An Exhaustive Analysis of the American Junior and Community College: A Guide for the Modern Student

Introduction: Deconstructing the Labels

In the lexicon of American higher education, few terms are as conflated and misunderstood as “junior college” and “community college.” They are often used interchangeably in casual conversation, by guidance counselors, and even by the institutions themselves, creating a fog of confusion for prospective students and their families.¹

This report aims to cut through that fog, providing a definitive analysis of these two institutional labels.

While they often describe the same type of two-year, post-secondary school, the terms carry distinct historical weight and, in modern usage, frequently signal a crucial difference in governance, mission, and funding: public versus private control.

The contemporary distinction can be summarized as follows: the term “community college” has evolved to primarily describe publicly funded two-year institutions with a broad, multifaceted mission designed to serve the specific needs of a local geographic area.⁴

These are the institutions that form the backbone of open-access higher education in the United States.

Conversely, the term “junior college” is now most accurately applied to private two-year institutions.

These colleges, often with a more singular academic focus, are typically funded by tuition and private donations and are more likely to offer a residential campus experience.⁴

The “junior college” label also persists in the realm of collegiate athletics, most notably through the National Junior College Athletic Association (NJCAA), which governs sports programs at both public and private two-year schools.⁴

The evolution from “junior” to “community” is not merely a semantic drift; it signifies a profound philosophical transformation in the purpose and promise of American two-year higher education.

This report will trace this evolution from its elitist origins to its democratic aspirations.

It will analyze the modern institutional landscape, dissecting the critical differences in funding, academic programming, and campus environment.

Furthermore, it will examine the student experience in depth, from admissions and costs to the diverse student body and the often-perilous transfer process that defines the journey for millions.

Ultimately, this exhaustive analysis will provide evidence-based guidance for prospective students, empowering them to look beyond the labels and make an informed choice that aligns with their unique educational and career goals.

Section I: The Genesis and Evolution of the Two-Year College

The story of the two-year college in America is a narrative of transformation, reflecting the nation’s shifting ideals about access, opportunity, and the very purpose of higher education.

What began as a mechanism to streamline the university evolved into a uniquely American institution designed to serve the multifaceted needs of the populace.

The shift in terminology from “junior college” to “community college” mirrors this ideological journey.

Subsection I.A: The “Junior College” as a University Filter

The concept of the two-year college did not emerge from a desire to democratize education but rather from an effort to refine it.

The intellectual architect of the “junior college” was William Rainey Harper, the formidable first president of the University of Chicago.⁹

In a move that would shape American higher education for a century, Harper restructured his university in 1892, dividing it into a “junior college” for the first two years of study and a “senior college” for the final two years, culminating in a bachelor’s degree.⁹

He even introduced the associate’s degree for those completing the junior division.⁹

Harper’s vision was fundamentally elitist.

Influenced by the German university model, he believed that the true work of a university—specialized research and advanced scholarship—was being diluted by the need to provide foundational, high-school-level instruction to freshmen and sophomores.¹¹

His solution was to offload this preparatory work.

He envisioned junior colleges, often as extensions of local high schools, that would handle the first two years of college-level work.

These institutions would serve as a filtering mechanism, identifying and preparing the “truly gifted” for the rigors of the senior college while providing a “terminal” education for those not destined for a baccalaureate.⁹

The goal was not to expand opportunity for all, but to protect the sanctity and efficiency of the research university by ensuring that “only the best and brightest made it to the bachelor’s degree-issuing universities”.¹¹

This established the “collegiate function”—preparing students for transfer—as the original, and for many years, the sole purpose of the junior college.¹²

Harper’s concept found its first concrete expression in 1901.

J.

Stanley Brown, a colleague of Harper’s and the principal of Joliet Township High School in Illinois, established Joliet Junior College by adding a fifth and sixth year of college-level courses to his high school’s curriculum.⁴

Now recognized as the oldest continuously operating public two-year college in the United States, Joliet set the template for early junior colleges.

These institutions were typically small, often with fewer than 200 students, and were extensions of the local public school system.

Their focus was narrow, centered on a liberal arts curriculum with the explicit goal of transferring students to four-year universities.⁴

They reflected the needs of the high schools from which they sprang and, in their nascent stage, struggled to forge a distinct identity.⁴

Subsection I.B: The Rise of the “Community” Mission

While the university transfer model dominated the early identity of the junior college, other societal forces were simultaneously pushing for a broader mission.

The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw a growing demand for trained schoolteachers, leading to the establishment of “normal schools” that often operated as two-year, post-secondary programs.⁴

Concurrently, the nation’s shift from an agrarian to an industrial economy created a need for a technically skilled workforce, giving rise to vocational institutes.⁴

These parallel movements, combined with the ambitions of local communities to provide their own accessible post-secondary options, planted the seeds for a more comprehensive institutional model.¹²

Two major historical events acted as powerful catalysts for this evolution.

First, the Great Depression of the 1930s led to a dramatic surge in junior college enrollment, which nearly tripled from 56,000 in 1929 to 150,000 in 1939.⁹

With jobs scarce, many young people who would have otherwise entered the workforce turned to higher education.

This influx included a large number of students who were not on a traditional university track, compelling junior colleges to expand their vocational and “semiprofessional” program offerings to meet the demand for practical job training.¹¹

The second and most transformative catalyst was the post-World War II era.

The Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944, popularly known as the G.I.

Bill, opened the doors of higher education to millions of returning veterans, overwhelming the capacity of the nation’s four-year colleges and universities.¹¹

This unprecedented demand for access created a critical juncture.

In 1947, a report from President Harry Truman’s Commission on Higher Education provided the blueprint for the future.

The Truman Commission Report was a landmark document that fundamentally redefined the mission of the two-year college.

It explicitly called for the establishment of a national network of public, low-cost

“community colleges”.⁹

This was a radical departure from the Harper model.

The commission envisioned institutions that would not just serve as university feeders, but would be comprehensive educational and cultural centers for their local areas, offering a broad curriculum and serving all members of the community who could benefit from post-secondary study.⁹

This new vision was championed by influential leaders like Jesse R.

