplines before committing to one.¹

Private universities, particularly smaller liberal arts colleges, tend to offer a more focused or limited range of majors.³

Their financial and physical capacity does not support the same encyclopedic catalog as a flagship state school.

However, their independence allows them to excel in creating specialized, niche, or innovative interdisciplinary programs that might be overlooked by larger institutions.¹

For a student with a clear and defined academic passion, the focused curriculum of a private university that specializes in their field of interest can be a significant advantage.²⁹

3.2 The Research Landscape: Scale vs. Focus

Both public and private universities are vital engines of research and innovation, but they often approach this mission from different perspectives.

As major recipients of state and federal research funding, large public universities are often epicenters for massive, government-sponsored research initiatives.⁵

They boast extensive infrastructure, including state-of-the-art laboratories, vast library systems, and dedicated research parks, offering unparalleled resources and scale, particularly in the STEM fields.²

For students interested in large-scale, collaborative projects, these institutions provide an exceptional environment.

Elite private research universities like Stanford and Johns Hopkins are also global leaders in research, funded heavily by their endowments and private grants.²

The research environment at these and other private institutions can be more personalized.

They often emphasize targeted research programs and offer competitive fellowships that may provide undergraduates with more direct, one-on-one research opportunities alongside faculty members.²⁸

While smaller private colleges cannot match the sheer scale of public research efforts, their smaller size can translate into more accessible research experiences for undergraduates.²

3.3 The Learning Environment: Class Size, Faculty Interaction, and Student Support

Perhaps the most tangible difference in the day-to-day academic experience is the learning environment itself, shaped primarily by class size and the resulting level of faculty interaction.

This is a defining characteristic.

Public universities are well-known for large lecture-style classes, especially in introductory and lower-division courses, where enrollment can easily exceed 200 students.²

This scale is a necessity to educate their large student bodies.

In stark contrast, private universities consistently market their small class sizes and low student-to-faculty ratios as a core strength.¹

An average class size of 15-20 students is common, and some have student-to-faculty ratios as low as 3:1.³¹

This size differential has a direct impact on faculty interaction and mentorship.

The intimate setting of a small private university class naturally fosters more personalized attention, encourages active participation, and allows for the development of stronger relationships between students and professors.¹

This can lead to more tailored academic advising, more meaningful letters of recommendation, and more direct career guidance.¹

While direct faculty interaction in a large lecture hall may be less frequent, public universities are not devoid of support.

They invest heavily in extensive support systems to serve their students, including dedicated tutoring centers, writing labs, supplemental instruction sessions, and large academic advising departments designed to help students navigate the institution’s offerings and bureaucracy.¹

These factors point to two different pedagogical models.

The scale of the public university often necessitates a “consumer” model for undergraduate education, where students are presented with a vast menu of courses, programs, and support services from which they must proactively build their own educational experience.

The smaller scale of many private universities facilitates an “apprentice” model, where students can work more closely with faculty in a more guided, seminar-style environment.

Neither approach is inherently superior; their effectiveness depends on the individual student’s learning style.

A self-directed, independent learner can thrive in the resource-rich environment of a large public university.

A student who learns best through dialogue, collaboration, and direct mentorship may be better served by the high-touch environment of a private college.

Section 4: The University Experience: Culture, Community, and Admissions

A university education extends far beyond the classroom and laboratory.

The social fabric, campus culture, and student community are integral to the experience.

The structural differences between public and private universities create distinct social ecosystems, which in turn influence who applies, who is admitted, and what life is like once enrolled.

4.1 Campus Life and Student Community

The sheer scale of a university is a primary determinant of its campus culture.

Life at a large state university is often compared to living in a bustling metropolis.³¹

The campus is characterized by high energy, constant activity, and a seemingly endless array of student clubs, organizations, and large-scale events, particularly major NCAA Division I sporting events that serve as a powerful focus of school spirit and community identity.¹

In contrast, the experience at a smaller private university is more akin to living in a close-knit village.¹

The smaller student population fosters a more intimate and often more tightly-knit community where it is common to see familiar faces across campus.²

This environment can make it easier for students to connect deeply with peers and faculty, and institutional traditions often play a more central role in campus life.¹

4.2 A Tale of Two Diversities: Demographic vs. Geographic

The concept of “diversity” in higher education is not monolithic.

