An Exhaustive Analysis of Master’s Degree Credit Requirements: A Comparative Study of Domestic and International Systems

Section 1: Deconstructing the Credit Hour: An Examination of Academic Currency

The pursuit of a master’s degree represents a significant investment of time, intellect, and financial resources.

Central to navigating this landscape is a clear understanding of its fundamental unit of measurement: the credit hour.

Far from being a simple metric of classroom attendance, the credit hour in the United States is a complex, regulated, and economically significant unit that serves as the currency of academic progress.

It dictates program length, determines tuition costs, and forms the basis for institutional accreditation and federal funding.

This section deconstructs the credit hour, examining its formal definition, its regulatory power, and its conceptual divergence from international systems, thereby establishing the foundational knowledge required to interpret the credit requirements of any master’s program.

1.1 The U.S. Federal Definition of a Credit Hour

The modern understanding of the credit hour in American higher education is anchored in a formal definition provided by the U.S. Department of Education.

This definition, found in 34 CFR 600.2, establishes a baseline for what an institution must provide in exchange for awarding academic credit.

It stipulates that a credit hour is an amount of student work that “reasonably approximates not less than” one hour of direct faculty instruction or classroom presence and a minimum of two hours of out-of-class student work each week for approximately fifteen weeks for one semester hour of credit.¹

This standard is often referred to as the “Carnegie Unit” and forms the bedrock of course design and scheduling across the nation.

However, the federal definition is intentionally flexible, acknowledging that learning is not confined to the lecture hall.

It explicitly allows for an “equivalent amount of work” for other academic activities, including laboratory work, internships, practica, and studio work.¹

This flexibility is crucial at the graduate level, where learning modalities are diverse.

For instance, a three-credit graduate seminar might meet for only one hour per week, far less than the standard three hours of in-class time.

Such a structure is permissible under the federal definition if the institution can demonstrate that the course requires a substantial amount of outside research and preparation from the student—for example, the equivalent of eight or more hours of work each week—to justify the credit award.³

The definition also accounts for different academic calendars.

While the semester system (typically 15 weeks) is common, some institutions operate on a quarter system (10-12 weeks).

A quarter hour represents the same total academic effort as a semester hour but is distributed over a more condensed timeframe.³

This distinction is critical when comparing programs from different institutions, as a simple numerical comparison of credits can be misleading without understanding the underlying calendar system.

1.2 The Credit Hour as a Regulated and Economic Unit

The significance of the federal credit hour definition extends far beyond academic bookkeeping.

It is a high-stakes unit of compliance that directly links an institution’s curriculum to its financial viability and legitimacy.

Adherence to this definition is a mandatory prerequisite for institutions seeking to participate in Title IV federal financial aid programs, which include Pell Grants and federal student loans.¹

This transforms the credit hour from a mere academic measure into a de facto unit of currency for federal student aid, creating a powerful incentive for institutions to meticulously document and justify their credit awards.

This regulatory framework is enforced by accrediting agencies.

These independent bodies are tasked with ensuring that the institutions they oversee have established and consistently apply policies for determining credit hours that align with the federal definition and commonly accepted practices in higher education.¹

An institution’s accredited status, which is essential for its reputation and its students’ ability to receive financial aid, is therefore contingent upon its rigorous application of the credit hour standard.

This explains the often bureaucratic and detailed nature of university curriculum committees and course approval processes; they are not just debating pedagogical merit but are also ensuring regulatory compliance.

The practical application of this definition is quantitative.

A standard three-credit course in a 15-week semester is expected to comprise at least 2,250 minutes of instructional time (750 minutes/credit×3 credits) and 4,500 minutes of supplementary out-of-class work.⁵

This framework governs how syllabi are constructed, how courses are scheduled, and how program lengths are determined, creating a standardized, though complex, system for measuring and comparing academic work across the diverse landscape of American higher education.

1.3 International Equivalents and Conceptual Differences

When the lens is widened to a global perspective, it becomes clear that the term “credit” does not have a universal meaning.

The U.S. system, with its foundation in “contact hours,” stands in contrast to many international systems that are based on a more holistic measure of total student workload.

The most prominent international framework is the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS), a cornerstone of the Bologna Process designed to standardize higher education across Europe.⁷

In the ECTS framework, a full academic year is consistently defined as 60 credits.

Crucially, each ECTS credit represents a total student workload of 25 to 30 hours, a figure that encompasses all required learning activities: attending lectures, participating in seminars, completing assignments, conducting research, and preparing for exams.⁷

This represents a fundamental philosophical departure from the U.S. model.

While the American system starts with the building block of direct faculty instruction and adds out-of-class work, the ECTS model starts with the total expected workload and allows institutions to allocate that time across various learning activities.

This “total workload” philosophy is also prevalent in other major English-speaking educational systems.

In the United Kingdom, for example, while students may have fewer than ten hours of weekly contact time, they are expected to undertake 30 to 35 hours of independent study, reflecting a focus on the total learning effort.⁹

Similarly, the “credit point” systems used in Australia and the university-specific credit systems in Canada tend to reflect all forms of study and assessment, not just contact time.⁸

This foundational incompatibility between the U.S. “seat time” model and the international “total workload” model means that a direct, one-to-one comparison of “credits” is inherently flawed.

It is akin to comparing units of distance with units of Mass. This conceptual divide underscores the complexity of international credential evaluation and explains the necessity of the detailed conversion formulas that will be explored in Section 6.

Without understanding this underlying difference, students, admissions officers, and employers risk fundamentally misinterpreting the value and scope of an international master’s degree.

Section 2: The U.S. Master’s Degree Landscape: A Quantitative Overview

While the definition of a credit hour provides a micro-level view of academic measurement, understanding the requirements for a master’s degree necessitates a macro-level perspective.

In the United States, the number of credits required to earn a master’s degree is not a single, fixed figure but rather a wide spectrum influenced by a confluence of factors including academic discipline, professional standards, and institutional policies.

This section provides a quantitative overview of this landscape, establishing the common range of credit requirements and identifying the key variables that determine where a specific program will fall within that range.

2.1 The General Range: 30 to 60 Credit Hours

Across the vast array of master’s programs offered by U.S. institutions, a general consensus has emerged regarding the typical credit load.

Most master’s degrees require between 30 and 60 credit hours to complete.¹⁰

This range serves as a reliable benchmark for prospective students, with the majority of standard, non-licensure programs clustering at the lower end of this spectrum.

For many common degrees, such as a Master of Arts (M.A.) or a Master of Education (M.Ed.), the requirement is typically between 30 and 36 credit hours.⁴

This volume of work is generally designed to be completed by a full-time student in one and a half to two years.