Bogue, the executive secretary of the American Association of Junior Colleges (AAJC), who promoted the term “community college” and published a seminal book on the topic.⁹

The term was first coined even earlier by A.

J.

Cloud of San Francisco Junior College, but it was the Truman Commission and Bogue’s advocacy that propelled it into the national consciousness.⁹

The philosophical shift was formally recognized by the AAJC itself.

In 1972, the organization changed its name to the American Association of Community and Junior Colleges (AACJC), and in 1992, it became the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC), effectively solidifying “community college” as the standard descriptor for public two-year institutions and marking the culmination of a half-century-long evolution in mission and identity.⁴

The very history of these terms reveals a core tension that persists in these institutions today.

The movement from “junior college” to “community college” was not merely a rebranding exercise; it represented a fundamental pivot in the philosophy of American higher education.

The “junior college” concept was born from a top-down, university-centric perspective.

Its primary purpose was to serve the needs of the senior institution by acting as a preparatory stage and a filter, ensuring a more refined student body for advanced study.⁹

In contrast, the “community college” concept emerged from a bottom-up, society-centric ideal.

Its mission, as articulated by the Truman Commission, was to serve the diverse needs of the local populace by providing broad, open access to multiple educational pathways, including academic transfer, vocational training, and adult education.⁹

This ideological shift from serving the university to serving the community is the central theme in the development of the modern community college.

It also explains the inherent complexity of their mission: they must simultaneously maintain the academic rigor required for the “junior” function of university transfer while upholding the “community” function of open-access vocational, remedial, and continuing education—a dual mandate that creates significant challenges in funding, curriculum design, and student support.

Section II: The Modern Institutional Landscape: Funding, Governance, and Mission

Today, the landscape of two-year higher education in the United States is dominated by the public community college, but the private junior college continues to occupy a small but distinct niche.

The differences between them extend far beyond their names, encompassing their core missions, funding structures, governance, and the overall campus environment they provide.

Understanding these distinctions is crucial for any student weighing their post-secondary options.

Subsection II.A: The Public Community College

Modern public community colleges are defined by their comprehensive and multifaceted mission, a direct legacy of the post-war expansion and the vision of the Truman Commission.

This mission is often described as having five key pillars:

1. Academic Transfer: This remains a cornerstone function, providing the first two years of a bachelor’s degree curriculum—often called the “collegiate function”—for students intending to transfer to a four-year institution.¹² These programs typically lead to an Associate of Arts (A.A.) or Associate of Science (A.S.) degree.
2. Career and Technical Education (CTE): Community colleges are primary providers of workforce training, offering Associate of Applied Science (A.A.S.) degrees and shorter-term certificates designed for direct entry into skilled occupations. These programs span a vast range of fields, including nursing, information technology, robotics, law enforcement, and advanced manufacturing.⁶
3. Workforce Development: Beyond formal degree programs, community colleges partner directly with local businesses and industries to provide customized training, upskilling for incumbent workers, and rapid-response programs to meet emerging regional economic needs.¹⁸
4. Developmental (or Remedial) Education: As open-access institutions, community colleges serve a large number of students who are underprepared for college-level coursework. They provide foundational classes in math, reading, and writing to build the skills necessary for academic success.²⁰
5. Community and Adult Education: This pillar embodies the “community” focus, offering a wide array of non-credit courses and services. These include English as a Second Language (ESL) instruction, High School Equivalency (GED) preparation, and personal enrichment courses for lifelong learners in subjects ranging from photography to financial planning.¹⁸

This expansive mission is supported by a complex and often inequitable funding model.

The primary sources of revenue for public community colleges are a combination of state government appropriations, local property tax levies, and student tuition and fees.²²

Federal funding contributes a smaller share of institutional operating budgets, with most federal dollars flowing directly to students in the form of financial aid like Pell Grants.²³

States employ various formulas to distribute their appropriations.

Many use enrollment-based models that allocate funds based on metrics like full-time equivalent (FTE) students or student “contact hours” (the number of hours of instruction).²²

A growing trend is the adoption of performance-based funding (PBF) models, which tie a portion of state aid to student outcomes such as course completion, degree attainment, and successful transfer.²²

However, this funding structure contains a critical flaw: the heavy reliance on local property taxes.

This mechanism directly links a college’s financial health to the wealth of the community it serves, creating vast disparities.

A college located in an affluent suburb with a strong commercial tax base can raise significantly more revenue per student than a college in a sparsely populated rural area or an impoverished urban center.⁴

For example, analysis in Texas revealed that local property taxes can generate anywhere from $11 to $1,100 per student per penny of tax effort, a hundredfold difference based solely on geographic location.²²

This results in a deeply paradoxical system where the institutions designed to serve the most economically disadvantaged students—those who require the most intensive academic and personal support—are often the most poorly and inequitably funded.²³

This chronic underfunding is a root cause of many of the challenges facing community colleges, from overcrowded advising offices to deferred maintenance and, ultimately, to the struggles many students face in completing their programs and transferring.

In terms of governance, most public community colleges are overseen by locally elected boards of directors or trustees.¹²

This structure ensures that the college remains responsive to the specific needs and priorities of its local community.

However, it can also lead to a lack of standardization and consistency across a state, contributing to the complex and varied landscape of transfer requirements and program offerings that students must navigate.

Subsection II.B: The Private Junior College

In contrast to their public counterparts, private junior colleges are characterized by a more focused, less comprehensive mission.

Having seen their numbers decline since a peak in the 1940s, the surviving institutions have carved out a specific niche in the higher education ecosystem.⁶

They generally do not attempt to be all things to all people.

Instead, they often concentrate on a singular purpose, most commonly a high-quality liberal arts curriculum designed for seamless transfer to selective four-year universities.⁴

Many have a particular ethos, such as a religious affiliation, that informs their educational environment.¹²

Their funding model is also fundamentally different.

Private junior colleges are funded primarily through student tuition and fees, which are substantially higher than those at public community colleges.²⁸

They also rely on private donations, fundraising, and income from endowments to support their operations.²⁹

Perhaps the most significant differentiator is the campus environment.

