The Currency of Knowledge: A Definitive Guide to Converting ECTS to US Academic Credits

I still remember the meeting vividly.

Across from my desk sat a brilliant French literature student, her transcript a testament to two years of intensive study at a top European university—120 ECTS credits, earned through countless hours in seminars, libraries, and late-night writing sessions.

My job, as an admissions advisor at a U.S. university, was to translate her academic life into our system.

I followed the standard procedure, applied the simple, universally accepted formula, and delivered the devastating news: her 120 ECTS credits would be recognized as only 60 U.S. credits.

We had, with a few keystrokes, erased a full year of her education.

The look on her face—a mixture of confusion, disbelief, and heartbreak—has stayed with me for years.

She was facing not just the loss of time, but the crushing financial burden of an extra year of tuition she hadn’t planned for.¹

For years, I was part of that system, a well-meaning administrator applying a rule that felt deeply, fundamentally unfair.

I saw student after student, their rich academic histories flattened by the blunt instrument of conversion.

The common wisdom, repeated in advising offices and online forums, was always the same: “Just divide ECTS by two.” But this shortcut, I came to realize, was the source of immense confusion and inequity, because it ignores the profound philosophical chasm between the two systems.³

My epiphany didn’t come from a policy memo or a conference.

It came from a place of deep frustration, a refusal to accept that this was the best we could do.

I realized we weren’t just converting numbers; we were attempting to translate entire educational cultures.

The breakthrough was an analogy: ECTS is like measuring the total volume of water in a reservoir, representing the entire sum of a student’s academic workload.

The U.S. credit system, in contrast, is like measuring the flow rate of water through the dam’s turbines, representing only the time spent in direct contact with a professor.

Once I saw it this way, everything changed.

The 2:1 ratio was revealed for what it was: a crude attempt to compare volume to flow rate without understanding that they measure two completely different things.

This report is the culmination of that journey.

It is not just another article repeating the same flawed formula.

It is a definitive guide that deconstructs both systems from first principles, reveals the hidden mechanics that govern conversion, and provides a strategic playbook for students, advisors, and administrators.

My mission is to help you navigate this labyrinth and ensure that your hard-earned “currency of knowledge” is valued as it deserves.

In a Nutshell: Key Takeaways for Navigating the Conversion

For those needing immediate answers, here is the strategic summary of this report:

• The 2:1 Ratio is a Starting Point, Not a Final Answer: Most U.S. universities use a baseline conversion of 2 ECTS credits to 1 U.S. credit hour because a European academic year is 60 ECTS and a U.S. year is typically 30 credits. However, this is an oversimplification that ignores the fundamental differences in what each system measures.⁴
• The University is the Ultimate Authority: Independent credential evaluation services like WES or ECE provide expert opinions, but the U.S. university you are applying to has the final and absolute say on how many credits it will accept and how they will apply to your degree.¹ Some universities even refuse to accept third-party evaluations.⁸
• Your Syllabus is Your Most Powerful Tool: For a course to be counted toward your major or specific degree requirements, it must be evaluated by the relevant academic department. A detailed course syllabus—including learning outcomes, weekly topics, and assessment methods—is the single most critical piece of evidence you can provide to prove equivalency.⁹
• Research Policies Before You Apply: Conversion rules vary significantly between universities. Investigate the specific international transfer credit policies of your target schools before you apply. Look for their stated ECTS conversion ratio and their requirements for credential evaluation services.

The Anatomy of a Credit: Deconstructing Two Worlds

At the heart of the conversion problem lies a simple truth: the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) and the U.S. credit hour system are built on fundamentally different philosophies.

They are not just different units of measurement, like inches and centimeters; they are different ways of measuring.

Understanding this distinction is the first and most critical step toward a fair evaluation.

The ECTS Philosophy: A Measure of Total Student Workload

The ECTS was designed as a “student-centered system” with a clear and ambitious goal: to measure the total student workload required to achieve defined learning outcomes.¹²

This represents a radical departure from traditional systems that simply count hours spent in a classroom.

In our analogy, ECTS measures the entire volume of the reservoir.

This “workload” is a comprehensive metric that includes every planned academic activity a student undertakes.