2.2 Factors Influencing Credit Hour Variation

The significant variance within the 30-to-60-credit range is not arbitrary; it is a direct reflection of a program’s specific academic and professional objectives.

Several key factors systematically influence a program’s total credit requirement.

First, the academic discipline and level of specialization play a crucial role.

Programs in more technical or quantitatively rigorous fields often demand a greater number of credits to ensure comprehensive coverage of the subject matter.

For example, a Master of Science (M.S.) in engineering or computer science may require between 36 and 48 credits, reflecting a more intensive curriculum than a standard 30-credit humanities degree.¹⁰

Second, and perhaps most significantly, programs that lead to professional licensure or certification consistently have the highest credit requirements.

Fields such as nursing, counseling, social work, and some areas of education are governed by external professional bodies and state licensing boards that mandate specific curricular content and, critically, extensive supervised practical experience.

To accommodate these required internships, practica, or clinical hours, these programs often range from 45 to 60 credit hours, and in some cases, even more.⁴

The credit total in these instances is less a matter of institutional choice and more a function of meeting external professional standards.

Third, every institution retains the prerogative to set its own curriculum.

The college or university ultimately decides the exact number of credits required for each of its programs, leading to variation even among degrees in the same field at different schools.¹²

This institutional autonomy allows programs to develop unique strengths and specializations, but it also necessitates careful research by prospective students to compare programs accurately.

Finally, the specific program structure can add to the total credit count.

The inclusion of a formal research thesis, a dual-degree option that combines two fields of study, or extensive practicum components will naturally increase the number of credits required for graduation.⁴

This tiered credit structure reveals that the total credit requirement for a master’s degree is more than just a measure of program length; it is a powerful proxy for the program’s intensity and its alignment with the professional world.

A clear positive correlation exists between the number of credits and the degree’s level of specialization, technical rigor, or connection to professional regulation.

A 30-credit M.A. signals the acquisition of advanced academic knowledge in a specific discipline.

In contrast, a 60-credit Master of Social Work signals not only the mastery of academic theory but also the completion of the extensive, supervised field experience required for professional practice.

Prospective students can therefore use a program’s credit total as an initial, valuable heuristic to gauge its fundamental orientation—whether it is primarily academic or applied—and its suitability for specific, often regulated, career pathways.

2.3 Curriculum Composition

The total credit requirement for a master’s degree is distributed across several distinct curricular components, each serving a specific educational purpose.

While the exact allocation varies by program, a common structure can be identified.

• Core Courses: These courses form the intellectual foundation of the degree, covering the essential theories, methods, and knowledge that all students in the program are expected to master. Core courses typically account for a significant portion of the curriculum, often around half of the total credit hours.¹⁰
• Elective Courses: Electives provide students with the flexibility to tailor their studies to their specific interests and career goals. These courses allow for deeper specialization within a subfield of the broader discipline and generally constitute a smaller, but important, part of the program.¹⁰
• Capstone or Thesis Projects: Many master’s programs culminate in a final, integrative experience that requires students to synthesize and apply the knowledge they have gained. This can take the form of a traditional research thesis, a comprehensive capstone project, a research paper, or a presentation. This final project is a credit-bearing requirement, typically accounting for 3 to 6 credits of the total.¹⁰
• Practical Experience: In professionally oriented fields, a required internship, practicum, or clinical placement is a standard component. This real-world experience is essential for applying theoretical knowledge in a professional setting and can add several credits to the program’s total requirement.¹⁰

By understanding this typical composition, students can better evaluate a program’s curriculum, assessing whether the balance of foundational knowledge, specialized electives, and culminating research or practical experience aligns with their educational objectives.

Section 3: Disciplinary Divergence: Credit Requirements Across Fields of Study

The broad 30-to-60-credit range for U.S. master’s degrees becomes much clearer when examined through the lens of specific academic and professional disciplines.

Different fields have developed distinct curricular norms based on their unique knowledge bases, skill requirements, and professional standards.

This section provides a granular, comparative analysis of the credit requirements for four of the most common master’s degree types: the Master of Business Administration (MBA), the Master of Science (M.S.) in Engineering, the Master of Arts (M.A.) in Humanities, and the Master of Education (M.Ed.).

3.1 The Master of Business Administration (MBA)

The MBA stands out in the landscape of graduate education for its typically higher credit requirements.

While some programs may be as low as 30 credits, the common range for an MBA is between 40 and 60 credit hours, with many traditional, two-year programs requiring the completion of about 60 credits.¹⁴

This is notably higher than the 30-36 credits typical for many other master’s degrees, even those that cover some of the same foundational business material, such as finance or management.¹⁵

A standard MBA curriculum structure illustrates how these credits are allocated.

For example, a 36-credit program at St. John’s University is composed of eight core courses (24 credits), three concentration field courses (9 credits), and a required capstone course (3 credits).¹⁶

This structure can be scaled up for more comprehensive or specialized programs.

Howard University’s MBA, for instance, requires a total of 48 credit hours, of which 33 are dedicated to core courses that provide the foundation for graduate business education.¹⁷

Programs with highly specialized tracks, such as an Accounting MBA designed to prepare students for the public accountancy profession, can require even more, with the St. John’s program in this area demanding 57 credits.¹⁶

This tendency toward higher credit counts in MBA programs suggests a phenomenon of “credit creep,” where the perceived value, rigor, and comprehensiveness of a professional credential become linked to its credit total.

An analysis of these requirements reveals that the difference is not solely attributable to unique content.

Instead, the higher credit count serves as a market differentiator.

A 57-credit Accounting MBA signals a more intensive, specialized, and therefore potentially more valuable professional qualification to employers than a standard 36-credit general M.A. In these professional fields, credit hours function not only as a measure of academic work but also as a powerful tool for program branding, specialization, and signaling in a competitive job market.

3.2 The Master of Science (M.S.): Focus on Engineering

In contrast to the wide variation seen in MBA programs, Master of Science in Engineering programs exhibit a strong consensus around a baseline requirement.

The vast majority of M.S. in Engineering degrees require a minimum of 30 credit hours of coursework beyond the bachelor’s degree.¹⁸

This 30-credit standard provides a consistent foundation across institutions.

However, significant variation exists in how these 30 credits are structured and whether additional credits are required.

The curriculum typically involves a combination of core concentration courses, advanced mathematics courses, technical electives, and a culminating experience that can be either a research thesis or a non-thesis project/capstone.²⁰

For example, the M.S. in Mechanical Engineering at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte requires a total of 30 credit hours.

