Table of Contents
Part 1: The Personal Failure – My Degree Plan Implodes
The acceptance letter from my dream university’s engineering program should have been a moment of pure triumph.
Instead, it felt like a punch to the gut.
I sat staring at the attached document, a sterile-looking table titled “Transfer Credit Evaluation.” My eyes scanned the columns, a knot tightening in my stomach.
Course after course from my two years at community college—calculus, physics, specialized programming classes—was marked with notations like “Applied as General Elective” or, even worse, “No Credit Awarded.” In total, nearly a third of the credits I had meticulously planned and painstakingly earned were gone, vanished into an academic black hole.
Like millions of students across the country, I had chosen the community college path as a smart, strategic first step.
It was the sensible, financially responsible route to a prestigious bachelor’s degree.1
I wasn’t just a student; I was a project manager.
I had a color-coded spreadsheet.
I met with my advisor every semester.
I cross-referenced the community college’s catalog with the university’s online transfer guide.
I did everything I was told to do, following the standard advice to the letter.3
I believed I was building a bridge to my future, laying down each course like a perfectly measured plank.
The evaluation letter revealed that my bridge led nowhere.
The university’s engineering department, in its infinite wisdom, had deemed my community college’s physics sequence “insufficiently rigorous,” despite it using one of the same core textbooks.5
My advanced programming course, which I had aced, was rejected because its course description didn’t align perfectly with their own, a subtle difference in wording that now cost me thousands of dollars.3
Other credits, perfectly good ones, were accepted by the university’s general admissions office but were useless for my major, counting only as elective credit and doing nothing to shorten my path to graduation.8
The consequences were immediate and devastating.
The loss of those core credits meant I was no longer on track to graduate in two years.
My carefully constructed plan had imploded, adding at least another full year to my studies.
The financial implications were staggering.
I was now facing an extra year of university tuition, fees, and living expenses—a sudden, unplanned debt of over $20,000.6
I felt a profound sense of betrayal.
It wasn’t just the money or the time; it was the realization that the system I had trusted, the one that encourages the transfer pathway as a model of efficiency, seemed designed to fail.
I had followed all the rules, yet here I was, penalized for it.
This experience forced me to question everything.
If the standard advice was so clearly inadequate, what was the real game being played? It was a painful, expensive lesson, but it set me on a path to uncover the hidden architecture of the college transfer system—a system that operates on a logic far different from what students are led to believe.
Part 2: The Broken System – More Than Just Paperwork
My story, I soon discovered, was not an anomaly.
It was the norm.
The frustration and financial pain I experienced are replicated on a massive scale across the country every single year.
The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) published a landmark report that quantified this systemic failure: on average, students who transfer lose an estimated 43% of their credits.10
Let that number sink in.
For every ten courses a student completes, more than four are effectively erased upon transfer.
This isn’t a rounding error; it’s a systemic hemorrhage of time, effort, and money.
This issue affects a huge portion of the student population.
An estimated 35% of all college students transfer at least once, making this credit loss a national crisis in higher education affordability and efficiency.11
The severity of the loss varies depending on the transfer path, but the numbers are universally grim.
Students transferring between public institutions—the most common route—still lose an average of 37% of their credits.
The situation becomes catastrophic for those navigating less-traveled paths.
For instance, students transferring from a private for-profit college to a public university lose a staggering 94% of their credits, essentially forcing them to start their education from scratch.11
This “credit black hole” is not the result of a single, simple problem.
It is the product of a deeply fragmented and often adversarial system, a maze of bureaucracy that seems almost intentionally difficult to navigate.
Each institution operates as its own sovereign entity, with unique and often opaque policies for accepting credits.3
This creates a complex matrix of rules that can overwhelm even the most diligent student.
There is no universal standard, no single source of truth, leaving students to piece together information from disparate and often contradictory sources.14
The real power in this process, however, often lies not with a central admissions office but deep within the academic departments of the receiving institution.
Faculty members and department chairs frequently exercise substantial discretion in evaluating credits, particularly those intended to satisfy major requirements.15
Their decisions can be influenced by a host of factors beyond simple course content, including a pervasive, often unspoken bias against the academic rigor of community colleges or other institutions.6
A course can be rejected not because its content is deficient, but because of a subjective judgment about the institution where it was taught.