Public and private universities tend to cultivate different types of diversity due to their distinct missions and recruitment strategies.

By virtue of their public mandate, lower in-state tuition, and generally higher acceptance rates, state universities tend to enroll student bodies that are more demographically and socioeconomically diverse, often mirroring the population of their home state.²

They serve as a critical pathway to higher education for a broad cross-section of the state’s citizenry.

Private universities, on the other hand, typically charge the same tuition to all students, regardless of their state of residency.

This, combined with national and international recruitment efforts, often results in a more geographically diverse student body, attracting students from across the United States and around the world.²

It is important to note that both institutional types face significant challenges in achieving racial and ethnic diversity that reflects the nation as a whole, a persistent issue particularly among the most selective institutions.³⁵

This landscape is being further complicated by recent legal and political developments.

The 2023 Supreme Court ruling that effectively ended the use of race-based affirmative action in admissions, along with new federal data reporting requirements, is forcing all universities to fundamentally re-examine how they construct a diverse student body.³⁶

4.3 Navigating the Gates: Admissions Selectivity and Evolving Preferences

Admissions competitiveness varies widely and defies simple categorization.

While on average public universities have a higher acceptance rate (approximately 78%) than private universities (approximately 70%), this statistic masks a vast range of selectivity within each category.³⁸

Many public flagship universities, such as the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) with an 11% acceptance rate, are among the most selective in the country, while numerous private institutions have open or near-open admissions policies.³⁹

A critical factor for applicants to public universities is the preference given to in-state residents.

Many state university systems are required by law or policy to enroll a certain percentage of students from their home state, which can make admission significantly more competitive for out-of-state applicants competing for a smaller number of spots.³

Other admissions preferences are also under scrutiny.

Legacy admissions—the practice of giving preferential treatment to the children of alumni—has historically been more prevalent at private universities but is also practiced by a substantial number of public flagships.⁴⁰

This practice is facing growing criticism and legal challenges, with states like Virginia and Colorado recently banning it at their public institutions.⁴⁰

The end of affirmative action has intensified the debate over the fairness and legality of all such non-merit-based advantages in the admissions process.

Table 4: Admissions Selectivity Snapshot

Institution Type	Average Acceptance Rate	Examples of Highly Selective Institutions (Fall 2023 Rate)	Examples of Less Selective Institutions (Fall 2023 Rate)
Public Universities	~78%	UCLA (11%), University of Michigan (18%), University of Virginia (19%)	Arizona State University (90%), University of Kansas (92%), University of Kentucky (92%)
Private Universities	~70%	Harvard (3%), Stanford (4%), MIT (5%), Duke (6%)	Liberty University (99%), Dominican University of California (96%), Pace University (77%)
Source: Data compiled from NACAC, Appily, Research.com, and BestColleges.com.38 Rates are approximate and subject to change.

The definition of “advantage” in both campus culture and admissions is subjective and shifting.

The public model’s focus on state residents creates a community rich in local demographic diversity, while the private model’s national recruitment fosters one rich in geographic diversity.

The “better” environment depends on the student’s personal goals.

Simultaneously, the entire landscape of admissions preferences is in flux.

The dismantling of long-standing practices like affirmative action is creating a more unpredictable environment where the very definition of “merit” is being debated and redefined, with a potential new emphasis on standardized metrics that could have profound and perhaps unintended consequences for diversity of all kinds.³⁷

Section 5: Strategic Synthesis and Recommendations for Stakeholders

The decision between a state and a private university is multifaceted, requiring a careful evaluation that moves beyond common stereotypes and surface-level data.

By synthesizing the financial, academic, and cultural dimensions analyzed in this report, stakeholders can develop a strategic approach to finding the institution that offers the best fit and the greatest potential for student success.

5.1 Debunking the Myths: A Data-Driven Reality Check

A clear-eyed assessment must begin by dismantling pervasive myths with evidence.

