Table of Contents
I still remember the weight of the book in my hands.
It was the first volume of Homer’s Iliad, assigned for Literature Humanities, the very first class in Columbia’s legendary Core Curriculum.
I was a first-year student, bright-eyed and armed with a meticulously planned four-year schedule that would propel me toward a degree in chemical engineering.
To me, the Core was a mountain of an obstacle, a series of archaic and frustrating hurdles I had to clear before my “real” education could begin.
Like many prospective students, I had heard the warnings.
The Core was a “glorified gen-ed” 1, but one that consumed a staggering portion of your academic life—somewhere between 55 and 67 credits, a full third to one-half of your time at Columbia.2
For a STEM-focused student like me, this felt like a profound misallocation of resources.
I shared the frustrations I’d read about on student forums: the “relentless” reading load, with hundreds of pages for every class 1, and the annoyance of dedicating so much time to subjects I felt were irrelevant to my future career.3
The Core, with its insistence on “dead white men” 5, seemed like a turnoff compared to the freedom of an open curriculum.1
This is the story of how wrong I was.
It’s the story of a painful failure, a surprising epiphany, and the discovery that the Core Curriculum is not a checklist of old books, but one of the most radical and effective designs for building a modern mind I have ever encountered.
The Agony of the Checklist — My Failed Introduction to the Core
My initial approach to the Core was purely tactical.
I treated it as a series of tasks to be efficiently completed.
I was a good student; I knew how to analyze texts.
So, when the first major paper for Literature Humanities came due, I was confident.
The topic was the nature of rage in The Iliad.
I executed my plan perfectly.
I identified key themes, pulled relevant quotes, structured a five-paragraph essay with a clear thesis, and cited my sources.
I had checked all the boxes.
I had analyzed the text.
I expected an A.
What I got back was a C- and a single, devastating comment scrawled in red ink at the bottom of the last page: “You have analyzed the text, but you have not yet begun to think with it.”
The grade was a shock, but the comment was an earthquake.
It wasn’t just a critique of my paper; it felt like a judgment on my entire way of thinking.
I had treated one of the foundational works of human civilization like a problem set, a thing to be solved and discarded.
The feedback implied a different mode of engagement entirely, one that was foreign and, frankly, terrifying.
For the first time in my academic life, I felt completely lost.
I had followed all the rules, but I had fundamentally missed the point.
That C- paper became a symbol of my core struggle: I saw the curriculum as a list of requirements, but Columbia was demanding something more, something I couldn’t yet understand.
The Epiphany — Uncovering the Intellectual Architecture
The turning point came, bizarrely, in a sophomore-year systems engineering course.
We were studying complex designs, learning how individual components—pumps, valves, circuits—were not just assembled randomly but integrated into a coherent system where each part had a specific function that enabled the whole.
We were learning to distinguish between a pile of parts and a blueprint.
Staring at a schematic on a projector screen, it hit me with the force of a revelation.
The Core Curriculum wasn’t a pile of disconnected bricks—Homer here, Plato there, a painting, a symphony.
It was a coherent intellectual architecture, a meticulously designed blueprint for building a mind.
This new paradigm shifted everything.
The goal wasn’t to master the content of every book, but to internalize the structure of the arguments, the methods of analysis, and the languages of different disciplines.
The Core’s official mission—to provide students with “wide-ranging perspectives” and “critical and creative thinking skills” 6—wasn’t just marketing copy.
It was a literal description of an engineering project for the human intellect.
Suddenly, the sequence of courses made sense.
The entire curriculum wasn’t a historical survey but a functional one.
Each piece was designed to build a specific capacity, creating a versatile and resilient cognitive structure.
This realization transformed my frustration into fascination.
I was no longer a prisoner of the Core; I was an apprentice learning its design.
To make this new understanding tangible, I began to map it out, to see the blueprint for what it was.
Table 1: The Core Curriculum Blueprint: An Architectural Guide
| Architectural Component | Core Course(s) | Architectural Function | Key Skill Forged |
| The Foundation | Literature Humanities & Contemporary Civilization | To build a shared intellectual vocabulary and a structural framework for understanding the human condition, justice, and society. | Critical analysis of foundational texts; engaging in sustained, evidence-based dialogue. |
| The Vaults & Stained Glass | Art Humanities & Music Humanities | To construct new modes of perception and analysis, teaching the languages of visual and auditory structure. | Visual and auditory literacy; formal analysis. |
| The Modern Wing | Frontiers of Science & University Writing | To apply the Core’s analytical methods to scientific inquiry and to articulate original, research-based arguments. | Methodological inquiry (scientific habits of mind); advanced academic argumentation and research. |
This framework became my guide.