While public community colleges are overwhelmingly commuter-based institutions designed to serve a local population, private junior colleges are far more likely to be residential.

They often provide on-campus housing, robust student life programs, and competitive athletic teams, creating a self-contained, traditional “college experience”.⁷

This is their core value proposition.

They market themselves not as a cheaper alternative, but as a provider of a small-scale, supportive, and immersive two-year transition that prepares students socially and academically for a larger university.

They cater to a niche market of students and families who value this sheltered environment and are willing and able to pay a premium for it.

The following table provides a clear, side-by-side comparison of these two institutional types.

Feature	Public Community College	Private Junior College
Primary Terminology	Community College, Technical College	Junior College
Primary Funding Sources	State Appropriations, Local Property Taxes, Student Tuition 22	Student Tuition, Private Donations, Endowments 28
Governance	Locally Elected Board of Trustees 12	Private Board of Trustees
Core Mission	Comprehensive: Transfer, CTE, Workforce, Remedial, Community Ed 18	Focused: Primarily Liberal Arts Transfer 4
Admissions Policy	Open-Access / Open-Enrollment 30	Selective Admissions
Typical Annual Tuition	Low Cost (Avg. $3,990 in-state for 2023-24) 32	High Cost (Avg. $18,282 for private 2-year) 28
Campus Environment	Primarily Commuter, Limited Housing, Flexible Schedules 3	Often Residential, On-Campus Housing, Traditional Student Life 7
Primary Degree Offered	Associate of Arts (A.A.), Science (A.S.), Applied Science (A.A.S.) 33	Associate of Arts (A.A.)

Section III: The Student Profile: Demographics and Campus Realities

The student body and the on-campus environment are where the theoretical missions of community and junior colleges translate into lived reality.

The profile of a typical community college student is markedly different from that of a student at a traditional four-year university, a fact that shapes every aspect of the institution, from classroom dynamics to support services.

Subsection III.A: A Portrait of the Community College Student

The single most defining characteristic of the American community college is the unparalleled diversity of its student body.

These institutions serve as the primary gateway to higher education for a vast cross-section of the population, particularly for groups historically underrepresented in academia.

Compared to four-year institutions, community colleges enroll a significantly higher proportion of Hispanic, Black, Native American, and low-income students.²³

They are a critical entry point for first-generation college students; in California’s massive system, for instance, 35% of students are the first in their family to attend college.³⁶

At a community college, the “non-traditional” student is, in fact, the norm.

The average student age is higher, with data showing that nearly half of all public two-year college students are 24 or older.¹⁸

This demographic reality reflects the large number of adult learners, career changers, and parents who attend.

A substantial percentage of students are financially independent from their parents, have their own children or other dependents, and must balance their studies with significant work commitments.¹⁸

This is why the majority of community college students attend part-time.

In the 2020-21 school year, 72% of all community college students were enrolled part-time ³⁷, and in California’s system, 64% of students in Fall 2023 were taking fewer than 12 units.³⁶

This diverse population arrives with a wide spectrum of educational goals.

While a majority—about 57% in California—enroll with the intent to transfer and earn a bachelor’s degree, this is by no means the only objective.³⁶

A significant cohort, about 17% in California, are “short-term career students” focused on acquiring specific skills or certificates to enter the workforce or advance in their current job.³⁶

Additionally, community colleges serve a large and growing number of dual-enrollment students, who are still in high school but earning college credit, a group that comprised 11% of enrollment in California in Fall 2023.³⁶

This heterogeneity in age, background, preparedness, and goals is the institution’s greatest strength, fulfilling its open-access mission, but it also creates profound operational challenges.

An institution cannot effectively serve an 18-year-old, full-time transfer-track student and a 40-year-old single parent taking a single online course to upskill with a one-size-fits-all approach.

This diversity of need places immense strain on resources and demands an extraordinary level of flexibility in everything from course scheduling to academic advising and financial aid—a level of complexity that is rarely matched by the institution’s funding.

Subsection III.B: The Academic and Social Environment

The academic environment at a community college offers distinct advantages.

A primary benefit is the small class size.

With an average student-to-faculty ratio of around 16:1, classrooms are more intimate than the large lecture halls common at major universities.³⁴

This fosters greater interaction between students and instructors, who are hired and promoted based on their teaching effectiveness rather than their research output.³

This can lead to more personalized attention and academic support.

However, a potential drawback is the sector’s heavy reliance on part-time, or adjunct, faculty.

While often experienced professionals in their fields, adjunct instructors may have limited availability outside of their scheduled class times for office hours or mentoring, which can be a challenge for students needing extra help.³

The social environment is fundamentally shaped by the commuter nature of most community colleges.

The vast majority of students live off-campus and travel to school for classes, often juggling their studies with jobs and family obligations.³⁹

This creates a more transient campus culture compared to the immersive, 24/7 environment of a residential university.

While many community colleges offer a range of extracurricular activities, including student government, special interest clubs, and competitive athletic programs governed by the NJCAA, student participation can be hampered by the logistical challenges of commuting.⁸

For students seeking the traditional “college experience” of dorm life, football games, and Greek life, the community college environment can feel isolating or temporary.³⁸

Recognizing the complex needs of their student population, community colleges have developed an extensive infrastructure of student support services.

These are not ancillary but are central to the institutional mission of promoting student success.

Standard services include academic advising, career counseling, and tutoring.⁴²

Beyond these, community colleges provide robust support for students with disabilities through Disabled Student Programs and Services (DSPS), which offer accommodations like sign language interpreters and assistive technology.⁴³

They also have specialized programs to support distinct populations, such as veterans resource centers, programs for former foster youth (like California’s NextUp), and assistance for low-income student parents (CalWORKs).⁴³

Comprehensive mental health counseling is also a critical and expanding service on most campuses, helping students navigate the stress, anxiety, and depression that can be significant barriers to academic success.⁴⁴

Section IV: The Transfer Pathway: A Bridge with Obstacles

For the majority of students who enter a community college, the ultimate goal is a bachelor’s degree.

The “2+2” model—two years at a community college followed by two years at a university—is held up as the primary vehicle for affordable, accessible baccalaureate attainment.