Students can fulfill this through a thesis option, which includes 24 credit hours of coursework and 6 credit hours of thesis research, or a non-thesis option, which consists of 30 credit hours of coursework culminating in a 3-credit capstone course.²⁰

Some institutions set a higher bar.

The M.S. program in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Washington requires a total of 42 credits.

Here, the thesis option is structured as 30 credits of coursework plus 12 credits of thesis research, while the non-thesis option requires all 42 credits to be in numerically graded courses.²²

These examples demonstrate that while the 30-credit mark is a common minimum, prospective students must examine the specific curriculum of each program to understand the true scope of the requirements.

3.3 The Master of Arts (M.A.): Focus on Humanities

Master of Arts programs in disciplines such as the humanities typically fall within the 30 to 36 credit hour range, reflecting a focus on advanced coursework, critical theory, and research skills.²³

These programs are designed to provide deep subject matter expertise and prepare students for a variety of careers or for further doctoral study.

The curriculum of an M.A. in Humanities often includes a set of required core proseminars that introduce students to the foundational theories and methodologies of the field.

For instance, a 30-credit program at Hood College requires 12 credits of proseminars in areas like art, history, literature, and philosophy.²⁵

The remainder of the credits are allocated to elective courses, which allow for specialization, and a final project.

The structure of this final project can alter the credit distribution; students completing a 6-credit thesis will take fewer elective courses than those who opt for a 3-credit final portfolio.²⁵

Some programs, like the one at the University of Dallas, require a total of 36 credits, with 30 allocated to coursework and 6 dedicated to the thesis, and may also include non-credit requirements such as demonstrating competency in a foreign language.²⁴

3.4 The Master of Education (M.Ed.)

Master of Education programs are consistently positioned at the lower end of the credit spectrum, with a strong and widespread consensus around a 30-credit total requirement.²⁷

This standardization makes the M.Ed. one of the more predictable master’s degrees in terms of length and structure.

These programs are typically designed for practicing teachers and other education professionals seeking to enhance their skills, knowledge, and leadership capabilities.

While 30 credits is the norm, minor variations exist.

For example, American College of Education offers a range of M.Ed. specializations that require either 31 or 34 credits.³¹

The curriculum of a typical 30-credit M.Ed. program is often evenly divided between core requirements and concentration-specific electives.

Augusta University’s online M.Ed. in Instruction, for example, requires 15 credit hours of core courses in subjects like educational research, instructional technology, and diversity, and another 15 credit hours of elective courses based on the student’s chosen area of focus.²⁹

This balanced structure provides both a common foundation for all students and the flexibility to specialize in a particular area of educational practice.

3.5 Table 1: Typical Credit Hour Requirements for U.S. Master’s Degrees by Discipline

Degree Type	Typical Credit Range	Common Curriculum Structure	Key Source References
Master of Business Administration (MBA)	40–60 credits	40-50% Core Courses, 20-30% Concentration/Electives, 5-10% Capstone	14
Master of Science (M.S.) in Engineering	30–42 credits	40-60% Concentration Courses, 10-20% Mathematics, 20-30% Thesis or additional Electives/Capstone	18
Master of Arts (M.A.) in Humanities	30–36 credits	30-40% Core Proseminars, 40-50% Electives, 10-20% Thesis or Portfolio	23
Master of Education (M.Ed.)	30–34 credits	50% Core Courses, 50% Concentration/Electives	28

Section 4: Structural Determinants of Credit Allocation: Thesis, Non-Thesis, and Capstone Pathways

Beyond the broad influence of academic discipline, the single most important structural factor determining the composition of a master’s degree is the nature of its culminating experience.

The choice between a traditional research thesis and a non-thesis pathway, which typically involves a capstone project or comprehensive examination, fundamentally alters how credits are allocated, how long the program takes, and what skills are emphasized.

This decision is not merely a matter of academic preference; it is a critical fork in the road that aligns the student’s educational experience with specific, long-term career aspirations.

4.1 The Thesis vs. Non-Thesis Dichotomy

The core distinction between these two pathways lies in their ultimate objective.

A thesis program is centered on the creation of original research.

It requires the student, under the close guidance of a faculty advisor, to conduct a multi-semester investigation into a specific topic, culminating in a substantial, publishable-quality written work that must be formally defended before a committee of faculty experts.³²

This path is the traditional preparatory route for students who intend to pursue a Ph.D. or a career in academic or scientific research.

It is designed to develop deep expertise in a narrow subject area and to hone the skills of scholarly inquiry, data analysis, and long-form academic writing.³⁴

In contrast, a non-thesis program is designed to provide a broader, more practice-oriented education.

It replaces the intensive, singular focus of the thesis with additional coursework and a more contained final project, often called a capstone.³²

A capstone project may involve solving a real-world problem, developing a portfolio, or completing a comprehensive literature review, but it is typically less involved and less focused on novel research than a thesis.³⁵

This pathway is generally better suited for working professionals who are seeking to gain practical, immediately applicable skills to advance within their current industry or to pivot to a new career field.³³

The allocation of credits within a program serves as the tangible manifestation of this philosophical difference.

A program that dedicates a significant portion of its curriculum—often 20% to 30% of the total credits—to a single, deep research endeavor is signaling a pedagogical focus on knowledge creation.

Conversely, a program that replaces those research credits with a wider array of coursework and a smaller capstone project is signaling a focus on knowledge application and breadth of expertise.

Therefore, a student is not just choosing between writing a long paper and taking more classes; they are choosing between a program designed to train a future researcher and one designed to train an advanced practitioner.

The credit breakdown is the blueprint of that training.

4.2 Credit Allocation and Program Duration

The structural differences between thesis and non-thesis tracks have a direct and predictable impact on credit allocation and, consequently, on the time it takes to complete the degree.

In a thesis-based program, a significant number of credits are formally assigned to the research and writing process.

These are often designated with specific course codes, such as “Thesis Research,” and can account for anywhere from 6 to 12 credits of the program’s total.²⁰

In a non-thesis program, these credits are reallocated to additional elective or concentration courses, with the final capstone project typically requiring only 3 credits.²⁰

This difference in credit structure directly influences the program’s timeline.

Thesis programs almost invariably take longer to complete.

The process of defining a research topic, conducting the research, analyzing the data, writing the thesis, and scheduling a defense is complex and often unpredictable, frequently extending beyond the time allocated for coursework.³²

A non-thesis program, with its more structured, course-based curriculum, offers a more predictable and often shorter path to graduation.³⁴

This makes the non-thesis option particularly attractive to students who need to balance their studies with professional and personal commitments and who value a clear, defined timeline for degree completion.

4.3 Case Study: M.S. in Engineering and M.Ed. Programs

A comparison of specific programs provides a clear illustration of how these structural differences play out in practice.

