The Public Trust: An Analysis of the Nonprofit Status, Funding, and Societal Mission of U.S. Community Colleges

Section 1: The Definitive Status of Community Colleges: A Legal and Structural Analysis

The organizational identity of community colleges in the United States is fundamentally rooted in a non-profit, public-service ethos.

The answer to whether they are non-profit organizations is an emphatic yes, but this classification is not monolithic.

The vast majority of institutions known as community colleges are public entities, whose non-profit character is an inherent consequence of their governmental structure and mission.

A smaller number operate as private non-profits, including tribal and independent colleges.

Understanding this landscape requires a nuanced examination of the legal frameworks, structural distinctions, and historical terminology that define this vital sector of American higher education.

1.1 Public Institutions as Nonprofit Entities: A Dual Status

The term “community college” has evolved to predominantly describe publicly funded two-year institutions of higher education.¹

According to data from the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC), of the 1,044 community colleges in the nation, 936 are public.²

These public institutions are, by their very nature, non-profit.

Their purpose is not to generate returns for private shareholders but to serve a public mission, with all revenues reinvested into their educational operations.³

This non-profit status is legally codified through two primary mechanisms within the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (IRC), often creating a dual status for a single institution.

First, many public community colleges are considered political subdivisions or instrumentalities of a state or local government.

Under the principle of inter-governmental immunity, codified in IRC Section 115, income derived from an “essential governmental function” and accruing to a state or its political subdivisions is not subject to federal income tax.⁵

Education is broadly recognized as such a function.

In states like California, community colleges are explicitly defined as part of the public school system, granting them tax exemptions on this basis.⁷

This status anchors them firmly as governmental entities, accountable to taxpayers and public officials.

Second, in addition to their inherent governmental status, many public community colleges and their affiliated foundations also seek and obtain tax-exempt status as charitable and educational organizations under IRC Section 501(c)(3).²

This classification is crucial for their financial vitality, as it permits them to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions from individuals, corporations, and foundations.⁶

To qualify, an organization must be organized and operated exclusively for purposes the government deems beneficial to society, such as education, and must not engage in prohibited political activities.⁵

This hybrid legal identity is a defining characteristic of the public community college model.

It is not simply a “non-profit” in the way a private charity is, nor is it merely a government agency.

It is a unique fusion of both.

The governmental status (under IRC Section 115) provides a foundation of public funding and a clear mandate to serve the community’s needs.

Simultaneously, the charitable status (under IRC Section 501(c)(3)) provides financial flexibility and a vehicle—the college foundation—to engage private citizens and philanthropy in that public mission.

This structure allows community colleges to leverage both public tax dollars and private generosity to fulfill their role as engines of opportunity.

Their non-profit status, therefore, is not an incidental feature but a direct consequence of their public identity and mission.

1.2 Distinguishing from Private Non-Profits

While both a public community college and a private university like Harvard or Drexel can be classified as 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations, their foundational structures, funding models, and governance are profoundly different.³

Private non-profit colleges and universities are not governmental entities.

Their primary funding sources are student tuition, private donations, and income from often-large endowments, rather than direct, ongoing appropriations from state and local taxes.³

Their governance structures reflect this private nature.

A private non-profit university is governed by a self-perpetuating private board of trustees, accountable to the institution’s charter and bylaws.

In contrast, a public community college is typically governed by a local board of trustees whose members are either publicly elected or appointed by government officials, such as the governor or local sponsoring bodies.¹¹

This distinction is critical to understanding the community college mission.

A public community college’s purpose is inextricably linked to the needs of a geographically defined public and its taxpayers.

Its curriculum, especially in vocational and technical fields, is designed to be responsive to the local economy.¹

A private non-profit university, while serving a public good through education and research, defines its mission according to its private charter and board.

Its scope is often national or international, and its accountability is to its alumni, donors, and institutional legacy rather than to a specific local constituency in the same direct, structural Way.