However, while the path is well-trodden, it is fraught with systemic obstacles that prevent a large portion of aspiring students from reaching their destination.

The gap between transfer aspiration and attainment is one of the most critical issues in American higher education.

Subsection IV.A: The Promise and the Peril of Transfer

The data on transfer reveals a stark and persistent disconnect between student goals and outcomes.

An estimated 80% of students who begin at a community college express their intention to transfer and earn a bachelor’s degree.⁴⁷

Yet, the reality falls far short of this ambition.

National data shows that only about 31% to 33% of community college students actually manage to transfer to a four-year institution within six years.³⁵

The final outcome is even more sobering: just 16% of all students who start at a community college successfully earn a bachelor’s degree within that six-year timeframe.⁴⁸

A primary culprit behind this attrition is the phenomenon of credit loss, often referred to as “transfer swirl” or “transfer burn.” When students move from a two-year to a four-year institution, they often find that many of the credits they have worked hard and paid for are not accepted or do not apply to their major requirements at the new institution.

On average, a transfer student loses 13 college credits in the process—the equivalent of nearly an entire semester of work and tuition.⁴⁹

Some studies indicate that nearly 40% of transfer students receive no credit at all for their previously completed coursework.⁵⁰

This loss of credit has devastating consequences, forcing students to retake courses, which extends their time to degree, significantly increases the overall cost of their education, and diminishes their momentum and morale.²¹

Subsection IV.B: Systemic Barriers to Successful Transfer

The high rate of transfer failure is not the result of a single cause but rather a complex web of systemic barriers.

These are not primarily issues of student motivation or capability; research consistently shows that transfer students who successfully navigate the system perform as well as, and sometimes better than, students who started at the four-year institution as freshmen.⁴⁷

The problem lies within the structure of the transfer process itself.

1. Navigational Complexity and Inconsistent Requirements: Students are often confronted with a bewildering maze of transfer requirements that lack standardization. State-level articulation agreements, which are meant to guarantee credit transfer between public institutions, can be weak, outdated, or difficult to decipher.²¹ The problem is compounded by the fact that course requirements for the same major can vary dramatically from one university campus to another, even within the same public university system. A student preparing for transfer to multiple potential universities may have to satisfy several different sets of prerequisites, a daunting and often impossible task.⁵¹
2. Inadequate Academic Advising: The complexity of the transfer map requires expert guidance, yet community colleges are chronically understaffed in this area. With counselor-to-student ratios often far exceeding recommended levels—for example, a statewide average of 1:508 in California versus a recommended 1:370—many students receive inconsistent or insufficient advising.⁵¹ This leaves them to navigate the labyrinth of transfer tools and requirements largely on their own, a situation that often leads to costly mistakes in course selection.²¹
3. Financial Shocks and Disjointed Aid: Transferring often involves a significant financial shock. Tuition at a public four-year university is, on average, nearly three times higher than at a community college, and that doesn’t include new costs like on-campus housing and meal plans.²¹ The financial aid system is not unified across the two-year and four-year sectors. Students must make crucial decisions about their academic path at the community college without knowing what financial aid package they will receive from a future university, creating immense uncertainty and stress.⁵² For international students, the problem is acute; they discover that institutional scholarships are far scarcer and less generous for transfer applicants compared to first-year freshmen.⁵³
4. Institutional Stigma and Culture: A more subtle but powerful barrier is the cultural bias that can exist at four-year institutions. Some university faculty and administrators harbor a perception that community college courses are less rigorous, leading to a reluctance to accept transfer credits or to fully integrate transfer students into the academic life of the university.²¹ This “transfer stigma” can impact students’ confidence and sense of belonging at their new institution.
5. The Challenge for Place-Bound Students: Many community college students are “place-bound,” meaning they are tied to their local area by jobs, family responsibilities, or financial constraints and are not able to relocate for college.⁵¹ For these students, transfer pathways are only viable if they guarantee admission to a
   local university campus. When articulation agreements do not provide this local guarantee, they are effectively useless for a large segment of the student population.⁵¹

These obstacles demonstrate that the “transfer problem” is not a reflection of student failure but rather a systemic design failure.

It is the predictable outcome of a fragmented higher education structure where two distinct institutional sectors—two-year and four-year—operate with different funding models, separate governance, misaligned incentives, and a lack of deep, functional coordination.

Four-year institutions have little financial incentive to simplify the process; indeed, forcing students to retake “lost” credits generates additional tuition revenue.

Community colleges, often funded based on enrollment, may lack the resources or mandate to track and ensure the long-term baccalaureate attainment of their former students.

This creates the “transfer trap,” a feature, not a bug, of the current landscape, which can only be rectified through intentional, high-level policy interventions such as statewide common course numbering, mandatory credit acceptance policies, and unified financial aid planning.

Subsection IV.C: Stories of Success and Strategies for Mitigation

Despite the formidable barriers, millions of students have successfully navigated the transfer path, and their stories offer valuable lessons.

Narratives of students like twin brothers Craig and Brian Scott, who used their time at County College of Morris to clarify their goals before transferring to Montclair State University, highlight the power of community college as a strategic stepping stone.⁵⁴

Brian noted, “If you’re unsure about college in general, your best bet is to go to community college so you can actually get an understanding of how college works”.⁵⁴

Their success was bolstered by finding a supportive environment, getting involved in campus life to build a network, and leveraging Montclair’s clear 2+2 transfer program.⁵⁴

Similarly, Leyla, a student who could not afford a four-year university out of high school, attended Santa Monica College, which she called “the best decision she ever made,” before successfully transferring to her dream school, UCLA.⁵⁵

These stories, along with a body of research, point to clear, evidence-based strategies that can dramatically improve a student’s chances of success.

One of the most effective strategies is to complete an associate degree before transferring.

Studies show that students who transfer with a credential, such as an A.A.

or A.S.

degree, are significantly more likely to complete their bachelor’s degree than those who transfer without one.⁴⁸

This is often because completing the degree ensures that a block of general education credits will be accepted, and it demonstrates a level of academic persistence to the receiving institution.