It encompasses not only attending lectures and seminars but also the vast amount of time spent on independent study, lab work, research, preparing projects, writing papers, and studying for exams.⁴

The system is built on a clear standard: one full-time academic year is equivalent to 60 ECTS credits.¹⁶

This workload is substantial, translating to an estimated 1,500 to 1,800 hours of total student work annually.¹⁸

This holistic measurement of a student’s total effort is the system’s greatest strength and the primary source of the conversion challenge.

An admissions officer trained to look for “seat time” will fail to see the majority of the academic labor that an ECTS credit represents.

The value of that credit is not just in the lecture hall; it is in the library, the lab, and the late nights spent mastering the material.

The very design of ECTS, focused on student input and learning outcomes, is philosophically misaligned with systems that measure academic progress through the proxy of classroom attendance.

Furthermore, while the 60-credit annual standard is consistent, the number of work hours assigned to a single ECTS credit varies by country, reflecting different national academic cultures.

This variance underscores that ECTS is a measure of overall academic effort, not a rigid accounting of time.

Country	1 ECTS Point Equivalent (Hours)	60 ECTS Points Equivalent (Total Annual Workload in Hours)
United Kingdom	20	1,200
Austria, Ireland, Italy, Malta	25	1,500
Finland, Lithuania, Sweden	27	1,600
Holland & Portugal	28	1,680
Germany	30	1,800
(Data synthesized from 17)

The US Credit Philosophy: The Carnegie Unit and the Primacy of “Contact Hours”

The U.S. system is built upon a much different foundation: the “Carnegie Unit,” which historically measures the amount of time a student spends in direct contact with an instructor.³

This is the “flow rate at the dam’s turbines”—a measure of activity at a single point, not the total volume behind it.

The standard formula, recognized by the U.S. Department of Education and accrediting bodies, is that one semester credit hour consists of one hour of direct instruction (a “contact hour”) and an assumed two hours of out-of-class student work per week, typically over a 15-week semester.²²

Therefore, a standard 3-credit course is understood to involve 45 contact hours and an assumed 90 hours of independent study.²³

The critical flaw in this model when comparing it to ECTS is what it doesn’t measure.

The U.S. system assumes a fixed 1:2 ratio between in-class and out-of-class work but only formally quantifies the in-class portion.³

The 90 hours of homework for a 3-credit course are an expectation, not a measured component of the credit itself.

This creates a systemic blind spot.

An American evaluator is conditioned to ask, “How many hours per week did this class meet?”.²³

When faced with a European transcript for a 10 ECTS research seminar that met for only two hours a week but required 250 hours of independent research, the U.S. system’s logic leads to a gross undervaluation.

It lacks a formal mechanism to “see” and quantify the vast, unstructured workload that is already baked into the ECTS value, leading directly to the credit loss experienced by so many students.¹

The Conversion Conundrum: From Philosophical Divide to Practical Math

The gap between the “total workload” philosophy of ECTS and the “contact hour” methodology of the U.S. system is where the practical problems of conversion begin.

Institutions have developed formulas and policies to bridge this divide, but these tools range from blunt instruments to more nuanced, institution-specific interpretations.

The Ubiquitous 2:1 Ratio: A Necessary but Flawed Shortcut

The most common conversion formula is simple and straightforward: 2 ECTS credits are equivalent to 1 U.S. semester credit.⁴

This ratio is not arbitrary; it is derived from a top-down comparison of a full-time academic year in both systems.

European universities define a full year as 60 ECTS, while U.S. universities consider a full-time load to be approximately 30 credits (15 per semester).¹⁶

Dividing 60 by 30 yields the 2:1 ratio.

Many prominent U.S. universities explicitly state this as their baseline policy.

The University of Michigan, for example, provides a clear conversion table where 6 ECTS equals 3 U-M credits.⁶

Ohio State University’s policy states directly that “2 ECTS units = 1 Ohio State semester hour”.⁸

New York University also confirms that European universities using ECTS will have their credits converted to “half once within the US”.²⁹

This ratio serves as a pragmatic tool for administrative efficiency, allowing admissions offices to process a high volume of international applications with a consistent starting point.

However, the real-world application of this simple math can be devastating for students.

