The Currency of College: A Definitive Report on Credit Hours, Units, and the High-Stakes Maze of Academic Transfer

Decoding the Language of Academic Credit

The lexicon of American higher education is built upon a foundation of terms that, while seemingly straightforward, mask a complex and often inconsistent system of valuing academic work.

Understanding this vocabulary—credit hours, units, and the formulas that define them—is the first and most critical step in navigating the intricate landscape of college degrees, tuition, and academic transfer.

This system represents a century-old attempt to quantify learning through a standardized, time-based metric, yet its application varies significantly across institutions, creating profound challenges for students.

Credit Hours vs. Units: An Interchangeable Vernacular

Within the context of U.S. higher education, the terms “credit,” “unit,” and “hour” are, for most practical purposes, used interchangeably.

A course catalog may list a class as being worth “3 units,” “3 credits,” or “3 credit hours,” and in each case, the term signifies the value assigned to that course within the institution’s academic framework.¹

This common vernacular creates an illusion of a national standard, leading students to reasonably assume that a 3-credit course at one university is equivalent to a 3-credit course at another.

However, this assumption is a primary source of confusion and subsequent credit loss for transfer students.

While the terminology is synonymous, the actual academic weight of these credits can differ dramatically.

The true determinant of a credit’s value is not its name but the underlying academic calendar of the institution—most commonly, a semester or quarter system.¹

This fundamental difference in structure means that the seemingly standardized language of credits masks a deeply fragmented system, setting the stage for the significant challenges students face when attempting to move their academic achievements between institutions.

The Anatomy of a Credit Hour: The Workload Formula

The modern definition of a credit hour is rooted in the Carnegie Unit, a time-based measure developed in the early 20th century.

Federal regulations and the policies of accrediting bodies have established a widely accepted formula for what a credit hour represents in terms of student work.

A single credit hour reasonably approximates one hour of classroom or direct faculty instruction and a minimum of two hours of out-of-class student work each week for the duration of a semester.⁵

This 1:2 ratio of in-class to out-of-class time translates into a total expected workload.

Over a typical 15-week semester, a single credit hour corresponds to a minimum of 45 hours of total student engagement.⁷

For a standard 3-credit course, a student is therefore expected to dedicate approximately 135 hours to their studies (

3 credits×45 hours/credit).

This 45-hour standard is the bedrock of the system, serving as the institutionally accepted and federally recognized justification for awarding credit, regardless of whether the course is delivered in person or online.⁷

Policies from a wide range of universities consistently cite this workload expectation as the basis for their credit allocation.⁹

While the original Carnegie Unit was strictly a measure of “seat time,” the contemporary credit hour has evolved to become a proxy for total student workload.

This shift is what allows institutions to award credit for a diverse array of learning experiences, but it also introduces a layer of subjectivity, as the “two hours of out-of-class work” is an expectation for an “average student,” not a precisely verifiable metric.

This ambiguity often becomes a point of contention during credit transfer evaluations.

Beyond the Lecture Hall: Calculating Credit for Varied Instructional Modes

Recognizing that learning is not confined to the traditional lecture, the credit hour framework has been adapted to accommodate various instructional formats.

The core principle of equivalent workload is maintained, but the ratio of contact time to credit awarded is adjusted based on the nature of the academic activity.

• Laboratory and Studio Courses: These hands-on formats typically require more supervised contact time per credit hour. A common ratio is two to three hours of lab or studio work per week for one credit hour.⁶
• Internships, Practica, and Clinicals: For experiential learning, credit is often awarded based on the total hours of supervised fieldwork. For example, an institution might require a minimum of 45 hours of internship work for each unit of credit.⁹
• Online and Asynchronous Courses: In the absence of physical “seat time,” credit for online courses is justified by demonstrating that the course design requires an equivalent amount of student work. This can be achieved through the “demonstration of competency, demonstration of proficiency, or fulfillment of learning outcomes” judged by faculty to be equivalent to a traditional course.¹² More practically, institutions often quantify this through required and supervised online activities, such as instructor-mediated discussion boards, proctored online exams, interactive tutorials, and tracked engagement with pre-recorded lectures.⁷

This flexibility demonstrates the system’s attempt to evolve, but it also highlights the central tension between a time-based metric and the goal of measuring learning outcomes.

The Ghost in the Machine: The Carnegie Unit’s Enduring Legacy

To understand the complexities and shortcomings of the modern credit hour system, one must examine its origins.