1.3 The Small Minority: Independent and Tribal Colleges

To provide a complete picture, it is essential to acknowledge the small but significant subset of community colleges that are not public.

The AACC identifies 35 tribal colleges and 73 “independent” colleges within its membership.²

Historically, the term “junior college” was used for both public and private two-year institutions, but its modern usage more commonly refers to private two-year colleges.¹

These independent and tribal colleges operate as private non-profit 501(c)(3) organizations.

They share the community-focused, associate-degree-granting mission but are structured as private entities.

Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs) represent a particularly unique category.

While they are private non-profits, they have a distinct federal relationship and receive a significant portion of their funding through the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA).²

The existence of these institutions demonstrates that the community college model—characterized by a two-year curriculum, open access, and community focus—can thrive outside of direct state and local government operation.

However, they remain fundamentally non-profit and mission-driven.

The overwhelming dominance of the public model shapes the sector’s identity, but these private non-profit counterparts are an important part of the diverse landscape of American higher education.

Section 2: The Higher Education Spectrum: A Comparative Framework

To fully appreciate the significance of the community college’s non-profit status, it is instructive to place it in context, particularly by contrasting it with the for-profit college sector.

This comparison reveals that the line between non-profit and for-profit is arguably the most consequential distinction in American higher education.

It is a divide that goes beyond funding sources and tax forms, shaping an institution’s core purpose, its relationship with students, and its ultimate value to society.

2.1 Mission and Purpose: Public Good vs. Shareholder Value

The foundational difference between non-profit and for-profit higher education lies in their mission.

Non-profit institutions, whether they are public community colleges or private universities, are mission-driven.³

Their primary purpose is education, research, and public service.

Any revenue generated beyond operating costs is, by law and principle, reinvested back into the institution.

These funds are used to improve academic programs, upgrade facilities, provide student support services like advising and tutoring, and fund financial aid.³

The ultimate goal is to enhance the student experience and fulfill the college’s educational mission.¹⁴

For-profit colleges, in stark contrast, are businesses.

They are operated by private, profit-seeking corporations, and their primary legal and fiduciary duty is to generate profit for their owners and shareholders.¹⁰

While they deliver educational programs, their core purpose is financial return.

This market-driven mission fundamentally alters their operational calculus.

A significant portion of revenue from student tuition is often allocated to non-educational expenses, such as marketing, recruitment, and shareholder dividends, rather than being fully invested in the classroom experience or student support.³

This creates an inherent tension between the educational needs of students and the financial demands of investors.

2.2 Student Experience and Outcomes: A Tale of Two Models

This fundamental difference in mission has profound and well-documented consequences for students in terms of cost, debt, and academic outcomes.

• Cost and Debt: Community colleges are public assets designed for affordability. For-profit colleges are commercial products priced for maximum revenue. As a result, for-profit schools cost significantly more, with some analyses showing their per-credit cost is two to four times higher than at public institutions.¹⁶ For example, one report noted that Tarrant County College’s tuition was $64 per credit hour, compared to an average of $647 at for-profit schools.¹⁶ This high cost structure forces a heavier reliance on student loans. Approximately 88% of for-profit graduates take on student debt, compared to 66% of public college graduates, leading to higher default rates that can have devastating long-term financial consequences for students.¹⁶
• Credit Transferability: The non-profit higher education system, particularly the public sector, is built around the principle of credit transfer. Community colleges design their courses, especially through articulation agreements, to be accepted by four-year institutions, creating a “2+2” pathway to a bachelor’s degree.¹⁷ For-profit colleges often exist outside this collaborative ecosystem. A major and persistent criticism is the poor transferability of their credits. Some experts estimate that up to 90% of credits earned at a for-profit institution may be deemed non-transferable by traditional colleges, forcing students who wish to continue their education to start over, having wasted immense time and money.¹⁶
• Reputation and Quality: While community colleges have long battled a perception gap, they are established parts of the public education system held to rigorous accreditation standards.¹⁸ Employers tend to value degrees from non-profit institutions more highly, viewing them as a signal of a well-rounded and credible education.³ For-profit colleges, conversely, have a documented history of poor performance, including low graduation rates, high student debt, and a failure to prepare students for gainful employment in their field of study.³

2.3 The Rise of “Non-Profit Conversion”: A Blurring of the Lines?

The clear reputational, financial, and regulatory advantages of the non-profit model have led to a notable trend: for-profit institutions seeking to convert to non-profit status.