It revealed that the Core wasn’t about what I was learning, but about how I was learning to think.
Pillar I: The Foundation — Forging a Common Language (Literature Humanities & Contemporary Civilization)
In any great structure, the foundation determines the integrity of everything built upon it.
In the Core’s architecture, the two year-long, mandatory seminars, Literature Humanities and Contemporary Civilization, serve this function.
They are the load-bearing walls.
Their purpose is to construct a shared intellectual vocabulary and a common set of “Great Questions” that all Columbia students, regardless of major or generation, can engage with.
This is the “communal learning experience” that forges a community spanning disciplines and decades.7
Literature Humanities (Lit Hum): A Dialogue with the Human Condition
Lit Hum, as it’s affectionately known, is not a simple survey of “great books.” It is an “intensive study and discussion of significant works” in small, seminar-style classes of about 22 students.10
The syllabus itself is a deliberately constructed dialogue.
It begins with the dawn of written storytelling in
Gilgamesh and the epic questions of honor and mortality in Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey.
It then traces a conversation through millennia, moving to Plato’s philosophical inquiries into love in the Symposium, the crisis of faith and self in Augustine’s Confessions, the structure of hell in Dante’s Inferno, and culminating in modern explorations of identity and justice in Virginia Woolf’s To the Lighthouse and Toni Morrison’s Song of Solomon.10
The goal is to learn how to be in an “intellectual community,” to collectively explore how these challenging texts create meaning.10
One alumnus perfectly captured the magic of this shared experience, recalling “that tingling sense of excitement I felt the first day of Lit Hum as my professor chanted
The Iliad’s opening line”.8
It is in these moments that the foundation is laid, not just in knowledge, but in a shared method of inquiry.
Contemporary Civilization (CC): A Dialogue with Society
Running parallel to Lit Hum is Contemporary Civilization, the oldest course in the Core, founded in 1919.12
If Lit Hum explores the individual, CC explores the community.
Its stated purpose is to introduce students to the “kinds of communities—political, social, moral, and religious—that human beings construct”.14
The syllabus is structured as a direct, often contentious, debate between thinkers across history.
Students read Plato’s Republic on the ideal state, then see its premises challenged by the social contract theories of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau.
They witness the birth of modern economics in Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations and the radical critique of that system in The Marx-Engels Reader.
The course extends into the 20th and 21st centuries, grappling with Freud on civilization, Du Bois on race, de Beauvoir on gender, and Fanon on colonialism.15
This structure teaches a vital skill: how to place ideas in a dynamic, critical conversation.
You don’t just learn what Locke thought; you learn to use Locke to argue with Aristotle, and then use Fanon to critique them both.
You learn that the world of ideas is not a static museum but a roiling debate.
The Evolving Foundation: Understanding the “Canon Wars”
It is impossible to discuss the Core’s foundation without addressing the fierce “canon wars” that have surrounded it for decades.
Critics charge that the curriculum is crumbling under the weight of identity politics, replacing timeless classics with “mediocre drivel” to appease activists.17
They point to the displacement of works like
Paradise Lost or Antigone from the required list as evidence of a “crumbling core”.15
From within my new architectural framework, however, I came to see this debate in a completely different light.
The constant evolution of the canon is not a sign of the Core’s decay, but direct evidence of its success in fulfilling its most fundamental mission: to prepare students to grapple with “the insistent problems of the present”.12
This mission was established at its founding.
CC was created in the wake of World War I not to venerate the past, but to understand the chaotic present.20
By definition, “the present” and its “insistent problems” are always changing.
A curriculum that refused to evolve would betray its own founding principle.
As our society’s understanding of its most urgent problems has expanded to more fully include issues of race, gender, colonialism, and identity, the Core’s syllabus
must evolve to reflect that.
The inclusion of authors like Jane Austen (the first woman, added in 1985), Toni Morrison (the first Black author, added in 2015), and more recent additions to CC like W.E.B.
Du Bois, Frantz Fanon, and the Combahee River Collective are not acts of demolition.10
They are necessary renovations to the foundation, ensuring it remains relevant to the world we actually inhabit.
Historically, student activism has been the primary catalyst for this evolution.
The 1968 student protests directly influenced the CC syllabus to focus more on politics and revolution, while a 2007 hunger strike calling for expanded ethnic studies was a key factor in replacing the “Major Cultures” requirement with the more robust “Global Core”.20
These controversies are a sign of the curriculum’s health and vitality.
They prove the Core is a living dialogue, not a dead monument.
It expands the conversation rather than simply replacing texts.