As the student from Greece experienced, her standard 5 ECTS courses were converted to 2.5 U.S. credits.¹

In an academic ecosystem where the vast majority of courses are valued at 3 credits, this leaves students with awkward, “unusable” fractional credits.

It can disrupt their degree progression, forcing them to take extra classes to make up for these small deficits, which accumulate over time into significant financial and academic burdens.

Beyond the Baseline: Nuanced Ratios and Institutional Idiosyncrasies

While the 2:1 ratio is the most common, it is not universal law.

A deeper look into university policies reveals that credit evaluation is not a standardized calculation but an institutional interpretation.

Some universities have developed more nuanced formulas that better reflect the academic realities of the ECTS system.

For instance, Georgia Institute of Technology employs a more specific ratio of 1.4 ECTS to 1 GT credit hour.³⁰

The University of Texas at Austin’s study abroad office notes that a five ECTS course is typically equal to a three UT Austin credit course, which implies a more favorable

1.67:1 ratio.¹¹

These variations are significant.

They demonstrate that institutions have the autonomy to move beyond the simple 60:30 annual comparison and create policies that may better account for the intensive workload of European programs or align more practically with their own course structures.

The existence of these different ratios proves that the conversion process is subjective and can be influenced by factors like faculty analysis of foreign curricula, a desire to avoid the “2.5 credit” problem, and established articulation agreements.

The Role of Professional Bodies: Setting the Stage for Best Practices

Guiding the landscape of international credential evaluation are professional organizations like NAFSA (National Association of Foreign Student Advisers) and AACRAO (American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers).

These bodies establish the principles and best practices that inform institutional policies.³¹

Their core philosophy advocates for a holistic and student-centered approach.

A joint statement from AACRAO, the American Council on Education (ACE), and the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) urges evaluators to consider the “quality, comparability, and appropriateness” of learning.³⁴

Best practices encourage a “presumption of transferability,” meaning the burden of proof should be on the institution to justify

why credit is not accepted, rather than on the student to defend why it should be.³⁴

However, it is crucial to understand that these are guidelines, not mandates.

As authoritative as these organizations are, individual institutions retain the final authority over their own academic policies.³²

This explains the wide variation in student experiences.

The spectrum of university policies, from the rigid 2:1 ratio to more flexible, nuanced approaches, reflects varying degrees of adherence to these enlightened best practices.

The Gatekeepers: How Universities and Evaluators Make the Call

Ultimately, the fate of a student’s international credits rests in the hands of two key entities: the U.S. university itself and, in many cases, a third-party credential evaluation service.

Understanding the distinct roles and the power dynamics between these gatekeepers is essential for any student navigating the process.

Institutional Sovereignty: The University is King

The single most important principle in credit transfer is this: the receiving U.S. university is the final and absolute arbiter of which credits it will accept, how many they are worth, and how they apply to a degree program.¹

An external evaluation report is, at best, an advisory opinion; the university’s internal decision is the only one that matters.

The process typically involves two stages.

First, the central admissions or registrar’s office conducts an initial evaluation to assign a baseline U.S. credit value to the foreign coursework, often using the institution’s standard ECTS conversion ratio.³⁶

This determines if a course is eligible for

transfer credit.

Second, for that credit to be applied toward a specific major, minor, or general education requirement, it must be reviewed and approved by the relevant academic department.

This second, crucial step almost always requires the student to provide detailed course syllabi as evidence of content and rigor.¹⁰

The variation in policies across institutions can be stark, making pre-application research critical.

University	Stated ECTS-to-US Credit Ratio	Policy on Credential Evaluation Services	Key Policy Notes
University of Michigan	2:1 (e.g., 6 ECTS = 3 U-M credits)	Does not explicitly require a service; evaluates international credits in-house.	International credits are converted, and the credit earned may differ from the original transcript.6
Ohio State University	2:1	Explicitly will not accept evaluations from services like WES or ECE for transfer credit evaluation.	Requires official transcripts sent directly from the originating institution for its own internal evaluation.8
University of Texas at Austin	~1.67:1 (5 ECTS = 3 UT credits)	Evaluates in-house; does not require a service for admissions.	Specific course evaluations are made only after a student has been admitted.11
New York University	2:1	Does not explicitly require a service; evaluates in-house.	Transfer credits are granted for courses with a grade of “C” or better where NYU offers corresponding courses.29
Georgia Institute of Technology	1.4:1	Does not require a service; uses an extensive in-house equivalency table and faculty review.	International coursework is subject to review on a case-by-case basis; a syllabus is required for courses not already in their database.10