Compounding this academic gatekeeping is a layer of financial “micro-frictions” that disproportionately harms students with the fewest resources.
The process is littered with small but significant costs: fees for sending official transcripts, separate application fees for transferring within the same university system, and, most perniciously, the practice of withholding a student’s entire transcript over minor outstanding debts like a parking ticket or library fine.16
These hurdles, while seemingly trivial to the institution, can be insurmountable barriers for a student struggling to make ends meet.
As I dug deeper, I uncovered a more troubling reality.
This systemic inefficiency is not merely an unfortunate byproduct of a complex bureaucracy; in many ways, it is a feature, not a bug.
The business model of higher education provides a powerful, if unspoken, incentive for this friction.
Institutions are compensated based on the number of credit hours students take.
By rejecting credits earned elsewhere, a receiving university directly increases the number of courses—and thus the amount of tuition—a transfer student must pay to them to graduate.18
This creates a direct financial conflict of interest, where the institution’s bottom line is improved by the student’s loss.
This “not invented here” syndrome, where an institution implicitly values its own courses over those from another, is not just a matter of academic pride; it is an economic engine.
The system isn’t broken; it’s working exactly as it was designed—to protect the interests and revenue of the institutions, often at the direct expense of the students it purports to serve.
Part 3: The Supply Chain Epiphany – From Student to Systems Thinker
Months after my transfer plan imploded, I was commiserating with a friend who worked in logistics for a large electronics manufacturer.
She was venting about a crisis at work.
A critical shipment of microprocessors from an overseas supplier had been rejected at their assembly plant in Texas, threatening to halt the entire production line for their flagship product.
She wasn’t just complaining; she was speaking a different language.
“The whole mess started because we failed on supplier validation,” she said, pacing her apartment.
“The specs on the new chips were slightly off, so they failed QC.
Now we’re scrambling to mitigate the disruption, but our integration protocols with the backup supplier are slow.
We didn’t have a good risk management plan for this node in the chain.”
Supplier validation.
Quality control.
Integration protocols.
Risk management.
The words echoed in my mind.
A light bulb went off, so bright it was blinding.
My failed transfer wasn’t an administrative hiccup.
It wasn’t a personal failing.
It was a classic, textbook supply chain failure.
In that moment, the entire problem reframed itself with stunning clarity:
- My community college was the supplier.
- The courses I took and the credits I earned were the components.
- My target university was the final assembly plant.
- My bachelor’s degree was the finished product.
- And that dreaded Transfer Credit Evaluation? It was the quality control inspection at the receiving dock.
I had failed because I had been thinking like a student when I needed to be thinking like a supply chain manager.
A supply chain manager would never simply trust a supplier’s brochure.
They would rigorously vet that supplier.
They would demand detailed specifications for every component to ensure it would integrate seamlessly into the final product.
They would map the entire logistical path from the supplier’s factory to their own, planning for every checkpoint and potential bottleneck.
They would, above all, identify potential risks and build contingency plans to manage them.19
I had done none of this.
I had chosen my supplier based on convenience and cost.
I had assumed the components would fit.
I had trusted the system to handle the logistics.
I had no plan for what would happen when my “shipment” was rejected at the factory gates.
The problem wasn’t any single part of the process; it was my complete lack of an integrated, end-to-end systems view.
This epiphany was more than just a clever analogy; it was a powerful new paradigm.
It transformed the problem from an insurmountable bureaucratic maze into a complex but manageable system.
It suggested that the principles of Supply Chain Management (SCM)—a discipline built to bring order, predictability, and efficiency to complex global operations—could be directly applied to navigating a student’s journey through higher education.22
This shift in perspective was profoundly empowering.
It moved the locus of control from the opaque, impersonal “system” back to the individual.
By adopting the mindset of a supply chain architect, a student could stop being a passive product being processed by the system and become an active manager, strategically sourcing components and designing a resilient pathway to their finished degree.
Part 4: The Four Pillars of the Academic Supply Chain
Applying the principles of supply chain management to education isn’t just a metaphor; it’s a practical, actionable strategy.