At the Georgia Institute of Technology, the Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering (M.S.M.E.) program requires a total of 30 credit hours for both its thesis and non-thesis options.

However, the internal allocation of these credits is starkly different.

The non-thesis option requires students to complete 21 credit hours in their major area of study.

The thesis option, by contrast, requires only 12 credit hours of coursework in the major area, with the remaining 9 credits being allocated specifically to the master’s thesis (course code ME 7000).³⁸

In this model, the total credit count is held constant, and the choice represents a direct trade-off between breadth of coursework and depth of research.

The University of Alberta’s Master of Education (M.Ed.) program offers a different model.

Here, the total credit requirements differ between the two tracks.

The course-based M.Ed. requires a minimum of ★36 credits, which includes a final capping exercise.

The thesis-based M.Ed., however, requires a minimum of only ★21 credits in formal coursework.

The remainder of the degree requirements are fulfilled through ongoing registration in a thesis course (e.g., THES 903, THES 906), which itself carries a credit weight and represents the substantial time and effort dedicated to the research project.⁴⁰

This model explicitly acknowledges that thesis research is a significant, credit-bearing academic activity that replaces a substantial amount of traditional coursework.

4.4 Table 2: Comparison of Thesis vs. Non-Thesis Master’s Program Structures

Attribute	Thesis Option	Non-Thesis Option	Key Source References
Total Credits	Often the same as non-thesis, but can be lower in terms of formal coursework.	Typically 30–36 credits, primarily composed of coursework.	39
Coursework Credits	Fewer coursework credits to allow for research. (e.g., 12-24 credits)	More coursework credits. (e.g., 27-33 credits)	20
Research/Project Credits	High (e.g., 6–12 credits) allocated to thesis research.	Low (e.g., 3 credits) for a capstone project or comprehensive exam.	20
Typical Duration	Longer and more variable; often 2+ years for full-time students.	Shorter and more predictable; often 1.5–2 years for full-time students.	32
Final Deliverable	Original research thesis; publishable-quality paper; formal oral defense.	Capstone project, portfolio, comprehensive exam, or major research paper.	32
Ideal Candidate/Career Path	Aspiring Ph.D. students; careers in academia, research, and development.	Working professionals seeking career advancement; industry-focused roles.	33

Section 5: Pacing and Progression: The Impact of Full-Time vs. Part-Time Enrollment

While program structure and discipline define the total number of credits required for a master’s degree, a student’s enrollment status determines the pace at which those credits are earned.

The decision to enroll full-time or part-time is one of the most significant logistical choices a graduate student makes, with profound implications for their academic timeline, financial obligations, and overall educational experience.

This choice is rarely a simple matter of academic preference; instead, it is often a strategic calculation based on a complex interplay of professional commitments, financial resources, and administrative regulations.

5.1 Defining Full-Time and Part-Time Status

At the graduate level in the United States, the definitions of full-time and part-time enrollment are distinct from their undergraduate counterparts.

A full-time graduate student is typically defined as one who is enrolled in nine or more credit hours per semester.⁴²

This is notably lower than the 12- to 15-credit load of a full-time undergraduate, a difference that reflects the significantly greater depth, rigor, and expected out-of-class workload associated with graduate-level courses.⁴

Consequently, part-time enrollment for a graduate student is any load of fewer than nine credits per semester.

It is common for part-time students, particularly those who are working professionals, to take just one or two courses at a time, for a total of 3 to 6 credits per term.⁴

This reduced course load allows them to balance their studies with the demands of their careers and personal lives.

Some universities also define a “half-time” status, often around 5-6 credits, which can be important for financial aid eligibility.⁴⁴

5.2 Impact on Time to Degree

The relationship between enrollment status and the time it takes to complete a master’s degree is direct and mathematically straightforward.

The total number of credits required for the degree remains the same regardless of enrollment status, but the timeline for accumulating those credits changes dramatically.

• Full-Time Enrollment: Most master’s programs are designed with a full-time student in mind and are structured to be completed in one and a half to two academic years.¹⁰ For a 36-credit program, a full-time student taking 9 credits per semester would finish in four semesters, or two academic years.
• Part-Time Enrollment: For a part-time student, the same 36-credit program would take significantly longer. A student taking 6 credits per semester would need six semesters, or three academic years, to graduate. One taking only 3 credits per semester would need twelve semesters, or six years. In practice, part-time students often complete their degrees in 3 to 5 years, though the timeline can be longer depending on course availability and personal pacing.¹⁰ To ensure program completion, most universities impose a maximum time-to-degree limit, which is typically between 5 and 7 years.⁴⁵

5.3 Financial and Administrative Implications

The decision to enroll full- or part-time is deeply intertwined with a web of financial and administrative policies that can have a greater impact on a student’s choice than their preferred learning pace.

• Tuition Structure: The way tuition is assessed often differs by enrollment status. Full-time students frequently pay a flat-rate tuition fee per semester, which covers any load at or above the full-time threshold (e.g., 9-12 credits). Part-time students, in contrast, are typically charged on a per-credit-hour basis.⁴⁵ This can create a complex financial trade-off. While the per-semester cost is lower for a part-time student, the cumulative cost of the degree over a longer period, especially if tuition rates increase annually, might end up being higher than for a full-time student who completes the program more quickly.⁴⁷
• Financial Aid Eligibility: Enrollment status is a critical determinant for most forms of financial aid. Federal student loans, for example, often require students to be enrolled at least half-time (a threshold defined by the institution, but often around 5 or 6 credits) to be eligible for aid and to defer repayment of prior loans.⁴ Many institutional scholarships and grants are available only to full-time students.
• Graduate Assistantships: Students who receive funding through teaching or research assistantships are typically required to maintain a specific credit load to remain eligible for their position and the accompanying tuition waiver. While this load may sometimes be slightly less than the standard full-time definition (e.g., 8 credits instead of 9), it still represents a substantial commitment that precludes a very slow, part-time pace.⁴⁴
• International Student Regulations: For international students studying in the U.S. on an F-1 or J-1 visa, the choice is often not a choice at all. Immigration regulations generally mandate that they maintain full-time enrollment status throughout their program to remain in legal visa compliance.⁴⁴

These factors demonstrate that a student’s enrollment pace is often a dependent variable, determined by a complex equation of financial necessity, administrative requirements, and personal commitments.

The academic plan is therefore constructed around these powerful logistical realities, not the other way around.

This reframes the full-time versus part-time decision from a simple preference for a faster or slower pace to a strategic calculation of personal and financial resources against a backdrop of rigid institutional and governmental policies.