The Carnegie Unit was not the product of pedagogical research or a deliberate effort to measure student learning.

Rather, it was an administrative tool born of a specific historical contingency, and its legacy continues to shape—and often constrain—the structure of American higher education.

From Pensions to Pedagogy: The Accidental Creation of a National Standard

In 1905, industrialist Andrew Carnegie established the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (CFAT) with a $10 million donation to create a pension fund for university professors.¹⁸

To administer this fund, the foundation needed a way to define what constituted a “college” and to differentiate it from the often-unstandardized high schools of the era.

To determine eligibility for the pension program, CFAT created a standard: a “unit” of high school work was defined as 120 hours of contact time with an instructor over a year.²⁰

Colleges seeking to participate in the lucrative pension fund were required to demand a minimum of 14 such units for admission.¹⁸

The allure of the pension fund (now known as TIAA-CREF) was so powerful that it drove the near-universal adoption of this time-based standard.

By 1910, the “Carnegie Unit” was embedded in the operational DNA of American secondary and postsecondary education.²⁰

This history is crucial because it reveals that the credit hour was created for administrative convenience—to standardize eligibility for a financial program—not to measure educational achievement.

The entire system of American academic credit is thus a case of path dependency, where a century-old administrative solution has become the unchangeable foundation for academic, financial, and regulatory structures, creating immense institutional inertia against reform.

“Seat Time” as a Proxy for Learning: Strengths and Criticisms

The Carnegie Unit’s primary function has always been administrative.

It provided a common, easily measurable currency that allowed institutions to manage student progress, calculate faculty workload, facilitate transfers, and ensure a minimum “opportunity to learn” by standardizing instructional time.²⁰

However, from its inception, the unit was never intended to be a measure of

what students actually learned.

That responsibility was left to faculty through grades and exams.²³

This is the central criticism of the system.

Relying on “seat time” as the primary measure of academic progress masks vast differences in educational quality and student mastery.

Critics, including the Carnegie Foundation itself in recent years, argue that this focus on time discourages innovation, penalizes students who can demonstrate mastery more quickly, and is a poor proxy for genuine competency.²¹

The conflict between the system’s need for administrative convenience and the educational goal of fostering innovation is stark.

Models like competency-based education, which are not time-bound, directly challenge the credit hour’s logic and, by extension, the entire administrative apparatus built upon it, creating a significant barrier to reforms that prioritize demonstrated learning over standardized time.²⁴

How the Carnegie Unit Shapes Everything: Financial Aid, Accreditation, and Faculty Workload

The influence of the Carnegie Unit extends far beyond the classroom, forming the core administrative and financial cog of the entire higher education machine.

• Federal Financial Aid: Eligibility for federal student aid programs, such as Pell Grants and Direct Loans, is directly tied to the credit hour. Federal regulations require institutions to use this time-based measure to define the length of programs and track a student’s progress toward a degree, effectively mandating its use.¹¹
• Accreditation: Regional accrediting bodies, which are the gatekeepers of institutional quality and eligibility for federal funds, require institutions to have a clear and consistent policy for defining and awarding credit hours, ensuring it aligns with the federal standard of equivalent workload.⁷
• Faculty Workload and Budgets: Universities use the credit hour to calculate faculty teaching loads, often expressed in Weighted Teaching Units (WTUs) or similar metrics. A professor’s workload is determined by the number of credits they teach, which in turn influences departmental budgets and resource allocation.⁶

Because it is so deeply integrated into the financial and regulatory framework of higher education, replacing the Carnegie Unit is not a simple matter of adopting a new academic metric.

It would require a fundamental restructuring of how financial aid is disbursed, how faculty are compensated, and how institutional quality is assessed.

A Tale of Two Calendars: Semester vs. Quarter Systems

While the credit hour serves as a seemingly common unit of measure, its value is fundamentally altered by the academic calendar on which an institution operates.

The two dominant systems in the United States—semester and quarter—package educational content in structurally different ways.

This incompatibility functions like two different operating systems trying to run the same software; while data can be moved between them, the transfer process is often cumbersome and results in significant loss.

Comparing the Frameworks: Pace, Depth, and Course Load

The semester system, which is more common, divides the academic year into two primary terms of approximately 15 weeks each (fall and spring), with an optional summer session.²⁷

The quarter system divides the year into three or four terms of about 10 weeks each (fall, winter, spring, and an optional summer).²⁸

These structural differences create distinct pedagogical and student experiences.