It breaks the overwhelming task of transferring into four distinct, manageable pillars.
By focusing on these core areas, you can move from being a victim of the system to being the architect of your academic journey, dramatically increasing your chances of a seamless and successful transfer.
Pillar 1: Strategic Sourcing & Procurement — Designing Your Starting Point
In manufacturing, success begins long before the first part is made; it begins with strategic sourcing.
A company doesn’t just buy from the cheapest or closest supplier.
It conducts a rigorous qualification process to find partners who can reliably deliver high-quality, perfectly compatible components on time.
As a student, your first institution is your primary supplier, and choosing it is the most critical procurement decision you will make.
First and foremost is Supplier Qualification, which in academic terms means Accreditation.
This is the non-negotiable baseline.
There are two main types: regional and national.
The vast majority of traditional, non-profit, and public four-year universities are regionally accredited.
Many for-profit, career, and vocational schools are nationally accredited.
While one is not inherently “better” than the other, they operate in different ecosystems.
Attempting to transfer credits from a nationally accredited institution to a regionally accredited one is the leading cause of catastrophic credit loss, as most regionally accredited schools will not accept them.7
This is the equivalent of trying to fit metric parts into a machine built with imperial measurements; it simply doesn’t work.
Verifying that your starting “supplier” and your target “assembly plant” share the same accreditation is your first and most important quality check.
Next, you must examine the Component Specifications, or Articulation Agreements.
These are formal, written agreements between institutions that guarantee that specific courses from one school will be accepted and applied correctly at the other.11
An articulation agreement is your supplier’s pre-approved parts list.
It removes ambiguity and provides a contractual assurance of compatibility.
When researching your initial college, you should actively hunt for these agreements on their websites.
A robust, transparent, and long-standing set of articulation agreements with your target universities is a sign of a high-quality, reliable supplier.
Conversely, a lack of clear agreements is a major red flag, indicating a riskier and more uncertain supply route.11
Finally, look for Standardized Part Numbers, which exist in the form of Common Course Numbering Systems.
Some states, like Ohio and Texas, have implemented statewide systems where core courses (like “ENGL 101” or “MATH 2413”) are assigned a common number that all public institutions in the state agree to honor.18
This is a massive advantage for transfer students, as it creates a standardized, interchangeable set of components, ensuring that a freshman composition course taken at any community college is guaranteed to meet the requirement at any state university.
Enrolling in a college that participates in such a system is like sourcing from a supplier that adheres to universal ISO 9001 quality standards—it dramatically reduces the risk of component rejection.
Pillar 2: Integration & Visibility — Exposing the Hidden Gaps in the Chain
A modern supply chain would collapse without deep technological integration and end-to-end visibility.
A manager needs to know not just that a component has been shipped, but that it has been received, passed quality control, and is moving to the assembly line in real-time.
The academic transfer process is plagued by a critical lack of this integration and visibility, and it is in these gaps that credits disappear.
The single most misunderstood and dangerous gap is the difference between credit transfer and credit application.
This is the crucial distinction that derails countless students.
“Transfer” simply means the receiving institution acknowledges that you took a course and assigns some credit for it.
“Application” means that credit is used to fulfill a specific requirement for your degree program, particularly for your major.15
A university’s general admissions office might “accept” 60 of your credits (they arrive at the loading dock), but the head of the chemistry department might only “apply” 30 of them to your chemistry major requirements (the other 30 are left in the warehouse as useless elective credit).8
This is a catastrophic failure of integration between the university’s receiving department (admissions) and its final assembly line (the academic department).
This problem is exacerbated by a profound Lack of Visibility caused by Data Silos.
Just as a company suffers when its sales, inventory, and finance systems don’t talk to each other, a student suffers when information is fragmented across the educational landscape.27
Your community college advisor has one set of data, often based on outdated information or general guidelines.14
The university’s website provides another layer of public-facing, often simplified information.
The admissions office has its own internal processes.
And the ultimate decision-maker, the faculty chair of your target department, holds the final, critical piece of information—which is often unwritten and based on their specific, evolving curriculum needs and academic judgments.15
There is no single, integrated dashboard, leaving you to navigate a system with critical blind spots.
Therefore, you must become the integration platform.
You must proactively bridge these data silos.