Section 6: A Global Perspective: Comparative Analysis of Master’s Credit Systems

The concept of academic credit, while universal in principle, is highly localized in practice.

The U.S. credit hour system, with its emphasis on contact hours, is just one of several models used by major English-speaking countries.

To provide a truly comprehensive answer to the question of master’s degree requirements, it is essential to analyze the systems used in the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia.

These systems differ not only in their numerical scales but, more fundamentally, in their philosophical underpinnings, making direct comparisons and conversions a complex but necessary task for navigating global higher education.

6.1 United Kingdom: A Standardized System

The United Kingdom employs a remarkably standardized and coherent framework for its postgraduate qualifications.

A master’s degree in the UK is designated as a Level 7 qualification within the national framework and is consistently worth 180 credits.⁹

This uniformity applies across universities and across a wide range of disciplines, from a Master of Arts (M.A.) to a Master of Science (M.Sc.) or an M.A.⁵⁰

The 180-credit total is typically divided into two main components.

The first part consists of taught modules, which collectively account for 120 credits.

These modules, which are analogous to U.S. courses, are usually offered in standardized blocks worth multiples of 15 credits (e.g., a module may be worth 15, 30, or 45 credits).⁴⁸

The second, and often defining, component of a UK master’s degree is the dissertation.

This substantial piece of independent research is a mandatory requirement for most programs and is worth the remaining 60 credits, representing one-third of the entire degree’s workload.⁴⁹

This structure emphasizes both the acquisition of advanced knowledge through coursework and the development of in-depth research and writing skills through a major scholarly project.

6.2 Canada: A Heterogeneous, University-Specific System

In stark contrast to the UK’s national standard, Canada’s higher education system is decentralized, with no single, unified credit system.

Instead, credit requirements and definitions are determined by individual universities and vary by province.⁸

While most master’s degrees in Canada are designed to be completed in one to two years of full-time study, the number of “credits” required to do so is highly variable and institution-specific.⁵²

This heterogeneity can be seen by comparing several leading Canadian universities:

• McGill University: Programs in the Faculty of Arts, such as the M.A. in History, consistently require the completion of 45 credits. However, the internal allocation of these credits differs dramatically based on the program track. The thesis option requires 30 credits dedicated to thesis research and 15 credits of complementary coursework, while a non-thesis option might involve 18 credits of seminar courses and a 15-credit research paper.⁵⁴
• University of Manitoba: This university specifies different minimum coursework requirements for its master’s programs. A thesis-based master’s requires a minimum of 12 credit hours of coursework in addition to the thesis. A course-based master’s, on the other hand, requires a minimum of 24 credit hours of coursework, culminating in a project or comprehensive exam.⁵⁷
• University of Toronto: This institution uses a system of “Full-Course Equivalents” (FCEs) rather than credits. A typical one-semester course is worth 0.5 FCE. The Master of Science (M.Sc.) in Computer Science requires the completion of 2.0 FCEs (equivalent to four semester-long courses) plus a major research paper.⁵⁸ The more applied Master of Science in Applied Computing (MScAC) has a higher requirement of 3.0 FCEs (six courses) in addition to a mandatory eight-month industrial internship.⁶⁰

These examples underscore the fact that in Canada, the term “credit” is a local unit of measurement, and its value must be interpreted within the context of the specific degree-granting institution.

6.3 Australia: The Non-Unified “Credit Point” System

Australia’s system mirrors Canada’s in its lack of a unified national credit framework.

Each Australian university establishes its own “credit point” system, and the numerical values are not directly comparable from one institution to another.⁸

For federal funding and statistical purposes, the Australian government uses a standardized measure called the Equivalent Full-Time Student Load (EFTSL), where one year of full-time study is equal to 1.000 EFTSL, regardless of the university’s internal credit point system.⁸

Most master’s degrees are designed to take between 1.5 and 2 years of full-time study to complete.⁴⁶

The variance in credit point systems is significant:

• University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney): The Master of Information Technology is a two-year program that requires the completion of 96 Units of Credit (UoC).⁶³
• University of Melbourne: The full-time Master of Business Administration (MBA) requires 225 credit points, while the online MBA requires 218.75 credit points.⁶⁵
• Charles Sturt University: The Master of Information Technology requires 96 credit points, with individual subjects typically being worth 8 credit points each.⁶⁸

This diversity means that prospective students and credential evaluators cannot assume that a “credit point” at one Australian university is equivalent to one at another.

6.4 The Challenge of Credit Conversion

The fundamental differences in both the philosophy (contact hours vs. total workload) and the numerical scales of these systems make credit conversion a challenging but essential task for international academic mobility.

While any official evaluation must be done by a credentialing agency or the admitting university, some general rules of thumb can provide a useful approximation.

• UK/ECTS to U.S. Semester Hours: The most widely accepted conversion ratio is 2 ECTS credits = 1 U.S. semester credit.⁷ Since the UK system often uses a ratio of 2 UK credits = 1 ECTS credit, the approximate conversion becomes
  4 UK credits = 1 U.S. semester credit.⁷⁰ Using this logic, a 180-credit UK master’s degree represents a workload roughly equivalent to 45 U.S. semester hours, significantly more than a typical 30- or 36-credit U.S. master’s degree.
• Australian Credit Points to U.S. Semester Hours: This conversion is highly idiosyncratic and depends entirely on the specific Australian university. International credit conversion guides published by U.S. universities reveal a patchwork of unique conversion multipliers. For example, the University of Arizona’s guide indicates that at the University of New South Wales, 6 credit points are equivalent to 4 U.S. credits, while at Griffith University, 20 credit points are equivalent to 8 U.S. credits.⁷² There is no single, reliable formula; conversion must be done on an institution-by-institution basis.
• Canadian Credits to U.S. Semester Hours: Because most Canadian universities operate on a semester system similar to the U.S., a “3-credit” course in Canada is often equivalent to a 3-credit course in the U.S. However, this is not a universal rule, and official evaluation is still necessary, especially for universities that use different systems like FCEs.

6.5 Table 3: International Master’s Degree Credit System Conversion Guide

Country	System Name	Typical Total for Master’s Degree	Basis of Measurement	Approx. Conversion to 1 U.S. Semester Hour	Key Source References
United States	Semester Hours	30–60	Contact Hours + Out-of-Class Workload	N/A	1
United Kingdom	UK Credits	180	Total Student Workload	4 UK Credits	9
Canada	University-Specific Credits / FCEs	Varies (e.g., 45 credits, 2.0-4.0 FCEs)	Total Student Workload	Varies (often 1-to-1 for semester-based schools)	54
Australia	Credit Points (University-Specific)	Varies (e.g., 96, 225)	Total Student Workload	Varies by Institution (No Standard Conversion)	8

Section 7: Modulating the Academic Trajectory: Transfer Credits and Prior Learning Assessments

While the total number of credits required for a master’s degree is largely fixed by the institution and program, the number of credits a student must complete at that institution can often be reduced.