The Evaluators: The Role of WES, ECE, and Other Services

Independent agencies like World Education Services (WES) and Educational Credential Evaluators (ECE) are founding members of the National Association of Credential Evaluation Services (NACES).⁴²

They provide expert opinions on the U.S. equivalency of foreign academic credentials.

They are not accrediting bodies; they are evaluation services.⁴⁴

Students and institutions can request different types of reports.

A “General” or “Document-by-Document” report simply verifies the authenticity of a credential and provides its U.S. equivalent (e.g., a Licence from France is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor’s degree).

The far more useful—and often required—report is the “Course-by-Course” evaluation.

This provides a detailed breakdown of all subjects taken, with suggested U.S. semester credits, letter grades, and a calculated Grade Point Average (GPA).⁴⁶

Herein lies a significant contradiction in the U.S. system.

Many universities mandate that international applicants pay for a course-by-course evaluation from a NACES-member agency as a required part of their application.⁴⁸

This creates an official-seeming hurdle that costs students time and money.

However, other top-tier institutions, like Ohio State, explicitly state they

will not accept these third-party reports and will only evaluate official transcripts sent directly from the foreign university.⁸

This delegation of the initial assessment by some universities creates a false sense of finality for students.

They invest in an expensive report, assuming it to be binding, only to find that the university admissions office treats it as a non-binding recommendation, reserving the final academic judgment for itself.

This process adds a costly bureaucratic layer and creates a dangerous gap between a student’s expectation and the institutional reality.

The Syllabus is Your Passport: Proving Comparability

When a European course does not appear on a university’s pre-approved transfer equivalency list, the detailed course syllabus becomes the student’s passport to earning specific credit.⁹

The burden of proof rests entirely on the student to provide the necessary documentation to the academic department for review.³⁷

A useful syllabus for a U.S. academic department is more than just a brief course description.

To effectively prove comparability, it should include:

• A comprehensive course description and clearly stated learning outcomes.
• A week-by-week schedule of topics covered.
• A full list of required textbooks and other readings.
• A detailed breakdown of assessment methods (e.g., percentage weight of exams, research papers, presentations, lab work).¹⁰

Armed with this level of detail, a department can make an informed judgment about whether a foreign course truly matches the content and rigor of one of its own.

The Student’s Playbook: Navigating the Labyrinth Without Losing Your Way

The conversion process can feel like a high-stakes game with opaque rules.

But armed with the right knowledge and a proactive strategy, students can navigate this labyrinth and advocate effectively for the credit they have earned.

The horror stories of lost time and money are not inevitable outcomes; they are often the result of a lack of preparation in a system that places the burden of proof squarely on the applicant.²

Mission Planning: Pre-Application Intelligence Gathering

The most critical work happens before you pay a single application fee.

1. Conduct Reconnaissance: Become an expert on the international transfer credit policies of your target universities. Go to their admissions or registrar websites and search for terms like “international transfer credit,” “foreign credential evaluation,” or “ECTS”.⁴⁹
2. Analyze the Data: Scrutinize the policy for key information. What is their stated ECTS conversion ratio? Do they require a credential evaluation from a service like WES, or do they prohibit it? What is the documented process for getting courses approved by academic departments?.⁵
3. Assemble Your Dossier: Do not wait to be asked. Proactively collect an electronic copy of the detailed, official syllabus for every university course you have ever taken. This is your evidence locker.

The Application Gauntlet: Executing with Precision

When submitting your applications, precision is paramount.