This means never asking the lazy question, “Will my credits transfer?” or “How many credits do you accept?” The strategically correct questions are: “How many of my completed and planned credits will apply directly to the course-by-course requirements for a Bachelor of Science in Computer Engineering?” and “Can you provide me with a preliminary degree audit showing exactly which requirements are met and a list of the specific courses I will have left to take to graduate?” Crucially, this question must be directed to an advisor within your specific target department, not just the general admissions office.
Get the answer in writing.
This is how you gain visibility into the entire chain and ensure your components are destined for the assembly line, not the warehouse.
Pillar 3: Logistics & Distribution — The Mechanics of Moving Your Credits
Even with perfectly sourced components and a fully integrated plan, the physical process of moving those components from supplier to factory must be managed with precision.
This is the tactical, “paperwork” part of the transfer, but errors here can be just as costly as strategic ones.
Think of yourself as the logistics coordinator for your academic career.
The core of academic logistics is Shipping & Handling, which revolves around your Official Transcripts.
Your transcript is the sealed shipping container for your credits.
For it to be considered “official,” it must be sent directly from the registrar of your current institution to the admissions office of your target institution.17
This is an inviolable rule.
If you have the transcript sent to yourself, even with the intention of immediately forwarding it, you have broken the chain of custody.
The seal is considered broken, the shipment is compromised, and the transcript becomes “unofficial” and worthless for admission and credit evaluation purposes.
Many students waste money on redundant transcript fees because they misunderstand this fundamental logistical principle.
If the transcript is the shipping container, then your Syllabi are the Bill of Lading—the detailed, itemized manifest for each component inside.
The syllabus for every course you take is an essential document.
It lists the textbook used, the topics covered week by week, the grading criteria, and the learning objectives.
It is the official specification sheet for that course “component.” You must make it a personal policy to download and save a PDF of the syllabus for every single class you complete.
This is non-negotiable.
When a credit is questioned or rejected, the syllabus is your primary piece of evidence in an appeal.
It is how you prove to the “quality control inspector” at the receiving university that your “Calculus I” component is, in fact, materially equivalent to their own.17
Without it, you are arguing from a position of weakness.
Finally, your Advisors at both institutions are your Customs and Clearance Brokers.
They are the human agents who can help you navigate the checkpoints and clear your shipment.
However, you must manage them proactively.
Effective advising is consistently cited as one of the top factors for students who successfully transfer all their credits.29
Maintain an open and continuous line of communication with advisors at both your sending and receiving schools.1
Provide them with your course plans.
Ask them to review your progress.
Use them to help you get the departmental-level answers you need.
They are a critical part of your logistics network, but they are a resource you must actively manage, not passively wait for.
Pillar 4: Risk Management & Reverse Logistics — Planning for Disruption and Recapturing Value
The best supply chain managers are masters of risk management.
They don’t just plan for success; they obsess over potential failures.
They map their supply chains to identify vulnerabilities, build in redundancies, and develop detailed contingency plans for when disruptions inevitably occur.
As a student architecting your academic journey, you must do the same.
Your first step is Forecasting Risk.
Not all supply routes are created equal.
The data is overwhelmingly clear that some transfer paths are inherently riskier than others.
As previously noted, transferring from a for-profit or nationally accredited institution to a regionally accredited one carries an extremely high risk of near-total credit loss.11
Transferring between private institutions or across state lines also introduces more variables and uncertainty compared to transferring between public institutions within a state that has strong articulation policies.3
Part of your strategic planning must involve a clear-eyed assessment of these risks.
Choosing a less-risky path from the outset is the most powerful risk mitigation strategy available.
Next, you need a Contingency Plan for when a component is rejected.
The initial credit evaluation you receive is not always the final word.
Most institutions have an Appeals Process, and you should be prepared to use it.17
This is your primary contingency plan.
An appeal is not a desperate plea; it is a formal request for re-evaluation based on new evidence.
This is where your meticulous logistics pay off.
Your primary evidence will be the course syllabus (your bill of lading), which you can present to the department chair to demonstrate the equivalence of your coursework.
Being prepared to advocate for yourself, armed with documentation, can often result in an overturned decision.