Table 2: The Evolving Dialogue – How the Core’s Foundation Adapts
| Core Question | Foundational Text | Expanded Dialogue (Recent Additions) |
| What is Justice? | Plato, Republic | Ambedkar, Annihilation of Caste |
| What is the nature of the Self? | Augustine, Confessions | Woolf, To the Lighthouse |
| What is the legacy of colonialism? | Locke, Second Treatise on Government | Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth |
| What is the role of gender in society? | Aristotle, Politics | de Beauvoir, The Second Sex |
Pillar II: The Vaults & Stained Glass — Structuring Perception (Art and Music Humanities)
If Lit Hum and CC build the foundation with text and logic, Art and Music Humanities construct the soaring vaults and stained-glass windows of the intellectual cathedral.
Their function is to teach students new, non-textual languages of analysis, fundamentally altering how they perceive the world through sight and sound.
Many universities bundle the arts into a single requirement, but Columbia’s insistence on distinct, sustained courses in both art and music history is a unique feature of its architecture.1
Art Humanities (Art Hum): Learning to See
Art Hum is not an art appreciation course; its goal is the development of “visual literacy”.22
It is an “analytical study” of how formal structure, context, and materials combine to create meaning.
The course is not a comprehensive survey but a deep dive into a limited number of monuments and artists, from the Parthenon and Amiens Cathedral to works by Michelangelo, Rembrandt, Picasso, and Cindy Sherman.22
A typical analysis, for instance, involves deconstructing the architecture of the Parthenon.
Students learn to identify the Doric and Ionic orders, to understand the physics of post-and-lintel construction, and to analyze the “optical refinements”—like the slight curvature of the stylobate or the taper of the columns—that the architects used to create an illusion of perfection.23
This rigorous, almost scientific, approach to seeing is paired with the transformative experience of visiting New York’s world-class museums for class assignments.
For many alumni, this is an epiphany in itself; one recalls how their “first museum visit thanks to Art Humanities; it changed my major from economics to art history”.8
Music Humanities (Music Hum): Learning to Listen
Music Hum performs a similar function for the ear.
It is designed to provide students with the “language of music” and the ability to “respond intelligently to a variety of musical idioms”.24
The curriculum traces the evolution of Western music’s architecture, moving chronologically from the monophonic structure of Gregorian chant and the complex polyphony of the Renaissance to the development of tonality in the Baroque period with Bach, the symphonic forms of the Classical era with Mozart and Beethoven, and the revolutionary dissonance of 20th-century composers like Stravinsky.24
Students learn to deconstruct sound, to identify ritornello form in a Vivaldi concerto or sonata form in a Mozart symphony.
They are not just listening to music; they are analyzing its blueprint.
This training in auditory literacy, like its visual counterpart in Art Hum, provides a new mode of perception that enriches a student’s engagement with the world long after the final exam.
Pillar III: The Modern Wing — Applying the Blueprint (Frontiers of Science & University Writing)
The final component of the architecture is the modern, functional wing, where the historical and aesthetic principles of the Core are put into practice.
Frontiers of Science and University Writing, both typically taken in the first year, are not remedial or introductory courses in the traditional sense.
They are the crucial bridge between absorbing knowledge and creating it, teaching students to apply the Core’s analytical methods to scientific inquiry and to articulate their own original, research-based arguments.
Frontiers of Science (FroSci): The Architecture of Inquiry
One of the most common points of friction for students is Frontiers of Science.
Humanities majors often dread it as a science requirement, while STEM majors can find its approach frustratingly abstract.
One student complained that the course’s “scientific habits of mind” felt “very arbitrary” and questioned their relevance.27
My architectural framework revealed a different purpose.
FroSci is not primarily about teaching scientific facts; it is about inculcating “scientific habits of mind”.28
It is the humanities of science.
The course is taught from the perspective of how scientists actually work: how they frame questions, design experiments, build models, and interpret data.28
This focus on methodology and the
process of discovery, rather than a “tyranny of content” 31, makes it the direct counterpart to the critical thinking taught in the humanities.
Just as Lit Hum teaches you to analyze how a text creates meaning, FroSci teaches you to analyze how an experiment creates knowledge.
It demonstrates that the same principles of rigorous, evidence-based inquiry apply across all disciplines, unifying the intellectual enterprise of the university.
University Writing (UW): The Art of Intellectual Construction
If the Core is an architectural blueprint for the mind, University Writing is the course that teaches you how to draw your own blueprints.
Its mission is to facilitate students’ “entry into the intellectual life of the university” by making them more capable and independent academic readers and writers.32
The sequence of four major essays is a microcosm of the entire Core journey.
First, students analyze a single, complex text.
Second, they place multiple texts into a critical conversation with one another.