• Myth 1: “Private universities are unaffordable for anyone but the rich.”
  Reality: This is the most significant and widespread misconception. While the published “sticker price” of private universities is alarmingly high, it is not the price most students pay. Through aggressive tuition discounting and the strategic use of institutional aid funded by large endowments, private universities can often make their net price highly competitive. For many middle- and low-income families, and for high-achieving students receiving merit scholarships, the final cost of a private university can be comparable to or even lower than that of a public university.2
• Myth 2: “Public universities offer a lower-quality education.”
  Reality: Institutional quality is not determined by its public or private status. Many public flagship universities, such as the University of Michigan, UC Berkeley, and the University of Virginia, are consistently ranked among the most prestigious and academically rigorous institutions in the world.32 They are global leaders in research and produce graduates who are highly sought after by top employers and graduate programs.46 Quality is specific to the institution and even to the department within it, not to the university type.
• Myth 3: “You’re just a number at a big state school.”
  Reality: While the scale of a large public university can feel impersonal, particularly in introductory lecture courses, these institutions invest heavily in comprehensive student support structures.1 Motivated students can find intimate communities and strong mentorship within smaller academic departments, honors colleges, living-learning communities, and the vast array of student organizations. The large university contains many small villages within it for students who seek them out.

5.2 The Decision Matrix: Aligning Institutional Type with Student Profile

There is no single “best” type of university, only the best fit for an individual student.

Stakeholders should use the following framework to align a student’s profile with the institutional model that best suits their needs.

• Financial Profile: The first step is to move beyond sticker price. Families should use the Net Price Calculator available on every university’s website to get a personalized estimate of what they will actually pay. A student with high financial need may find that a well-endowed private university’s need-based aid package is more generous than their state school’s. A student with high academic or artistic merit may find that a private university’s merit scholarships make it the most affordable option. The key question is not “What does it cost?” but “What will it cost us?”.²⁶
• Academic Profile & Learning Style: An honest assessment of the student’s learning style is critical. Is the student an independent, self-motivated learner who would thrive with the immense choice and resources of a large public university? Or do they learn best through discussion, direct mentorship, and collaboration in a high-touch, seminar-style environment more typical of a private college? Is their academic interest broad and exploratory, suiting a comprehensive public university, or highly specialized, aligning with a private university known for that specific niche?.¹
• Social & Cultural Preferences: The ideal campus environment is deeply personal. Does the student seek the high energy and large-scale social and athletic events of a “big city” public university? Or do they prefer the intimacy and strong community bonds of a “small village” private college? What type of peer group is most desired? One that reflects the demographic diversity of a specific state, or one that brings together geographic and cultural perspectives from around the globe?.²
• Career Goals: Stakeholders should consider the long-term return on investment. Does the student’s intended career path benefit more from the vast, diverse alumni network and broad industry connections of a large state university? Or would they be better served by the personalized career services, tailored internships, and focused alumni network that a smaller private college can often provide?.¹

5.3 Future Outlook: Emerging Pressures and Trends in U.S. Higher Education

The landscape of American higher education is not static.

Stakeholders making decisions today must be aware of the powerful trends that will shape these institutions tomorrow.

• The Great Convergence: The clear lines between public and private financial models will continue to blur. Declining state support will push public universities to further embrace private-sector revenue tactics, while political and social pressure will compel private universities to continue demonstrating their public value through access and affordability initiatives.
• The ROI Arms Race: In an era of high costs and mounting student debt, all institutions face increasing pressure to demonstrate a clear and tangible return on investment (ROI).²⁸ This will intensify the focus on career preparation, internship placement rates, and tracking graduate earnings, making these metrics more central to university marketing and student decision-making.
• The Post-Affirmative Action Landscape: The new legal framework governing admissions is the most significant driver of change. Universities are in a period of experimentation, seeking legally defensible methods to achieve diversity. This will lead to continued evolution in what constitutes a “holistic” review and may shift focus toward socioeconomic factors, geographic diversity, and other non-racial proxies for life experience. This evolving landscape creates uncertainty and requires that stakeholders remain informed about the changing “rules of the game” in college admissions.