Furthermore, students should proactively seek out and follow state-level guaranteed transfer programs where they exist, such as Ohio’s Transfer Assurance Guides (TAGs) or California’s Associate Degree for Transfer (ADT), which are designed to create a seamless pathway to public universities.⁴⁹

The following table synthesizes the primary barriers to transfer and outlines strategies for both students and institutions to overcome them.

Barrier	Impact on Student	Student-Level Strategy	Institutional-Level Solution
Credit Loss (“Transfer Burn”)	Increased time to degree; wasted tuition money; loss of academic momentum.49	Earn an associate degree before transferring; follow a state-guaranteed transfer pathway (e.g., ADT, TAGs).48	Create and maintain clear, up-to-date articulation agreements; adopt statewide common course numbering systems.35
Navigational Complexity	Confusion over requirements; taking incorrect or excess courses; paralysis in planning.21	Identify target university and major early; meet with advisors at BOTH the community college and the target university.47	Standardize lower-division major prep requirements across university system campuses; develop user-friendly, unified transfer planning tools.51
Advising Gaps	Lack of guidance; inconsistent advice; navigating the process alone.21	Be proactive: schedule advising appointments early and often; come prepared with specific questions; build a relationship with a counselor.56	Increase funding to hire more counselors to meet recommended student-to-counselor ratios; provide specialized transfer advising.51
Financial Shock	Inability to afford higher university tuition; accumulating unexpected debt; dropping out for financial reasons.21	Research total cost of attendance at target universities early; apply for transfer-specific scholarships; complete the FAFSA annually.38	Create unified financial aid planning tools that map the full four-year cost; increase institutional aid for transfer students.52
Institutional Stigma	Feeling of being “less than” native students; faculty reluctance to accept credits; social isolation.21	Get involved in campus life at the new university immediately; form study groups; seek out transfer student support centers.54	Provide dedicated transfer student orientation and support services; educate faculty on the academic quality of transfer students.38

Section V: A Guide for Specific Student Populations

The decision to attend a community or junior college is not one-size-fits-all.

The value proposition of a two-year institution varies dramatically depending on a student’s individual circumstances, goals, and background.

This section provides tailored analysis and guidance for three key student profiles: the undecided student, the career changer or adult learner, and the international student.

Subsection V.A: The Undecided Student

For the high school graduate who is uncertain about their future career path or academic major, the community college can be an ideal incubator.

The primary advantage is economic: it offers a low-cost, low-risk environment to explore a variety of academic disciplines without the immense financial pressure of university tuition.⁵⁸

A student can take introductory courses in business, psychology, art, and biology for a fraction of the cost, allowing for intellectual exploration and self-discovery before committing to an expensive four-year track.

This is a significant benefit, considering that 75% of American college students change their major at least once.⁶⁰

Many community colleges have formalized this exploratory function, offering “pathway programs” or “exploratory majors” that group general education courses around broad areas of interest, such as Health Sciences or Business, to help students find their passion while still making progress toward a degree.⁵⁹

The smaller class sizes can also provide a more supportive environment for students to build academic confidence and foundational skills before transitioning to the larger, more impersonal setting of a university.⁵⁸

Subsection V.B: The Career Changer & Adult Learner

Community colleges are exceptionally well-suited to the needs of adult learners and those seeking to change careers.

Recognizing that these students often juggle full-time work, family responsibilities, and other commitments, community colleges are built for flexibility.

They offer a wide array of evening, weekend, and online classes that allow students to pursue their education without upending their lives.⁶²

For a career changer, the community college offers targeted and efficient pathways to a new profession.

Rather than enrolling in a lengthy and expensive bachelor’s program, a student may only need a specific certificate or an Associate of Applied Science (A.A.S.) degree to gain the necessary credentials for their desired field.¹⁷

This allows for rapid upskilling and a quicker return to the workforce.

Furthermore, these institutions often provide robust career services, including self-assessment tools and partnerships with local employers, to help adults align their skills with in-demand jobs.¹⁷

The focus is on practical, workforce-relevant education that provides a direct return on investment.

Subsection V.C: The International Student

For international students, the community college pathway presents a complex calculus with significant advantages and serious risks.

On one hand, it offers a much more accessible entry point into the U.S. higher education system.

The admissions process is typically far less competitive than at four-year universities, often with an open-enrollment policy and no requirement for standardized tests like the SAT or ACT.⁶⁴

English language proficiency requirements can also be more flexible, with many community colleges offering on-site assessment and robust ESL programs instead of mandating a high TOEFL score for admission.⁶⁴

The lower tuition costs and smaller, more personalized class sizes can provide a gentler academic and cultural transition to life and study in the United States.⁶⁵

In states like California, the community college system has well-established transfer agreements with world-class universities, offering a clear and viable pathway to a top-tier degree.⁶⁷

On the other hand, the financial and logistical hurdles can be substantial.

While tuition is lower, institutional financial aid and scholarships are virtually nonexistent for international students at community colleges.

In contrast, many four-year universities offer significant aid packages to qualified international freshmen.

This can create a paradoxical situation where the total cost of a four-year degree obtained via the 2+2 transfer route is actually higher than attending a university for all four years with a good financial aid package.⁵³

Furthermore, securing an F-1 student visa can be more challenging for community college applicants.

Consular officers may question why a student is choosing a two-year institution over a four-year university in their home country, requiring the student to present a very clear and convincing academic plan.⁶⁷

Finally, students who do successfully transfer often find that scholarships for transfer students are much rarer and less generous than those offered to incoming first-year students, compounding the financial challenge.⁵³

The following decision matrix is designed to help these student archetypes weigh their options and identify the most critical questions to ask during their college search.