A prominent example is Purdue University’s 2017 purchase of the for-profit Kaplan University for $1, which was then relaunched as the non-profit Purdue University Global.¹⁶

This phenomenon is driven by a desire to escape the intense scrutiny of the for-profit sector and gain access to the public trust, government funding, and philanthropic opportunities associated with the non-profit label.

However, these conversions are often highly controversial.

Critics question whether a simple change in tax status can truly transform an institution’s underlying culture and priorities from a profit-seeking enterprise to a student-centric, mission-driven organization.

This trend underscores the powerful legitimacy of the non-profit model while also highlighting the need for regulators and consumers to look beyond labels to assess an institution’s true commitment to the public good.

The very existence of this conversion strategy validates the argument that the non-profit/for-profit divide is the most consequential in higher education, as it aligns institutional interests with either students or shareholders.

The following table provides a summary of these critical distinctions, clarifying the unique position of public community colleges within the broader landscape.

---

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of U.S. Higher Education Models

Key Attribute	Public Community College	Private Non-Profit University	For-Profit College
Primary Mission	Public service; community needs; open access; workforce development 14	Education; research; institutional legacy 3	Generate profit for owners and shareholders 3
Legal/Tax Status	Governmental entity (IRC §115) and/or Public Charity (IRC §501(c)(3)) 5	Public Charity (IRC §501(c)(3)) 5	Private business/corporation 10
Primary Funding	State/local taxes; student tuition; federal aid 20	Student tuition; endowment income; private donations 3	Student tuition (largely from federal student aid) 16
Governance	Locally appointed or elected public board of trustees 12	Independent, private board of trustees 11	Corporate board of directors; accountable to shareholders 16
Typical Tuition	Low; subsidized by public funds 19	High, but often with significant institutional financial aid 3	Very high, often exceeding public and private non-profit costs 16
Credit Transferability	Generally high, especially within state public systems 16	Generally high, subject to institutional policies 18	Often very low; a major source of student frustration and loss 16

---

The comparison reveals a system where for-profit institutions often exist in a symbiotic, and at times parasitic, relationship with the public system.

Data shows that for-profit colleges enroll approximately 10-13% of all postsecondary students yet receive a disproportionate 25% of all federal financial aid funds—money that originates from taxpayers.¹⁶

When students at these institutions are left with high debt and non-transferable credits, or when a for-profit school abruptly closes, it is often the local public community college that becomes their safety net, helping them pick up the pieces and start their educational journey anew.¹⁶

This dynamic highlights the protective role community colleges play as a reliable, non-predatory, and publicly accountable option in the complex higher education marketplace.

Section 3: Governance and Funding: The Mechanics of a Public, Non-Profit Model

The public, non-profit mission of a community college is not merely an abstract ideal; it is enacted daily through concrete structures of funding and governance.

These mechanisms determine who the college serves, what it teaches, and how it remains accountable to its community.

The tripartite funding model and localized governance are the engines that drive the community college’s role as an accessible and responsive institution, though these same structures also create significant challenges and inequities across the sector.

3.1 A Tripartite Funding Structure: Strengths and Vulnerabilities

Unlike private universities that rely heavily on tuition and endowments, or for-profit colleges that subsist on tuition revenue, public community colleges are financed through a diversified blend of public and private sources.

Analysis of fiscal year 2017 data provides a clear picture of this unique financial architecture ²⁰:

• State Appropriations: 33%
• Local Funding (e.g., property taxes): 20%
• Student Tuition and Fees: 17%
• Federal Government: 18%
• Other Sources (e.g., self-supporting operations): 12%

This funding model is the primary reason community colleges can fulfill their access mission.