Works cited

1. Public vs. Private University: What’s the Difference? | Tiffin University, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.tiffin.edu/news/public-vs-private-university-whats-the-difference/
2. Private vs. Public Colleges: What’s the Difference? | BestColleges, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.bestcolleges.com/blog/private-vs-public-colleges/
3. Private Universities vs Public Universities in the US | Shorelight, accessed August 11, 2025, https://shorelight.com/student-stories/public-vs-private-universities-whats-the-difference/
4. The Student’s Guide to In-State vs. Out-of-State Tuition – BestColleges.com, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.bestcolleges.com/resources/in-state-vs-out-of-state-tuition/
5. How Are Public Institutions of Higher Education Funded?, accessed August 11, 2025, https://bellwether.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/DollarsAndDegrees_1_Bellwether_April2024.pdf
6. Benchmarking Student Diversity at Public Universities in the United States: Accounting for State Population Composition – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed August 11, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4262928/
7. Public vs. Private Universities: Which One’s Better? | Amber, accessed August 11, 2025, https://amberstudent.com/blog/post/private-vs-public-colleges-whats-the-difference
8. What is a Public University? What is a Private University? | Study in the States – Homeland Security, accessed August 11, 2025, https://studyinthestates.dhs.gov/2013/01/what-public-university-what-private-university
9. ED536172 – Private Universities and Public Funding: Models and Business Plans. Policy Commentary, Universities UK, 2008-Aug – ERIC, accessed August 11, 2025, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED536172
10. The Differences between Private and Public Universities in the US | Mastersportal, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.mastersportal.com/articles/3166/the-differences-between-private-and-public-universities-in-the-us.html
11. Private vs. Public Universities: Key Differences – Xavier Now, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.xavier.edu/now/2025/public-vs-private-universities
12. Private vs public universities – James Madison University International Study Center, accessed August 11, 2025, https://isc.jmu.edu/blog/private-vs-public-universities
13. THE LANDSCAPE OF STATE FUNDING FORMULAS FOR PUBLIC COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, accessed August 11, 2025, https://policy-lab.squarespace.com/s/ISPaper_TheLandscapeofStateFundingFormulasforPublicColleges.pdf
14. Understanding College and University Endowments – CASE, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.case.org/system/files/media/file/Understanding-Endowments-White-Paper_0.pdf
15. California’s Higher Education Funding Landscape, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.ppic.org/publication/californias-higher-education-funding-landscape/
16. State University No More: Out-of-State Enrollment and the Growing Exclusion of High-Achieving, Low-Income Students at Public Flagship Universities – Jack Kent Cooke Foundation, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.jkcf.org/research/state-university-no-more-out-of-state-enrollment-and-the-growing-exclusion-of-high-achieving-low-income-students-at-public-flagship-universities/
17. Are teachers’ jobs safe in America anymore? Trump’s 2025 funding freeze says otherwise, accessed August 11, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/are-teachers-jobs-safe-in-america-anymore-trumps-2025-funding-freeze-says-otherwise/articleshow/123241187.cms
18. Why America’s richest universities are laying off staff: The hidden cost of federal funding cuts, accessed August 11, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/why-americas-richest-universities-are-laying-off-staff-the-hidden-cost-of-federal-funding-cuts/articleshow/123169207.cms
19. University endowment tax hike is costing students, not just colleges: Here’s why it matters more than you think, accessed August 11, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/university-endowment-tax-hike-is-costing-students-not-just-colleges-heres-why-it-matters-more-than-you-think/articleshow/123217099.cms
20. Trump’s new endowment tax hits elite US universities hard: Could it shut the door on lower-income applicants?, accessed August 11, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/trumps-new-endowment-tax-hits-elite-us-universities-hard-could-it-shut-the-door-on-lower-income-applicants/articleshow/123188106.cms
21. Trends in College Pricing Highlights – College Board Research, accessed August 11, 2025, https://research.collegeboard.org/trends/college-pricing/highlights
22. Average Cost Of College 2024-2025 | Bankrate, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/loans/student-loans/average-cost-of-college/