The longer duration of a semester allows for more in-depth exploration of subject matter and more time to form relationships with faculty and peers.

The faster pace of the quarter system allows students to take a wider variety of courses over their academic career but can also lead to a feeling of constant exams and a more superficial treatment of complex topics.²⁸

The Mathematics of Conversion: Why 120 Doesn’t Equal 180

The different term lengths necessitate a different valuation of credits.

Because a semester is longer, a semester credit represents more total work than a quarter credit.

This leads to a standard mathematical conversion that is a frequent and significant point of confusion for transfer students.

• 1 semester credit is equivalent to 1.5 quarter credits.
• 1 quarter credit is equivalent to 2/3 (or approximately 0.67) semester credits.³⁰

This ratio explains why degree requirements differ so dramatically.

A typical bachelor’s degree on a semester system requires approximately 120 credits, while the same degree on a quarter system requires approximately 180 credits.³¹

When a student transfers between these systems, their credits must be converted, and this is where problems arise.

For example, a 3-credit semester course converts to 4.5 quarter credits.⁴

This fractional credit, or “rounding error,” often fails to satisfy a 5-credit quarter course requirement, forcing the student to either lose the value of the credit or take an additional course to make up a small deficit, demonstrating a core structural friction in the national system.³⁴

Feature	Semester System	Quarter System
Term Length	Approx. 15 weeks 6	Approx. 10 weeks 28
Terms per Academic Year	2 (Fall, Spring) + optional Summer 28	3 (Fall, Winter, Spring) + optional Summer 28
Typical Credits per Course	3-4 credits 35	2-4 credits 28
Full-Time Course Load (per term)	12-18 credits (4-6 classes) 28	9-12 credits (3-4 classes) 28
Total Credits for Bachelor’s Degree	Approx. 120-130 credits 31	Approx. 180 credits 31

The Transfer Trap: Why Millions of Credits Vanish Each Year

The process of transferring between colleges, a path taken by over a third of U.S. students, is fraught with obstacles that lead to the loss of millions of earned credits annually.

This “transfer trap” has devastating consequences, increasing the time and cost of obtaining a degree, depleting financial aid, and derailing the academic aspirations of countless students.

The opaque, inconsistent, and often punitive nature of credit transfer actively erodes student and public trust in higher education, fueling the perception that institutions are more concerned with revenue than student success.

The Scope of the Problem: Quantifying Credit Loss with National Data

The scale of credit loss is staggering.

A landmark study by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that students who transfer lose, on average, 43% of their credits in the process.³⁶

This loss is not confined to obscure transfer pathways; even students moving between public institutions—the most common route—lose an estimated 37% of their credits.

The problem is even more acute for students navigating other pathways, such as those transferring from a private for-profit school to a public one, who lose a catastrophic 94% of their credits on average.³⁷

This systemic failure has profound financial and academic consequences.

Survey data reveals that one in five transfer students is forced to repeat a course they have already passed, 13% run out of financial aid as a direct result of repeating coursework, and a shocking 16% give up on pursuing their degree altogether because the transfer process is so difficult.³⁹

This phenomenon represents a significant equity barrier, as the students most likely to start at community colleges to save money are the ones most harmed by the financial and temporal costs of lost credits, undermining the very promise of affordability and social mobility that the transfer pathway is meant to provide.

Statistic	Value/Percentage	Source(s)
Average % of College Credits Lost Upon Transfer	43%	36
% of Credits Lost in Public-to-Public Transfers	37%	37
% of Credits Lost in For-Profit to Public Transfers	94%	37
% of Transfer Students Who Lose at Least a Quarter of Their Credits	30%	40
% of Transfer Students Reporting They Had to Repeat a Course	20% (1 in 5)	39
% of Transfer Students Who Ran Out of Financial Aid Due to Repeating Courses	13%	39
% of Transfer Students Who Gave Up on Their Degree Due to Transfer Difficulties	16%	39

Pathways to Failure: Transferability vs. Applicability

A primary source of student frustration lies in the critical distinction between credit transferability and credit applicability.

A course may be deemed “transferable,” meaning the receiving institution accepts the credits and they appear on the student’s transcript, often as general elective credit.