With public sources from state and local governments covering over half of their revenue, they can keep tuition dramatically lower than other sectors.

In 2020-21, the average published tuition and fees for a full-time student at a public two-year college were just $3,770, compared to $10,560 at a public four-year college.²²

However, this reliance on public appropriations creates significant vulnerabilities.

Community colleges are often subject to the volatility of state budget cycles, with their funding being among the first to be cut during economic downturns.

Furthermore, the model creates deep structural inequities.

Because a substantial portion of funding is tied to local sources like property taxes, colleges located in affluent communities with strong tax bases have far more resources than those in economically distressed urban or rural areas.²⁰

This leads to a troubling paradox: the community colleges serving the most disadvantaged student populations, who require the most intensive academic and social supports, are often the ones with the fewest dollars per student.²⁰

This resource disparity is exacerbated by a systemic funding gap between two-year and four-year public institutions.

Even though community colleges serve a higher percentage of high-need students, they receive less than half the educational revenue per full-time equivalent (FTE) student compared to public four-year colleges—approximately $8,700 versus $17,500.²⁰

This chronic underfunding fundamentally constrains their ability to provide the comprehensive support services necessary for student success.

---

Table 2: Typical Revenue Sources for Public Community Colleges (FY 2017)

Revenue Source	Percentage of Total Revenue
State Government	33%
Local Sources	20%
Federal Government	18%
Tuition and Fees	17%
Other/Self-Supporting Operations	12%

Source: Community College Research Center, based on federal data.

²⁰

3.2 Governance and Local Control: The “Community” in Community College

The governance structure of community colleges is explicitly designed to embed them within their local communities.

Each community college district is typically administered by its own local board of trustees.¹³

These board members are often appointed by local governing bodies (like county commissions or school boards) and the state governor, or in some cases, are directly elected by the citizens of the district.¹²

This model of local control is intended to ensure that the college remains responsive to the unique social and economic needs of the community it serves.¹

This local responsiveness is a hallmark of the community college system.

It allows colleges to partner directly with local employers to design workforce development programs that create a pipeline of skilled labor for regionally important industries, from healthcare and information technology to advanced manufacturing.¹⁴

In California, for example, the statewide system is directed to maintain local autonomy to the maximum degree possible, empowering local boards to lead on policy for their districts.²¹

Internally, many community colleges operate on a principle of “shared governance.” This is a collaborative model where faculty, professional staff, administrators, and sometimes students participate in developing policies and making decisions, particularly on academic matters such as curriculum, degree requirements, and methods of instruction.¹¹

While the board of trustees retains final legal authority, shared governance structures like academic senates and college-wide councils ensure that the expertise of front-line educators and staff informs institutional strategy.¹¹

This contrasts sharply with the top-down, corporate management structure often found in for-profit college chains.

3.3 The Role of Philanthropy and Foundations

The non-profit status of community colleges enables them to tap into a crucial third stream of revenue: private philanthropy.

Most public community colleges have established affiliated foundations, which are separate 501(c)(3) non-profit entities that exist solely to raise and manage private support for the college or college system.²

According to the Council for Advancement and Support of Education (CASE), there are approximately 900 such foundations serving community colleges.²

These foundations are a vital component of the community college financial model.

They solicit donations from alumni, local businesses, and community members, and they apply for grants from major philanthropic organizations like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Jay Pritzker Foundation.²

This private funding provides a flexible source of support that can be used for purposes often restricted by rigid public budget lines.

Foundation funds are commonly used for student scholarships, emergency aid grants to help students with unexpected financial crises, seed money for innovative new programs, and technology upgrades.²

The existence of these foundations is a direct result of the colleges’ non-profit, charitable status.

They represent a powerful mechanism for blending public and private resources in service of a public mission.

While philanthropic dollars constitute a smaller portion of the overall budget compared to public appropriations, they provide a critical margin of excellence and support that can make the difference between a student dropping out and completing their degree.