Finally, a truly resilient system plans for even catastrophic failure through Reverse Logistics.
In the business world, this refers to the process of handling returns, repairs, and recapturing value from products.
In academia, the most powerful example of this is the concept of Reverse Transfer.
Imagine a student who successfully transfers from a community college to a four-year university but, for financial or personal reasons, has to drop out before completing their bachelor’s degree.
They often leave with a pile of debt and no credential to show for their work.
Reverse transfer policies, supported by legislation like the Reverse Transfer Efficiency Act, allow that student to have the credits they earned at the four-year university sent back to their community college.
If those combined credits meet the requirements for an associate’s degree, the college can award it retroactively.30
This is a game-changing risk management tool.
It ensures that even if the primary mission fails, the student can still recapture significant value from their investment, leaving with a valuable credential that can improve their job prospects.
To fully grasp the financial stakes you are managing, consider the following breakdown of the true cost of credit loss.
| Scenario Description | Credits Lost (of 60) | Extra Semesters Needed | Additional Tuition & Fees | Additional Living Expenses | Opportunity Cost (Lost Wages) | Total Financial Impact |
| Ideal Scenario (The Perfect Supply Chain) | 0 (0%) | 0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Common Disruption Scenario | 15 (25%) | 1 | $10,800 | $12,000 | $22,500 | $45,300 |
| National Average (The Credit Black Hole) | 26 (43%) | 2 | $21,600 | $24,000 | $45,000 | $90,600 |
Note: Cost estimates are illustrative, based on average public four-year institution costs and entry-level wages.
Actual costs will vary.
Sources for model:.10
This table transforms the abstract percentage of “43% credit loss” into a concrete and alarming number.
It makes it clear that failing to manage your academic supply chain isn’t just an inconvenience; it can be a five- to six-figure financial catastrophe.
This is the risk you are actively working to mitigate.
Part 5: Conclusion – Becoming the Architect of Your Own Academic Supply Chain
My story began with a moment of failure—a carefully constructed plan reduced to rubble by a single, sterile document.
That failure, however, was not an ending.
It was the catalyst for a fundamental shift in perspective.
It forced me to look beyond the surface-level advice given to students and see the deeper, systemic logic that truly governs the transfer process.
The frustrating, opaque, and costly world of college transfers is not a maze without a map; it is a complex system that can be understood and navigated with the right strategic framework.
The paradigm shift from student to supply chain architect is the key.
It is the difference between being a passive passenger on a journey fraught with peril and being the pilot who charts the course, anticipates turbulence, and executes a plan to arrive safely at the destination.
This mindset transforms your role and empowers you with agency in a system that often feels designed to strip you of it.
- You are no longer just choosing classes; you are strategically sourcing components from qualified suppliers, ensuring they meet the precise specifications of your final product.
- You are no longer just filling out forms; you are managing logistics, ensuring the seamless, documented, and verifiable movement of your academic assets from one point to another.
- You are no longer just talking to an advisor; you are integrating a complex system, bridging data silos and demanding end-to-end visibility to eliminate the gaps where your hard work can disappear.
- You are no longer just hoping for the best; you are actively managing risk, identifying potential points of failure, developing contingency plans, and building in mechanisms to recapture value.
The higher education system may be flawed, its incentives misaligned, and its processes needlessly complex.
But it is not insurmountable.
By adopting the principles of the Academic Supply Chain, you can impose order on the chaos.
You can design a resilient, efficient, and successful path to your degree, bypassing the credit black hole that has derailed so many others.
You can become the architect of your own education.