Student Type	Key Motivations	Top Advantages of a 2-Year College	Top Disadvantages/Risks	Critical “Must-Ask” Questions
The Undecided Student	Major exploration; lower financial risk; academic transition.58	Low cost allows for exploration without high debt; smaller classes provide support; flexible schedules.58	Potential for credit loss if planning is poor; limited course selection in advanced topics; less immersive campus life.38	“What are your ‘exploratory’ or ‘pathway’ programs for undecided students?” “Which of your general education courses have guaranteed transfer agreements with state universities?”
The Career Changer / Adult Learner	Upskilling for a new job; career advancement; flexibility around work/family.17	Flexible evening/online classes; targeted certificate and A.A.S. programs for quick workforce entry; lower tuition.17	Some employers may prefer a bachelor’s degree; A.A.S. degrees may not be designed for transfer if goals change.68	“What are the job placement rates for this specific certificate program?” “Do you offer credit for prior learning or work experience?” “What support services exist for working parents?”
The High-Achieving / Cost-Conscious Student	Saving significant money on a bachelor’s degree; strengthening a transfer application to a top university.55	Dramatically lower tuition for the first two years; smaller classes with teaching-focused faculty; honors programs.31	The “transfer trap” of lost credits and complex navigation; less access to undergraduate research; potential social disconnect after transferring.49	“What is your transfer success rate to my target university?” “Do you have a specific articulation agreement or honors transfer program with that school?” “Which advisor specializes in transfer to selective institutions?”
The International Student	Easier admissions; lower initial tuition; cultural/academic adjustment period.64	Open admissions (no SAT/ACT); flexible English requirements; smaller classes; clear transfer pathways in some states (e.g., California).64	Lack of financial aid can make total cost higher; difficulty securing a student visa; fewer transfer scholarships available.53	“What is the total cost of attendance for an international student, including health insurance?” “What are your transfer scholarship opportunities?” “What support services do you offer specifically for international students?”

Section VI: Debunking Myths and Shaping Perceptions

Despite their central role in American higher education, community colleges are often misunderstood and undervalued, shrouded in a series of persistent myths.

These misconceptions can deter qualified students from making what could be a sound strategic choice for their future.

Addressing these myths with factual evidence is essential for shaping a more accurate public perception.

Myth 1: Community college is for students who can’t get into a “real” college.

This is perhaps the most pervasive and damaging myth.

The reality is that while community colleges do provide a crucial second chance for students who struggled in high school, they are also a deliberate, strategic choice for many high-achieving and ambitious students.70 The primary motivation for these students is often financial.

Attending a community college for the first two years allows them to save thousands, even tens of thousands, of dollars while completing the same general education requirements they would at a university.69 Many students use this time to build an outstanding academic record and then transfer to highly selective institutions.

Indeed, many graduates of top universities like UC Berkeley began their journey at a community college.70 Moreover, a host of successful and famous individuals, including Tom Hanks, Steve Jobs, and NASA astronaut Eileen Collins, are proud community college alumni, a testament to the fact that it is a smart choice, not a second-best one.72

Myth 2: The classes are easy.

This misconception often leads to a rude awakening for new students.

Community college courses are designed to be rigorous and equivalent to their freshman and sophomore-level counterparts at four-year universities; this is a prerequisite for their credits to be transferable.70 The curriculum is challenging, and instructors expect college-level work.

Students who approach their classes with a casual, high-school mentality often find themselves struggling to keep up.

The smaller class sizes can actually lead to greater accountability and more personalized scrutiny from professors, making it harder to slide by than in an anonymous 300-person lecture hall.71

Myth 3: Credits won’t transfer.

This myth is a partial truth rooted in the very real systemic problems of the transfer process.

As detailed in Section IV, credit loss is a significant danger for students who do not plan carefully.49 However, it is not an inevitability.

The blanket statement that “credits won’t transfer” is false.

With proactive planning, regular consultation with academic advisors at both the community college and the target university, and adherence to formal articulation agreements, the vast majority of core general education credits can and do transfer successfully, particularly to in-state public universities.69 The key is for students to be informed and strategic from their very first semester.

Myth 4: There is no campus life.

While the social environment at a commuter-focused community college is different from that of a residential university, it is a fallacy to say that campus life is nonexistent.

Many community colleges have a surprisingly vibrant social fabric.

They offer a wide array of student-run clubs, from academic honor societies like Phi Theta Kappa to community service organizations and professional development groups.8 Arts and culture are often thriving, with theater productions, art exhibits, and music performances.

Furthermore, nearly half of all community colleges in the U.S. have intercollegiate sports programs that compete under the banner of the NJCAA, offering students the chance to be competitive athletes.8 While there may not be Greek life or massive football stadiums, there are ample opportunities for students to get involved, build relationships, and have a rich social experience.71

Myth 5: An associate degree isn’t valuable.

This myth ignores the diverse purposes of a two-year education.

For many high-demand technical and healthcare fields—such as nursing, dental hygiene, automotive technology, or cybersecurity—an Associate of Applied Science (A.A.S.) degree is a respected, industry-recognized credential that provides a direct and efficient pathway to a well-paying career.40 Employers in these sectors often value the hands-on, practical skills that A.A.S.

programs provide.

Furthermore, the landscape is evolving.

A growing number of community colleges, approximately 187 nationwide, are now authorized to offer bachelor’s degrees, typically in applied, workforce-focused fields that fill a specific regional economic need that local universities are not meeting.73 This trend of community college baccalaureates (CCBs) is further blurring the lines between the sectors and demonstrating the increasing value and flexibility of the community college credential.

Conclusion: Making an Informed Choice

The distinction between “junior college” and “community college” is far more than a simple matter of semantics.

It is a reflection of a century-long evolution in American higher education, tracing a path from an elitist university-preparatory model to a democratic, comprehensive institution designed to provide open access to opportunity.

Today, the choice for most students is between a public community college, defined by its affordability and broad, community-focused mission, and a private junior college, which offers a more focused, traditional, and residential experience at a significantly higher cost.

The analysis reveals that the American community college stands as a remarkable engine of social and economic mobility.

It is the primary entry point to higher education for millions of low-income, first-generation, and underrepresented students.

It provides flexible, affordable pathways for adult learners and career changers, and it serves as a vital partner in regional workforce development.

However, this report also illuminates the central paradox of the system: this engine of opportunity is perpetually burdened by inequitable funding structures and a fragmented, often dysfunctional, transfer system.

The promise of the community college is immense, but its fulfillment is not guaranteed.

Student success is achievable, but it demands proactive, informed, and strategic navigation from every individual who enrolls.

Ultimately, the choice of which institution to attend should not be based on the name on the sign, but on a careful evaluation of fit.