This further cements the identity of community colleges as community-based, non-profit institutions that invite investment from all sectors of society.

Section 4: Mission in Action: The Socio-Economic Impact of Non-Profit Community Colleges

The legal status, funding mechanisms, and governance structures of community colleges are not ends in themselves; they are the framework that enables these institutions to fulfill a unique and essential mission in American society.

As non-profit, public-service entities, community colleges act as powerful engines of opportunity, key partners in regional economic development, and vital entry points to higher education for millions.

Their impact is a direct manifestation of their access-oriented, community-focused, and non-commercial ethos.

4.1 Engines of Opportunity and Social Mobility

Community colleges are, by design and in practice, the most accessible segment of American higher education.

Often called “democracy’s colleges” or “opportunity colleges,” they serve approximately 10 million students annually, which represents about 44% of all U.S. undergraduates.¹

Their open-admissions policies, which allow students to enroll regardless of prior academic achievement, create an entry point for populations that have been historically underserved by traditional universities.²³

The student body of community colleges reflects this mission of broad access.

Compared to four-year institutions, they enroll significantly higher percentages of first-generation students, low-income students, and students from Black and Hispanic backgrounds.¹⁹

In the 2018-19 academic year, 41% of students at public two-year colleges were Black or Hispanic, compared to 30% at four-year colleges.²²

They also serve a large number of non-traditional students, including adults seeking to retrain for new careers, working parents attending part-time, and immigrants learning English.¹⁹

This role as a gateway to opportunity has deep historical roots.

The modern community college movement was profoundly shaped by the post-World War II G.I.

Bill, which opened the doors of higher education to millions of veterans.²⁶

This democratic impulse was further codified in the landmark 1947 report from the President’s Commission on Higher Education, commonly known as the Truman Commission.

The report called for a national network of public, low-cost “community colleges” that would expand access, serve local needs, and strengthen American democracy by ensuring that higher education was not reserved for the wealthy elite.²⁸

Today, community colleges continue to fulfill this vision, acting as powerful “engines of upward mobility” that provide a crucial pathway for students from low-income backgrounds to move into the middle class.¹⁹

4.2 The Community’s College: Workforce Development and Economic Contribution

A defining feature of the community college mission is its direct and intentional connection to the local economy.

Their non-profit, public-service model, combined with local governance, makes them indispensable partners in regional workforce and economic development.¹⁴

They are the primary providers of career and technical education (CTE) in the United States, offering associate degrees and certificates in high-demand fields such as healthcare, information technology, public safety, advanced manufacturing, and biotechnology.¹⁶

These programs are often developed in direct partnership with local employers to ensure the curriculum teaches the specific skills needed for regionally important jobs.¹⁴

This responsiveness creates a direct talent pipeline that benefits both students seeking family-supporting wages and businesses seeking skilled workers.

The economic impact extends far beyond individual graduates.

By increasing the earning power of the local workforce, community colleges bolster government tax revenues and reduce the demand for public social services.¹⁹

Furthermore, the colleges themselves are significant economic actors, generating local activity through their own operations spending and the spending of their students and employees.¹⁵

An economic impact study at one college, for example, found that 96% of its alumni remained in the local area, and the college’s activities generated over $126 million in income for the regional economy.¹⁵

This deep integration with the local community is a function of their non-profit, public-service model; their success is measured not by profits, but by the prosperity of the community they serve.

4.3 Debunking the Stigma: Academic Rigor and Transfer Success

Despite their critical role, community colleges have long contended with a persistent and damaging stigma.