Universities have developed several mechanisms to recognize and validate prior learning, whether it was acquired in another graduate program or through professional experience.

These pathways—including the transfer of academic credits and Prior Learning Assessment (PLA)—can significantly accelerate a student’s time to degree completion, reduce overall tuition costs, and create more flexible and efficient routes to obtaining a master’s credential.

7.1 Transfer of Graduate Credits

One of the most common ways to reduce the required credit load is by transferring graduate-level credits earned at a different accredited institution.

Most universities have policies that allow for a limited number of previously earned credits to be applied toward a master’s degree, provided the coursework is relevant and meets the academic standards of the new program.¹⁰

The number of credits that can be transferred is almost always capped to ensure that the majority of the degree is completed at the granting institution.

These caps vary but typically fall within a predictable range.

Many programs limit transfer credits to a maximum of 6 ¹⁰, while others may allow up to 9 ¹⁸ or, in some cases, 12 credits.¹¹

The process is not automatic; it involves a formal, case-by-case evaluation by the admitting department to determine how the previous courses align with their curriculum.¹⁰

Generally, transfer credits are applied toward fulfilling elective or foundational course requirements, and they rarely substitute for core, required courses or the final thesis or capstone project.¹³

7.2 Prior Learning Assessment (PLA)

A more innovative mechanism for awarding credit is the Prior Learning Assessment (PLA).

This process is distinct from transferring academic credits, as it allows students to earn formal academic credit for knowledge and skills gained outside of the traditional classroom setting.

PLA recognizes the value of learning acquired through professional work experience, military training, industry certifications, or other life experiences.¹⁰

This approach is particularly common at institutions that cater to adult learners and working professionals, who often bring a wealth of relevant experience to their graduate studies.

Through a formal assessment process, which may involve creating a portfolio, taking an exam, or a faculty evaluation, students can demonstrate that their professional experience has enabled them to master the content of a specific course.

If successful, they are awarded credit for that course, allowing them to bypass it and accelerate their path to graduation.¹⁰

7.3 Accelerated and Dual-Degree Programs

Beyond transferring prior work, students can also pursue intentionally structured programs designed for accelerated completion.

• Accelerated Master’s Programs: Often called “4+1” or “5-year” programs, these pathways allow high-achieving undergraduate students to begin taking graduate-level courses during their senior year. A specified number of these graduate credits—often up to 9—can then be “double-counted,” applying toward both their bachelor’s and master’s degree requirements.¹⁸ This creates a seamless and efficient transition to graduate study, often allowing for the completion of a master’s degree in just one additional year.
• Dual-Degree Programs: These programs allow a student to pursue two master’s degrees simultaneously (e.g., an MBA and a Master of Science in Nursing) in less time than it would take to earn each degree sequentially.¹⁵ This efficiency is achieved by strategically overlapping the curricula. Core courses from one program are permitted to count as elective courses in the other, reducing the total number of unique courses the student must take. This allows for the development of interdisciplinary expertise in a compressed timeframe.¹⁵

The increasing prevalence and formalization of these mechanisms—transfer credits, PLA, and accelerated programs—signal a significant shift in the philosophy of higher education.

They represent a move away from a monolithic, institution-bound model of degree attainment toward a more flexible, modular, and student-centric approach to credentialing.

PLA, in particular, challenges the traditional notion that all valid learning must occur within a university classroom by formally validating and quantifying the learning that happens in the workplace.

This trend reflects an “unbundling” of the master’s degree.

Instead of a single, 36-credit package that must be purchased in its entirety from one provider, the degree is becoming an assemblage of learning blocks acquired from different sources—other universities, professional life, undergraduate study—and validated by the final degree-granting institution.

This evolution is a direct response to the demands of a modern knowledge economy, where continuous, lifelong learning is paramount, and it has profound implications for the future business model of graduate education.

Section 8: Synthesis and Strategic Considerations for Prospective Students

The number of credit hours required for a master’s degree is a deceptively simple question with a profoundly complex answer.

As this analysis has demonstrated, the final figure is not a static number but the output of a dynamic equation involving multiple, interdependent variables.

For a prospective graduate student, navigating this landscape requires moving beyond the initial query of “how many credits?” to a more sophisticated set of strategic questions that probe a program’s structure, value, and alignment with their unique personal and professional goals.

This concluding section synthesizes the report’s key findings and reframes them as a practical guide for program evaluation.

8.1 Synthesizing the Key Variables

The credit requirement for any given master’s degree is a function of four primary, interacting factors:

1. Geography: The country of study establishes the fundamental credit system. The U.S. operates on a “contact hour”-based semester system (30-60 credits), the UK uses a standardized “total workload” system (180 credits), while Canada and Australia employ heterogeneous, university-specific credit point systems where the numerical totals vary widely.
2. Discipline: The field of study creates clear patterns in credit requirements. Professional and licensure-oriented degrees like the MBA (40-60 credits) or a Master of Science in Nursing (45-60+ credits) demand a significantly higher credit load than more academically focused degrees like the M.Ed. (30 credits) or M.A. in Humanities (30-36 credits).
3. Program Structure: The choice between a thesis and a non-thesis track fundamentally alters the allocation of credits. A thesis path dedicates a substantial portion of the curriculum (e.g., 6-12 credits) to original research, while a non-thesis path replaces those credits with additional coursework and a smaller capstone project.
4. Enrollment Status: A student’s pace of study (full-time vs. part-time) determines the number of credits taken per term and, consequently, the overall time to degree. A full-time, non-thesis M.Ed. in the U.S. represents one of the most direct paths to a master’s credential (approximately 30 credits over 1.5-2 years), whereas a part-time, thesis-based M.S. in Engineering could represent one of the longest (30-42 credits spread over 4-5 years or more).

8.2 Strategic Questions for Program Evaluation

Armed with an understanding of these variables, a prospective student can approach the process of program selection with a more critical and strategic mindset.

The initial question of “how many credits?” should serve as a starting point for a deeper inquiry.