However, those same credits may not be “applicable,” meaning they do not count toward fulfilling specific general education or major requirements.⁴¹

A student can successfully transfer 60 credits but still find themselves needing to retake dozens of credits’ worth of core courses for their degree.

Credits are often deemed non-applicable for several reasons.

The most common is a perceived lack of course equivalency, where a review of the syllabus leads a department to conclude the course is not a sufficient match for their own.⁴²

In other cases, credits are rejected because they are deemed “less rigorous” than those at the receiving institution—a subjective judgment that can be colored by institutional prestige or bias against community colleges.

Finally, many universities impose caps on the total number of credits that can be transferred and applied to a degree, regardless of their equivalency.⁴²

Voices from the Maze: Student Narratives of Lost Time and Money

Behind the statistics are millions of individual stories of frustration and financial hardship.

Student forums and news reports are filled with accounts from students who feel betrayed by the system.

One student, Ricki Korba, discovered after transferring to California State University, Bakersfield, that most of her science classes from community college would not count, even though some used the same textbooks.

The decision forced her to retake a year’s worth of classes, adding over $20,000 to the cost of her degree.⁴²

Another student reported following a computer science roadmap at their community college, assured that the credits would transfer to the local university, only to find that the specialized courses were accepted merely as general electives, forcing them to retake the entire major sequence.⁴¹

These experiences lead many students to consider dropping out and foster a deep cynicism, with 74% of transfer students agreeing with the statement that colleges care more about making money than about educating students.³⁹

The Global Bridge: International Credit Transfer to the U.S. System

For international students, the already formidable challenges of navigating the U.S. credit system are compounded by additional layers of bureaucracy, expense, and uncertainty.

The process of converting foreign academic work into U.S. credit hours is a multi-step gauntlet that functions as a significant gatekeeping mechanism, filtering out students who lack the financial resources, time, or institutional knowledge to successfully complete it.

Translating Education: From ECTS and CATS to U.S. Semester Hours

Unlike the relatively decentralized U.S. system, many other regions have more standardized credit frameworks.

The most common are the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS), used throughout Europe, and the UK’s Credit Accumulation and Transfer Scheme (CATS).⁴³

These systems operate on a different scale, which necessitates conversion.

A full-time academic year is typically valued at:

• ~30 credits in the U.S. Semester Credit Hour (SCH) system.
• 60 credits in the ECTS system.
• 120 credits in the CATS system.⁴³

While institutions ultimately set their own conversion rates, these values lead to common rules of thumb for equivalency.

Academic System	Full-Time Year Load	Rule-of-Thumb Conversion (to 1 U.S. Semester Credit)
U.S. Semester Credit Hour (SCH)	~30 Credits 43	N/A
European Credit Transfer System (ECTS)	60 Credits 43	2 ECTS ≈ 1 U.S. SCH 43
UK Credit Accumulation & Transfer Scheme (CATS)	120 Credits 43	4 CATS ≈ 1 U.S. SCH 43

The Role of the Evaluator: Navigating Credential Evaluation Services

Before a U.S. institution will even consider foreign credits, most require the student to obtain a formal evaluation from a third-party credential evaluation service.

Organizations like World Education Services (WES) or Educational Credential Evaluators (ECE) are the most widely recognized.⁴⁵

These services review a student’s official foreign transcripts and prepare a report for the U.S. university.

This process typically involves two types of reports: a “document report,” which simply verifies that a foreign degree is equivalent to a U.S. degree, and a more detailed “course report,” which provides a course-by-course evaluation with recommended U.S. credit and grade equivalencies.⁴⁵

This mandatory step adds significant time—often several months—and expense to the transfer process, creating another barrier for international applicants.⁴⁵

Common Hurdles: Syllabi in Translation, Grade Conversion, and “Undistributed” Credits

Even after a credential evaluation, numerous hurdles remain.

Students are typically required to provide detailed syllabi for every course they wish to transfer, and these documents must often be officially translated into English.⁴⁷

U.S. institutions also apply a minimum grade requirement, typically accepting only courses with a grade equivalent to a “C” or better, a determination that can be complex when converting from different international grading scales.⁴⁹

Perhaps the most frustrating obstacle is the common practice of awarding “undistributed” or “unassigned” credit.⁴⁹

In this scenario, the university acknowledges the credit recommended by the evaluation service but does not assign it a specific course equivalency (e.g., it is listed as “History 1XX” instead of “HIST 101: U.S. History”).