A common myth portrays them as a “lesser” or “easier” option for students who could not gain admission to a “real” four-year college.¹⁸

This perception is rooted in classism and elitism and is demonstrably false when examined against the evidence.³³

• Faculty and Standards: Community colleges are held to the same rigorous accreditation standards as four-year universities.¹⁸ Their faculty members are highly qualified, typically required to have at least a master’s degree, and many hold doctorates. It is common for professors to teach the same courses at both a local community college and a nearby four-year university, delivering an equivalent level of academic rigor.¹⁸
• Transfer Student Performance: The most compelling evidence against the stigma is the performance of transfer students. Multiple studies confirm that community college students who transfer to selective four-year institutions graduate at rates equal to or higher than students who started at those same institutions as freshmen or who transferred from other four-year schools.³⁵ Research examining performance in challenging STEM gateway courses like calculus, physics, and chemistry has found that transfer students perform at about the same level as their peers who began at the university.³⁶

However, this success must be viewed with nuance.

While high-achieving transfer students prove the quality of community college preparation, the overall transfer pipeline is notoriously leaky.

A wide gap exists between aspiration and reality.

While roughly 80% of entering community college students state an intention to earn a bachelor’s degree, only about one-third actually transfer to a four-year institution within six years.

Of those who transfer, just under half complete a bachelor’s degree.

The net result is that only about 16% of all students who start at a community college successfully navigate the full path to a bachelor’s degree within six years.³⁷

This “transfer gap” is a major systemic failure, but it is not typically a failure of student ability or institutional rigor.

Research points instead to structural barriers, such as inadequate academic advising, confusing transfer requirements, and the frustrating loss of earned credits during the transfer process.³⁶

The narrative that often pits the community college mission of “open access” against poor “success” metrics like completion rates is a flawed framing.

The reality is that the American higher education system has tasked community colleges with serving students who have the greatest academic and financial needs, a core function of their public good mission.²³

Yet, the system simultaneously provides them with the lowest level of per-student funding.²⁰

Research clearly shows that better-resourced institutions produce higher completion rates, particularly for the same underserved student populations that community colleges specialize in serving.²⁰

The issue, therefore, is not that “access” is inherently incompatible with “success.” The issue is that the system provides broad access but fails to adequately fund the intensive support services—such as personalized advising, tutoring, and financial aid counseling—that are necessary to ensure success for that specific student population.

The challenge lies not in the mission itself, but in the chronic and inequitable allocation of public resources.

Section 5: Strategic Outlook and Recommendations

The analysis of their legal status, funding, governance, and societal impact confirms that public, non-profit community colleges are indispensable assets in the American educational landscape.

Their structure is uniquely designed to promote equity, serve local communities, and provide a non-predatory pathway to postsecondary credentials.

Moving forward, stakeholders must not only preserve this model but also address its systemic weaknesses to fully realize its potential.

5.1 The Enduring Value of the Public, Non-Profit Model

The public, non-profit community college model, born from the democratic vision of the Truman Commission, remains the most effective and equitable structure for providing broad access to higher education and meeting the diverse needs of the nation.³⁰

Its non-profit status ensures that its primary goals are aligned with the public good, serving students and communities rather than shareholders.

This stands in stark and necessary contrast to the for-profit sector, where the fundamental conflict between education and profit has consistently led to poor outcomes for students and a misallocation of public funds.¹⁶

The community college is a public trust, and its preservation and strengthening should be a national priority.

5.2 Navigating Financial Headwinds and Policy Shifts

To ensure the long-term health of the sector, policymakers and institutional leaders must address the core financial challenges that undermine the community college mission.

• Recommendation for Policymakers: State and federal governments must confront the systemic underfunding and inequity built into the current financial model. State funding formulas should be reformed to be more equitable, providing additional, targeted resources to colleges that serve the most disadvantaged students, thereby breaking the cycle where local wealth dictates educational opportunity.²⁰ Closing the per-student operational funding gap between community colleges and public four-year universities is essential to providing the resources necessary to turn access into success.
• Recommendation for College Leaders: While advocating for more robust public investment, community college leaders must also be proactive in diversifying their revenue. This includes strengthening the capacity and sophistication of their affiliated 501(c)(3) foundations to increase philanthropic support.² Furthermore, by continuing to build deep, data-driven partnerships with local industries, colleges can demonstrate their undeniable value as engines of economic development, making a powerful case for sustained and increased public investment from local and state governments.¹⁴

5.3 Maximizing the Public Good: Strengthening the Pipeline

The greatest challenge facing the sector is the leaky pipeline that prevents far too many aspiring students from achieving their educational goals.