Works cited
- College Credit Transfer to Stretch Savings Further, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.collegesavings.org/college-credit-transfer-to-stretch-savings-further
- Are there any financial disadvantages in CC transfer to 4 years university? – Reddit, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/comments/4peupj/are_there_any_financial_disadvantages_in_cc/
- FAQ About Transferring College Credits – BestColleges.com, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.bestcolleges.com/careers/faq-about-transferring-college-credits/
- Pros and cons of being a transfer student – Sallie, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.sallie.com/resources/colleges/pros-and-cons-of-transferring-schools
- Improving Credit Transfer in Texas Colleges and Universities, accessed August 15, 2025, https://texas2036.org/posts/improving-credit-transfer-in-texas-colleges-and-universities/
- How the college transfer process derails students’ plans – The Hechinger Report, accessed August 15, 2025, https://hechingerreport.org/waste-of-time-community-college-transfers-derail-students/
- Institutional Challenges Associated with Credit Transfer – AARC, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.aarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Credit_transfer_challenges.pdf
- How to Avoid Common Pitfalls When Transferring College Credits – StraighterLine, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.straighterline.com/blog/how-to-avoid-common-pitfalls-when-transferring-college-credits
- A National Snapshot – American Council on Education, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/National-Snapshot-Transferring-Earned-Credit.pdf
- The Costs of Today’s College Credit Transfer System for Learners and the Mindsets and Practices That Reduce Them, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.chepp.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CHEPP_Cost-of-Todays-College-Credit_WHITE-PAPER-003-FINAL.pdf
- Higher Education: Students Need More Information to Help Reduce Challenges in Transferring College Credits – GAO, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-17-574
- GAO-17-574, HIGHER EDUCATION: Students Need More Information to Help Reduce Challenges in Transferring College Credits, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-17-574.pdf
- Transfer Credits: Supporting Student Mobility in Higher Education – Workday Blog, accessed August 15, 2025, https://blog.workday.com/en-us/transfer-credits-supporting-student-mobility-higher-education.html
- Dissecting the transfer process – Community College Daily, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.ccdaily.com/2024/09/dissecting-the-transfer-process/
- How Faculty Members Influence Credit Transfer at Four-Year Institutions – MDRC, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.mdrc.org/work/publications/how-faculty-members-influence-credit-transfer-four-year-institutions
- The bureaucratic obstacles that can derail low-income college students | PBS News, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/education/bureaucratic-obstacles-derail-low-income-students
- 10 Common Pitfalls for Transfer Students and How to Avoid Them – Neumann University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://learn.neumann.edu/neudirections/10-common-pitfalls-for-transfer-students-and-how-to-avoid-them
- Higher Ed’s Credit Transfer System Is Broken. Here’s a Better Way. | EdSurge News, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-04-20-higher-ed-s-credit-transfer-system-is-broken-here-s-a-better-way
- The Seven Principles of Supply Chain Management, accessed August 15, 2025, https://supplychainventure.com/PDF/TheSevenPrinciplesofSupplyChainManagement.pdf
- The 5 P’s of Logistics: Principles That Drive the Industry – Benjamin Gordon, accessed August 15, 2025, https://benjamingordon.me/the-5-ps-of-logistics-principles-that-drive-the-industry/
- Supply Chain Management (SCM): How It Works & Why It’s Important – Investopedia, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/scm.asp
- Supply Chain Management for Complex Systems – Number Analytics, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/supply-chain-management-for-complex-systems
- The Role of Supply Chain Planning in Today’s Complex Business Environment, accessed August 15, 2025, https://logisticsviewpoints.com/2025/06/25/the-role-of-supply-chain-planning-in-todays-complex-business-environment/
- Transferring Credits From National To Regionally Accredited Colleges – TheBestSchools.org, accessed August 15, 2025, https://thebestschools.org/resources/transferring-credits-and-school-accreditation/
- The costs of doing a college transfer and how to limit them – MassMutual Blog, accessed August 15, 2025, https://blog.massmutual.com/planning/college-transfer-costs
- Transfer Credit Ohio: Transfer to Degree Guarantee, accessed August 15, 2025, https://transfercredit.ohio.gov/
- 7 Supply Chain Integration Challenges for 2024 – Cleo, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.cleo.com/blog/7-supply-chain-challenges
- The Consequences of System Integration Issues – Panorama Consulting Group, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.panorama-consulting.com/the-consequences-of-system-integration-issues/
- Study: Students understand transfer credit loss, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.aacrao.org/who-we-are/newsroom/article/2020/07/27/study-students-understand-transfer-credit-loss
- Lawmakers Reintroduce Legislation to Help Students Transfer Credits from 4-year University to Community Colleges – warner.senate.gov, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.warner.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2023/6/lawmakers-reintroduce-legislation-to-help-students-transfer-credits-from-4-year-university-to-community-colleges