This report concludes with three core recommendations for prospective students:

1. For Students Intending to Transfer: The single most important factor is the transfer pathway. Before enrolling in a single class, students must rigorously investigate the articulation agreements between the community college and their target four-year institutions. They should speak with academic advisors at both the sending and receiving schools to map out a course plan that guarantees maximum credit applicability. Success in transfer is a function of planning, not chance.
2. For Students Seeking Career and Technical Education: The focus should be on labor market outcomes. Students should investigate the college’s partnerships with local employers, inquire about the specific job placement rates for their program of interest, and seek out opportunities for internships, apprenticeships, and other forms of work-based learning. The value of a CTE program is measured by the career it enables.
3. For All Students: The quality of support services is paramount. An institution with a well-staffed, accessible advising center, robust tutoring services, and comprehensive mental health support is intrinsically more valuable than one without, regardless of its name or reputation. Given the complexities of navigating college, these support systems are not a luxury; they are a necessity for success.

Looking forward, the role of these institutions will continue to evolve.

The significant and growing trend of community colleges offering their own bachelor’s degrees represents a fundamental shift in the structure of American higher education.⁷³

This blurring of the traditional lines between the two-year and four-year sectors promises to create new, more streamlined pathways to a baccalaureate, potentially mitigating the “transfer trap” that has hindered so many.

As these institutions continue to adapt, their importance as flexible, responsive, and essential providers of post-secondary education in the 21st century will only continue to grow.