This credit is often useless for fulfilling degree requirements until the student undertakes the arduous process of petitioning individual academic departments, providing syllabi, and convincing faculty to manually approve an equivalency.

This practice is not merely an administrative placeholder; it reflects a systemic skepticism toward foreign education, placing the burden of proof entirely on the international student and presuming their coursework is not equivalent until proven otherwise.

Forging Clearer Paths: Institutional Best Practices and Recommendations

While the challenges of credit transfer are systemic, they are not insurmountable.

A growing number of institutions and state systems are implementing student-centric policies and leveraging technology to create more transparent, equitable, and efficient pathways.

These best practices offer a roadmap for reform, suggesting that the solution requires not just technical tools but a fundamental cultural shift toward prioritizing student success over institutional protectionism.

Building Bridges: The Power of Articulation Agreements and Transfer Guides

The most effective strategy for ensuring seamless credit transfer is the creation of formal articulation agreements.

These are partnerships, most commonly 2+2 agreements between community colleges and four-year universities, that pre-define which courses will transfer and exactly how they will apply to specific degree programs.⁵⁰

These agreements remove all ambiguity for students, providing a clear and guaranteed path to a bachelor’s degree.

On a broader scale, statewide initiatives can have a massive impact.

Systems like Texas’s Common Course Numbering System ensure that equivalent introductory courses have the same number across all public institutions in the state.⁵²

Similarly,

transferable core course sequences, like the Indiana College Core, guarantee that a student who completes a block of general education courses at one public institution can transfer that entire block to another without a course-by-course re-evaluation.³⁶

Technology as a Tool: Leveraging Databases and Platforms

Transparency is a powerful antidote to the confusion of the transfer process, and technology is the key to providing it.

Many universities now host online transfer credit evaluation tools on their websites.

These searchable databases allow prospective students to look up their current institution and courses to see pre-approved equivalencies at the potential receiving institution.⁵³

National platforms like Transferology take this a step further by aggregating transfer equivalency data from a network of member institutions.

A student can enter their completed coursework and see how it would apply at hundreds of different colleges, empowering them to “shop” for the institution that will grant them the most credit and provide the fastest, most affordable path to a degree.⁵³

Making transfer policies radically transparent in this way can create a powerful competitive advantage for student-centric institutions in attracting the vast and growing market of transfer students.

A Student-Centric Approach: Recommendations for Fair and Transparent Credit Evaluation

Ultimately, solving the transfer crisis requires a philosophical shift in institutional culture.

Rather than viewing transfer evaluation as a gatekeeping function, institutions should adopt a student-centric approach grounded in a set of core principles.

• Presume Transferability: The institutional mindset should shift from “Why should we accept this credit?” to “Why shouldn’t we?” The burden of proof should be on the institution to justify non-acceptance, not on the student to defend every course.⁵⁰
• Focus on Learning Outcomes, Not 100% Equivalency: Evaluation should be based on whether a course has comparable learning outcomes, not on whether its syllabus is an exact replica of a course offered at the receiving institution. Acknowledge that program content can be distributed differently across institutions.⁵⁰
• Privilege Application to Degree Requirements: Whenever possible, transfer credits should be applied to general education or major requirements rather than being relegated to the category of general electives.⁵⁰
• Provide Proactive and Accessible Advising: Students need clear, accurate, and early guidance. Transfer policies, articulation agreements, and evaluation tools should be publicly accessible and easy to navigate.³⁹

Implementing these practices requires overcoming cultural barriers such as faculty skepticism and departmental protectionism.

However, for institutions committed to access, equity, and student success, creating a fair and transparent transfer process is not just an administrative task—it is a moral imperative.