The following questions will yield far more valuable insights for making an informed decision:

• Beyond the total credits, how are those credits allocated? What is the ratio of required core courses to specialized electives? How many credits are dedicated to the final research project or capstone? Does this allocation align with my desire for foundational knowledge versus specialized expertise?
• What does the credit total signal about the program’s orientation? Is this a 30-credit program designed for advanced academic study, or is it a 60-credit professional training program designed to meet rigorous external licensure requirements? Does this signal match my career objectives?
• How does the culminating project (thesis, capstone, or comprehensive exam) align with my long-term goals? Am I building a foundation for future Ph.D. study and a career in research, for which a thesis is paramount? Or am I seeking to acquire practical skills for immediate application in industry, for which a non-thesis, project-based program is better suited?
• What are the institution’s policies on transfer credits and Prior Learning Assessment (PLA)? Can I leverage my previous graduate coursework or my professional experience to reduce the number of credits I need to complete, thereby saving time and money?
• How does the institution define “full-time” and “part-time” status, and what are the financial and administrative implications of my intended enrollment pace? What is the minimum credit load required to be eligible for financial aid, scholarships, or a graduate assistantship? If I am an international student, what are the mandatory enrollment requirements to maintain my visa status?

8.3 Concluding Remarks: The Credit Hour as a Guide, Not a Destination

The academic credit hour is the essential organizational unit of higher education.

It provides the structure for curricula, the basis for tuition, and the metric for progress.

A thorough understanding of credit requirements, as detailed in this report, is therefore indispensable for any individual planning to undertake graduate study.

It is the map needed to navigate the complex logistical and financial terrain of a master’s degree.

However, it is crucial to recognize that the credit hour is a means to an end, not the end itself.

It is a proxy for learning, not the learning itself.

The ultimate value of a master’s degree is not measured in the quantity of credits accumulated but in the quality of the knowledge and skills acquired, the depth of the professional network built, and the breadth of the career opportunities unlocked.

The credit hour is the unit of measurement for the academic journey; the true destination is the intellectual and professional transformation that the journey provides.

By using this report as a comprehensive guide, prospective students can make informed, strategic decisions that ensure their chosen path is not only logistically sound but also perfectly aligned with their highest aspirations.