• The Transcript Protocol: U.S. universities require official transcripts. This means the document must be sent directly from your European university’s registrar to the U.S. university’s admissions office in a sealed, stamped envelope or via a secure official electronic service. Transcripts submitted by the student are considered unofficial and will be rejected.⁸
• Navigating Credential Services: If a university requires an external evaluation, apply for a “Course-by-Course” report from a NACES-member organization. Follow their documentation requirements to the letter to avoid delays.⁴³
• Avoiding Unforced Errors: Pay meticulous attention to administrative details. As one student painfully discovered, a simple discrepancy in how her name was recorded across different documents (e.g., Ana L. Ramos vs. Ana Luiza Figueiredo Ramos) caused her application to stall because the system couldn’t match her transcripts to her file.⁵¹ Ensure your name is identical on all documents.

The Aftermath: Appealing a Disappointing Evaluation

Receiving an evaluation that dismisses a significant portion of your academic work is deeply frustrating.¹

An emotional reaction is understandable, but a strategic response is more effective.

• Follow the Chain of Command: The appeals process begins with your assigned academic advisor at the U.S. university. From there, it can be escalated to the department chair or undergraduate director for the specific subject area in question.³⁸ As frustrating as the situation may be, retaining a lawyer is almost always an expensive and fruitless endeavor, as universities have broad discretion over their own academic standards.¹
• Build a Compelling Case: This is where your preparation pays off. The most effective appeals are not arguments about abstract “fairness”; they are academic arguments that present concrete evidence. Instead of saying, “It’s unfair that my 5 ECTS course only got 2.5 credits,” you should frame your appeal as an academic petition. Provide the departmental evaluator with the course syllabus and a respectful, point-by-point comparison showing how the learning outcomes, reading list, and major assignments (like a 25-page research paper) from your European course are directly comparable in rigor and content to the U.S. course for which you are seeking equivalent credit. This approach elevates the conversation from a bureaucratic dispute over numbers to a peer-level discussion about academic substance. It is the most powerful strategy for converting a generic “departmental elective” credit into a direct “equivalent credit” that can satisfy a core major requirement.³⁹

From Translation to Transformation

The challenge of converting ECTS to U.S. credits is, at its core, an act of translation.

It is not a simple math problem but a complex negotiation between two valid but fundamentally different systems of academic accounting.

Returning to our analogy, we must find a way to communicate the vast, potential energy stored in the reservoir (ECTS workload) to a system designed to measure the kinetic energy of the turbines (U.S. contact hours).

This report has illuminated the path to a more successful translation.

The journey requires a shift in perspective and a commitment to strategy, guided by a few core principles:

1. The 2:1 ratio is a blunt instrument, not a golden rule.
2. The university you apply to is the ultimate authority.
3. Credentialing service reports are advisory, not binding.
4. Your course syllabus is your most powerful advocacy tool.

My own journey with this issue transformed from one of frustration to one of advocacy.

Armed with the “reservoir vs. flow rate” analogy, I successfully championed a new, more holistic evaluation process at my university.

We moved away from a rigid reliance on the 2:1 ratio and implemented a syllabus-driven review system that empowered our academic departments to recognize the true workload and rigor of ECTS-based courses.

The result was a fairer, more transparent process that led to better outcomes for our international students.

We transformed our office from gatekeepers into guides.

This is the potential that lies before every student and every institution.

For students, the path forward is to become diligent researchers of policy and proactive archivists of their own academic work.

For institutions, the challenge is to develop transparent and pedagogically sound transfer policies that honor the full scope of student learning, regardless of its origin.

By doing so, we can move beyond mere translation and foster a true transformation in global academic mobility, ensuring the currency of knowledge flows freely and fairly across all borders.