Works cited

1. Can someone explain college units to me? – CollegeVine, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.collegevine.com/faq/31205/can-someone-explain-college-units-to-me
2. How Does a ‘College Unit’ Work? – ThoughtCo, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-a-college-unit-793232
3. Credit hours vs units for college classes on UC app? : r/ApplyingToCollege – Reddit, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/r5gazd/credit_hours_vs_units_for_college_classes_on_uc/
4. Hours vs. Units for GE Courses – UC Transfers – College Confidential Forums, accessed August 15, 2025, https://talk.collegeconfidential.com/t/hours-vs-units-for-ge-courses/1709534
5. northwest.iu.edu, accessed August 15, 2025, https://northwest.iu.edu/academic-affairs/curriculum-processes/credit-hour.html#:~:text=Generally%2C%20one%20unit%20of%20credit,is%20defined%20as%2050%20minutes.
6. Course credit – Wikipedia, accessed August 15, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Course_credit
7. Credit Hours and Calculation – Office of Online Education – Wake Forest University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://oe.wfu.edu/program-development-2/credit-hours-and-calculation/
8. www.northcentralcollege.edu, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.northcentralcollege.edu/news/2020/09/03/what-does-credits-mean-college#:~:text=To%20further%20break%20college%20credits,hours%20of%20work%20per%20week.%E2%80%9D
9. Credit Definitions | University of Arizona Calendar, accessed August 15, 2025, https://catalog.arizona.edu/policy/courses-credit/credit/credit-definitions
10. How to Calculate: Credit Units / Class Time / Course Classifications/ Faculty Workload, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.humboldt.edu/sites/default/files/academic-programs/2024-12/howtocalculatescu.pdf
11. Credit Hour Definition and Program Length (Policy) | Lake Michigan College, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.lakemichigancollege.edu/policies/definition-of-a-credit-hour-and-program-length
12. Definition of a Credit Hour – Indiana University Northwest, accessed August 15, 2025, https://northwest.iu.edu/academic-affairs/curriculum-processes/credit-hour.html
13. www.aic.edu, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.aic.edu/academics/credit-hours-calculator/#:~:text=Each%20credit%20hour%20corresponds%20to,study%20and%20research%2C%20and%20assignments.
14. Credit Hour Workload Calculator | Academics | AIC – American International College, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.aic.edu/academics/credit-hours-calculator/
15. Guidelines for Credit Hour Determination – Catalogs – Mount St. Joseph University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://registrar.msj.edu/undergraduate-catalog/academic-information/guidelines-for-credit-hour-determination.html
16. Credit Hour Guidance – NYU, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.nyu.edu/academics/accreditation-authorization-assessment/resources-faqs/credit-hour-guidance.html
17. Instructional Equivalencies Chart, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.albright.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/instructional-equivalencies-chart-carnegie-units-updated-9-22-15.pdf
18. Carnegie unit | Standardized Testing, Education Reform & Curriculum – Britannica, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Carnegie-unit
19. The High School Credit-Hour: A Timeline of the Carnegie Unit – Education Week, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/the-high-school-credit-hour-a-timeline-of-the-carnegie-unit/2022/12
20. Carnegie Unit and Student Hour – Wikipedia, accessed August 15, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnegie_Unit_and_Student_Hour
21. Carnegie Unit Definition – The Glossary of Education Reform -, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.edglossary.org/carnegie-unit/
22. The Carnegie Unit: What is it? – SUNY System Administration, accessed August 15, 2025, https://system.suny.edu/media/suny/content-assets/documents/faculty-senate/ugrad/TheCarnegieUnit.pdf
23. The Carnegie Unit: A Century-Old Standard in a Changing Education Landscape – Lumina Foundation, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.luminafoundation.org/files/resources/carnegie-unit-report.pdf
24. S3E3: The Carnegie Unit, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.aacrao.org/resources/newsletters-blogs/for-the-record/for-the-record/2020/07/08/the-carnegie-unit
25. ED554803 – The Carnegie Unit: A Century-Old Standard in a Changing Education Landscape, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2015-Jan – ERIC, accessed August 15, 2025, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED554803
26. The Carnegie Unit: A Century‐Old Standard in Changing Education – Lumina Foundation, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.luminafoundation.org/resource/the-carnegie-unit/
27. What is the difference between semester hours and quarter hours?, accessed August 15, 2025, https://rid.org/faq-items/what-is-the-difference-between-semester-hours-and-quarter-hours-2/
28. Semester vs. Quarter System in College – BestColleges.com, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.bestcolleges.com/blog/semester-vs-quarter-system/
29. Semester vs. Quarter in College and Universities | Drexel Online, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.online.drexel.edu/support/college-semester-versus-quarter.aspx