Strengthening this pipeline requires a shared commitment from all stakeholders.

• Recommendation for Four-Year Institutions: Four-year colleges and universities must evolve from being passive recipients of transfer students to being active partners in their success. This means moving beyond simple articulation agreements to co-creating seamless, fully aligned “guided pathways” that eliminate ambiguity and credit loss.⁴² Given the proven academic quality of transfer students, four-year institutions have a responsibility to reform internal policies and biases that create unnecessary barriers, recognizing that these students are a vital source of talent and diversity.³⁵
• Recommendation for Philanthropy: Foundations and private donors have a critical role to play. While student scholarships are important, strategic philanthropic investment should also target the institutional capacity of community colleges. Funding for initiatives that strengthen academic advising, modernize data systems for tracking student progress, and expand wraparound support services can have an outsized impact on student retention and completion.² Supporting national reform networks like Achieving the Dream, which focus on evidence-based, systemic institutional transformation, can help scale best practices across the entire sector.² By investing in the core infrastructure of success, philanthropy can help community colleges fully deliver on their promise as America’s great engines of opportunity.

Works cited

1. Community colleges in the United States – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_colleges_in_the_United_States
2. Community colleges: A critical access point to higher education – Candid insights, accessed August 6, 2025, https://blog.candid.org/post/community-colleges-a-critical-access-point-to-higher-education/
3. What’s the Difference Between Public, Private, Nonprofit and For …, accessed August 6, 2025, https://news.chapman.edu/2021/11/11/whats-the-difference-between-public-private-nonprofit-and-for-profit-colleges-and-universities/
4. What Does Nonprofit Mean for College Students? | SNHU, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.snhu.edu/about-us/newsroom/education/what-does-a-nonprofit-university-mean
5. Tax-Exempt Status of Universities and Colleges, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.aau.edu/key-issues/tax-exempt-status-universities-and-colleges
6. Tax Exemption for Universities and Colleges, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.aau.edu/sites/default/files/AAU%20Files/Key%20Issues/Taxation%20%26%20Finance/Tax-Exempt-Status-of-Universities-FINAL.pdf
7. College Exemption – Property Tax – California State Board of Equalization, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/college_exemption.htm
8. Backgrounder: Tax-Exempt Status of Colleges and Universities, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Explainer-Tax-Exempt-042125.pdf
9. Federal Tax Provisions Affecting Colleges and Universities – American Council on Education, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.acenet.edu/Documents/Taxes-and-Colleges-Universities.pdf
10. For-Profit vs. Nonprofit Colleges: What’s the difference and why does it matter? – BigFuture, accessed August 6, 2025, https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/plan-for-college/find-your-fit/types-of-colleges/types-of-colleges/for-profit-vs-non-profit
11. Shared Governance – SUNY, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.suny.edu/about/shared-governance/sunyvoices/cgl-toolkit/shared-governance/
12. system.suny.edu, accessed August 6, 2025, https://system.suny.edu/academic-affairs/suny-governance/#:~:text=Each%20community%20college%20is%20administered,of%20an%20elected%20student%20member.
13. SUNY Governance, accessed August 6, 2025, https://system.suny.edu/academic-affairs/suny-governance/
14. Editorial: What are community colleges? Are they vocational schools? – AACC, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.aacc.nche.edu/2018/03/30/editorial-what-are-community-colleges-are-they-vocational-schools/
15. Community colleges: A public good, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.ccdaily.com/2024/03/community-colleges-a-public-good/
16. Community Colleges vs. For-Profit Schools – Tarrant County College, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.tccd.edu/magazine/volume-06/issue-01/community-colleges-vs-for-profit/
17. Community College – EducationUSA |, accessed August 6, 2025, https://educationusa.state.gov/your-5-steps-us-study/research-your-options/community-college
18. Community College Myths & Stereotypes | MWCC, accessed August 6, 2025, https://mwcc.edu/blog/community-college-myths/