Works cited

1. Credit Hour Definition | Student Handbook American Public University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.apu.apus.edu/student-handbook/academic-success/before-a-course-begins/credit-hour-definition/
2. Credit Hour Definition – Office of the Provost – University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, accessed August 15, 2025, https://provost.illinois.edu/policies/policies/courses/credit-hour-definition/
3. Credit Hour – FSA Partner Connect, accessed August 15, 2025, https://fsapartners.ed.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/dpcletters/GEN1106.pdf
4. Evaluating Master’s Degree Plans – How Many Credits Do You Need? – Post University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://post.edu/blog/evaluating-masters-degree-plans-how-many-credits-do-you-need/
5. Credit Hour Guidance – NYU, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.nyu.edu/academics/accreditation-authorization-assessment/resources-faqs/credit-hour-guidance.html
6. Credit Hour Definition | CLAS Policies and Procedures – The University of Iowa, accessed August 15, 2025, https://policy.clas.uiowa.edu/clas-policies-and-procedures/undergraduate-education/credit-hour-definition
7. Converting ECTS to US Credits: Everything You Need to Know – Study Abroad, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.educations.com/student-resources/ects-to-us-credits-conversion
8. Course credit – Wikipedia, accessed August 15, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Course_credit
9. What is a Masters degree? | Prospects.ac.uk, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.prospects.ac.uk/postgraduate-study/masters-degrees/what-is-a-masters-degree
10. How Many Credits Does it Take to Get a Master’s Degree? | Bellevue University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.bellevue.edu/articles/how-many-credits-is-a-masters-degree
11. How Many Credits Do You Need to Graduate College? | SNHU, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.snhu.edu/about-us/newsroom/education/how-many-credits-to-graduate-college
12. How Many Credits Is a Master’s Degree? | DeVry University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.devry.edu/blog/how-many-credits-is-a-masters-degree.html
13. How Many Credits For a Master’s Degree? | Franklin.edu, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.franklin.edu/blog/how-many-credits-for-a-masters-degree
14. How Many Credits Are Needed for an MBA? | University of Bridgeport, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.bridgeport.edu/news/credits-needed-for-mba-degree/
15. Master of Business Administration – Wikipedia, accessed August 15, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_of_Business_Administration
16. How Long Does it Take to Get an M.B.A.? | St. John’s University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.stjohns.edu/news-media/johnnies-blog/how-long-does-it-take-get-mba
17. Master of Business Administration | Howard University School of Business, accessed August 15, 2025, https://business.howard.edu/programs/graduate/master-business-administration
18. Master of Engineering Requirements | Graduate School – Michigan Technological University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.mtu.edu/gradschool/policies-procedures/requirements/engineering/
19. Grad FAQs | Southern University and A&M College, accessed August 15, 2025, http://www.subr.edu/page/1045
20. Master’s Degree Requirements – Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science, accessed August 15, 2025, https://mees.charlotte.edu/academic-programs/master-science-mechanical-engineering/masters-degree-requirements/
21. Engineering, M.S. : SLU – Saint Louis University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.slu.edu/science-and-engineering/academics/graduate-programs/engineering-ms.php
22. M.S. degree course requirements – UW Department of Mechanical Engineering, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.me.washington.edu/students/grad/ms-courses
23. How Long Does it Take to Get a Master’s Degree in Humanities? | Tiffin University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://go.tiffin.edu/blog/how-long-does-it-take-to-get-a-masters-degree-in-humanities/
24. Humanities Requirements – University of Dallas, accessed August 15, 2025, https://udallas.edu/academics/programs/humanities/requirements.php
25. Humanities (M.A.) – Hood College, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.hood.edu/graduate/academics/programs/humanities-ma
26. Master’s Programs | American Public University System – Academic Catalog, accessed August 15, 2025, https://catalog.apus.edu/graduate/academic-programs/masters/
27. Master of Education in Teaching and Learning, accessed August 15, 2025, https://education.wayne.edu/teaching-learning/med
28. Master of Education – Mississippi University for Women, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.muw.edu/education/graduate/med/
29. Online Master’s in Education (MEd) in Instruction | Augusta University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.augusta.edu/online/med-instruction.php
30. Ed.M. Programs – Rutgers Graduate School of Education, accessed August 15, 2025, https://gse.rutgers.edu/ed-m-programs/
31. Education Master’s Programs | ACE – American College of Education, accessed August 15, 2025, https://ace.edu/degree-programs/masters-degrees/masters-education/
32. Thesis vs Non-Thesis | Illinois Institute of Technology, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.iit.edu/admissions-aid/graduate-admission/thesis-vs-non-thesis
33. Thesis vs. Non-Thesis Master’s Programs: Which is Right for You? – University of the Potomac, accessed August 15, 2025, https://potomac.edu/thesis-vs-non-thesis-masters/
34. Thesis or Non-Thesis Option – Lamar University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.lamar.edu/arts-sciences/computer-science/degrees/graduate/thesis-nonthesis.html
35. Thesis vs. Non-thesis: What’s the Difference? | UGA Online, accessed August 15, 2025, https://online.uga.edu/news/thesis-vs-non-thesis-whats-difference/
36. Still don’t totally understand thesis vs non-thesis degrees? : r/GradSchool – Reddit, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/GradSchool/comments/1mjjiab/still_dont_totally_understand_thesis_vs_nonthesis/
37. Thesis vs. Non-thesis (Project) Paths – UGA, accessed August 15, 2025, http://rx.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Thesis-vs-Project_options.pdf
38. Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering The Master of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering (M.S.M.E.) has the following, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.me.gatech.edu/sites/default/files/2022-04/MSME%20Requirement.pdf
39. Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering | Georgia Tech Catalog, accessed August 15, 2025, https://catalog.gatech.edu/programs/mechanical-engineering-ms/
40. Secondary Education | Faculty of Education – University of Alberta, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.ualberta.ca/en/education/programs/graduate-programs/secondary-education.html
41. Specialization in Adult, Community and Higher Education (ACHE) – University of Alberta, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.ualberta.ca/en/education/programs/graduate-programs/adult-community-and-higher-education.html
42. M.A. in Humanities | The Graduate School, accessed August 15, 2025, https://gradschool.duke.edu/academics/programs-degrees/humanities/
43. Course Load – Texas Woman’s University Catalog, accessed August 15, 2025, https://catalog.twu.edu/graduate/graduate-school/general-requirement-regulations-doctoral-degrees/course-load/
44. Course Loads and Full, Three-Quarter, and Half-Time | Graduate College | University of Illinois Chicago, accessed August 15, 2025, https://grad.uic.edu/course-loads-and-full-three-quarter-and-half-time/
45. Full-Time vs. Part-Time Student: What’s the Difference? – BestColleges.com, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.bestcolleges.com/blog/full-time-vs-part-time-student/
46. Postgraduate study – Study at UQ – The University of Queensland, accessed August 15, 2025, https://study.uq.edu.au/study-options/postgraduate
47. Full Time vs Part Time College Credit Hours: Which is Best for You? – ELFI, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.elfi.com/full-time-vs-part-time-college-credit-hours-which-is-best-for-you/
48. Guide to Masters study – University of Sussex, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.sussex.ac.uk/study/masters/guide-to-masters-study
49. What is a Master’s Degree? | Uni Compare, accessed August 15, 2025, https://universitycompare.com/advice/postgraduate/masters-degree
50. Masters UK Credit Requirements: Everything You Need to Know – LSIB – UK, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.lsib.co.uk/2022/answers.aspx?id=493&questions=how+many+credits+in+a+masters+uk
51. Masters Degree Grading Systems in the UK and Other Countries – FindAMasters, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.findamasters.com/guides/masters-degree-grades
52. Graduate studies in Canada – EduCanada, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.educanada.ca/study-plan-etudes/graduate-studies-etudes-superieures.aspx?lang=eng
53. Levels of Post-Secondary Study in Canada – Canadavisa.com, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.canadavisa.com/levels-of-post-secondary-study-in-canada.html
54. M.A. Program (Current) | History and Classical Studies – McGill University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.mcgill.ca/history/graduate/current-ma-history-programs
55. M.A. Program (Prior to Fall 2021) | History and Classical Studies – McGill University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.mcgill.ca/history/graduate/ma
56. History (Thesis) (M.A.) (45 credits) | Course Catalogue – McGill University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://coursecatalogue.mcgill.ca/en/graduate/arts/history-classical-studies/history-thesis-ma/
57. Master’s Degrees General Regulations – University of Manitoba Academic Calendar, accessed August 15, 2025, https://catalog.umanitoba.ca/graduate-studies/academic-guide/masters-degrees-general-regulations/
58. Computer Science MSc | School of Graduate Studies (SGS) Calendar – University of Toronto, accessed August 15, 2025, https://sgs.calendar.utoronto.ca/computer-science-computer-science-msc
59. Master of Science (MSc), accessed August 15, 2025, https://web.cs.toronto.edu/graduate/msc
60. Computer Science | MScAC – University of Toronto, accessed August 15, 2025, https://mscac.utoronto.ca/concentrations/cs/
61. Computer Science | School of Graduate Studies (SGS) Calendar – University of Toronto, accessed August 15, 2025, https://sgs.calendar.utoronto.ca/degree/Computer-Science
62. What Is the Academic Credit System in Education? How Does It Benefit International Students? | Mastersportal, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.mastersportal.com/articles/948/what-is-the-academic-credit-system-in-education-how-does-it-benefit-international-students.html
63. Master of Information Technology | UNSW Sydney, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.unsw.edu.au/study/postgraduate/master-of-information-technology
64. Information Technology – UNSW – Handbook, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.handbook.unsw.edu.au/postgraduate/programs/2020/8543
65. Master of Business Administration (MC-BAOL) — The University of Melbourne Handbook, accessed August 15, 2025, https://handbook.unimelb.edu.au/2025/courses/mc-baol
66. Master of Business Administration (MC-BA) — The University of Melbourne Handbook, accessed August 15, 2025, https://handbook.unimelb.edu.au/courses/mc-ba
67. Master of Business Administration (MC-BA) — The University of Melbourne Handbook, accessed August 15, 2025, https://handbook.unimelb.edu.au/2024/courses/mc-ba
68. Master of Information Technology (with specialisations) – Study – Charles Sturt University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://study.csu.edu.au/courses/master-information-technology
69. International Credit & Grade Conversion – Office of Global Engagement – University of Alabama at Birmingham, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.uab.edu/global/students/education-abroad/plan-your-academic-success/international-credit-grade-conversion
70. Institutional Accreditation and Transfer Credits – API Abroad, accessed August 15, 2025, https://apiabroad.com/project/program-accreditations-transfer-credits/
71. ECTS Equivalents Credit Table for UK & Non-European Study Abroad Exchanges, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.tcd.ie/study/assets/PDF/ECTS_Equivalents_Credit_Table_UK.pdf
72. International Credit Conversion Guide – Transfer Credit & Articulation, accessed August 15, 2025, https://transfercredit.arizona.edu/content/international-credit-conversion-guide-iccg
73. How Many Years Does It Take to Earn an MBA? | Walden University, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.waldenu.edu/online-masters-programs/master-of-business-administration/resource/how-many-years-does-it-take-to-get-an-mba