30. Semester vs Quarter System Explained & Full List of Colleges, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.collegetransitions.com/blog/semester-vs-quarter-system-in-college/
31. What Counts Under The Quarter Credit System? – TheBestSchools.org, accessed August 15, 2025, https://thebestschools.org/resources/quarter-vs-semester-credits/
32. Credit Information and Continuing Education Units – UCR Extension, accessed August 15, 2025, https://extension.ucr.edu/helpcenterstudentresources/academicpoliciesandinfo/creditinformationandcontinuingeducationunits
33. What Does Credits Mean In College?, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.northcentralcollege.edu/news/2020/09/03/what-does-credits-mean-college
34. My credit transfer is screwed : r/udub – Reddit, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/udub/comments/1e7ktwy/my_credit_transfer_is_screwed/
35. www.bestcolleges.com, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.bestcolleges.com/blog/semester-vs-quarter-system/#:~:text=Semester%2Dlong%20courses%20are%20usually,on%20your%20learning%20style%20preferences.
36. Giving Credit Where Credit is Due | All4Ed, accessed August 15, 2025, https://all4ed.org/publication/giving-credit-where-credit-is-due/
37. GAO-17-574, HIGHER EDUCATION: Students Need More Information to Help Reduce Challenges in Transferring College Credits, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-17-574.pdf
38. Higher Education: Students Need More Information to Help Reduce Challenges in Transferring College Credits – GAO, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-17-574
39. Removing Credit Transfer Barriers Key to Improving Higher Ed Completion Rates | Diverse, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.diverseeducation.com/opinion/article/15749057/removing-credit-transfer-barriers-key-to-improving-higher-ed-completion-rates
40. Survey: 3 in 10 Students Lose Significant Academic Credits Transferring Between Colleges, accessed August 15, 2025, https://upcea.edu/survey-3-in-10-students-lose-significant-academic-credits-transferring-between-colleges/
41. Community college transfers finding that they have wasted their time? – Reddit, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/college/comments/134oc20/community_college_transfers_finding_that_they/
42. How the college transfer process derails students’ plans – The Hechinger Report, accessed August 15, 2025, https://hechingerreport.org/waste-of-time-community-college-transfers-derail-students/
43. How do academic credit systems work and compare? – Short Term …, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.shorttermprograms.com/page/academic-credit-systems
44. Credits, Contact Hours, and Units Abroad – Arlotto Family Center for Global Engagement, accessed August 15, 2025, https://cge.tcnj.edu/students/credits-contact-hours-and-units-abroad/
45. How to Transfer Credit from Foreign Universities to U.S. Schools – eLearners.com, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.elearners.com/colleges/transferring-credit-from-foreign-universities-to-us-schools/
46. Undergraduate Transfer Credit Policies: Office of the Registrar – Northwestern University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.registrar.northwestern.edu/registration-graduation/transfer-and-test-credit/transfer-credit-policies.html
47. Navigating International Credit Transfers: Best Practices for Students – Honor Society, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.honorsociety.org/articles/navigating-international-credit-transfers-best-practices-students
48. 3 Transfer Problems International Students Should Look Out For, accessed August 15, 2025, https://blog.internationalstudent.com/3-transfer-problems-international-students-should-look-out-for/
49. WCMS CTS : Indiana University Bloomington – Credit Transfer Service, accessed August 15, 2025, https://cts.admissions.indiana.edu/policy.html
50. Best Practices in Transfer Evaluation, accessed August 15, 2025, https://uwm.edu/academicaffairs/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2020/01/transfer_evaluation.pdf
51. Effective Practices That Support Transfer Students – American Council on Education, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.acenet.edu/Research-Insights/Pages/Student-Support/Effective-Practices-Transfer-Students.aspx
52. Transfer Colleges and Credits – My Texas Future, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.mytexasfuture.org/adult-college/transfer-process/
53. Transfer Credit Evaluation | Office of Admissions, accessed August 15, 2025, https://admissions.tc.umn.edu/admissions/transfer-admission/transfer-credit-evaluation
54. Search by School | Test and Transfer Credit Tool | UTD – The University of Texas at Dallas, accessed August 15, 2025, https://transfercredit.utdallas.edu/search-by-school/
55. Transfer Course Search Tool | Transfer Center for Policy & Resources, accessed August 15, 2025, https://transfercredit.wsu.edu/tools/transfer-course-search-tool/
56. Transfer Credit Evaluation Services | Ohio University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.ohio.edu/admissions/transfer-credits/evaluation-services
57. 7 Tips for Transfer Students | PLNU, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.pointloma.edu/resources/undergraduate-studies/7-tips-transfer-students