Works cited

1. My Greek University Credits Were Severely Reduced After Transferring to a US University – What Can I Do? : r/gradadmissions – Reddit, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/gradadmissions/comments/1f2zh8a/my_greek_university_credits_were_severely_reduced/
2. Is it dumb to lose a lot of credits for a transfer? : r/InternationalStudents – Reddit, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/InternationalStudents/comments/1kbb060/is_it_dumb_to_lose_a_lot_of_credits_for_a_transfer/
3. At first glance, the introduction of the ECTS would seem to facilitate credit transfer, accessed August 15, 2025, http://www.aasap.de/archiv/RD%20Conference%202008.ECTS.The%20American%20Perspective.pdf
4. Converting ECTS to US Credits: Everything You Need to Know – Study Abroad, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.educations.com/student-resources/ects-to-us-credits-conversion
5. UNC Charlotte Academic Procedure: European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) Equivalency, accessed August 15, 2025, https://provost.charlotte.edu/policies-procedures/academic-policies-and-procedures/european-credit-transfer-system-ects/
6. European Credit (ECTS) Conversion to U-M Credit – TeamDynamix – University of Michigan, accessed August 15, 2025, https://teamdynamix.umich.edu/TDClient/154/Portal/KB/ArticleDet?ID=7482
7. Evaluating International Credentials: Problems of Transfer Credit – WENR – WES, accessed August 15, 2025, https://wenr.wes.org/2017/11/evaluating-international-credentials-problems-of-transfer-credit
8. International Transfer Credit Frequently Asked Questions – The Ohio State University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://registrar.osu.edu/student-hub/transfer-credit/international-transfer-credit/international-transfer-credit-frequently-asked-questions/
9. Credit Transfer – CIS Abroad, accessed August 15, 2025, https://cisabroad.com/academics/credit-transfer
10. Transfer Credit Information – Undergraduate Admission – Georgia Tech, accessed August 15, 2025, https://admission.gatech.edu/transfer/transfer-credit
11. Study Abroad Credit | Texas Global, accessed August 15, 2025, https://global.utexas.edu/abroad/apply/credit
12. European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS), accessed August 15, 2025, https://learnworkecosystemlibrary.com/initiatives/european-credit-transfer-and-accumulation-system-ects/
13. ECTS Users’ Guide – European Higher Education Area and Bologna Process., accessed August 15, 2025, https://ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/ECTS_Guide/77/4/ects-guide_en_595774.pdf
14. ECTS USERS’ GUIDE – Umcs, accessed August 15, 2025, https://phavi.umcs.pl/at/attachments/2014/0513/141948-ects-guide-en.pdf
15. Student Workload – Bologna Process @Cihan University-Erbil, accessed August 15, 2025, https://bologna.cihanuniversity.edu.iq/implementation/student-workload
16. Degrees and academic credits | Lund University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/admissions/study-lund-university/degrees-and-academic-credits
17. All You Need to Know about the European Credit System ECTS | Mastersportal, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.mastersportal.com/articles/388/all-you-need-to-know-about-the-european-credit-system-ects.html
18. European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) – ENIC-NARIC, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.enic-naric.net/ects—european-credit-transfer-and-accumulation-system.aspx
19. What is the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS)? – Study.eu, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.study.eu/article/what-is-the-ects-european-credit-transfer-and-accumulation-system
20. European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System – Wikipedia, accessed August 15, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Credit_Transfer_and_Accumulation_System
21. What is the ECTS? | Uni Compare, accessed August 15, 2025, https://universitycompare.com/advice/student/ects
22. What You Need to Know about the American University Credit System | Mastersportal, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.mastersportal.com/articles/1110/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-american-university-credit-system.html
23. Credit Hours and Time Equivalencies | Office of the Provost | West Virginia University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://provost.wvu.edu/curriculum-development-and-review/course-proposals/credit-hours-and-time-equivalencies
24. Confused about the credit system in the US : r/college – Reddit, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/college/comments/1i6egaw/confused_about_the_credit_system_in_the_us/
25. Program Integrity Questions and Answers – Credit Hour | U.S. Department of Education, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.ed.gov/laws-and-policy/higher-education-laws-and-policy/program-integrity-information-questions-and-12
26. Calculating Contact Hours – Wesley Theological Seminary, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.wesleyseminary.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Calculating-Contact-Hours.pdf
27. Contact/Credit Hours | Undergraduate Courses, Curricula, and Academic Standards – NC State University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://oucc.dasa.ncsu.edu/courses/contact-credit-hours/