Third, they construct their own complex, research-based argument using 8-10 sources.
Finally, they translate that argument into an op-ed for a broad public audience.33
This progression perfectly mirrors the skills built throughout the curriculum: from close reading (Lit Hum) to engaging in dialogue (CC) to formulating and defending an original thesis.
This is where my own story found its resolution.
After my epiphany, I began to see the connections.
I approached a complex problem in my chemical engineering research not as a simple equation to be solved, but as a text to be read.
I could see the “history” of the problem (as in CC), analyze competing “texts” in the form of research papers (as in Lit Hum), identify the underlying assumptions (as in FroSci), and articulate a novel argument for a new approach (as in UW).
The Core had given me a set of intellectual tools that transcended my major, perfectly fulfilling its promise to “counterbalance the specialization of chosen majors”.6
Living in the Cathedral — The Lived Experience of the Core
An architectural blueprint is one thing; living in the building is another.
The lived experience of the Core is one of intense struggle and profound community.
The grueling workload is not an exaggeration.
The “hundreds of pages of reading to do” 2 for Lit Hum and CC, the constant scheduling conflicts 4, and the sheer pressure can be overwhelming, especially for students juggling demanding majors.3
There are also institutional challenges, such as faculty shortages that can lead to a gap between the Core’s ideal of being taught by senior professors and the reality of sections led by graduate students.34
Yet, this shared struggle is precisely what forges the legendary Core community.
The experience creates an “intimate intellectual community that spans disciplines and interests and fosters deep, enduring friendships”.7
The real education often happens outside the classroom, in the late-night arguments in a dorm lounge that continue for years, as one alumnus recalled.8
It’s in these moments, debating Plato with a future physicist or arguing about Foucault with a future artist, that the Core’s architecture becomes a lived reality.
You build “close relationships and interacted with people who I otherwise never would have crossed paths with”.35
For many, including myself, the full appreciation is a delayed epiphany.
Alumni testimonials are filled with stories of the Core’s value becoming clear only years after graduation.8
It’s described as the “foundation for a life of honesty, integrity, curiosity” 8, a set of “philosophical ideas and principles that you can learn to live a good life by” 8, and an experience that “comes flooding back” when you stand before the Parthenon or the Uffizi Gallery for the first time.8
One alumnus perfectly summarized the journey: “Some of us thought at the time that the Core’s purpose was to equip us for cocktail conversation.
We were wrong”.8
Conclusion — An Enduring Architecture for a Modern Mind
My journey through the Core Curriculum began with frustration and failure.
I saw a checklist of requirements, a series of obstacles preventing me from pursuing what I thought was my real education.
I ended with a profound sense of gratitude for what I now understand to be the most formative and valuable part of my time at Columbia.
The enduring genius of the Core lies in its architecture.
In an age of hyper-specialization and fleeting information, it makes a radical claim: that the most practical education is not one that teaches you what to think, but one that provides a timeless, robust, and flexible blueprint for how to think.
It builds a mind capable of critical analysis, synthetic reasoning, and humane understanding.
It is an education designed not for a specific job, but for a “lifetime of critical and creative intelligence”.6
More than a century after its inception, the Core continues to evolve, to argue with itself, and to challenge its students.
It remains steadfast in its mission to equip them with the courage and the intellectual tools necessary to confront the most “insistent problems of the present”.19
It is more than a curriculum; it is an invitation to join a timeless dialogue, an apprenticeship in the art of building a thoughtful life.
It is an architecture for the mind, and it is built to last.