Works cited

1. www.coursera.org, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.coursera.org/articles/what-are-junior-colleges#:~:text=Sometimes%20called%20a%20community%20college,take%20vocational%20and%20technical%20classes.
2. Community college vs junior college: What’s the difference? – CollegeVine, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.collegevine.com/faq/35488/community-college-vs-junior-college-what-s-the-difference
3. Difference Between a University and Community College | University of Bridgeport, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.bridgeport.edu/news/difference-between-university-and-community-college/
4. Community colleges in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_colleges_in_the_United_States
5. History and Background: Community Colleges – ewa.org, accessed August 10, 2025, https://ewa.org/issues/higher-ed/history-and-background-community-colleges
6. Junior college – Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junior_college
7. What Makes RBC a Junior College, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.rbc.edu/inside-rbc-blogs/what-makes-rbc-a-junior-college/
8. 7 Reasons to Consider Attending a Community College | CollegeData, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.collegedata.com/resources/explore-your-options/7-reasons-to-consider-attending-a-community-college
9. Community Colleges in America: A Historical Perspective, accessed August 10, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ876835.pdf
10. History | Texas Association of Community Colleges, accessed August 10, 2025, https://tacc.org/tacc/history
11. A Brief Community College Origin Story – Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.richmondfed.org/region_communities/regional_data_analysis/surveys/community_college/community_college_insights/2023/cc_20231214
12. Community Colleges: A Brief History by Glenn Ricketts | NAS, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.nas.org/articles/Community_Colleges_A_Brief_History
13. The Origin of California’s Community Colleges, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.ccleague.org/archive/the-origin-of-californias-community-colleges/
14. Community Colleges – The History of Community Colleges, The junior college and the research university., The Community College Mission – StateUniversity.com – Education, accessed August 10, 2025, https://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/1873/Community-Colleges.html
15. What is a Community College? | Study in the USA – International Student, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.internationalstudent.com/study_usa/community-colleges/what-is/
16. Community College – EducationUSA | – U.S. Department of State, accessed August 10, 2025, https://educationusa.state.gov/your-5-steps-us-study/research-your-options/community-college
17. Switching Careers? Consider Going to Community College, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.communitycollegereview.com/blog/switching-careers-consider-going-to-community-college
18. An Introduction to Community Colleges and Their Students, accessed August 10, 2025, https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/introduction-community-colleges-students.html
19. Four ways community colleges can improve career readiness – EAB, accessed August 10, 2025, https://eab.com/resources/blog/community-college-blog/four-ways-community-colleges-can-improve-career-readiness/
20. Community Colleges – Iowa Department of Education, accessed August 10, 2025, https://educate.iowa.gov/higher-ed/community-colleges
21. Community college transfer processes discourage degree completion – The Journalist’s Resource, accessed August 10, 2025, https://journalistsresource.org/education/community-college-transfer-bachelors-degree-barriers-research/
22. Financing Community Colleges: A Recap, Recommendations, & Overlooked Opportunities, accessed August 10, 2025, https://everytexan.org/2023/03/20/financing-community-colleges-a-recap-recommendations-overlooked-opportunities/
23. Public Funding of Community Colleges, accessed August 10, 2025, https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/public-funding-community-colleges.html
24. FUNDING MODELS FOR – Association of Community College Trustees, accessed August 10, 2025, https://acct.org/sites/default/files/documents/2024-08/ACCT_Funding%20Models%20for%20Community%20Colleges%20Report_Final.pdf
25. Community College Student-Focused Distribution Model : Postsecondary Finance and Capital – Oregon.gov, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.oregon.gov/highered/about/postsecondary-finance-capital/pages/community-college-funding-model.aspx
26. Student Centered Funding Formula | California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.cccco.edu/About-Us/Chancellors-Office/Divisions/College-Finance-and-Facilities-Planning/Student-Centered-Funding-Formula
27. Variation in Community College Funding Levels – Urban Institute, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2023-12/Variation%20in%20Community%20College%20Funding%20Levels.pdf
28. Average Cost of Community College [2024]: Tuition + Fees – Education Data Initiative, accessed August 10, 2025, https://educationdata.org/average-cost-of-community-college
29. Regional vs. National Accreditation: Which is Better? – Drexel University Online, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.online.drexel.edu/news/national-vs-regional-accreditation.aspx
30. What Are Junior Colleges and Why Should I Attend One? | Coursera, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.coursera.org/articles/what-are-junior-colleges
31. 4 Reasons to Consider Community College – The Princeton Review, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.princetonreview.com/college-advice/community-college
32. College Price – AACC, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.aacc.nche.edu/category/news/datapoints/college-price/
33. College Terminology – Northwest Iowa Community College, accessed August 10, 2025, https://nwicc.edu/student-services/terminology/
34. Community College Enrollment Statistics – Yellow Bus ABA, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.yellowbusaba.com/post/community-college-enrollment-statistics
35. Improving Community College to University Transfer | Education Finance and Policy – MIT Press Direct, accessed August 10, 2025, https://direct.mit.edu/edfp/article/20/3/516/127479/Improving-Community-College-to-University-Transfer
36. Student Enrollment and Demographics | California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.cccco.edu/About-Us/Chancellors-Office/Divisions/Research-Analytics-Data/data-snapshot/student-demographics
37. Community College Facts at a Glance | U.S. Department of Education, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.ed.gov/higher-education/find-college-or-educational-program/community-college/facts-at-a-glance
38. Pros and Cons of Starting at a Community College – Office of Admissions – University of South Florida, accessed August 10, 2025, https://admissions.usf.edu/blog/pros-and-cons-of-starting-at-a-community-college
39. ELI5: Whats the difference between a community college and a regular college? – Reddit, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/1dyjgz0/eli5_whats_the_difference_between_a_community/
40. r/AskReddit on Reddit: What is the difference between college, junior college, community college and university in the U.S.?, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/18tmqhd/what_is_the_difference_between_college_junior/
41. Community College vs. University: Which Is Right for You? – Appily.com, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.appily.com/guidance/articles/academics-college-readiness/community-college-vs-university-which-right-for-you
42. Support Services – Maine Community College System, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.mccs.me.edu/our-colleges/student-life-resources/support-services/
43. Support Services | California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.cccco.edu/Students/Support-Services
44. Student Support | San Diego Community College District, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.sdccd.edu/students/support-services/
45. Student Support | Maricopa Community Colleges, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.maricopa.edu/students/student-support
46. Opinion: Community College Students Face Ongoing Challenges – City Limits, accessed August 10, 2025, https://citylimits.org/opinion-community-college-students-face-ongoing-challenges/
47. Success rate of transfer students from community college to universities? – CollegeVine, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.collegevine.com/faq/182387/success-rate-of-transfer-students-from-community-college-to-universities
48. A thorough look at transfer students – Community College Daily, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.ccdaily.com/2024/02/a-thorough-look-at-transfer-students/
49. Do Community College Credits Transfer to a Four-Year Degree? – Franklin University, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.franklin.edu/blog/transfer-from-community-college-to-4-year-university
50. Averting the transfer trap – Community College Daily, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.ccdaily.com/2025/03/averting-the-transfer-trap/
51. Five Barriers to Transfer for California Students – Assembly Higher Education Committee, accessed August 10, 2025, https://ahed.assembly.ca.gov/system/files/2024-02/3-five-transfer-barriers-ccc.pdf
52. Five Barriers to Transfer for California Students: Why Coordination Is the Path Forward, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.cccco.edu/-/media/CCCCO-Website/docs/executive-summary/TransformTransfer-Exec-Summary-Digital-final.pdf?la=en&hash=DAF6D1F849B60EE03B4241BAB34C5D4B5B3F5CD0
53. Don’t try to get into community college!!! : r/IntltoUSA – Reddit, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/IntltoUSA/comments/18xghol/dont_try_to_get_into_community_college/
54. Community College Transfer Success Stories At Montclair State …, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.montclair.edu/newscenter/2025/07/17/community-college-transfer-success-stories-at-montclair-state-university/
55. How I Transferred From Community College – A Student’s Story | CollegeVine Blog, accessed August 10, 2025, https://blog.collegevine.com/transfer-community-college-story
56. is community college the best decision? – Reddit, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/college/comments/138k860/is_community_college_the_best_decision/
57. My College Experience as a Transfer Student, accessed August 10, 2025, https://collegesofdistinction.com/advice/my-college-experience-as-a-transfer-student/
58. Community College vs UCLA: Which one is better for an undecided major? – CollegeVine, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.collegevine.com/faq/20840/community-college-vs-ucla-which-one-is-better-for-an-undecided-major
59. Undecided, Undeclared Exploratory Major – Mt. Hood Community College, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.mhcc.edu/education-options/degrees-certificates/undecided-undeclared/
60. Undecided Students | North Hennepin Community College, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.nhcc.edu/admissions-aid/undecided-students
61. Undecided – LCCC | Laramie County Community College, Wyoming, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.lccc.wy.edu/pathways/undecided.aspx
62. Can I Work and Go to Community College?, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.sanjuancollege.edu/blog/working-and-going-to-community-college/
63. Benefits of Attending a Community College | KCTCS, accessed August 10, 2025, https://kctcs.edu/newsroom/blog/posts/05302023-benefits-of-attending-community-college.aspx
64. Reasons to Study at a Community College as an International Student, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.internationalstudent.com/study_usa/community-colleges/why-study/
65. Why international students should consider community college | – Interstride, accessed August 10, 2025, https://interstride.com/blog/why-international-students-should-consider-community-college/
66. Community Colleges in the US | Study in the USA – International Student, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.internationalstudent.com/study_usa/community-colleges/
67. Internationals in Community College? : r/IntltoUSA – Reddit, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/IntltoUSA/comments/19870sw/internationals_in_community_college/
68. The Pros and Cons of Pursuing a Two-Year Degree | Huntington Learning Center, accessed August 10, 2025, https://huntingtonhelps.com/blog/pursuing-a-two-year-degree/
69. 4 Community College Myths You Need to Know, accessed August 10, 2025, https://blog.dallascollege.edu/2018/08/4-community-college-myths-you-need-to-know/
70. Myths About Community Colleges, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.collegeraptor.com/find-colleges/articles/myths/myths-about-community-colleges/
71. 5 Myths About Community College You Need to Stop Believing, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.iavalley.edu/5-myths-about-community-college-you-need-to-stop-believing/
72. 8 Community College Success Stories – Church Hill Classics Blog, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.diplomaframe.com/chc-blog/8-community-college-success-stories/
73. 10 MYTHS… AND 10 REALITIES Community College Baccalaureate (CCB) programs, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.accbd.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CCBA-10-Myths.pdf