23. Average Cost of College: Tuition Statistics – BestColleges.com, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.bestcolleges.com/research/average-cost-of-college/
24. In-State vs Out-Of-State Tuition: Picking the Right School for You – College Raptor, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.collegeraptor.com/find-colleges/articles/college-search/how-to-decide-between-in-state-or-out-of-state-colleges/
25. goingmerry.com, accessed August 11, 2025, https://goingmerry.com/blog/state-vs-private-colleges/#:~:text=Unlike%20State%20universities%2C%20which%20rely,more%20robust%20financial%20aid%20programs.
26. Are State Universities Really Cheaper Than Private Colleges?, accessed August 11, 2025, https://goingmerry.com/blog/state-vs-private-colleges/
27. Public vs Private University: What’s the Difference? – Study Abroad, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.educations.com/articles-and-advice/public-vs-private-university
28. Difference Between Public & Private University: Tips on Which One to Choose for 2025, accessed August 11, 2025, https://research.com/universities-colleges/public-private-university-difference
29. Public vs. Private Universities in the US: Key Differences – GradRight, accessed August 11, 2025, https://gradright.com/public-vs-private-universities-in-the-us-key-differences/
30. What’s the Difference Between a Private and Public University? – Scholarships360, accessed August 11, 2025, https://scholarships360.org/college-admissions/private-vs-public-college/
31. Private vs. Public Universities | Cal Lutheran, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.callutheran.edu/guides/private-public-universities/
32. What’s the Real Difference Between Public and Private Universities in the U.S.? – Reddit, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/1kslrne/whats_the_real_difference_between_public_and/
33. College Sizes: Small, Medium, or Large? | CollegeData, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.collegedata.com/resources/the-facts-on-fit/college-size-small-medium-or-large
34. How Small Class Sizes in Private Schools Triumph over Public Institutions, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.gantryviewschool.com/blog/how-small-class-sizes-in-private-schools-triumph-over-public-institutions
35. ‘Segregation Forever’? Private Universities Haven’t Increased Diversity in the Past 20 Years. What Now? – The Education Trust, accessed August 11, 2025, https://edtrust.org/rti/private-universities-havent-increased-diversity/
36. Affirmative action in California – Ballotpedia, accessed August 11, 2025, https://ballotpedia.org/Affirmative_action_in_California
37. How Trump’s executive order could reshape college admissions and campus diversity across the US, accessed August 11, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/how-trumps-executive-order-could-reshape-college-admissions-and-campus-diversity-across-the-us/articleshow/123226526.cms
38. College Acceptance Rates: Learn the Average College Admission Rates | Appily, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.appily.com/guidance/articles/finding-your-college/college-acceptance-rates
39. List of College Acceptance Rates for 2025 – Research.com, accessed August 11, 2025, https://research.com/education/list-of-college-acceptance-rates
40. Who uses legacy admissions? – Brookings Institution, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/how-widespread-is-the-practice-of-giving-special-consideration-to-relatives-of-alumni-in-admissions/
41. Virginia Bans Legacy Admissions in Public Universities and Colleges – SCHEV & Higher Ed News | Virginia State Council Of Higher Education, VA, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.schev.edu/Home/Components/News/News/450/16
42. Choosing College: Public, Private, & In-State Universities – The Renegade Report, accessed August 11, 2025, https://renegadereport.org/4807/editorial/choosing-college-public-private-in-state-universities/
43. College Acceptance Rates for 150 Popular Schools – BestColleges.com, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.bestcolleges.com/blog/college-acceptance-rates/
44. Debunking 3 myths about attending private colleges – Marymount University, accessed August 11, 2025, https://marymount.edu/blog/debunking-3-myths-about-attending-private-colleges/
45. What’s the between public and private universities? : r/AskAnAmerican – Reddit, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAnAmerican/comments/1ix70ih/whats_the_between_public_and_private_universities/
46. Is there any clear evidence that private universities tend to be better than public ones?, accessed August 11, 2025, https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/201175/is-there-any-clear-evidence-that-private-universities-tend-to-be-better-than-pub
47. Public vs. Private College: What’s the Difference? – American University, accessed August 11, 2025, https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/private-vs-public-institutions/