28. International Transfer Credit Policy, accessed August 15, 2025, https://policies.osu.edu/sites/default/files/documents/2024/09/intl-transfer-credit-policy.pdf
29. Exchange/International University Course Approval Form Undergraduate Students – NYU Tandon, accessed August 15, 2025, https://engineering.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/2020-09/NEW_Permission%20to%20Complete%20Courses%20at%20an%20Exchange%20Site_0.pdf
30. Exchange Credit Transfer Instructions | Office of International Education, accessed August 15, 2025, https://ea.oie.gatech.edu/exchange-credit-transfer-instructions
31. Guide to Education Systems by Country – NAFSA, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.nafsa.org/bookstore/guide-education-systems-country
32. Transfer Credit Evaluation, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.aacrao.org/resources/professional-proficiencies/transfer-articulation/transfer-credit-evaluation
33. International – The American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.aacrao.org/resources/AACRAO-International
34. Best Practices in Transfer Evaluation – UW-Milwaukee, accessed August 15, 2025, https://uwm.edu/academicaffairs/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2020/03/Undergraduate-Online.pdf
35. A Guide to Best Practices: Awarding Transfer and Prior Learning …, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.aacrao.org/docs/default-source/signature-initiative-docs/trending-topic-docs/transfer/guide-to-best-practices.pdf?sfvrsn=4820bb55_6
36. Transfer Credit | Texas State University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://mycatalog.txstate.edu/undergraduate/general-information/admissions/transfer-credit/
37. Study Abroad Transfer Credit Guidelines, accessed August 15, 2025, https://studyabroad.brown.edu/return-home/credit-transfer/study-abroad-transfer-credit-guidelines
38. Transfer Credit Policy | U-M LSA Program in International and Comparative Studies (PICS), accessed August 15, 2025, https://ii.umich.edu/pics/undergraduates/transfer-credit-policy.html
39. Transfer Credit FAQs | University of Michigan Office of Undergraduate Admissions, accessed August 15, 2025, https://admissions.umich.edu/apply/transfer-applicants/transfer-credit/transfer-credit-faqs
40. r/UTAdmissions FAQ: Transfer Credit Policies – Reddit, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/UTAdmissions/wiki/credittransfer/
41. Transfer Credits – NYU, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.nyu.edu/admissions/undergraduate-admissions/how-to-apply/transfer-applicants/transfer-credits.html
42. Credential Evaluations – WES, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.wes.org/credential-evaluations/
43. Evaluation of Foreign Degrees – United States Department of State, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.state.gov/global-community-liaison-office/family-member-employment/family-member-employment-in-the-d-c-area/evaluation-of-foreign-degrees/
44. WES: International Credential Evaluation Services | NACES Member, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.wes.org/
45. ECE | NACES Member | Foreign Credential Evaluation Services, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.ece.org/
46. Applicants to U.S. Institutions – ECE, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.ece.org/ECE/Credential-Evaluations/US-Institutions
47. Credential Evaluation Services for U.S. Education | TEC, accessed August 15, 2025, https://evalcompany.com/academic-credential-evaluation/
48. International Study Transfer Credit | UMGC, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.umgc.edu/transfers-and-credits/credit-from-colleges/international-study
49. Transferring Study Abroad Business Credits – Washburn University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.washburn.edu/academics/college-schools/business/study-abroad/transferring.html
50. Transfer Credit | The University of the South – Sewanee Registrar, accessed August 15, 2025, https://registrar.sewanee.edu/students/student-guide/transfer-credit/
51. A transfer nightmare – The Globe SLCC, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.globeslcc.com/2019/01/16/a-transfer-nightmare/
52. ITT Tech horror stories… – TechExams Community, accessed August 15, 2025, https://community.infosecinstitute.com/discussion/11681/itt-tech-horror-stories
53. Credit Transfer – UNM Study Abroad Programs, accessed August 15, 2025, https://studyabroad.unm.edu/resources-and-information/credit-transfer.html
54. Transfer Credit | University of Michigan Office of Undergraduate Admissions, accessed August 15, 2025, https://admissions.umich.edu/apply/transfer-applicants/transfer-credit
55. International Transfer Credit Evaluation | Office of Admissions, accessed August 15, 2025, https://admissions.tc.umn.edu/admissions/international-admission/international-transfer-credit-evaluation
56. Credential Evaluation FAQs – ECE, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.ece.org/ECE/Credential-Evaluations/Individual-FAQs
57. ECE® Foreign Transcript Evaluation Process: Complete Guide, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.ece.org/Blogs/The-ECE-Foreign-Transcript-Evaluation-Process.htm