19. An Introduction to Community Colleges and Their Students, accessed August 6, 2025, https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/introduction-community-colleges-students.html
20. Public Funding of Community Colleges, accessed August 6, 2025, https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/public-funding-community-colleges.html
21. The California Community College System Governance Students and Employees, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.gavilan.edu/about/trustees_orientation/pres_docs/TheCaliforniaCommunityCollegeSystem.pdf
22. An Introduction to Community Colleges and Their Students, accessed August 6, 2025, https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/introduction-community-colleges-students.pdf
23. Community Colleges: Multiple Missions, Diverse Student Bodies, and a Range of Policy Solutions – Urban Institute, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/83551/2000899-community-colleges-multiple-missions-diverse-student-bodies-and-a-range-of-policy-solutions_3.pdf
24. Shared Governance | Austin Community College District, accessed August 6, 2025, https://infohub.austincc.edu/shared-governance/
25. New Report on the State of Academic Governance in Community Colleges | AAUP, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.aaup.org/news/new-report-state-academic-governance-community-colleges
26. Community College Education | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/education/community-college-education
27. A Brief History of the Community College Model, accessed August 6, 2025, http://communitycollegedata.com/articles/a-brief-history-of-the-community-college-model/
28. Community Colleges in America: A Historical Perspective, accessed August 6, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ876835.pdf
29. A Brief Community College Origin Story – Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.richmondfed.org/region_communities/regional_data_analysis/surveys/community_college/community_college_insights/2023/cc_20231214
30. Higher Education for American Democracy – Wikipedia, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higher_Education_for_American_Democracy
31. Access, Equity, and Community Colleges: The Truman Commission and Federal Higher Education Policy from 1947 to 2011 – Project MUSE, accessed August 6, 2025, https://muse.jhu.edu/article/505479
32. 4 Community College Myths You Need to Know, accessed August 6, 2025, https://blog.dallascollege.edu/2018/08/4-community-college-myths-you-need-to-know/
33. What We Don’t Talk About Enough: Community Colleges – ACRLog, accessed August 6, 2025, https://acrlog.org/2023/10/26/what-we-dont-talk-about-enough-community-colleges/
34. 10 MYTHS… AND 10 REALITIES Community College Baccalaureate (CCB) programs, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.accbd.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CCBA-10-Myths.pdf
35. Persistence: The Success of Students Who Transfer from Community Colleges to Selective Four-Year Institutions – Jack Kent Cooke Foundation, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.jkcf.org/research/persistence/
36. Community college transfer processes discourage degree completion – The Journalist’s Resource, accessed August 6, 2025, https://journalistsresource.org/education/community-college-transfer-bachelors-degree-barriers-research/
37. A thorough look at transfer students – Community College Daily, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.ccdaily.com/2024/02/a-thorough-look-at-transfer-students/
38. Just 16% of community college students transfer and earn a bachelor’s degree, accessed August 6, 2025, https://www.highereddive.com/news/community-college-students-transfer-bachelors-degree-completion/706773/
39. Tracking Transfer: Community College and Four-Year Institutional Effectiveness in Broadening Bachelor’s Degree Attainment, accessed August 6, 2025, https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/tracking-transfer-community-college-and-four-year-institutional-effectiveness-in-broadening-bachelors-degree-attainment.html
40. Community College: The Unfinished Revolution – Issues in Science and Technology, accessed August 6, 2025, https://issues.org/rosenbaum/
41. ‘The reckoning is here’: More than a third of community college students have vanished – The Hechinger Report, accessed August 6, 2025, https://hechingerreport.org/the-reckoning-is-here-more-than-a-third-of-community-college-students-have-vanished/
42. en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 6, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_College_Research_Center