Works cited
- Is it just me or is the core curriculum just a buzz word : r/columbia – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/columbia/comments/1lzyeo6/is_it_just_me_or_is_the_core_curriculum_just_a/
- At the core of Columbia’s academic scene: What’s up with the Core Curriculum for Columbia College?, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.columbiaspectator.com/spectrum/2017/03/31/at-the-core-of-cus-academic-scene-whats-up-with-the-core-curriculum-for-columbia-college/
- The Core Curriculum : r/columbia – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/columbia/comments/j9ufj7/the_core_curriculum/
- Boring students to the Core – Columbia Spectator, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.columbiaspectator.com/opinion/2019/03/08/boring-students-to-the-core/
- The Core Curriculum? – Columbia University – College Confidential Forums, accessed August 12, 2025, https://talk.collegeconfidential.com/t/the-core-curriculum/864022
- The Core Curriculum | Columbia College, accessed August 12, 2025, http://www.college.columbia.edu/core-curriculum
- The Core Curriculum | Columbia Undergraduate Admissions, accessed August 12, 2025, https://undergrad.admissions.columbia.edu/academics/college/core
- Your Core Stories | Columbia College Today, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.college.columbia.edu/cct/issue/fall-2020/article/your-core-stories
- The Core Curriculum | Blue View | Columbia Undergraduate Admissions – YouTube, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XqzeqA9M2g
- Literature Humanities | Columbia College, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.college.columbia.edu/core-curriculum/classes/literature-humanities
- Literature Humanities < Columbia College, accessed August 12, 2025, https://bulletin.columbia.edu/columbia-college/core-curriculum/literature-humanities/
- www.college.columbia.edu, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.college.columbia.edu/core-curriculum/about#:~:text=The%20Core%20was%20the%20first,widespread%20debates%20about%20the%20aims
- About the Core | Columbia College, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.college.columbia.edu/core-curriculum/about
- Contemporary Civilization < Columbia College, accessed August 12, 2025, https://bulletin.columbia.edu/columbia-college/core-curriculum/contemporary-civilization/
- Contemporary Civilization | Columbia College, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.college.columbia.edu/core-curriculum/classes/contemporary-civilization
- Contemporary Civilization – WikiCU, the Columbia University wiki encyclopedia, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.wikicu.com/Contemporary_Civilization
- Columbia’s Crumbling Core — Minding The Campus, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.mindingthecampus.org/2022/02/11/columbias-crumbling-core/
- Celebrating the Texts of Those ‘Dead White Males’ – The American …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.theamericanconservative.com/celebrating-the-texts-of-those-dead-white-males/
- To the Columbia board of trustees: The Core is watching, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.columbiaspectator.com/opinion/2025/04/30/to-the-columbia-board-of-trustees-the-core-is-watching/
- Core Curriculum (Columbia College) – Wikipedia, accessed August 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_Curriculum_(Columbia_College)
- A Location of Possibility and the Practice of Freedom: How a Decolonial Contemporary Civilization Section is Transforming Columbia’s Classroom Culture, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.columbiaspectator.com/the-eye/2022/02/22/a-location-of-possibility-and-the-practice-of-freedom-how-a-decolonial-contemporary-civilization-section-is-transforming-columbias-classroom-culture/
- Art Humanities < Columbia College | Columbia University, accessed August 12, 2025, https://bulletin.columbia.edu/columbia-college/core-curriculum/art-humanities/
- Masterpieces of Western Art (Humanities W 1121) Ba – Columbia College, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.college.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/arthum_master_syllabus.pdf
- Music Humanities: W1123, Section 9 – Todd Tarantino, accessed August 12, 2025, http://www.toddtarantino.com/hum/HUMSyllabusS14.pdf
- Music Humanities (Masterpieces of Western Music) – lucie vágnerová, accessed August 12, 2025, https://lucievagnerova.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/music-humanities-syllabus_lucievagnerova5.pdf
- Music Humanities < Columbia College, accessed August 12, 2025, https://bulletin.columbia.edu/columbia-college/core-curriculum/music-humanities/
- Reviewing and Revising the Core, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.columbiaspectator.com/2007/03/23/reviewing-and-revising-core/
- Science for All in a Core Curriculum: Frontiers of Science at Columbia University, accessed August 12, 2025, https://scienceliteracy.bard.edu/uploads/7/5/6/8/75682377/kelley-frontiers-of-science.pdf
- Frontiers of Science < Columbia College, accessed August 12, 2025, https://bulletin.columbia.edu/columbia-college/core-curriculum/frontiers-science/
- Frontiers of Science | Columbia College, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.college.columbia.edu/core-curriculum/classes/frontiers-science
- Faculty chairs discuss the continuing relevance of the Core Curriculum at panel celebrating the Core’s centennial anniversary – Columbia Spectator, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.columbiaspectator.com/news/2019/09/30/faculty-chairs-discuss-the-continuing-relevance-of-the-core-curriculum-at-panel-celebrating-the-cores-centennial-anniversary/
- University Writing < Columbia College, accessed August 12, 2025, https://bulletin.columbia.edu/columbia-college/core-curriculum/university-writing/
- University Writing | Columbia College, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.college.columbia.edu/core-curriculum/classes/university-writing
- Unfunded Mandate: Columbia College, Arts and Sciences, and the Bollinger Era, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.columbiaspectator.com/archives/lead-2016-05-05-unfunded-mandate-columbia-college-arts-and-sciences-and-bollinger-era.html
- core curriculum : r/columbia – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/columbia/comments/1btdpie/core_curriculum/
- Columbia Core (personal) – Rodney Ramcharan – Google Sites, accessed August 12, 2025, https://sites.google.com/site/rodneyramcharan/home/blog/columbia-core-personal
